K221104 · Conformis, Inc. · MEH · Aug 4, 2022 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K221104
Device Name
Actera™ hip system
Applicant
Conformis, Inc.
Product Code
MEH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Aug 4, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3353
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Total hip replacement using the Actera™ hip system is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing total hip replacement due to: · A severely painful and/or disabled joint from osteoarthritis, theumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, or congenital hip dysplasia. · Treatment of non-displaced non-unions of the hip, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques. · Revision procedures for failed previous hip surgery (excluding situations where hardware is present). The Actera™ hip system implants are intended for cementless fixation using an anterior, lateral or surgical technique.
Device Story
Actera™ hip system is an uncemented total hip replacement prosthesis; consists of a redesigned femoral stem, femoral head, acetabular cup, liner, and screws. Femoral stem features a triple-tapered design with integrated neck; utilizes press-fit fixation in the intramedullary canal. Components are implanted by orthopedic surgeons in a clinical setting using anterior, lateral, or posterior surgical techniques. System provides structural support and joint articulation to restore hip function; benefits patients by alleviating pain and disability associated with degenerative joint disease or fractures. Output is the physical restoration of the hip joint; healthcare providers use X-ray templates for preoperative sizing and component placement. Device is provided sterile; reusable instruments are used for implantation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluation included proximal and distal stem fatigue testing (ISO 7206-6, ISO 7206-4), range of motion analysis (ISO 21535), impingement analysis, and extensive coating characterization (ASTM F1854, F1147, F1044, F1160, F1978, F1926, F2024). Endotoxin levels were monitored via LAL testing (gel-clot method) to ensure levels ≤ 0.5 EU/mL or 20 EU/device. Results demonstrate the device performs as well as or better than the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Uncemented total hip system. Femoral stem: triple-tapered, hydroxyapatite (HA) coating (ASTM F1185) over commercially pure titanium (CPTi) (ASTM F1580). Femoral heads: CoCr or ceramic (BIOLOX® delta) with 12/14 taper. Acetabular component: shell with vitamin E polyethylene liner and cancellous screws. Fixation: press-fit. Sterilization: provided sterile. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature individuals requiring total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, congenital hip dysplasia, non-displaced non-unions of the hip, femoral neck fractures, or trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, or revision of failed previous hip surgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
Predicate Devices
DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. ACTIS® Duofix Hip Prothesis (K210581)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 4, 2022
Conformis Inc. Mary Kruitwagen Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 600 Technology Park Drive, 4th Floor Billerica, Massachusetts 01821
Re: K221104
Trade/Device Name: Actera™ hip system Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MEH, OOG Dated: May 24, 2022 Received: May 25, 2022
Dear Mary Kruitwagen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Limin Sun, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K221104
Device Name Actera™ hip system
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
Total hip replacement using the Actera™ hip system is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing total hip replacement due to:
· A severely painful and/or disabled joint from osteoarthritis, theumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, or congenital hip dysplasia.
· Treatment of non-displaced non-unions of the hip, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques.
· Revision procedures for failed previous hip surgery (excluding situations where hardware is present).
The Actera™ hip system implants are intended for cementless fixation using an anterior, lateral or surgical technique.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY
| Submitter's Name and Address: | Conformis, Inc.<br>600 Technology Park Drive,<br>Fourth Floor<br>Billerica, MA 01821<br>USA |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Establishment Registration<br>Number(s): | 3009844603 and 3004153240 |
| Date Summary was Prepared: | July 19, 2022 |
| Contact Person: | Mary Kruitwagen<br>Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Contact Information: | Mary.Kruitwagen@conformis.com<br>781-345-9038 |
| Trade/Device Name(s) | Actera™ hip system |
| Common Name: | Total Hip Replacement System |
| Device Class: | Class 2 |
| Regulation Number(s) and<br>Classification Names | 21 CFR 888.3353, Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained<br>Cemented Or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis<br>21 CFR 888.3358, Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained<br>porous-coated uncemented prosthesis |
| Product Codes: | Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal / polymer, non-<br>porous, calcium phosphate (MEH)<br>Hip Prosthesis, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer, +<br>Additive, Porous, Uncemented (OQG) |
| Primary Predicate Device: | K210581 DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. ACTIS® Duofix Hip Prothesis |
| Reference Device: | K202484 Conformis Cordera Hip System |
#### Device Description:
The Actera™ hip system is an uncemented, total hip replacement system comprised of femoral and acetabular components. All implanted components are provided sterile. X-ray templates, acetate or digital, are provided for determining implant sizes and component placement. Non-sterile reusable instruments are provided. The subject Actera™ hip system is comprised of the subject Actera™ femoral
{4}------------------------------------------------
stem and the previously cleared compatible femoral head, Cordera acetabular cup, Cordera cup liner and Cordera screws (predicate K202484).
The subject, Actera™ femoral stem, is a re-designed stem. The stem is a proximally filling, triple-tapered design that is substantially equivalent to the cleared predicate device DEPUY ACTIS® Hip Stem (K210581).
The femoral stem has an integrated neck with neck angle of 132° and neck length that progressively increases with stem size. Each size has two neck options: a standard neck, and a high offset neck that is shifted medially to provide additional femoral offset with the same leg length. The trunnion is a Conformis standard 12/14 taper, possessing a 12.7 mm diameter along with 5° 42′ 30″ angle with an asmachined geometry to form a taper lock with a mating femoral head implant. The trunnion is identical to that of the predicate Conformis Cordera femoral stem. The trunnion is designed to mate with existing standard 12/14 femoral heads. The stem body has a smooth tapered geometry in three planes. The proximal neck surface of the stem is highly polished; its geometry is intended to maximize range of motion. The femoral stems are designed to maximize contact between the stem and cancellous bone of the intramedullary canal and utilize press-fit fixation. The stem body is fully coated with hydroxyatite (HA) coating in conformance to ASTM F1185 on top of a proximal coating of commercially pure titanium (CPTi) conforming to ASTM F1580.
The femoral heads are unchanged from the previously cleared reference device Conformis Cordera Hip system (K202484). The femoral heads are available in either cobalt chromium alloy (CoCr) or ceramic (BIOLOX® delta). The femoral heads are designed to connect to the femoral stem neck. All femoral heads are polished and have a 12/14 taper to match the femoral stem.
The acetabular component is unchanged from the previously cleared reference device Conformis Cordera Hip system (K202484). It consists of a standard size shell in 1mm increments with standard screw hole placement, a mating vitamin E polyethylene liner, and cancellous screws. The acetabular component is designed for uncemented use; initial implant fixation is achieved through press-fit design. The 6.5mm diameter cancellous screws with low profile head fit through the acetabular shell screw holes and are driven using a 3.5mm hex drive recess. The acetabular component has matching circumferential scallops on the shell and liner that rotationally secure the liner in the shell and allow for dialing the liner in a desired orientation.
The purpose of this submission is to seek clearance of the subject Actera™ femoral stem which is substantially equivalent to the cleared predicate device DEPUY ACTIS® Hip Stem (K210581). The subject Actera femoral stem is compatible with the previously cleared femoral head, Cordera acetabular cup and liner, Cordera screws and reusable instruments (class I) as described in the predicate K210581. . This submission also seeks clearance for new class II reusable instruments. New class I 510Kexempt reusable instruments and x-ray templates are also described.
## Indications for Use:
Total hip replacement using the Actera™ hip system is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing total hip replacement due to:
• A severely painful and/or disabled joint from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, or congenital hip dysplasia.
{5}------------------------------------------------
- Treatment of non-displaced non-unions of the hip, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques.
- Revision procedures for failed previous hip surgery (excluding situations where hardware is present).
The Actera™ hip system implants are intended for cementless fixation using an anterior, lateral or posterior surgical technique.
## Indications and Technological Characteristics Comparison:
The indications for use in total hip replacement are similar to the primary predicate. The subject indications for use differ from the primary predicate because the subject system is not indicated for use in hemi-hip replacement. However, the subject device indications for use are almost identical to the reference device total hip replacement system and only differ through modification to include the lateral approach. The subject device incorporates total hip arthroplasty components with materials and designs that are the similar to the DePuy Orthopaedics ACTIS® DuoFix Hip Prothesis, K210581 predicate. The operating principle, fundamental technology, materials, manufacturing methods and sterilization options are the same as the predicate.
## Non-Clinical Performance Evaluation:
Performance testing includes proximal stem fatigue testing (ISO 7206-6), distal stem fatigue testing (ISO 7206-4), range of motion analysis per ISO 21535, impingement analysis, and coating characterization testing (ASTM F1854 stereological porous coating evaluation, ASTM F1147 static tensile testing, ASTM F1044 static shear testing, ASTM F1160 shear and bending fatigue testing, ASTM F1978 Taber abrasion testing, ASTM F1926 dissolution rate testing, ASTM F2024 phase composition testing per X-ray diffraction, and Ca/P ratio characterization testing using XRD analysis or wet chemistry method). Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing using the gel-clot method is employed to monitor the endotoxin levels of the subject and predicate implanted device and ensures they are within the recommended levels of 0.5 EU/mL or 20 EU/device. Verification and validation studies were also conducted. The results of the testing support that the subject device is safe, effective and performs as well as or better than the predicate device. No new issues of safety or efficacy were raised.
## Conclusion:
Based on a comparison of the intended use and technological characteristics of the subject device to predicate, and the results of the confirmatory testing, it is concluded that the proposed Actera™ hip system is considered substantially equivalent.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.