K231237 · Becton, Dickinson and Company · JKA · Jan 19, 2024 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K231237
Device Name
BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes
Applicant
Becton, Dickinson and Company
Product Code
JKA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jan 19, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1675
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are evacuated, sterile, single use, in vitro diagnostic medical devices available with Sodium Fluoride/Potassium Oxalate or Sodium Fluoride/Na2EDTA. They are intended to be used by trained healthcare professionals for the collection, containment, preservation, transportation, and centrifugation of venous blood specimens as required for in vitro diagnostic testing. Plastic BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are used to collect whole blood for the generation of plasma samples. Blood collected in BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes containing Sodium Fluoride/Potassium Oxalate are used for glucose and lactate determinations. Blood collected in BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes containing Sodium Fluoride/Na2EDTA are used for glucose determinations.
Device Story
Evacuated, sterile, single-use plastic tubes; used by trained healthcare professionals in clinical settings for venous blood collection. Tubes contain blended powder additives (Sodium Fluoride/Potassium Oxalate or Sodium Fluoride/Na2EDTA) to provide anticoagulation and antiglycolytic preservation. Operation involves insertion into standard needle holder; vacuum-driven blood draw; manual inversion for mixing; centrifugation at 2000 RCF. Output is plasma sample for clinical laboratory testing. Facilitates accurate glucose and lactate determination by preserving sample integrity during transport and processing.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials; performance established via bench testing and method comparison studies. Precision studies (N=25 for glucose, N=40 for lactate) demonstrated acceptable repeatability and reproducibility. Method comparison against cleared comparator tubes (N=83-137 samples) showed high correlation (r=0.99-1.0) for glucose and lactate across two instrument platforms. Stability studies confirmed glucose stability up to 24 hours (refrigerated) and lactate up to 45 minutes (on ice).
Technological Characteristics
Plastic tubes (13x75mm, 13x100mm); Hemogard™ safety closure; silicone-lubricated stoppers. Additives: Sodium Fluoride (antiglycolytic), Potassium Oxalate or Na2EDTA (anticoagulants). Vacuum-based draw mechanism. Sterilization via radiation (ISO 11137). Complies with CLSI GP39-A6 and CLSI EP25-A standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by trained healthcare professionals for venous blood collection, containment, preservation, transportation, and centrifugation to generate plasma samples for glucose and lactate diagnostic testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A blood specimen collection device is a device intended for medical purposes to collect and to handle blood specimens and to separate serum from nonserum (cellular) components prior to further testing. This generic type device may include blood collection tubes, vials, systems, serum separators, blood collection trays, or vacuum sample tubes.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K231237
B Applicant
Becton, Dickinson and Company
C Proprietary and Established Names
BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JKA | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1675 - Blood specimen collection device | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
| GIM | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1675 - Blood Specimen Collection Device | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Not applicable. Blood Collection Tube
C Type of Test:
Not applicable
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are evacuated, sterile, single use, in vitro diagnostic medical devices available with Sodium Fluoride/Potassium Oxalate or Sodium Fluoride/Na2EDTA. They are intended to be used by trained healthcare professionals for the collection, containment, preservation, transportation, and centrifugation of venous blood specimens as required for in vitro diagnostic testing. Plastic BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are used to collect whole blood for the generation of plasma samples.
Blood collected in BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes containing Sodium Fluoride/Potassium Oxalate are used for glucose and lactate determinations. Blood collected in BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes containing Sodium Fluoride/Na2EDTA are used for glucose determinations.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
Do not use if foreign matter is present or if tube is damaged.
Fluoride powdered additives may be white to pale pink. Do not use if it is any other color.
Follow your facility’s procedures if clots or other visible obstructions are present in the sample as this could lead to the inability to test the sample.
Any change in blood collection tube type, size, handling, processing, or storage condition for a particular laboratory assay should be evaluated by the laboratory for each instrument/reagent system per the laboratory's standard procedures.
BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes may contain trace levels of tert-butanol, ethylbenzene, formate, hexane, 2-methylpentane, 3-methylpentane, and xylene. It has not been determined if the presence of trace levels of these compounds will affect test results in chromatography-based assays.
D Special Instrument Requirements:
Not applicable. Specific analyzers used to evaluate the device are listed in the labeling and in section VII.B.1. Method Comparison, below.
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
K231237 - Page 2 of 8
{2}
The BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are evacuated, sterile, single use tubes intended to be used in settings where venous blood samples would be collected by trained healthcare professionals for the collection, containment, preservation, transportation, and centrifugation of blood in a closed tube.
BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are available in plastic 13 x 75mm and 13 x 100mm configurations with draw volumes from 2.0 to 6 mL. The configurations contain various additive combinations in a blended powder mixture, including the additives Potassium Oxalate (kOx) and Na₂-EDTA which provide an anticoagulated specimen when used according to the instructions for use. The tubes containing Na₂-EDTA can be used to produce plasma samples to measure glucose. The tubes containing kOx can be used to produce plasma samples to measure glucose or lactate. The blended powder mixture contains sodium fluoride (NaF), which acts as an antiglycolytic agent. Tubes include a gray color-coded BD Hemogard™ Closure indicative of the NaF additive. Tube stoppers are lubricated with silicone to facilitate stopper insertion.
## B Principle of Operation:
The BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are intended to be placed inside any BD Vacutainer® Needle Holder of the standard size or an adapter of a blood collection system. Once the vein of the patient has been penetrated using a standard needle, center the collection tube in the holder and push the tube fully onto the needle, puncturing the stopper of the tube. The tube uses a controlled vacuum to pull a specific volume of blood into the sterile interior of the tube. Once the pressure is equalized, the blood flow ceases, and the tube is removed from the needle holder or needle. Immediately after the blood has been drawn, the tube is gently inverted 8 times to mix the blood with the anticoagulant and antiglycolytic. The BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are centrifuged at 2000 RCF (relative centrifuge force or g's). The whole blood is then processed to plasma for various clinical laboratory testing.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Vacutainer Plus With Hemogard Closure
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K901449
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K231237 | K901449 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes | Vacutainer Plus with Hemogard Closure |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes are | Same |
K231237 - Page 3 of 8
{3}
| | used for the collection, containment, transportation, and processing of blood in a closed tube. It is used in settings where a venous blood sample is collected by a trained healthcare worker. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tube Material | Plastic | Same |
| Closure | Hemogard™ safety closure | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Tube Dimensions and Draw Volume | BD Vacutainer® Sodium Fluoride / Potassium Oxalate tubes: 13x75 mm – 2.0 mL 13x75 mm – 4.0 mL 13x100 mm – 6.0 mL
BD Vacutainer® Sodium Fluoride / Na2EDTA tubes: 13x75 mm – 2.0 mL | BD Vacutainer® Sodium Fluoride / Potassium Oxalate tubes: 13x75 mm – 2.0 mL |
| Shelf-Life | 15 – 16 months | 12 months |
| Anticoagulant | Sodium Fluoride /Potassium Oxalate, Sodium Fluoride /Disodium EDTA | Sodium Fluoride /Potassium Oxalate |
| Sample Type | Plasma | Serum, Plasma, Whole Blood |
| Intended Use Analytes | Glucose and Lactate | Glucose |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI GP39-A6, Tubes and Additives for Venous Blood Specimen Collection: Approved Standard-Sixth Edition
CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
ISO 11137-1, Sterilization of health care products - Radiation - Part 1: Requirements for development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
ISO 11137-2, Sterilization of health care products - Radiation - Part 2: Establishing the sterilization dose
K231237 - Page 4 of 8
{4}
ISO 14971:2019 Medical Devices – Application of risk management to medical devices- Third Edition
ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-3:2017 Sterilization of health care products - Radiation - Part 3: Guidance on dosimetric aspects of development, validation and routine control
ISO 11737-1:2018 Sterilization health care products - Microbiological methods - Part 1: Determination of a population of microorganisms on products- Third Edition
14-540 ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11737-2:2019 Sterilization of BD medical devices - Microbiological methods - Part 2: Tests of sterility performed in the definition, validation and maintenance of a sterilization process
ANSI AAMI ST67:2019 Sterilization of health care products - Requirements and guidance for selecting a sterility assurance level (SAL) for products labeled "sterile"
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
## A Analytical Performance:
### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Two studies were conducted to evaluate the repeatability (within-tube), lot-to-lot (between lots), and tube-to-tube (between tube) variation in the BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes. Sodium Fluoride/ Potassium Oxalate (NaF/KOx) tubes were tested and evaluated using glucose and lactate, and Sodium Fluoride EDTA (NaF/Na₂EDTA) tubes were tested and evaluated using glucose. The study designs included subjects from the clinical settings. Three lots of each of the BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes (candidate device) were used in the study. The study was performed using samples collected from 25 subjects for glucose and 40 subjects for lactate, and all samples were run in duplicate on two instrument platforms. One representative platform with precision results is summarized in the tables below:
Table 1. Precision Summary for BD Sodium Fluoride/Potassium Oxalate (NaF/KOx)
| Analyte (mg/dL) | Mean | Variance Component | CV% | SD | CV 95% CI | SD 95% CI |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose | 202.4 | Total Precision | 1.4 | 2.8 | 0.5,1.17 | 0.5,1.17 |
| | | Within-Tubes | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.1, 1.3 | 2.1, 2.7 |
| | | Between-Tubes | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.4, 0.9 | 0.8, 1.9 |
| | | Between Lots | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Lactate | 2.044 | Total Precision | 6.7 | 0.137 | 5.6, 8.5 | 0.114, 0.173 |
| | | Within-Tubes | 6.7 | 0.137 | 6.3, 7.1 | 0.129, 0.146 |
| | | Between-Tubes | 0.6 | 0.009 | 0.0,1.2 | 0.0,0.022 |
| | | Between Lots | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
### 2. Linearity:
Not applicable.
### 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
K231237 - Page 5 of 8
{5}
Benchtop studies were conducted to evaluate interference from stopper materials over the sample storage time. Study protocols, acceptance criteria, and results for this study were provided and found to be acceptable.
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable.
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
### A. Within-Tube Stability (sample stability):
Glucose (GLU) and lactate stability studies were conducted to assess within-tube stability for BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection tubes using NaF/ $\mathrm{Na_2EDTA}$ 13x75 2mL tubes for glucose determinations and NaF/KOx 13x75 4mL for glucose and lactate determinations. Stability studies were assessed for glucose up to 24hr. Lactate studies were assessed up to 45 minutes while the samples were stored in tubes on ice, followed by refrigerated storage and centrifugation. Analyte stability was tested on a minimum of two instrument platforms. The study protocols and acceptance criteria have been reviewed and found to be acceptable. These studies support the storage of samples for measurement of lactate up to 45 minutes when held on ice and glucose up to 4 hours at room temperature or 24 hours when refrigerated.
### B. Shelf-Life
Real Time stability testing of the BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection tubes showed that the candidate device is stable for 15-16 months when stored at 4 to $25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . The stability study protocol and acceptance criteria has been reviewed and found to be acceptable. The claimed shelf-life of each tube is shown below:
| Fluoride Blood Tube | Claimed Shelf-life | Volume |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NaF/Na2EDTA | 16 months | 2 mL |
| NaF/KOx | 15 months | 2 mL |
| NaF/KOx | 16 months | 4 mL |
| NaF/KOx | 15 months | 6 mL |
### C. Additional bench testing on the candidate device
Benchtop studies were conducted to assess draw volume, X-value, 2nd stopper pullout, stopper/shield separation, stopper leakage, tube leakage, breakage resistance during drop testing, breakage resistance during centrifugation testing, barrier formation and packaging performance during shipping and handling. The study protocols were reviewed, and performance was considered acceptable.
## 6. Detection Limit:
Not applicable.
## 7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
K231237 - Page 6 of 8
{6}
K231237 - Page 7 of 8
# B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Not applicable.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable. These tubes are for venous whole blood or plasma only.
# C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
A study was conducted to evaluate equivalence between the BD Vacutainer® Fluoride Blood Collection Tubes (6 mL BD Vacutainer® Sodium Fluoride / Potassium Oxalate and 2 mL BD Vacutainer® Sodium Fluoride / Na2EDTA) and a cleared comparator tube (NaF/K Oxalate Blood Collection Tubes, 2 mL) for testing glucose and lactate. All samples were collected by routine venipuncture using standard phlebotomy techniques. In addition, contrived samples were prepared to obtain results that spanned the analytical measurement range for the tested analytes. Glucose and Lactate were evaluated on two instrument platforms each and demonstrated comparable results between the candidate tubes and the comparator tubes.
Immediately after collection and prior to centrifugation, tubes were inspected for complete fill, clot formation and stopper leakage. After centrifugation, additional visual assessments were performed. Tubes were then handled and processed according to manufacturer's recommended handling conditions for tube inversions and centrifugation time and force. Biases between tube types were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. Regression analyses for a representative tube using each instrument platform are provided in the tables below:
Comparison results: BD NaF/K-Ox vs Comparator Tube NaF/K-Ox
| Analyte | Instrument | N | Intercept (95% CI) | Slope (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose | 1 | 119 | 0.53 (-0.12, 1.17) | 0.99 (0.99, 1.0) | 1.0 |
| | 2 | | -1.0 (-1.0, 0.42) | 1.0 (0.99, 1.0) | 0.99 |
{7}
Comparison results: BD NaF/Na2EDTA (Plasma) vs Comparator Tube NaF/K-Ox
| Analyte | Instrument | N | Intercept (95% CI) | Slope (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose | 1 | 137 | 2 (0.13, 2) | 1 (1, 1.01) | 0.999 |
| | 2 | | 0.62 (-1.01, 1) | 1 (1, 1.02) | 0.999 |
Comparison results: BD NaF/KOx vs Comparator Tube NaF/KOx
| Analyte | Instrument | N | Intercept (95% CI) | Slope (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lactate | 1 | 83 | 0 (-0.03, 0.1) | 1 (1, 1.03) | 0.993 |
| | 2 | | -0.01 (-0.07, 0.04) | 1 (0.96, 1.04) | 0.992 |
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not applicable
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K231237 - Page 8 of 8
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.