The subject Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem is a sterile, single-use device intended for use in total hip arthroplasty.
Device Story
The Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem is a component of the Restoration Modular Hip System, a modular femoral replacement system. It is a sterile, single-use, straight, conical, fluted distal stem designed for press-fit fixation into a prepared femoral canal. The device is used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings during primary or revision total hip arthroplasty. It features a male locking taper that mates with compatible Restoration Modular Proximal Femoral Bodies and a Locking Bolt. By allowing independent sizing of the proximal body and distal stem, the system enables surgeons to adjust hip biomechanics, including anteversion, height, and offset. The device provides structural stability and fixation for the femoral component, helping to restore joint function and alleviate pain associated with degenerative or traumatic hip conditions. It is labeled as MR Conditional.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was required or provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical laboratory testing, including distal stem fatigue testing (ISO 7206-4), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), shelf-life validation, and MR compatibility testing (ASTM F2052, F2213, F2182, F2119).
Technological Characteristics
Material: Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy (ASTM F136). Design: Straight, conical, fluted stem with male locking taper. Dimensions: 115mm length, 12mm-23mm diameters. Surface treatment: Shot peened and grit blasted. Fixation: Press-fit (cementless). MR Conditional. Sterilization: Sterile, single-use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis, functional deformity, failed previous treatments, or nonunions/fractures of the proximal femur. Used in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty, including cases of severe proximal bone loss. Designed for press-fit fixation in the proximal femur.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
December 21, 2021
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., dba Stryker Orthopaedics Allison Byrne Senior Specialist, Regulatory Affairs 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, New Jersey 07430
Re: K213129
Trade/Device Name: Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZO, LPH, MEH, KWZ, JDI, MAY, MBL Dated: September 23, 2021 Received: September 27, 2021
Dear Allison Byrne:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for
Limin Sun, Ph.D. Acting Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
#### K213129
#### Device Name
Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem
Indications for Use (Describe)
- · Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
· Rheumatoid arthritis;
- · Correction of functional deformity;
- · Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
- · Nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.
- Primary and revision total hip arthroplasty as well as in the presence of severe proximal bone loss. These femoral stems are designed to be press-fit into the proximal femur.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| Sponsor | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430 |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Allison Byrne<br>Senior Specialist, Regulatory Affairs<br>Stryker Orthopaedics<br>Allison.byrne@stryker.com<br>Ph: 201-831-5969 |
| Alternate Contact: | Krutanjali Shah<br>Senior Manager, Regulatory Affairs<br>Stryker Orthopaedics<br>Krutanjali.shah@stryker.com<br>Ph: 201-831-5665 |
| Date Prepared: | September 23rd, 2021 |
| Proprietary Name: | Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem |
| Common Name: | Total Hip Joint Replacement |
| Classification Name: | Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or<br>nonporous uncemented prosthesis (21 CFR § 888.3353)<br>Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated<br>uncemented prosthesis (21 CFR § 888.3358)<br>Hip joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented<br>prosthesis (21 CFR § 888.3310)<br>Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis (21<br>CFR § 888.3350) |
| Product Codes: | LZO - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer,<br>cemented or non-porous, uncemented<br>LPH - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, porous<br>uncemented<br>MEH - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer,<br>non-porous, calcium-phosphate<br>KWZ - prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented,<br>metal/polymer<br>JDI - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented<br>MAY - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer,<br>cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish |
{4}------------------------------------------------
MBL - prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous
#### Legally Marketed Predicate Devices to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed:
- Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem (K013106, K022549, K121308) ●
### Reason for 510(k) Submission:
The purpose of this submission is to introduce a line extension to the Restoration® Modular Hip System, specifically a new straight, conical distal stem.
### Device Description:
The subject Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem is a line extension to the Restoration Modular Hip System. The Restoration Modular Hip System is a modular femoral replacement system comprised of three main components: the Restoration Modular Proximal Femoral Body, the Restoration Modular Distal Stem, and the Locking Bolt. Each of these components feature unique design iterations and are offered in a range of sizes, allowing for independent sizing of the proximal femoral body and the distal stem. The distal stem addresses fixation and stability, and the proximal femoral geometry allows for adjustments to anteversion, height, and offset. The Restoration Modular Hip System is designed to attain fixation and restore hip biomechanics.
The subject device is a sterile, single-use device designed to be press-fit into a prepared femoral canal for either primary or revision total hip arthroplasty and is labeled as MR Conditional. The Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem utilizes a male locking taper for mating with one of the compatible Restoration Modular Proximal Femoral Bodies and Locking Bolt.
#### Intended Use:
The subject Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem is a sterile, single-use device intended for use in total hip arthroplasty.
#### Indications for Use:
- Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular ● necrosis;
- . Rheumatoid arthritis;
- Correction of functional deformity; ●
- Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and
- Nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with . head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.
- . Primary and revision total hip arthroplasty as well as in the presence of severe proximal bone loss. These femoral stems are designed to be press-fit into the proximal femur.
## Summary of Technological Characteristics:
The Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem is a sterile, single-use device that is intended to be press-fit into a prepared proximal femur for cementless fixation in either primary or revision total hip arthroplasty. The predicate device is the straight Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem, herein referred to as the predicate Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem. The predicate
{5}------------------------------------------------
Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem is currently available in 2 lengths, 155mm or 195mm, each available in 15 diameters ranging from 14mm to 28mm (in increments of 1mm). The subject device introduces an additional straight conical distal stem component into the currently marketed Restoration Modular Hip System. The subject device is herein referred to as the Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem and is available in 12 diameters ranging from 12mm to 23mm (in increments of 1mm).
The predicate Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem and the subject Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem are both straight, conical, fluted components with a taper extending the length of the stem, leading to a diametrically larger proximal section and smaller distal section. Both stems are machined from Ti-6A1-4V ELI alloy per ASTM F136 that is shot peened and then grit blasted after machining. They share an identical male locking taper that mates with the currently marketed compatible cone and calcar proximal femoral bodies.
#### Non-Clinical Performance Data:
The following non-clinical laboratory testing and engineering analyses were conducted to determine substantial equivalence:
- Distal Stem Fatigue Testing per ISO 7206-4:2010/AMD 1:2016 ●
- Biocompatibility evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018 ●
- Biocompatibility of the device packaging evaluated per ASTM F2475-20
- Shelf-life validated per the following standards: ●
- ISO 11607-1:2019 O
- o ISO 11607-2:2019
- ASTM F1980-16 O
- Testing performed per the following methods: O
- ASTM F1886/F1886M-16 ■
- ASTM F1929-15
- ASTM F88/88M-15
- l ASTM F2096-11(2019)
- Bacterial endotoxin testing (BET) as specified in ANSI/AAMI ST72:2019 was used for . pyrogenicity testing to achieve an endotoxin limit of < 20EU/Device.
The subject Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem has been submitted as MR Conditional. In alignment with FDA guidance document titled "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment," dated May 20, 2021, evaluations were performed according to the standards listed below:
- Magnetically Induced Displacement Force performed per ASTM F2052-15
- Magnetically Induced Torque performed per ASTM F2213-17 ●
- Heating by RF Fields performed per ASTM F2182-19 ●
- . Image Artifact performed per ASTM F2119-07 (2013)
#### Clinical Testing:
Clinical testing was not required as a basis to support substantial equivalence.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Conclusion:
Based upon an evaluation of intended use, indications for use, technological characteristics, principles of operation, and non-clinical performance data, the subject Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem is substantially equivalent to the predicate Restoration Modular Conical Distal Stem.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.