EMPHASYS Femoral Stems are orthopedic implants used in total or hemi-hip arthroplasty. The device consists of HA-coated femoral stems available in standard/high offsets and collared/collarless configurations. It is designed for use with modular femoral heads (metal, dual mobility, or ceramic) and acetabular components (total hip) or modular unipolar/bipolar heads (hemi-hip). The device is implanted by a surgeon in a clinical setting to replace damaged or diseased hip joint components. By providing a stable, biocompatible femoral component, the device restores joint function, reduces pain, and improves mobility for patients suffering from degenerative or traumatic hip conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical tests were conducted. Substantial equivalence was demonstrated through non-clinical bench testing, including neck and distal stem fatigue (ISO 7206), range of motion (ISO 21535), biocompatibility (ISO 10993), and MRI safety (ASTM F2503).
Technological Characteristics
Forged titanium alloy femoral stems with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. Features include standard/high offsets, collared/collarless configurations, and 130° neck angle. Modular design compatible with various femoral heads and acetabular components. Testing standards: ISO 7206-6 (neck fatigue), ISO 7206-4 (distal stem fatigue), ISO 21535 (range of motion), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), ANSI/AAMI ST 72 (endotoxin), and ASTM F2503/F2213/F2119/F2182 (MRI safety).
Indications for Use
Indicated for total hip replacement in patients with severely painful/disabled joints due to osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head/neck, failed previous hip surgery (reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement, or total hip replacement), or ankylosis. Indicated for partial hip replacement in patients with acute fracture of the femoral head/neck or fracture dislocation of the hip that cannot be reduced/treated with internal fixation, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, non-union of femoral neck fractures, high subcapital/femoral neck fractures in the elderly, degenerative arthritis of the femoral head only, or pathology of the femoral head/neck/proximal femur treatable by hemiarthroplasty.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
Actis DuoFix Hip Prosthesis - Collarless (K210581)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 5, 2021
DePuy Ireland UC % Clare Hill Senior Manager, Regulatory Affairs, CRO Regulatory Affairs DePuy Synthes, IRenc. 700 Orthopaedic Drive Warsaw, Illinois 46582
Re: K211657
Trade/Device Name: EMPHASYS Femoral Stems Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZO, KWL, KWL, KWY, MEH Dated: May 27, 2021 Received: May 28, 2021
Dear Clare Hill:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Limin Sun Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K211657
Device Name EMPHASYS Femoral Stems
Indications for Use (Describe)
#### INDICATIONS
Total hip replacement is indicated in the following conditions:
1. A severely painful and/or disabled joint from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia.
2. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
3. Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.
4. Failed previous hip surgery including joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, surface
replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement.
5. Certain cases of ankylosis.
Partial hip replacement is indicated in the following conditions:
1. Acute fracture of the femoral head or neck that cannot be appropriately reduced and treated fixation.
2. Fracture dislocation of the hip that cannot be appropriately reduced and treated with internal fixation.
- 3. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
- 4. Non-union of femoral neck fractures.
5. Certain high subcapital and femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
6. Degenerative arthritis involving only the femoral head in which the acetabulum does not require replacement.
7. Pathology involving only the femoral head/neck and/or proximal femur that can be adequately treated by hip hemiarthroplasty.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--|
| X Prescription Hos (Dart 21 CED 801 Subnart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CED 801 Subnart C) | |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) SUMMARY
(As required by 21 CFR 807.92 and 21 CFR 807.93)
| Submitter Information | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name | DePuy Ireland UC |
| Address | Loughbeg, Ringaskiddy<br>Co. Cork Munster, IRELAND |
| Phone number | 574-404-8782 |
| Establishment Registration<br>Number | 1818910 |
| Name of contact person | Clare Hill |
| Date prepared | 25 May 2021 |
| Name of device | |
| Trade or proprietary name | EMPHASYS Femoral Stems |
| Common or usual name | Total or Hemi-Hip Arthroplasty Prosthesis |
| Classification name | Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or<br>Non-Porous, Uncemented<br>Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal<br>Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal/Polymer, Cemented Or Uncemented<br>Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-<br>Porous, Calcium Phosphate |
| Class | II |
| Classification panel | 87 Orthopedics |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 888.3353: Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained<br>cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis<br>21 CFR 888.3360: Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or<br>uncemented prosthesis<br>21 CFR 888.3390: Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or<br>uncemented prosthesis |
| Product Code(s) | LZO, KWL, KWY, MEH |
| Legally marketed device(s) to<br>which equivalence is claimed | DePuy Corail AMT Hip Prosthesis (K190344) – Primary predicate<br>Corail AMT Hip Prosthesis (K042992)<br>DePuy Corail AMT Hip Prosthesis (K123991)<br>DePuy Corail AMT Hip Prosthesis (K173960)<br>DePuy Corail AMT Hip Prosthesis (K192946)<br>Summit Hip System (K001991) |
| | Summit Hip System (K170339) |
| | Actis DuoFix Hip Prosthesis - Collarless (K210581) |
| Reason for 510(k) submission | The purpose of this submission is to obtain market clearance for the<br>EMPHASYS Femoral Stems, one component of a system of prostheses used<br>in hip arthroplasty. |
| Device description | The EMPHASYS Femoral Stems include HA-coated femoral stems in<br>standard and high offsets and in collared and collarless configurations.<br>The EMPHASYS Femoral Stems are designed to be used as one component<br>of a system of prostheses in hip arthroplasty. The stems are compatible with a<br>DePuy modular metal, dual mobility, or ceramic femoral head, and either a<br>one-piece or a metal-backed two-piece acetabular component for use in total<br>hip arthroplasty, and with a modular unipolar metallic femoral head or a<br>modular bipolar head construct for hemi-hip arthroplasty. |
| Intended use of the device | Total and Hemi Hip Arthroplasty |
| Indications for use | Total hip replacement is indicated in the following conditions:<br>1. A severely painful and/or disabled joint from osteoarthritis, traumatic<br>arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia.<br>2. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.<br>3. Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.<br>4. Failed previous hip surgery including joint reconstruction, internal<br>fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement<br>arthroplasty, or total hip replacement.<br>5. Certain cases of ankylosis.<br>Partial hip replacement is indicated in the following conditions:<br>1. Acute fracture of the femoral head or neck that cannot be<br>appropriately reduced and treated with internal fixation.<br>2. Fracture dislocation of the hip that cannot be appropriately reduced<br>and treated with internal fixation.<br>3. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.<br>4. Non-union of femoral neck fractures.<br>5. Certain high subcapital and femoral neck fractures in the elderly.<br>6. Degenerative arthritis involving only the femoral head in which the<br>acetabulum does not require replacement.<br>7. Pathology involving only the femoral head/neck and/or proximal<br>femur that can be adequately treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
{5}------------------------------------------------
## SUMMARY OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEVICE COMPARED TO THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The subject EMPHASYS Femoral Stems are similar to the predicate CORALL AMT Hip Prosthesis (K042992, K123960, K190344) in intended use, indications for use, design. The subject and predicate systems are intended for total or hemi hip arthroplasy and have the same indications for use. Both are forged titanium alloy. HA coated stems for uncemented use with a taper. Both devices have the same size tapers, and both are offered in collaress, standard offset and high offset configurations. Both devices are used in a modular hip construct which includes DePuy femoral head and acetabular components. The design of the subject and predicate devices is similar in terms of shape and function the intraosseous geometry of the subject devices has a narrower ML profile in places and is shorter than the predicate stems. The subject devices are offered in a 130° neck angle that is in between the two angles offered by the predicate devices.
#### PERFORMANCE DATA
## SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTS CONDUCTED FOR DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
Testing and engineering analyses were performed on the EMPHASYS Femoral Stems to demonstrate substantial equivalence of safety and efficacy with the predicate device, addressing:
- Neck Fatigue (to ISO 7206-6: 2013) .
- Distal Stem Fatigue (to ISO 7206-4: 2010) .
- Range of Motion (to BS EN ISO 21535: 2009) .
- Taper equivalence
Biocompatibility evaluation was carried out to ISO 10993-1:2018 and testing was carried out to include genotoxicity to ISO 10993-3:2014, cytotoxicity to ISO 10993-5:2009, sensitization to ISO 10993-10:2010, pyrogenicity to ISO 10993-11:2017 and chemical characterization to ISO 10993-18:2020.
The proposed devices also meet the requirement of bacterial endotoxin testing as specified in ANSI/AAMI ST 72:2019.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging safety evaluation testing was performed following ASTM F2503-13, and the tests evaluated the worst-case components and constructs for magnetically induced force (ASTM F2213-17), image artefact (ASTM 2119-07 (reapproved 2013)) and RF heating (ASTM F2182-19). The testing concluded that there are no safety issues related to magnetic field interactions under specific conditions identified in the labelling.
Hydroxyapatie characterization data, as recommended in the FDA Guidance 510(k) Information needed for Hydrosyapatite coated Orthopedic Implants, is provided.
## SUMMARY OF CLINICAL TESTS CONDUCTED FOR DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE AND/OR OF CLINICAL INFORMATION
No clinical tests were conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
### CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM NON-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL DATA
The subject EMPHASYS Femoral Stems are substantially equivalent to the predicate CORAIL AMT Hip Prosthesis.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.