VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack

K231517 · Ortho Clinical Diagnostics · DHX · Aug 23, 2023 · Immunology

Device Facts

Record IDK231517
Device NameVITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack
ApplicantOrtho Clinical Diagnostics
Product CodeDHX · Immunology
Decision DateAug 23, 2023
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 866.6010
Device ClassClass 2

Intended Use

For the quantitative measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration in human serum and plasma (EDTA or heparin) using the VITROS 5600 Integrated System, to aid in the prognosis and management of cancer patients in whom changing concentrations of CEA are observed.

Device Story

The VITROS CEA Reagent Pack is an in vitro diagnostic immunoassay used on the VITROS 5600 Integrated System. It measures CEA concentration in human serum or plasma samples. The device uses a sandwich immunometric technique: CEA in the sample binds to a microwell coated with mouse monoclonal anti-CEA antibody and an HRP-labelled mouse monoclonal anti-CEA antibody conjugate. After washing, a luminogenic substrate is added; HRP catalyzes the oxidation of the luminol derivative, producing light proportional to the CEA concentration. The system detects the light signal. The device is used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in monitoring cancer patients by tracking changes in CEA levels over time. The device includes automated dilution capabilities for high-concentration samples. It is not intended for cancer screening.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Precision evaluated with 4 serum pools (N=240 per pool, total CV 3.1-3.6%). Linearity confirmed 0.22–499.6 ng/mL. Interference testing (CLSI EP07-A3) showed no interference for endogenous/exogenous substances including biotin up to 0.351 mg/dL. Method comparison (N=110) against predicate showed high correlation (R²=0.999, slope 1.01). Matrix comparison (serum vs. plasma) showed equivalence. Reference range verified with 140 healthy subjects.

Technological Characteristics

Sandwich immunoassay; uses mouse monoclonal anti-CEA antibodies. Reagents include BSA (3%), Tween 20, and EDTA. Luminescent detection via HRP-catalyzed oxidation of luminol derivative. Dimensions/form factor: Reagent pack for VITROS 5600 Integrated System. Connectivity: System-integrated. Sterilization: Not applicable (reagent).

Indications for Use

Indicated for quantitative measurement of CEA in human serum and plasma (EDTA or heparin) to aid in prognosis and management of cancer patients. Not for cancer screening. Not for use as absolute evidence of malignant disease.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular pattern around a stylized image. To the right of the seal, there is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Next to the square, the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" are written in blue, with the word "ADMINISTRATION" written in a smaller font size below. August 23, 2023 Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Rebecca Lewis Senior Regulatory Affairs Associate Felindre Meadows Pencoed Bridgend, CF35 5PZ United Kingdom #### Re: K231517 Trade/Device Name: VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.6010 Regulation Name: Tumor-Associated Antigen Immunological Test System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DHX Dated: May 23, 2023 Received: May 25, 2023 Dear Rebecca Lewis: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. {1}------------------------------------------------ Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems. For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100). Sincerely. # Ying Mao -S Ying Mao, Ph.D. Branch Chief Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health {2}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) K231517 Device Name VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack Indications for Use (Describe) For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only For the quantitative measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration in human serum and plasma (EDTA or heparin) using the VITROS 5600 Integrated System, to aid in the prognosis and management of cancer patients in whom changing concentrations of CEA are observed. | Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | <span style="font-size: 100%;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size: 100%;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | #### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. #### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {3}------------------------------------------------ # 510(k) Summary This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92. The assigned 510(k) number is: K231517. # Submitter's Information Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Inc. Felindre Meadows, Pencoed. UK CF35 5PZ Phone: +44 (0) 7971 427649 Fax: (585) 453-3368 Contact Person: Rebecca Lewis #### Preparation Date Aug 23, 2023 # Device Proprietary Name(s) VITROS® Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack Common Name(s) VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack #### Classification Names | Product Code | Class | Regulation Section | Panel | |--------------|-------|--------------------|------------| | DHX | II | 21 CFR 866.6010 | Immunology | #### Predicate Device(s) | Predicate Device | FDA 510(k) Number | |---------------------------------------------------|-------------------| | VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack | K041322 | #### Device Description The VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack (test) is performed using the VITROS CEA Reagent Pack and VITROS CEA Calibrators on the VITROS 5600 System. An immunometric immunoassay technique is used, which involves the reaction of CEA present in the sample with a microwell coated with biotinylated Antibody (Mouse monoclonal anti-CEA) bound to Streptavidin, and a Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)-labelled antibody conjugate (Mouse monoclonal anti- CEA). Unbound (HRP)-labeled anti-CEA antibody conjugate is removed by washing. The bound HRP conjugate is measured by a luminescent reaction. A reagent containing luminogenic substrates (a luminol derivative and a peracid salt) and an electron transfer agent, is added to the wells. The HRP in the bound conjugate catalyzes the oxidation of the QuidelOrtho {4}------------------------------------------------ VITROS CEA Reagent Traditional 510(k) luminol derivative, producing light. The electron transfer agent (a substituted acetanilide) increases the level of light produced and prolongs its emission. The light signals are read by the system. The amount of HRP conjugate bound is directly proportional to the concentration of CEA present in the sample. VITROS CEA Reagent Pack contains: 1 reagent pack containing: - 100 coated wells (antibody, mouse monoclonal anti-CEA, binds ≥8ng CEA/well); ● - 9.7 mL assay reagent (buffer containing bovine serum albumin, bovine gamma globulin and . antimicrobial agent). - 9.7 mL conjugate reagent (HRP-mouse monoclonal anti-CEA, binds ≥123ng CEA/mL). ● VITROS CEA Calibrator contains: - 1 set of VITROS CEA Calibrators 1 and 2 (human CEA in bovine serum with ● antimicrobial agent, 2 mL); nominal values 3 and 250 ng/mL (us/L) - 16 calibrator bar code labels (8 for each calibrator) ● # Intended Use Statement(s): Rx ONLY For in vitro diagnostic use only. For the quantitative measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration in human serum and plasma (EDTA or heparin) using the VITROS 5600 Integrated System, to aid in the prognosis and management of cancer patients in whom changing concentrations of CEA are observed. #### Comparison to Predicate Devices The following table provides a summary of the key features of the new device assessed against the predicate. | Device<br>Characteristic | Predicate Device | Modified Device | |--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Device<br>Characteristic | VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products<br>CEA Reagent Pack, K041322, cleared 17<br>June 2004 | VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA<br>Reagent Pack | | Intended Use | Rx ONLY<br>For in vitro diagnostic use only.<br><br>For the quantitative measurement of<br>carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)<br>concentration in human serum and<br>plasma (EDTA or heparin) using the<br>VITROS ECi/ECiQ/3600<br>Immunodiagnostic Systems and the<br>VITROS 5600/XT 7600 Integrated<br>Systems, to aid in the prognosis and<br>management of cancer patients in<br>whom changing concentrations of<br>CEA are observed. | Rx ONLY<br>For in vitro diagnostic use only.<br><br>For the quantitative measurement of<br>carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration in<br>human serum and plasma (EDTA or heparin)<br>using the VITROS 5600 Integrated System, to aid<br>in the prognosis and management of cancer<br>patients in whom changing concentrations of CEA<br>are observed. | | Antibody | Mouse Monoclonal anti-CEA antibody. | Same. | | Sample Type | Serum and Plasma. | Same. | {5}------------------------------------------------ # VITROS CEA Reagent Traditional 510(k) | Traditional 510(k)<br>Sample Volume | 20 µL. | Same. | |-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Traceability | Traceable to in-house reference<br>calibrators which have been value<br>assigned to<br>correlate to another commercially<br>available test with reference to the<br>1st International Preparation<br>73/601. | Same. | | Measuring Range | Analytical Measuring Interval:<br>0.31-400 ng/mL (µg/L) | Analytical Measuring Interval:<br>0.31-400 ng/mL (µg/L)<br>Extended Measuring Interval:<br>400 - 40,000 ng/mL (µg/L)<br>Reportable Measuring Interval:<br>0.31-40,000 ng/mL (µg/L) | | Detect on Limit | LOB: 0.06 ng/mL (µg/L)<br>LOD: 0.31 ng/mL (µg/L) | LOB: 0.08 ng/mL (µg/L)<br>LOD: Same.<br>LOQ: 0.31 ng/mL (µg/L) | | Calibrator Levels | 2. | Same. | | Instrumentation | VITROS 5600 Integrated System | Same. | # Differences: | Assay Principle | Sandwich immunoassay | Sandwich immunoassay. In the modified CEA assay, the<br>mouse anti- CEA antibody has been removed from the<br>Biotin Reagent and coated directly onto the well. The<br>modification to<br>allow the biotinylated antibody capture conjugate to<br>be pre- bound to the well, eliminates the risk of<br>biotin interference. | |-----------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Assay Reagent | 0.5% BSA, no Tween 20 or EDTA. | The modified product utilizes the same capture and<br>detection antibodies. The modified product includes the<br>addition of 0.6% Tween 20, 25 mM EDTA and an increase<br>in BSA concentration from 0.5% to 3% in the CEA assay<br>reagent.<br>These modifications have improved the CEA assay:<br>The purpose of BSA in the assay reagent<br>formulation is to minimize matrix effects, reduce<br>non-specific binding (NSB) and improve the<br>stability of the biotin conjugate. Hemoglobin in<br>samples may adsorb to the wells and introduce an<br>additional peroxidase activity, resulting in<br>elevated signals and therefore a positive bias.<br>Increase in BSA concentration of the assay<br>reagent reduces the NSB, and therefore addresses<br>the hemoglobin interference with the current<br>assay.<br>Improvement to the serum/plasma equivalence which<br>previously required a limitation on bias for EDTA in the<br>previously cleared product IFU. | {6}------------------------------------------------ #### Nonclinical Performance Several nonclinical tests were performed. #### Stability Studies Long term stability and on-board storage performance was evaluated consistent with methods based on CLSI EP25-A. Long Term Stability: Four runs have been performed on each time-point, monthly intervals, supports a 52 week shelf-life. data On-board Stability: Three Lots of the VITROS CEA assay were stored opened refrigerated for up to 12 weeks. Four runs were performed on each Lot at each time-point for fresh and open, all results were acceptable and support the current claim of 8 weeks on-board stability. #### Precision Precision was evaluated consistent with CLSI document EP05-A3. Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Third Edition. Four (4) precision fluids, covering the analytical measuring interval, were evaluated for performance. For one reagent lot, two (2) replicates of each precision fluid were run on two (2) occasions per day for twenty (20) days, for a total of 80 data points per fluid. The data presented are a representation of test performance and are provided as a guideline. Variables such as sample handling and storage, reagent handling and storage, laboratory environment, and system maintenance can affect reproducibility of test results. | System | Mean<br>CEA<br>Conc. | Repeatability* | | Within Lab** | | No. of<br>Obs. | No. of<br>Days | |--------|----------------------|----------------|------|--------------|------|----------------|----------------| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | | | | 5600 | 6.55 | 0.114 | 1.7% | 0.175 | 2.7% | 80 | 20 | | | 41.4 | 0.58 | 1.4% | 1.02 | 2.5% | 80 | 20 | | | 228 | 4.4 | 1.9% | 6.2 | 2.7% | 80 | 20 | | | 390 | 4.6 | 1.2% | 11.4 | 2.9% | 80 | 20 | | | | | | Product Claim | | |--|--|--|--|---------------|--| | | | | | | | *Repeatability (formerly called within-run precision) was determined using two replicates per run. ** Within Lab precision was determined using a single reagent lot and a single calibration. {7}------------------------------------------------ | | | | Units = ng/mL (µg/L) | | | | | | | | | | |--------|-----|------|-------------------------------|------|-----------------|------|-----------------|------|-------------|------|------------------------|------| | Sample | N | Mean | Within-run<br>(Repeatability) | | Between-<br>Run | | Between-<br>Day | | Between-Lot | | Within-<br>Laboratory* | | | | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | | PP1 | 240 | 6.44 | 0.107 | 1.7% | 0.096 | 1.5% | 0.095 | 1.5% | 0.132 | 2.1% | 0.217 | 3.4% | | PP2 | 240 | 40.8 | 0.59 | 1.5% | 0.84 | 2.1% | 0.62 | 1.5% | 0.45 | 1.1% | 1.28 | 3.1% | | PP3 | 240 | 223 | 4.3 | 1.9% | 3.4 | 1.5% | 3.2 | 1.4% | 4.5 | 2.0% | 7.8 | 3.5% | | PP4 | 240 | 381 | 5.6 | 1.5% | 6.6 | 2.1% | 6.0 | 1.6% | 8.7 | 2.3% | 13.7 | 3.6% | #### Additional Precision Analysis Summarv *Within-laboratory precision includes following components: repeatability, between-run, between-day and between-lot was determined using three reagent lots. #### Detection Capability Detection studies for the VITROS CEA Reagent were evaluated consistent with CLSI document EP17-A2. Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Second Edition. Four endogenous fluids containing no measurable carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were used for determining the LoB. The study design was 2 replicates per run, 2 runs per day over 5 test days = 20 reps per test fluid x 4 fluids = 80 replicates x 3 lots = 240 total replicates. Five samples were used for establishing the LoD, which were targeted at 1 to 5 times the LoB concentration. The LoD samples were admixtures of serum samples containing endogenous CEA combined with CEA affinity stripped serum to achieve the approximate target CEA concentrations. The LoD fluids were used to determine the LoQ. All samples were run using three reagent lots on one VITROS 5600 System, 6 replicates per run, 2 runs per day over 5 test days = 60 reps per fluid x 5 fluids = 300 replicates x 3 lots = 900 total replicates. The observed Limit of Detection (LoD) for the VITROS CEA test is 0.15 ng/mL (ug/L), determined consistent with CLSI document EP17. This supports the claimed LOD of 0.31ng/ml. The Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) for the VITROS CEA test was designed to be less than or equal to currently claimed low end of the measuring range of 0.31 ng/mL (ug/L) at 20% CV. The observed LoO at 20% CV was determined to be 0.15 ng/mL (ug/L), consistent with CLSI document EP17. The claimed LQ is set at 0.31 ng/mL (ug/L). The representative LoB is 0.08 ng/mL. {8}------------------------------------------------ #### VITROS CEA Reagent Traditional 510(k) Linearity Linearity studies were performed according to CLSI document EP06 2ªd edition. In a study with 13 levels and five replicates for each level on 1 reagent lot on one VITROS 5600 Integrated System, linearity was demonstrated from 0.22 ng/mL (ug/L) to 500 ng/mL (ug/L) with deviations from linearity within +/- 14.3%. | | | | Slope | | Intercept | | | |-------------------|---------------|----------|-------------------|----------|----------------------|-------|--| | Dilution<br>Range | % Recovery | Estimate | 95% CI | Estimate | 95% CI | R2 | | | 0.22 to 500 | 82.1% to 109% | 1.04275 | 1.025 to<br>1.061 | -0.06678 | -0.085 to -<br>0.049 | 0.999 | | | Sample ID | % HP | Expected<br>value<br>(ng/mL) | Measured<br>Value<br>(ng/mL) | Predicted<br>Value<br>(ng/mL) | Deviation<br>(ng/mL) | % Deviation | Allowable<br>nonlinearity | Within<br>Allowable<br>nonlinearity | |-----------|--------|------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------|-------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------| | Lin-2 | 0.04 | 0.267 | 0.219 | 0.212 | 0.008 | 3.6% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-3 | 0.05 | 0.317 | 0.262 | 0.264 | -0.002 | -0.8% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-4 | 0.50 | 2.565 | 2.632 | 2.608 | 0.024 | 0.9% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-5 | 1.01 | 5.11 | 5.26 | 5.26 | -0.006 | -0.1% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-6 | 5.00 | 25.0 | 26.2 | 26.0 | 0.19 | 0.7% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-7 | 14.99 | 74.95 | 81.6 | 78.1 | 3.48 | 4.5% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-8 | 34.98 | 175 | 186 | 182 | 4.2 | 2.3% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-9 | 50.00 | 250 | 266 | 260 | 5.4 | 2.1% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-10 | 69.99 | 350 | 351 | 365 | -13.6 | -3.7% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-11 | 80.00 | 400 | 398 | 417 | -18.3 | -4.4% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-12 | 89.96 | 449 | 455 | 469 | -13.4 | -2.9% | ±14.3% | Yes | | Lin-13 | 100.00 | 500 | 500 | 521 | -21.3 | -4.1% | ±14.3% | Yes | # Linearity/Measuring Range | VITROS System | Measuring (Reportable) Range | |---------------|------------------------------| | 5600 | 0.31-400 ng/mL( µg/L) | The extended measuring interval is 400-40,000 ng/mL (ug/L). Results with concentrations greater than 40,000 ng/mL (ug/L) will be reported as >40,000 ng/ mL(ug/L). # Matrix Comparison Serum and plasma (Li-Hep and EDTA) specimen matrices was determined to be equivalent. The results met the acceptance criteria for the comparison between serum and plasma (Li-Hep and EDTA) specimens spanning the expected measuring interval. Based on the analysis serum and plasma (Li-Hep and EDTA) are suitable specimen matrices for use with the VITROS CEA assay. Specimens Recommended - Serum and Plasma Specimens Not Recommended. - Do not use turbid specimens. Turbidity in specimens may affect test results. ● {9}------------------------------------------------ | VITROS 5600<br>System | | | |--------------------------------|--------------------|-----------------| | | Li-Hep | EDTA | | Ordinary<br>Deming<br>Slope | 0.998 | 0.995 | | 95% CI (Slope) | 0.9765 to 1.019 | 0.9459 to 1.044 | | Intercept | -0.1177 | -0.8768 | | 95% CI<br>(Intercept) | -0.8353 to -0.5999 | -3.056 to 1.302 | | Correlation<br>Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | 0.998 | | n | 40 | 40 | | Pass/Fail Status | Pass | Pass | #### Analytical Specificity #### Known Interferents The VITROS CEA assay was screened for interfering substances at CEA concentrations of approximately 3.00 ng/mL(ug/L) and 15.0 ng/mL(ug/L) following EP07 3rd ed – Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry and EP37 1st ed - Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry. Commonly encountered substances were tested. Of the compounds tested, none were found to cause bias of >10%. For substances that were tested and did not interfere, refer to "Substances that do not Interfere." #### Substances that do not Interfere The substances listed in the table below were tested with the VITROS CEA test following CLSI EP07and EP37 and found not to cause bias > 10% at CEA concentrations of approximately 3.00 ng/mL(ug/L) and 15.0 ng/mL(ug/L) at the test concentrations shown. | Substance | Concentration | |------------------------------------|---------------| | Acetaminophen | 20.3 mg/dL | | N-Acetylcysteine | 15.0 mg/dL | | Acetylsalicylic acid | 50 mg/dL | | Alpha-tocopherol | 6.45 mg/dL | | Aminoglutethimide | 39.8 mg/dL | | Amoxicillin | 5.40 mg/dL | | Ascorbic acid | 6.00 mg/dL | | Bilirubin, conjugated | 100 mg/dL | | Bilirubin, unconjugated | 100 mg/dL | | Biotin | 0.351 mg/dL | | Bleomycin | 300 mg/dL | | onal 510(k) | | | Carbamazepine | 4.50 mg/dL | | Cefoxitin sodium | 695 mg/dL | | Cholecalciferol (D3) | 19.2 µg/dL | | Cholesterol | 400 mg/dL | | Cisplatin | 1.3 mg/dL | | Codeine | 0.141 mg/dL | | Cotinine | 0. 24 mg/dL | | Cyclophosphamide | 54.9 mg/dL | | Dextran 40 | 1200 mg/dL | | Dextromethorphan | 0.00156 mg/dL | | Doxorubicin hydrochloride | 5.2 mg/dL | | Enoxaparin | 360 U/dL | | Ethanol | 600 mg/dL | | Etoposide | 83 mg/dL | | 5-Fluorouracil | 34.8 mg/dL | | Furosemide | 1.59 mg/dL | | Gamma globulin | 6 g/dL | | HAMA (Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies) | 800 µg/L | | Hemoglobin | 1000 mg/dL | | Hydralazine | 1.44 mg/dL | | Hydrocodone | 0.0072 mg/dL | | Ibuprofen | 71.0 mg/dL | | Intralipid | 2000 mg/dL | | Levothyroxine | 0.0429 mg/dL | | Loratadine | 0.0087 mg/dL | | Methotrexate | 136 mg/dL | | Mitomycin C | 5.52 mg/dL | | Morphine | 0.78 mg/dL | | Naproxen | 36.0 mg/dL | | Omeprazole | 0.840 mg/dL | | Phenytoin | 6.00 mg/dL | | Prednisone | 0.010 mg/dL | | Rheumatoid Factor | 900 IU/mL | | Tamoxifen | 4.8 mg/dL | | Theophylline | 6.0 mg/dL | | Total protein | 15.0 g/dL | | Triglycerides | 1500 mg/dL | | Vancomycin hydrochloride | 12.3 mg/dL | | Vinblastine | 138 mg/dL | | Vincristine | 140 mg/dL | {10}------------------------------------------------ # VITROS CEA Reagent Traditional 510(k) # Cross-Reactivity The cross-reactivity of the VITROS CEA test was evaluated by adding the following substance to a sample containing no CEA. {11}------------------------------------------------ | Substance | Tested<br>Concentration | VITROS 5600<br>% Cross Reactivity | | | |-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------| | | | Master<br>Lot<br>9991 | Master<br>Lot<br>9992 | Master<br>Lot<br>9993 | | Non- specific Cross- reacting<br>Antigen 1<br>(NCA 1) | 500 ng/mL<br>(µg/L) | ND | ND | ND | ND = Not Detectable; mean result is below the measuring interval of the assay # Other Limitations - · The VITROS CEA test is not recommended as a screening procedure for cancer detection. - · Patients with confirmed carcinoma frequently have CEA levels in the same range as normal patients. Elevated levels of CEA may be found in smokers or patients with nonmalignant conditions. Based on these observations, CEA levels in serum and plasma, regardless of level, should not be interpreted as absolute evidence of the presence or absence of malignant disease. - · Certain drugs and clinical conditions are known to alter CEA concentrations in vivo. For additional information, refer to one of the published summaries. - · The results from this test should be used and interpreted only in the context of the overall clinical picture. - · Heterophile, as well as human anti-animal antibodies (most common being human antimouse antibodies or HAMA) in serum or plasma of certain individuals are known to cause interference with immunoassays. The anti-animal antibodies may be present in blood samples from individuals regularly exposed to animals or who have received preparations of mouse monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis or therapy. Results inconsistent with clinical observations indicate the need for additional testing. # Dilution The dilution recovery and dilution imprecision product requirements were met for the VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack. Serum or Plasma (EDTA or heparin) samples with concentrations greater than the measuring range will be reported as >400 ng/mL(ug/L) and may be automatically diluted on the system up to 100-fold (1 part sample with 99 parts diluent) by the VITROS 5600 Integrated System with the VITROS High Sample Diluent B Reagent Pack prior to test. Refer to the VITROS High Sample Diluent B Reagent Pack Instructions for Use. # Expected Values # Adult Reference Interval The adult reference interval was validated following CLSI document EP28-A3c Defining. Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline - Third Edition. The distribution of CEA values for healthy non-smokers (n=68) and healthy smokers (n=72) showed equivalency to the expected values claim published in the Instructions for Use of the current US VITROS CEA {12}------------------------------------------------ VITROS CEA Reagent Traditional 510(k) assay, therefore the current distribution of results for healthy subjects will be transferred to the updated VITROS CEA assay. #### Product Claim: | | | Percent (%) | | | | |------------------|-----|--------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|--------------------| | Category | N | 0-3.0 ng/mL (µg/L) | >3.0-5.0 ng/mL (µg/L) | >5.0-10.0 ng/mL (µg/L) | >10.0 ng/mL (µg/L) | | Healthy Subjects | | | | | | | Nonsmokers | 149 | 91.9 | 6.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | | Smokers | 101 | 67.3 | 22.8 | 8.9 | 1.0 | | Total | 250 | 82.0 | 12.8 | 4.0 | 1.2 | Distribution of Healthy Subjects Results for the updated VITROS CEA assay: | Category | n | Percent (%) | | | | |------------------|----|-----------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------| | | | 0-3.0 ng/mL<br>(µg/L) | >3.0-5.0 ng/mL<br>(µg/L) | >5.0-10.0 ng/mL<br>(µg/L) | >10.0 ng/mL<br>(µg/L) | | Healthy Subjects | | | | | | | Non-smokers | 68 | 89.7 | 7.4 | 2.9 | 0 | | Smokers | 72 | 72.2 | 22.2 | 5.6 | 0 | #### High Dose Hook The assessment was consistent with the high dose hook guidance found in CLSI document EP34. The high dose hook panel was prepared with VITROS High Sample Diluent B (HSDB), containing no measurable CEA, spiked with endogenous CEA antigen to produce a fluid with a concentration of approximately 546,000 ng/mL(ug/L). This fluid was diluted with VITROS HSDB to produce a set of ten fluids (the High Dose Hook Panel) with concentrations spanning between 273 and 546,000 ng/mL (ug/L). The high dose hook panel samples were tested in singleton using one reagent lot on one VITROS 5600 System. The updated VITROS CEA assay has a high dose hook claim of up to 80,000ng/mL. #### Traceability of Calibration The Calibration of the VITROS CEA assay is traceable to in-house reference calibrators which have been value assigned to correlate to another commercially available test with reference to the 1st International Preparation 73/601. #### Method Comparison Accuracy was evaluated consistent with CLSI documents Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples. 3rd ed. CLSI guideline EP09c; and Evaluation of Total Analytical Error for Quantitative medical laboratory Measurement Procedures. 2nd ed. CLSI guideline EP21. Human serum samples were obtained from certified vendors and tested neat. A total of 110 samples were tested in singleton using one reagent lot and one VITROS 5600 Integrated System. Accuracy was evaluated consistent with CLSI document EP09c. The plot and table show the results of a method comparison study using patient (serum) samples analyzed on the VITROS CEA assay QuidelOrtho {13}------------------------------------------------ compared with those analyzed on the VITROS CEA assay (K041322) on the VITROS 5600 Integrated System. The relationship between the 2 methods was determined by a Passing and Bablok regression as shown in the Figure below. Image /page/13/Figure/2 description: The image is a regression plot for CEA (GEM.1110A) Lot 9993 versus a comparative method. The x-axis represents the comparative method VITROS CEA (GEM.1110) in ng/mL, while the y-axis represents 5600 PM 118 Lot 9993 in ng/mL. The plot includes a Passing-Bablok fit line represented by the equation y = 0.1059 + 1.006x, and dashed lines indicating the allowable difference of ±10%. {14}------------------------------------------------ | System | n | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Correlation<br>Coefficient | Conventional Units (U/mL) | | |--------------------------------|-----|------------------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------| | | | | | Range of<br>Samples | Intercept (95%<br>CI) | | 5600 vs. Comparative<br>Method | 110 | 1.01<br>(0.9972 to<br>1.012) | 0.999 | 0.56-396 | 0.106<br>(-0.01602 to -<br>0.3729) | # Conclusion The conclusions drawn from the nonclinical tests (discussed above) demonstrate the updated VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent pack is as safe, effective, and performs as well as the cleared predicate device. The information submitted in the premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Sort by
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...