K222791 · Lineus Medical, LLC · QOI · Oct 16, 2022 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K222791
Device Name
SafeBreak Vascular
Applicant
Lineus Medical, LLC
Product Code
QOI · General Hospital
Decision Date
Oct 16, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5220
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to separate when excessive tension is exerted across a peripheral IV administration set. When SafeBreak® Vascular separates, fluid flow is stopped from the infusion pump and blood flow is stopped from the patient's IV catheter. SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to aid in reduction of peripheral IV mechanical complications requiring IV replacement. SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to be used on peripheral IV catheters in adults and adolescent populations eighteen (18) years of age and older receiving intermittent or continuous infusions with an electronic pump.
Device Story
SafeBreak Vascular is an in-line mechanical device placed between a peripheral IV catheter and an administration set. It functions as a force-activated breakaway connector. When excessive tension is applied to the IV line, the device separates into two segments; internal valves automatically close on both ends to stop fluid flow from the pump and blood flow from the patient. Used in hospital settings, it prevents catheter dislodgement and associated mechanical complications. The device is single-use and sterile. It requires no active power or electronic integration; it operates purely via mechanical force thresholds. By preventing accidental catheter removal, it reduces the need for IV site replacement, thereby minimizing patient discomfort and potential infection risks associated with repeated cannulation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical separation force testing was conducted to validate the safety and effectiveness of the expanded pull force range (1-5 lbf). No clinical data was required or provided.
Technological Characteristics
In-line mechanical breakaway connector. Materials: Makrolon, Polycarbonate, Saint-Gobain, INEOS ABS Lustran, Silicone. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide. Single-use. Mechanical valve-based flow cessation upon separation. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults and adolescents (≥18 years) with peripheral IV catheters receiving intermittent or continuous infusions via electronic pump to reduce mechanical complications requiring IV replacement.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravenous catheter force-activated separation device is placed in-line with an intravenous (IV) catheter and an intravascular administration set, including any administration set accessories. It separates into two parts when a specified force is applied. The device is intended to reduce the risk of IV catheter failure(s) requiring IV catheter replacement.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, intravenous catheter force-activated separation device is subject to the following special controls:
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Performance data must be provided to demonstrate clinically acceptable performance for the intended use of the device.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Separation force testing;
(ii) Validation of anti-reconnect features;
(iii) Air and liquid leakage testing, both before and after separation;
(iv) Luer connection testing;
(v) Flow rate testing;
(vi) Particulate testing; and
(vii) Microbial ingress testing.
(3) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance testing must demonstrate that the device is sterile and non-pyrogenic.
(5) Performance testing must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
(6) Device labeling must include:
(i) Instructions for use; and
(ii) A discussion of catheter dressings intended to be used with the device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains two logos. On the left is the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. On the right is the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA logo has the letters FDA in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, with the word "ADMINISTRATION" underneath.
March 16, 2023
Lineus Medical, LLC % Dawn Norman Partner MRC Global, LLC 9085 E Mineral Circle, Suite 110 Centennial, Colorado 80112
Re: K222791
Trade/Device Name: SafeBreak Vascular Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5220 Regulation Name: Intravenous catheter force-activated separation device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QOI
Dear Dawn Norman:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending this letter to notify you of an administrative change related to your previous substantial equivalence (SE) determination letter dated October 16, 2022. Specifically, FDA is updating this SE Letter for a correction to the 510(k) Summary as an administrative correction.
Please note that the 510(k) submission was not re-reviewed. For questions regarding this letter please contact Dr. David Wolloscheck, OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices, 301-796-1480, David.wolloscheck@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
David Walloschek
David Wolloscheck, Ph.D. Acting Assistant Director DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and General Hospital Devices, and Human Factors OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image contains two logos. On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services USA logo. On the right is the FDA U.S. Food & Drug Administration logo. The FDA logo is in blue.
October 16, 2022
Lineus Medical, LLC % Dawn Norman Partner MRC Global, LLC 9085 E Mineral Circle, Suite 110 Centennial, Colorado 80112
Re: K222791
Trade/Device Name: SafeBreak Vascular Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5220 Regulation Name: Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QOI Dated: September 15, 2022 Received: September 15, 2022
Dear Dawn Norman:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{2}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE(@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Payal Patel
Payal Patel Assistant Director DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and General Hospital Devices. and Human Factors OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222791
Device Name SafeBreak® Vascular
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to separate when is exerted across a peripheral IV administration set. When SafeBreak@ Vascular separates, fluid flow is stopped from the infusion pump and blood flow is stopped from the patient's IV catheter. SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to aid in reduction of peripheral IV mechanical complications requiring IV replacement. SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to be used on peripheral IV catheters in adults and adolescent populations eighteen (18) years of age and older receiving intermittent or continuous infusions with an electronic pump.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <table><tr><td><div> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 201 Subpart D) </div></td><td><div> <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 201 Subpart C) </div></td></tr></table> | <div> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 201 Subpart D) </div> | <div> <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 201 Subpart C) </div> |
| <div> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 201 Subpart D) </div> | <div> <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 201 Subpart C) </div> | |
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary K222791
| Date Prepared: | March 7, 2023 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Company: | Lineus Medical<br>179 North Church Ave, Suite 202<br>Fayetteville, AR 72701 |
| Primary Contact: | Dawn Norman<br>Partner, MRC Global<br>Phone: 618-604-3064<br>Dawn.Norman@askmrcglobal.com |
| Company Contact: | Vance Clement<br>Chief Executive Officer<br>Lineus Medical<br>Phone: 901-351-9270<br>vance@lineusmed.com |
| Trade Name:<br>Common Name: | SafeBreak® Vascular<br>Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation Device |
| Classification:<br>Regulation Number:<br>Panel:<br>Product Code:<br>Primary Predicate: | Class II<br>21 CFR 880.5220<br>General Hospital<br>QOI<br>DEN190043, SafeBreak® Vascular<br>Manufacturer: Lineus Medical |
| Reference Device: | K212064, Orchid SRV™<br>Manufacturer: Linear Health Sciences, LLC |
#### Device Description:
SafeBreak® Vascular is placed in-line with an intravenous catheter and an intravascular administration set, including any administration set accessories. It separates into two parts when a specified force is applied. The device has been shown to reduce the risk of IV catheter failure(s) requiring IV catheter replacement. When SafeBreak® Vascular separates, fluid flow is stopped from the infusion pump and blood flow is stopped from the patient's IV catheter.
SafeBreak® Vascular is provided sterilized by Ethylene Oxide. The product is single use only and is not designed for reprocessing or re-sterilization by the user.
The purpose of this special 510(k) is to expand the separation force tolerance of SafeBreak® Vascular to 1-5 lbf.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use:
SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to separate when excessive tension is exerted across a peripheral IV administration set. When SafeBreak® Vascular separates, fluid flow is stopped from the infusion pump and blood flow is stopped from the patient's IV catheter. SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to aid in reduction of peripheral IV mechanical complications requiring IV replacement. SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to be used on peripheral IV catheters in adults and adolescent populations eighteen (18) years of age and older receiving intermittent or continuous infusions with an electronic pump.
#### Substantial Equivalence:
The subject SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to separate when excessive tension is exerted across a peripheral IV administration set. The separation force tolerance of SafeBreak® Vascular is being expanded to 1-5 lbf. The subject SafeBreak® Vascular is intended to aid in reduction in peripheral IV mechanical complications requiring IV replacement. The subject SafeBreak® Vascular has the same intended use, same or similar materials, same or similar technological characteristics, the same operating principle, as the predicate and reference devices, respectively.
The safety and effectiveness of the subject device has been verified and validated and are all are substantially equivalent. Thus, it can be concluded that the subject SafeBreak® Vascular does not raise different questions about safety and effectiveness.
| | K222791 | DEN190043 | Assessment of Differences |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| | Subject | Predicate | |
| General Device Characteristics | | | |
| Indications for<br>Use | SafeBreak® Vascular is intended<br>to aid in reduction of peripheral<br>IV mechanical complications<br>requiring IV replacement.<br>SafeBreak® Vascular is intended<br>to be used on peripheral IV<br>catheters in adults and<br>adolescent populations eighteen<br>(18) years of age and older<br>receiving intermittent or<br>continuous infusions with an<br>electronic pump. | SafeBreak® Vascular is<br>intended to aid in reduction of<br>peripheral IV mechanical<br>complications requiring IV<br>replacement.<br>SafeBreak® Vascular is<br>intended to be used on<br>peripheral IV catheters in<br>adults and adolescent<br>populations eighteen<br>(18) years of age and older<br>receiving intermittent or<br>continuous infusions with an<br>electronic pump. | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Materials | • Makrolon<br>• Polycarbonate<br>• Saint-Gobain<br>• INEOS ABS Lustran<br>• Silicone | • Makrolon<br>• Polycarbonate<br>• Saint-Gobain<br>• INEOS ABS Lustran<br>• Silicone | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
## Device Comparison
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | K222791 | DEN190043 | Assessment of Differences |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Subject | Predicate | |
| Separation force | 1-5 lbf | $4 \pm 1$ lbf | Substantially equivalent.<br>Both the predicate and<br>reference devices have<br>demonstrated the safety<br>and effectiveness of<br>separation forces. The<br>change in tolerance of the<br>subject device separation<br>force does not raise any<br>different questions of safety<br>or effectiveness. |
| Environment of<br>Use | Hospital | Hospital | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Principle of<br>Operation | The subject SafeBreak Vascular<br>connects to the needleless<br>connector found in the existing<br>IV extension set and to the<br>existing IV administration set via<br>luer connectors. Upon<br>installation of the SafeBreak<br>Vascular, infusion can occur.<br>Upon tension the SafeBreak<br>Vascular separates and the valve<br>on each end of the device closes,<br>stopping flow. | The subject SafeBreak Vascular<br>connects to the needleless<br>connector found in the existing<br>IV extension set and to the<br>existing IV administration set<br>via luer connectors. Upon<br>installation of the SafeBreak<br>Vascular, infusion can occur.<br>Upon tension the SafeBreak<br>Vascular separates and the<br>valve on each end of the<br>device closes, stopping flow. | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Vascular Access<br>Type | Peripheral intravenous catheter | Peripheral intravenous<br>catheter | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| For Use with<br>Electronic<br>Pump | Yes | Yes | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Continuous and<br>Intermittent<br>Infusion | Yes | Yes | Identical; Substantially<br>Equivalent |
## Performance Testing:
Mechanical testing (i.e., Separation Force Testing) of the SafeBreak® Vascular supports the safety and effectiveness of the expansion of the pull force range in the subject device. The pull force range specification was supported by the reference device.
## Conclusion:
The subject SafeBreak® Vascular has similar intended use, and identical materials, technological characteristics, and operating principle compared to the predicate device. In addition, performance testing and engineering analysis support the expansion of the separation force specification, compared to the reference device. The difference in technology does not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Therefore, it can be concluded that the subject device is as safe, as effective, and performs at least as safely and effectively as the predicate and reference device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.