K230451 · Hologic, Inc. · MKZ · Nov 16, 2023 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K230451
Device Name
Aptima® Chlamydia trachomatis Assay
Applicant
Hologic, Inc.
Product Code
MKZ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Nov 16, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3120
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
The Aptima® Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) assay is an in vitro qualitative nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for the detection of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) from Chlamydia trachomatis to aid in the diagnosis of chlamydial urogenital disease using the Panther system. The assay may be used to test the following specimens from symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals: patient-collected vaginal swab specimens1 (in a clinical setting); and female and male urine specimens. 1 Patient-collected vaginal swab specimens are an option for screening women when a pelvic exam is not otherwise indicated. The Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection Kit has not been evaluated for home use.
Device Story
The Aptima CT assay is an in vitro qualitative NAAT performed on the Panther system. It detects Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA in patient-collected vaginal swabs and urine. The process involves target capture using magnetic microparticles, transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) of 16S rRNA, and hybridization protection assay (HPA) for detection. The Panther system automates specimen processing, amplification, and chemiluminescent detection. Results are reported as Relative Light Units (RLU). Used in clinical settings (e.g., STI clinics, OB/GYN) by laboratory personnel. The output aids clinicians in diagnosing chlamydial urogenital disease. The device benefits patients by providing accurate, automated diagnostic testing for chlamydia.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, multicenter clinical study of 4,247 evaluable subjects (2,283 women, 1,964 men) across 11 US sites. Specimens included patient-collected vaginal swabs, female urine, and male urine. Performance was compared against a patient infected status (PIS) derived from up to 3 FDA-cleared NAATs. 6,415 specimens were analyzed. Results demonstrated performance consistent with current CT testing expectations, confirming the Panther system is equivalent to the previously cleared Tigris system.
Technological Characteristics
Nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) using target capture, TMA, and HPA. Employs magnetic microparticles for target isolation and acridinium ester-labeled DNA probes for chemiluminescent detection. Automated platform (Panther System). Qualitative binary output (positive/negative) based on RLU thresholds. Software-based automated interpretation. Complies with CLSI standards for molecular diagnostics and IEC 62304 for software lifecycle.
Indications for Use
Indicated for symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals, including women and men, for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital disease using patient-collected vaginal swabs or urine specimens.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Chlamydia serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to chlamydia in serum. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of chlamydia antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye used to identify chlamydia directly from clinical specimens or cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Chlamydia and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Chlamydia are the causative agents of psittacosis (a form of pneumonia), lymphogranuloma venereum (a venereal disease), and trachoma (a chronic disease of the eye and eyelid).
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K230451
B Applicant
Hologic, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Aptima Chlamydia trachomatis Assay
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MKZ | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 866.3120 - Chlamydia Serological Reagents | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
The Aptima CT assay (K043072) was previously cleared for use with the Tigris DTS platform (K063451) for endocervical and male urethral swabs, female and male urine, clinician- and patient-collected vaginal swabs, and PreservCyt liquid Pap specimens. With this submission, Hologic seeks clearance for the use of the assay on the Panther instrument with patient-collected vaginal swab specimens, and female and male urine specimens on the Panther system.
B Measurand:
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) ribosomal RNA
C Type of Test:
Target-mediated amplificated nucleic acid probe test
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K230451 - Page 2 of 12
A Intended Use(s):
The Aptima Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) assay is an *in vitro* qualitative nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for the detection of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) from *Chlamydia trachomatis* to aid in the diagnosis of chlamydial urogenital disease using the Panther system.
The assay may be used to test the following specimens from symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals: patient-collected vaginal swab specimens¹ (in a clinical setting); and female and male urine specimens.
¹ Patient-collected vaginal swab specimens are an option for screening women when a pelvic exam is not otherwise indicated. The Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection Kit has not been evaluated for home use.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Same as the Intended Use above
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
Panther System
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The Aptima CT assay is a nucleic acid amplification test that utilizes the target capture (TC), transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) and hybridization protection assay (HPA) technologies for the qualitative detection of *Chlamydia trachomatis*. Specimens are collected and transferred using their respective collection kit. The transport solution in the kit tube releases the rRNA target that are then captured by magnetic microparticles. A unique set of primers is used to amplify the target and the amplicon is detected by nucleic acid hybridization. Assay test results are automatically interpreted by the Panther System Aptima CT assay software.
This assay is similar to the Aptima Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis (K063451) in that the target organism is *C. trachomatis*. The primary differences between the two assays are the platform on which the assay is performed. There are no modifications to assay reagents.
B Principle of Operation:
The Aptima CT assay combines the technologies of target capture, TMA, and HPA. Specimens are collected and transferred into their respective specimen transport tubes. The transport solution in these tubes releases the rRNA target and protects it from degradation during storage. The target rRNA molecule is isolated from the specimens by use of a capture oligomer via target capture that utilizes magnetic microparticles. The capture oligomer contains a sequence complementary to a specific region of the target molecule, as well as a string of deoxyadenosine residues. During the hybridization step, the sequence specific region of the capture oligomer binds to a specific region of the target molecule. The capture oligomer:target complex is then
{2}
captured out of solution by decreasing the temperature of the reaction to room temperature. This temperature reduction allows hybridization to occur between the deoxyadenosine region on the capture oligomer and the polydeoxythymidine molecules that are covalently attached to the magnetic particles. The microparticles, including the captured target molecule bound to them, are pulled to the side of the reaction vessel using magnets and the supernatant is aspirated. The particles are washed to remove residual specimen matrix that may contain amplification reaction inhibitors. After the target capture steps are completed, the specimens are ready for amplification. Target amplification assays are based on the ability of complementary oligonucleotide primers to specifically anneal and allow enzymatic amplification of the target nucleic acid strands. The Hologic TMA reaction replicates a specific region of the 16S rRNA from CT via DNA intermediates. A unique set of primers is used for the target molecule. Detection of the rRNA amplification product sequences (amplicon) is achieved using nucleic acid hybridization. A single-stranded chemiluminescent DNA probe, which is complementary to a region of the target amplicon, is labeled with an acridinium ester molecule. The labeled DNA probe combines with amplicon to form stable RNA:DNA hybrids. The Selection Reagent differentiates hybridized from unhybridized probe, eliminating the generation of signal from unhybridized probe. During the detection step, light emitted from the labeled RNA:DNA hybrids is measured as photon signals in a luminometer, and are reported as Relative Light Units (RLU).
## C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name: Panther System
2. Specimen Identification: By handheld barcode reader and manual entry
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling: Fully automated
4. Calibration: The Aptima CT assay requires no calibration.
The Panther System undergoes preventative maintenance every 12 months, which includes luminometer calibration.
5. Quality Control: The Aptima CT assay Controls Kit includes 5 vials each of Positive and Negative Controls which are ready to use.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s): Aptima Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s): K063451
K230451 - Page 3 of 12
{3}
# C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K230451 | K063451 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Aptima Chlamydia trachomatis assay (Panther) | Aptima Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis (Tigris) |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The Aptima Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) assay is an in vitro qualitative nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for the detection of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) from Chlamydia trachomatis to aid in the diagnosis of chlamydial urogenital disease using the Panther system.The assay may be used to test the following specimens from symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals: patient-collected vaginal swabs1(in a clinical setting); and female and male urine specimens.1Patient-collected vaginal swab specimens are an option for screening women when a pelvic exam is not otherwise indicated.The Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection kit has not been evaluated for home use. | The Aptima Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis assay is a target amplification nucleic acid probe test that utilizes target capture for the in vitro qualitative detection of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) from Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) to aid in the diagnosis of chlamydial urogenital disease using the Tigris DTS Automated Analyzer or semi-automated instrumentation as specified. The assay may be used to test the following specimens from symptomatic individuals: clinician-collected endocervical, vaginal and male urethral swab specimens; and female and male urine specimens. The assay may be used to test the following specimens from asymptomatic individuals: clinician-collected endocervical, vaginal and male urethral swab specimens; patient-collected vaginal swab |
K230451 - Page 4 of 12
{4}
K230451 - Page 5 of 12
| | | specimens^{1}; and female
and male urine
specimens. This assay is
also intended for use
with the testing of
gynecological
specimens, from both
symptomatic and
asymptomatic patients,
collected in the
PreservCyt solution and
processed with the
Cytyc ThinPrep 2000
System.
^{1}Patient-collected
vaginal swab specimens
are an option for
screening women when
a pelvic exam is not
otherwise indicated.
The Aptima Multitest
Swab Specimen
Collection Kit is not for
home use. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Technology Principle of
Operation | Target Capture (TC),
Transcription-Mediated
Amplification (TMA),
Hybridization
Protection Assay (HPA) | Same |
| Assay Targets | *Chlamydia trachomatis*
rRNA | Same |
| Assay Results | Qualitative | Same |
| Function | Detection of rRNA
from *Chlamydia*
*trachomatis* | Same |
| **General Device**
**Characteristic Differences** | | |
| Platform | Automated PANTHER
System | Automated TIGRIS
System |
| Specimen Types | **Female Specimens:**
• Patient-collected
vaginal swab
• Urine
**Male Specimens:** | **Female Specimens:**
• Clinician -collected
vaginal swab
• Patient-collected
vaginal swab
(asymptomatic |
{5}
| | • Urine | only)
• Endocervical swab
• Gynecological specimens in PreservCyt solution
• Urine
**Male Specimens:**
• Urethral swab
• Urine |
| --- | --- | --- |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3 (Reaffirmed: September 2019) 7-251 Evaluation of Precision of Qualitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
CLSI EP07 3rd Edition 7-275 Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
CLSI EP12-A2 7-152 User Protocol of Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI EP15-A3 7-253 User Verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI EP17-A2 7-233 Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI EP25-A (Replaces EP25-P) 7-235 Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
CLSI MM03-3rd Edition (Replaces MM03-A2) 7-260 Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Infectious Diseases
CLSI MM13-2nd Edition 7-300 Collection Transport Preparation and Storage of Specimens for Molecular Methods
IEC 62304 Edition 1.1 2015-06 Consolidated Version 13-79. Medical device software – Software life cycle processes
ISO 14971 Third Edition 2019-12 5-125 Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices
IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.0 2014-02 19-8 Medical electrical equipment – Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance – Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances – Requirements and tests
K230451 - Page 6 of 12
{6}
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
## A Analytical Performance:
### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
#### Reproducibility
The reproducibility study was conducted over six days, at two external and one internal sites using the Panther System. Aptima CT assay reproducibility was evaluated across two assay lots with six operators. Two operators at each of the three testing sites performed a total of six Aptima CT assay runs per kit lot for a total of 36 runs per kit lot. Each run consisted of a 4-member precision panel: one CT-negative and three CT-positive panel members. A range of low and high positive panel members were created by spiking swab transport medium with CT organisms at concentrations from 0.25 IFU/mL to 25 IFU/mL. Reproducibility was determined by calculating the agreement (with a 95% two-sided confidence interval) with expected results for each panel member by site, by lot, and overall. Signal variability was calculated 1) within runs, 2) between runs, 3) between operators, 4) between sites/instruments, and 5) between reagent lots. Agreement values were 100% for all panel members. Two invalid results, one at each of the external sites, were excluded from the analyses.
Table 1. Reproducibility Study Data
| Panel Member | Targeted Conc (IFU/mL) | N | % Agrmt | Mean RLU | Between Sites | | Between-Operators | | Between-Lot | | Between-Run | | Within-Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 0 | 107^{1} | 100 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 49.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 101.1 | 1.7 | 112.8 |
| 2 | 0.25 | 108 | 100 | 7339.0 | 272.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 80.0 | 1.1 | 98.2 | 1.3 | 142.0 | 1.9 | 331.9 | 4.5 |
| 3 | 2.5 | 108 | 100 | 7387.6 | 307.8 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.9 | 1.3 | 139.9 | 1.9 | 114.0 | 1.5 | 370.0 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 25 | 107^{1} | 100 | 7424.4 | 285.6 | 3.8 | 39.6 | 0.5 | 136.9 | 1.8 | 91.3 | 1.2 | 138.7 | 1.9 | 359.8 | 4.8 |
Agrmt = agreement with expected result, Conc = concentration, CV = coefficient of variation, RLU = relative light unit, SD = standard deviation
Notes: The RLU value reported by the software is the total measured RLU divided by 1000 with the digits after the decimal point truncated. Variability from some factors may be numerically negative. In these cases, SD and CV are shown as 0.0.
1 One invalid result was excluded from the analysis.
### Within-Laboratory Precision
Within lab repeatability was evaluated using a 6-member precision panel. The negative panel member consisted of swab transport medium (STM) only and the positive panel members were created by spiking STM with concentrations of CT organisms ranging from 0.25 to 2,500 IFU/mL. Testing was performed by three operators using three separate Panther instruments. Two reagent lots were used on each instrument, at two runs per day, with three replicates, over 12 days. The percent agreement with the remaining panels to the expected results was 100%, with the lower-bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval 97.4% for each panel member.
K230451 - Page 7 of 12
{7}
Table 2. With-in Laboratory Precision, Percent Agreement, 95% Confidence Interval
| Panel | CT concentration | # Positive/Tested | % Positive | % Agreement | 95% Confidence Interval | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | Lower | Upper |
| 1 | 0 | 0/144 | 0 | 100 | 97.4 | 100 |
| 2 | 0.25 IFU/mL or 0.5 fg rRNA/assay | 144/144 | 100 | 100 | 97.4 | 100 |
| 3 | 2.5 IFU/mL or 5 fg rRNA/assay | 144/144 | 100 | 100 | 97.4 | 100 |
| 4 | 25 IFU/mL or 50 fg rRNA/assay | 144/144 | 100 | 100 | 97.4 | 100 |
| 5 | 250 IFU/mL or 500 fg rRNA/assay | 144/144 | 100 | 100 | 97.4 | 100 |
| 6 | 2,500 IFU/mL or 5,000 fg rRNA/assay | 144/144 | 100 | 100 | 97.4 | 100 |
Table 3. Panther System Aptima CT Assay Precision Data
| Panel | N | Mean RLU (x1000) | % Agrmt | Between-Instrument | | Between-Lot | | Between-Run | | Within-Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | SD (x1000) | CV (%) | SD (x1000) | CV (%) | SD (x1000) | CV (%) | SD (x1000) | CV (%) | SD (x1000) | CV (%) |
| 1 | 144 | 2 | 100 | 0.3 | 18.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 28.9 | 2.0 | 110.0 | 2.1 | 115.3 |
| 2 | 144 | 7670 | 100 | 348.2 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 430.3 | 5.6 | 153.1 | 2.0 | 574.3 | 7.5 |
| 3 | 144 | 7638 | 100 | 376.2 | 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 436.4 | 5.7 | 124.8 | 1.6 | 589.5 | 7.7 |
| 4 | 144 | 7657 | 100 | 370.2 | 4.8 | 98.8 | 1.3 | 430.2 | 5.6 | 125.1 | 1.6 | 589.5 | 7.7 |
| 5 | 144 | 7661 | 100 | 391.0 | 5.1 | 121.0 | 1.6 | 441.4 | 5.8 | 131.3 | 1.7 | 616.1 | 8.0 |
| 6 | 144 | 7598 | 100 | 391.8 | 5.2 | 128.3 | 1.7 | 450.2 | 5.9 | 112.3 | 1.5 | 620.7 | 8.2 |
Agrmt = agreement, CV = coefficient of variation, RLU = relative light unit, SD = standard deviation
2. Linearity:
Not applicable.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Please refer to K063451 for Analytical Specificity/Interference study.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable.
This is a qualitative assay with a binary output (positive/negative).
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Please refer to the decision summary of K063451 for stability study data.
6. Detection Limit:
Initially panels were prepared by spiking CT organisms into pools of urine, vaginal swab matrix and STM at rRNA equivalents of 0.25 IFU/mL and 2.5 IFU/mL. Panels were tested
K230451 - Page 8 of 12
{8}
on three Panther systems using two lots of reagents in replicates of 60 per panel member. The analytical sensitivity claim for the Aptima CT assay is 2.5 IFU/mL. The limit of detection (LoD) for the Aptima CT assay was further confirmed by testing two quantified strains (serovars G and E) of CT spiked into negative pools of vaginal matrix Each serovar was detected with greater than 95% positivity at less than 2.5 IFU/mL (95% detection at 0.00267 IFU/mL for serovar E and 0.00441 IFU/mL for serovar G). The analytical sensitivity of the Aptima CT assay was evaluated for 15 serovars on the DTS system, including serovars E and G, the two serovars giving a similar result on the Panther System.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Assay test results are automatically interpreted by the Aptima assay software. A test results may be negative, equivocal, positive, or invalid as determined by the total RLU in the detection step as shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Test Interpretation
| Test Interpretation | Total RLU (x1000) |
| --- | --- |
| Negative | 0* < 50 |
| Equivocal | 50 to < 100 |
| Low RLU Positive¹ | 100 to < 5,000 |
| Positive | 5,000 to < 12,000 |
| Invalid | 0* or > 12,000 |
*A zero (0 x 1000) RLU result on the run report represents a value between zero and 999 RLU. RLU values less than 690 on the Panther System will be reported as invalid.
¹ In the low positive range, data suggest positive results should be interpreted carefully, with the understanding that the likelihood of a false positive may be higher than a true positive.
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
Not applicable.
9. Carry-Over:
Hologic performed a carryover study using high-target sample dilutions of C. trachomatis rRNA in STM for a final concentration of 5×10⁵ fg rRNA/reaction (rRNA equivalent of 2.5×10⁵ IFU/mL). Each run consisted of at least 20% high positive CT samples interspersed with negative samples. Carryover was assessed over five runs on each of six Panther instruments, with a total of 5878 negative samples and 1560 CT high target samples. Eleven false positive results were produced, giving an overall carryover rate of 0.19% with a 95% confidence interval of 0.10% to 0.33%.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See Clinical Studies section below.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
K230451 - Page 9 of 12
{9}
# C Clinical Studies:
Aptima CT assay performance was evaluated in a prospective clinical study, using patient-collected first catch male and female urine specimens, and patient-collected vaginal swab specimens. Specimens were collected from 4413 male and female subjects in a multicenter study. Participants were sexually active individuals at least 14 years of age, attending one of 11 participating geographically diverse clinical collection sites, with or without symptoms of an STI infection.
Up to five specimens were collected from each female subject (four patient-collected vaginal swabs, one first-catch urine), and one first catch urine specimen was collected from each male subject. All specimens were collected by the subject at the clinical sites.
Three clinical testing sites performed Aptima CT assay testing. All comparator testing was completed at a single central laboratory. The clinical performance of the Aptima CT assay with vaginal swabs and male urine was evaluated using a Patient Infected Status (PIS) algorithm, and female urine was evaluated against Composite Comparator Algorithm (CCA), testing each sample with up to three FDA-cleared NAATs for detection of CT. Specimens were categorized as "infected" (PIS) for vaginal swabs and male urine and as "positive" (CCA) for female urine. CT PIS for PVS samples was determined based on the combined PVS and urine result with two different FDA-cleared NAATs. One or more positive result obtained with each assay designates the PIS as "infected". CT PIS for male urine and CT CCA for female urine were determined by testing each sample with up to three FDA-cleared NAATs. Specimens were categorized as PIS "infected" for male urine and as CCA "positive" for female urine if a positive result occurred in at least two of the comparator NAAT results, and as "not infected"/"negative" if at least two of the comparator results were negative; the third (tie-breaker) NAAT was only required if the first two NAAT results were discordant.
Overall, 4247 subjects were included in the clinical performance evaluation. Ages ranged from 14-84 years of age, with the average age range of 34.5 years. Female subjects comprised 53.2% of the subject population, 98.7% of whom were not pregnant. Of the 4247 subjects, 2283 were women and 1964 were men. Symptoms were reported in 1939 subjects (45.7%). Samples that originally met the inclusion criteria were excluded if deemed unsuitable or non-evaluable for testing based on the respective sample collection package insert.
Ninety-seven (97) female urine specimens were excluded from analysis, including 55 from a single site. Of these 97 excluded specimens, 54 were excluded because the PIS could not be determined, and the remaining were due to a sample handling deviation. Of the specimens collected, 6592 were processed in valid Aptima CT assay runs. Of these, 213 samples generated invalid results upon initial testing (invalid rate of 3.2%, 95% CI: 2.8%-3.7%); after retesting, 31 (0.5%) samples remained invalid.
A total of 6415 specimens from the 4247 evaluable subjects were included in the analyses comparing Aptima CT assay results to the PIS or CCA interpretation: 2265 patient-collected vaginal swabs, 2186 female urine specimens, and 1964 male urine specimens.
Performance characteristics of the Aptima CT assay are shown below in Tables 5 and 6.
K230451 - Page 10 of 12
{10}
Table 5. Clinical Performance of the Aptima CT Assay on the Panther System Compared to PIS, by Symptom Status
| Specimen Type | Symptom Status | n | TP | FP¹ | TN | FN² | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Specificity % (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PVS | Asymptomatic | 1163 | 87 | 4^{a} | 1069 | 3^{e} | 96.7 (90.7, 98.9) | 99.6 (99.0, 99.9) |
| | Symptomatic | 1102 | 89 | 6^{b} | 1001 | 6^{f} | 93.7 (86.9, 97.1) | 99.4 (98.7, 99.7) |
| | All | 2265 | 176 | 10 | 2070 | 9 | 95.1 (91.0, 97.4) | 99.5 (99.1, 99.7) |
| MU | Asymptomatic | 1136 | 56 | 1^{c} | 1078 | 1^{g} | 98.2 (90.7, 99.7) | 99.9 (99.5, 100) |
| | Symptomatic | 828 | 85 | 4^{d} | 738 | 1^{h} | 98.8 (93.7, 99.8) | 99.5 (98.6, 99.8) |
| | All | 1964 | 141 | 5 | 1816 | 2 | 98.6 (95.0, 99.6) | 99.7 (99.4, 99.9) |
PVS = patient-collected vaginal swab, TP = true positive, FP = false positive, TN = true negative, FN = false negative, MU = male urine
¹ Specimens were retested by an alternative CT NAAT assay with the following results (# positive results / # samples tested): a1/4, b1/6, c0/1, d0/4
² Specimens were retested by an alternative CT NAAT assay with the following results (# negative results / # samples tested): a1/3, f1/6, g0/1, h1/1
The CT specimen specific positive and negative percent agreements (PPA and NPA) between the Aptima CT assay and up to three FDA-cleared NAATs with female urine specimen are shown below in Table 6.
Table 6. CT Specimen Specific Agreement for Female Urine, by Symptom Status
| Specimen Type | Symptom Status | n | CCA+ ACT+ | CCA- ACT+¹ | CCA- ACT- | CCA+ ACT-² | PPA% (95% CI) | NPA% (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FU | Asymptomatic | 1136 | 77 | 2^{a} | 1055 | 2^{c} | 97.5 (91.2, 99.3) | 99.8 (99.3, 99.9) |
| | Symptomatic | 1050 | 74 | 7^{b} | 968 | 1^{d} | 98.7 (92.8, 99.8) | 99.3 (98.5, 99.7) |
| | All | 2186 | 151 | 9 | 2023 | 3 | 98.1 (94.4, 99.3) | 99.6 (99.2, 99.8) |
FU = female urine, CCA = composite comparator algorithm, ACT = Aptima CT assay, PPA = positive percent agreement, NPA = negative percent agreement, CI = confidence interval
¹ Specimens were retested by an alternative CT NAAT assay with the following results (# positive results / # samples tested): a0/2, b2/7
² Specimens were retested by an alternative CT NAAT assay with the following results (# negative results / # samples tested): c2/2, d1/1
The sensitivity of the Aptima CT assay on the Panther system in female urine specimens was also assessed against vaginal swabs tested on three NAATs. The data showed that the Aptima CT assay performance female urine specimens is 9.0% lower when compared to vaginal swab tested on three NAATs.
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
For evaluable specimens, the observed positivity rates from testing with Aptima CT assay were 7.3% (160/2186) for female urine specimens, 8.2% (186/2265) for patient-collected vaginal swab specimens, and 7.4% (146/1964) for male urine specimens.
K230451 - Page 11 of 12
{11}
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is acceptable and supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K230451 - Page 12 of 12
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.