K222773 · Anhui Tiankang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · PIF · Aug 17, 2023 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K222773
Device Name
Feeding Tube
Applicant
Anhui Tiankang Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
Product Code
PIF · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Aug 17, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5980
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
This product is intended for use in neonatal and pediatric patients to provide nutrition via nasal or orogastric placement. The Polyurethane Feeding Tube is not intended for use beyond 30 days. The PVC Feeding Tube is not intended for use beyond 24 hours.
Device Story
Feeding tube consists of single-lumen catheter (polyurethane or PVC) with enteral-only connector hub and tethered closure plug; includes radiopaque barium sulfate stripe for X-ray visualization; features side holes for flow/aspiration. Used in clinical settings for neonatal and pediatric patients; operated by trained personnel. Device delivers nutrition via nasal or orogastric route. Output is enteral access for nutrition delivery; assists clinicians in managing patient nutritional intake. Benefits include safe, temporary enteral feeding access.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only, including biocompatibility (ISO 10993), sterilization validation (ISO 11135), shelf-life/packaging integrity (ASTM F1980, F88, F1929, F1886), and mechanical performance (ISO 80369-3, ISO 80369-20, ISO 20695).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: TPU/PVC catheter, TPU/ABS hub, PVC tethered bolt. Radiopaque barium sulfate stripe. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (SAL 10^-6). Connectivity: ISO 80369-3 compliant enteral connectors. Dimensions: 4-12 French sizes; 40-109cm lengths. Standards: ISO 10993-1, ISO 20695:2020, ISO 80369-3/20.
Indications for Use
Indicated for neonatal and pediatric patients requiring enteral nutrition via nasal or orogastric placement. Polyurethane tubes limited to 30 days; PVC tubes limited to 24 hours.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gastrointestinal tube and accessories is a device that consists of flexible or semi-rigid tubing used for instilling fluids into, withdrawing fluids from, splinting, or suppressing bleeding of the alimentary tract. This device may incorporate an integral inflatable balloon for retention or hemostasis. This generic type of device includes the hemostatic bag, irrigation and aspiration catheter (gastric, colonic, etc.), rectal catheter, sterile infant gavage set, gastrointestinal string and tubes to locate internal bleeding, double lumen tube for intestinal decompression or intubation, feeding tube, gastroenterostomy tube, Levine tube, nasogastric tube, single lumen tube with mercury weight balloon for intestinal intubation or decompression, and gastro-urological irrigation tray (for gastrological use).
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The barium enema retention catheter and tip with or without a bag that is a gastrointestinal tube and accessory or a gastronomy tube holder accessory is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I (general controls) for the dissolvable nasogastric feed tube guide for the nasogastric tube. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 876.9.
Predicate Devices
Pediatric Nasogastric Feeding Tubes - Single ENFit Port (K210598)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the text on the right. The symbol is a stylized representation of a caduceus, a traditional symbol of medicine, with intertwined snakes and wings. To the right of the symbol is the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue, with "FDA" in a larger font size than the rest of the text.
August 17, 2023
Anhui Tiankang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Zhang Yong Management No. 228, Weiyi Road, Economic Development Zone Tianchang, Anhui 239300 China
Re: K222773
Trade/Device Name: Feeding Tube Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5980 Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal Tube And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PIF Dated: December 5, 2022 Received: December 6, 2022
Dear Zhang Yong:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Sivakami Venkatachalam -S
- for
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity and Transplant Devices OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222773
Device Name Feeding Tube
Indications for Use (Describe)
This product is intended for use in neonatal and pediatric patients to provide nutrition via nasal or orogastric placement. The Polyurethane Feeding Tube is not intended for use beyond 30 days. The PVC Feeding Tube is not intended for use beyond 24h
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
| | |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
__ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) summary
### l Submitter
Device submitter: Anhui Tiankang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. No.228, Weiyi Road, Economic Development Zone, Tianchang City, Anhui, China.
Contact person: Name: Zhang yong Title: Management representative Phone: +86-13705505106 Fax: +86-550-7309158 E-mail: zy@tkmedical.com
#### II Device
Trade Name of Device: Feeding Tube Common Name: Gastrointestinal tubes with enteral specific connectors Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal tube and accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product code: PIF Review Panel: Gastroenterology/Urology
# III Predicate Device 1
| Trade name: | Pediatric Nasogastric Feeding Tubes - Single ENFit Port |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulation name: | Gastrointestinal tube and accessories |
| Classification: | Class II |
| Product Code: | PIF |
| Premarket Notification: | K210598 |
| Manufacturer: | Cair Lgl |
#### IV Device description
The Feeding Tube consists of the following main components: a feeding tube single lumen catheter and an enteral only connector hub with integral tethered connection closure plug. The catheter tubing is made of Polyurethane or PVC. The catheter tubing has an orange or purple radiopaque stripe of barium sulfate embedded in the tubing wall which can be visualized on x-ray, for exact placement of the tip. The single lumen catheter tubing has side holes for better flow and to provide multiple openings for aspiration.
The proposed Feeding Tube is sterilized by Ethylene Oxide Gas to achieve a SAL of 10-6 and supplied sterility maintenance package which could maintain the sterility of the device during the shelf life of three years.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# V Indications for use
This product is intended for use in neonatal and pediatric patients to provide nutrition via nasal or orogastric placement.The Polyurethane Feeding Tube is not intended for use beyond 30 days. The PVC Feeding Tube is not intended for use beyond 24 hours.
# VI Comparison of technological characteristics with the predicate devices
The Feeding Tube are substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate Pediatric Nasogastric Feeding Tubes - Single ENFit Port. Table 6-1 is a detailed comparison of the Feeding Tube to the predicate devices regarding substantial equivalence.
| Device feature | Subject Device | Predicate Device K210598 | Comment |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Product | Feeding Tube | Pediatric Nasogastric Feeding<br>Tubes - Single ENFit Port | |
| Product code | PIF | PIF | Same |
| Regulation<br>Number | 21CFR 876.5980 | 21CFR 876.5980 | Same |
| Indications<br>for<br>use | This product is intended for<br>use in neonatal and pediatric<br>patients to provide nutrition<br>via nasal or orogastric<br>placement. The Polyurethane<br>Feeding Tube is not intended<br>for use beyond 30 days. The<br>PVC Feeding Tube is not<br>intended for use beyond 24<br>hours. | The Pediatric Nasogastric<br>Feeding Tubes - Single ENFit<br>Port are intended for enteral<br>feeding to deliver nutrition,<br>fluids, and medications to the<br>patient from an enteral feeding<br>syringe or feeding set designed<br>with ENFit connectors for<br>enteral applications.<br>This product is single use for no<br>longer than 29 days. | Difference<br>Comment 1 |
| Environment of<br>Use | Unspecified -Prescription<br>Only | Unspecified -Prescription Only | Same |
| Intended Users | Trained personnel well<br>versed in anatomical<br>landmarks, safe technique,<br>and potential complications<br>must perform the procedure.<br>Neonatal and Pediatric<br>patients | Physicians, nurses, and<br>trained clinicians (by facility<br>policy) | Same |
| Patient<br>Population | Neonatal and Pediatric patients | | |
| Single Use | Single Use | Single Use | Same |
| Device feature | Subject Device | Predicate Device K210598 | Comment |
| Connector | Compliant with ISO 80369-3 | Compliant with ISO 80369-3 | Same |
| Radiopacity<br>Verification | Compliant with ISO<br>20695:2020 | Compliant with ISO 20695:2020 | Same |
| Tube Markings | Compliant with ISO<br>20695:2020 | Compliant with ISO 20695:2020 | Same |
| French Sizes | 4,5,6.5,8,10,12 | 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 | Difference<br>Comment 2 |
| Lengths | 40cm, 60cm, 90cm, 105cm,<br>109cm | 40cm, 60cm, 90cm | Difference<br>Comment 3 |
| Liquid Leakage<br>Testing | Feeding tube set shall not<br>show signs of leakage<br>sufficient to form a falling<br>drop of water while being<br>subjected to the internally<br>applied pressure of 50 kPa to<br>60 kPa. | Tested and met updated<br>standard ISO 20695:2020<br>Enteral Feeding Systems -<br>Design and Testing | Same |
| Component and<br>Material | Head Melted Tube: TPU/PVC<br>Hub: TPU/ABS<br>Tethered Bolt: PVC | Tube: Polyurethane<br>Cap: Polypropylene<br>Connector: ABS<br>Tether: thermoplastic<br>polyurethane | Difference<br>Comment 4 |
| Tensile Testing | Tested and met updated<br>standard ISO 20695:2020<br>Enteral Feeding Systems -<br>Design and Testing | Tested and met updated<br>standard ISO 20695:2020<br>Enteral Feeding Systems -<br>Design and Testing | Same |
| Fluid Leakage:<br>Connector | The connector shall not leak<br>applied pressure of between<br>300 kPa and 330 kPa per<br>ISO 80369-3 and ISO<br>80369-20. | Tested per ISO 80369-20 and<br>met the standards of 80369-3<br>for fluid leakage. | Same |
| Stress<br>Cracking:<br>Connector | The connector shall have<br>adequate resistance to stress<br>cracking per ISO 80369-3<br>80369-20. | Tested per ISO 80369-20 and<br>met the standards of ISO<br>80369-3 for stress cracking. | Same |
| Resistance to<br>separation from<br>axial load:<br>connector | The connector shall not<br>separate from the reference<br>connector applied axial force<br>per ISO 80369-3 and ISO<br>80369-20. | Tested per ISO 80369- 20 and<br>met the standards of ISO<br>80369-3 for resistance to<br>separation from axial load. | Same |
| Device feature | Subject Device | Predicate Device K210598 | Comment |
| Resistance to<br>separation from<br>unscrewing:<br>connector | The connector shall separate<br>from the reference connector<br>applied unscrewing torque<br>less than 0.26 N.m per ISO<br>80369-3 and ISO 80369-20. | Tested per ISO 80369-20 and<br>met the standards of ISO<br>80369-3 for separation from<br>unscrewing. | Same |
| Resistance to<br>overriding:<br>connector | The connector shall not<br>override the threads or lugs<br>of the reference connector<br>applied torque of between<br>0.15 N.m to 0.17 N.m per<br>ISO 80369-3 and ISO<br>80369-20. | Tested per ISO 80369-20 and<br>met the standards of ISO<br>80369-3 for resistance to<br>overriding. | Same |
| Connector | The connector shall be<br>compatible with ISO 80369-3<br>reference connectors. | Evaluated per ISO 80369-3 for<br>ENFit dimensional verification | Same |
| Connector | Non- ENFit Connector | None | Difference<br>Comment 5 |
| Biocompatibility | Compliant with Use of<br>International Standard ISO<br>10993-1, “Biological<br>evaluation of medical devices<br>– Part 1: Evaluation and<br>testing within a risk<br>management process” | Compliant with Use of<br>International Standard ISO<br>10993-1, “Biological evaluation<br>of medical devices – Part 1:<br>Evaluation and testing within a<br>risk management process” | Same |
| Sterility<br>Condition | Sterile | Sterile | Same |
| Sterile Method | EO Sterilized | EO Sterilized | Same |
#### Table 6-1 Substantial equivalence discussion for Feeding Tube
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Difference comment 1
The difference between subject device and predicate device is only in textual expressions, and the actual indications for use are not different, which will not affect the safety and performance of the device.
# Difference comment 2
The french sizes of predicate device are covered by subject device, so this difference will not affect the safety and performance of the device
Difference comment 3
{7}------------------------------------------------
The lengths of 105cm and 109cm of the predicate device are not covered by the predicate device. The operator will select the corresponding length of the device according to the clinical needs. At the same time, the device has passed the performance test, so the difference will not affect the safety and performance of the device.
#### Difference comment 4
subject device is different from predicate device in material, the biocompatibility test has been performed on subject device according to ISO 10993, the result does not show any adverse effect which can demonstrate the safety of proposed device. Therefore, this difference does not raise new safety and effectiveness issues for the device.
# Difference Comment 5
The predicate device does not contain a Non-ENFit Connector, and since the subject device has been tested by the connector and the results show that it does not present the risks contemplated by ISO 80369-1, this does not affect the safety and effectiveness of the product device
#### VII Performance data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
#### Biocompatibility testing
Biocompatibility of the Feeding Tube was evaluated in accordance with ISO 10993-1:2018 for the body contact category of "Surface medical device-mucosal membrane" with a contact duration of "prolonged ( > 24h to 30d)". The following tests were performed, as recommended:
| In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test | ISO 10993-5: 2009 |
|--------------------------------|--------------------|
| Intracutaneous Reactivity Test | ISO 10993-10: 2010 |
| Skin Sensitization Test | ISO 10993-10: 2010 |
| Acute systemic toxicity | ISO 10993-11:2017 |
| Subacute toxicity | ISO 10993-11:2017 |
| Implantation effects | ISO 10993-6:2017 |
# Sterilization and shelf life testing
The sterilization method has been validated to ISO11135, which has thereby determined the routine control and monitoring parameters.
The testing is performed according to the following standards:
| EO residue | ISO 10993-7:2008 |
|-------------|------------------|
| ECH residue | ISO 10993-7:2008 |
The shelf life of three years is determined based on stability studies which include ageing test according to FDA recognized standard ASTM F1980-16.
Package integrity testing was conducted on the final, packaged, and sterile devices affer
{8}------------------------------------------------
environmental conditioning and simulated transportation. All packaging deemed acceptable for protection of product and sterility maintenance.
The testing is performed according to the following standards:
| Seal strength | ASTM F88/F88M-15 |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Blue Dye Penetration | ASTM F 1929-2015 |
| Seal Integrity (Visual Inspection) | ASTM F 1886/ F 1886M-16 |
### Performance testing
Performance testing is performed according to the following standards:
- ISO 80369-3:2016: Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare △ applications - Part 3: Connectors for enteral applications
- > ISO 80369-20:2015: Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications - Part 20: Common test methods
- A ISO 20695 Enteral feeding systems - Design and testing
# XI Clinical Test Conclusion
No clinical study is included in this submission.
#### X Conclusion
The Feeding Tube is substantially equivalent to its predicate device. The non-clinical testing demonstrates that the device is as safe, as effective and performs as well as the legally marketed device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.