The NG Delivery Catheter is intended for general intravascular use, including the peripheral, coronary and neuro vasculature for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and to assist in the delivery of interventional devices, such as distal access catheters, in the neurovasculature.
Device Story
Single lumen, variable stiffness, composite catheter; used for infusion of diagnostic agents and delivery of interventional devices in peripheral, coronary, and neurovasculature. Features hydrophilic coating for lubricity; luer fitting for accessory attachment; two radiopaque markers for fluoroscopic visualization. Supplied sterile, single-use. Includes steam shaping mandrel and peel-away introducer tube. Operated by clinicians in clinical settings. Device tracks through vasculature to target site; provides pathway for interventional devices; enables contrast media infusion. Benefits patient by facilitating minimally invasive neurovascular procedures.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, reactivity, systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, hemocompatibility) and performance testing (tensile strength, kink resistance, leakage, burst, torque, tip shapeability, hub validation, coating adherence, particulate matter, tip stiffness, flow rate, saline/contrast exposure, lubricity, radiopacity, physician usability) demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
Technological Characteristics
Single lumen, variable stiffness composite catheter. Hydrophilic coating. Radiopaque markers. Luer fitting. Sterilized via Ethylene Oxide. Complies with ISO 10555-1 (physical/dimensional/leakage), ISO 80369-7 (luer), and ISO 80369-1 (non-interconnectability).
Indications for Use
Indicated for general intravascular use (peripheral, coronary, neuro vasculature) for infusion of diagnostic agents (contrast media) and to assist delivery of interventional devices (e.g., distal access catheters) in the neurovasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 13, 2023
Balt USA, LLC Catherine Chiou Specialist. Regulatory Affairs 29 Parker Irvine, California 92618
Re: K230609
Trade/Device Name: NG Delivery Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QJP, DQY Dated: August 17, 2023 Received: August 17, 2023
Dear Catherine Chiou:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Naira Muradyan -S
Naira Muradyan, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K230609
Device Name NG Delivery Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The NG Delivery Catheter is intended for general intravascular use, including the peripheral, coronary and neuro vasculature for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and to assist in the delivery of interventional devices, such as distal access catheters, in the neurovasculature.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <svg fill="none" height="16" viewbox="0 0 16 16" width="16" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <path d="M5.44433 11.6667L14.6667 2.44433L13.5553 1.33333L5.44433 9.44433L2.44433 6.44433L1.33333 7.55567L5.44433 11.6667Z" fill="black" stroke="black" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.33333"></path> </svg> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> <svg fill="none" height="16" viewbox="0 0 16 16" width="16" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <rect height="14" stroke="black" stroke-width="2" width="14" x="1" y="1"></rect> </svg> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for "balt". The logo consists of a green circle with three smaller white circles inside, connected to the word "balt" in lowercase letters. The word "balt" is written in a simple, sans-serif font and is also green. The overall design is modern and clean.
## 510(k) Summary: K230609
| Applicant: | Balt USA, LLC<br>29 Parker<br>Irvine, CA 92618<br>Registration No.: 3014162263 |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Catherine Chiou<br>Specialist, Regulatory Affairs<br>Email: Catherine.chiou@baltgroup.com |
| Date Summary<br>Prepared: | September 13, 2023 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | NG Delivery Catheter |
| Common Name: | Catheter, Percutaneous |
| Review Panel: | Neurology |
| Product Code: | QJP, DQY |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.1250 |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Predicate Device: | Wedge Microcatheter<br>510(k) #: K172014 |
| Reference Device: | AXS Offset Delivery Assist Catheter<br>510(k) #: K163259 |
## Device Description:
The NG Delivery Catheter is a single lumen, variable stiffness, composite catheter. The design facilitates the advancement of the catheter and is intended to assist the delivery of interventional devices in the peripheral and neurovasculature. The outer surface of the NG Delivery Catheter is coated with a hydrophilic coating to increase lubricity. The proximal end of the NG Delivery Catheter incorporates a luer fitting for the attachment of accessories. Two radiopaque markers at the distal end help to facilitate fluoroscopic visualization.
A Steam Shaping Mandrel and Peel-away Introducer Tube are included within the tray. The NG Delivery Catheter is provided sterile, non-pyrogenic, and is intended for single use only.
## Indications for Use:
The NG Delivery Catheter is intended for general intravascular use, including the peripheral, coronary and neuro vasculature for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and to assist in the delivery of interventional devices, such as distal access catheters, in the neurovasculature.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for "balt". The logo consists of a green circle with a smaller circle attached to the top left, and a smaller circle inside the larger circle. The word "balt" is written in a sans-serif font to the right of the circle, with the same green color as the circle.
## Device Comparison:
| | Predicate Device: | Reference Device: | Subject Device: |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Wedge Microcatheter<br>(K172014) | AXS Offset Delivery Assist<br>Catheter (K163259) | NG Delivery Catheter<br>(K230609) |
| Device<br>Classification /<br>Product Code | Class II/DQY<br>(Percutaneous Catheters) | Same as K172014 | Class II/QJP, DQY<br>(Percutaneous Catheters) |
| Indications for<br>Use | The Wedge Microcatheter<br>is intended for general<br>intravascular use, including<br>the peripheral, coronary and<br>neuro vasculature for the<br>infusion of diagnostic agents,<br>such as contrast media, and to<br>assist in the delivery of<br>interventional devices, such as<br>the SOFIA 6F Catheter, in the<br>neurovasculature. | The AXS Offset Delivery<br>Assist Catheter is intended to<br>assist in the delivery of<br>interventional devices, such as<br>distal access catheters, in the<br>neurovasculature. | The NG Delivery Catheter<br>is intended for general<br>intravascular use, including<br>the peripheral, coronary and<br>neuro vasculature for the<br>infusion of diagnostic<br>agents, such as contrast<br>media, and to assist in the<br>delivery of interventional<br>devices, such as distal<br>access catheters, in the<br>neurovasculature. |
| Catheter OD,<br>Max | 1.73 mm (0.068") | 3.8F (1.27 mm; 0.05") | 4.5F (1.50 mm; 0.059")<br>-<br>5.3F (1.75 mm; 0.069") |
| Catheter ID | 0.53 mm (0.021") | 0.53 mm (0.021") | Same as K172014 |
| Effective<br>Length | 158 cm – 160 cm | 150 cm | 152 cm |
| Coating Length | 110 cm – 115 cm | 80 cm | 60 cm |
| Packaging Configuration | Microcatheter is placed in a<br>dispenser hoop and accessories<br>on a mounting card that is then<br>inserted into the pouch. The<br>pouch is then placed inside a<br>carton box. | Catheter is placed in a<br>dispenser coil, then inserted<br>into a pouch and placed<br>inside a carton box. | Same as K172014 |
| Sterilization | | | |
| Method | Ethylene Oxide | Same as K172014 | Same as K172014 |
| How Supplied | Sterile, Single Use | Same as K172014 | Same as K172014 |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for "Balt". The logo consists of a green circle with three smaller circles inside, connected to the word "Balt" in a stylized font. The color scheme is primarily green, giving it a natural or organic feel.
Biocompatibility:
The following biocompatibility testing was conducted for the subject device, NG Delivery Catheter:
| Test | Results | Conclusions |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Cytotoxicity (ISO MEM<br>Elution Test) | The test article scored a ' 1' and is<br>considered non-cytotoxic under the<br>conditions of the test. | The test article is<br>considered non-cytotoxic. |
| Sensitization (ISO Guinea Pig<br>Maximization Test) | None of the test animals challenged with<br>the test article extracts were observed<br>with a sensitization response greater than<br>'O'. | The test article did not<br>elicit a sensitization<br>response. |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity | The differences in the mean test and<br>control scores of the extract dermal<br>observations were 1.0 or less. | Requirements have been<br>met by the test article. |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | None of the animals in the study were<br>observed with abnormal clinical signs<br>indicative of toxicity during the 72-hour<br>test period. All were alive at the end of<br>the 72-hour test duration and body<br>weight changes were within acceptable<br>parameters over the course of the study. | Requirements have been<br>met by the test article. |
| Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity<br>(ISO Materials Mediated Rabbit<br>Pyrogen) | None of the rabbits administered with<br>the test article extract had a temperature<br>rise ≥ 0.5℃ at the required observation<br>time points. | The test article is<br>considered non-pyrogenic. |
| Hemocompatibility -<br>Hemolysis | The test article, in both extract and direct<br>method, met the criteria for assay<br>validity and displayed an Average Blank<br>Corrected Hemolytic Index above the<br>Negative Control below 2.0%. | The test article is<br>considered non-hemolytic. |
| Hemocompatibility -<br>Complement Activation | The test article result was statistically<br>significantly lower (p<0.05) than that of<br>the comparison article. | Test article performed<br>better than the comparison<br>article under the<br>conditions employed. |
| Hemocompatibility –<br>Thrombogenicity (In vivo) | The test article has "normal" vessel<br>observations, and patency of "not<br>occluded" for both left/right external<br>jugulars. | Scores indicate low<br>thrombogenic potential for<br>the test device. |
| Hemocompatibility –<br>Thrombogenicity (Partial<br>Thromboplastin Time) | The clotting time of the test article and<br>the comparison article are not<br>significantly different. | Requirements have been<br>met by the test article. |
| Hemocompatibility -<br>Thrombogenicity (Platelet<br>Leukocyte Count) | The test article platelet mean percentage<br>value was between 80 to 120% and was<br>at least 30% above the positive control. | Requirements have been<br>met by the test article. |
| Hemocompatibility -<br>Thrombogenicity (Comparative<br>Surface Assessment) | Each device was inspected with zero<br>noted locations with rough surfaces or<br>defects. | Requirements have been<br>met by the test article. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for "balt". The logo consists of a green circle with two smaller circles inside, connected to the word "balt" in a stylized font. The color scheme is primarily green and white, giving it a modern and clean look. The logo appears to be for a company or organization named "balt".
## Performance Data - Bench:
The following non-clinical bench testing was conducted to assess the performance of the subject device, NG Delivery Catheter:
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Physical and<br>Dimensional | The physical and dimensional attributes were<br>measured. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Tensile Strength | The peak tensile force was obtained per ISO<br>10555-1. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Kink Resistance | Kink resistance was evaluated after subjecting the<br>device to bending in a simulated use model. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Liquid-Leakage | The device was exposed to a minimum liquid<br>pressure for a minimum of 30 seconds. The device<br>was inspected for leakage per ISO 10555-1. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Air Leakage | The device was exposed to air pressure by<br>syringe. The device was inspected for leakage per<br>ISO 10555-1. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Static Burst | The distal tip of the catheter was blocked, and<br>fluid was injected into the lumen at increasing<br>pressure until the catheter burst. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Torque Strength | The device was evaluated for torque strength by<br>measuring the number of catheter rotations until<br>failure after tracking through a simulated use<br>model. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Catheter Tip<br>Shapeability | Tip shapeability of the distal tip was measured<br>after steam shaping. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Hub Validation Testing | The luer connector was tested to functional<br>requirements per ISO 80369-7 and non-<br>interconnectability to other hubs per ISO 80369-1. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Coating Adherence | The coating integrity was inspected under<br>simulated use conditions. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Particulate Matter | The catheter underwent simulated use testing and<br>particulate testing was conducted including a<br>reference device for comparison. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Tip Stiffness | The catheter stiffness profile was compared to the<br>reference device. | The tip stiffness was<br>comparable. |
| Flow Rate | The flow rate of contrast media and associated<br>injection pressures were evaluated. | Characterization only |
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo with a green circle on the left and the word "balt" on the right. The circle has a few smaller white circles inside it. The word "balt" is written in a simple, sans-serif font and is also green. The logo has a clean and modern look.
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Saline and Contrast<br>Exposure | After the device was used to deliver saline and<br>contrast media, the device was inspected for<br>damage, and dimensional attributes were measured. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Lubricity (Friction<br>Force) | The lubricity peak friction force was measured. | Characterization only |
| Radiopacity (Visibility) | The device was tested to demonstrate acceptable<br>radiopacity. | Acceptable |
| Physician Usability | The devices were prepared in accordance with<br>their respective instructions for use and met<br>established acceptance criteria for device<br>usability in a clinically relevant anatomical<br>model. | All samples passed the<br>acceptance criteria. |
## Performance Data - Animal:
Balt USA, LLC did not conduct non-clinical animal testing. The differences in technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
#### Performance Data - Clinical:
Balt USA, LLC did not conduct clinical testing. The differences in technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
### Conclusion:
The evidence presented in this 510(k) demonstrates substantial equivalence between the subject device and the predicate device. The subject and predicate devices have intended use and indications for use. The differences in technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. Non-clinical bench testing demonstrates the NG Delivery Catheter meets the specifications.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.