CardiaMend Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix
K210331 · Helios Cardio, Inc. · PSQ · Dec 21, 2021 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K210331
Device Name
CardiaMend Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix
Applicant
Helios Cardio, Inc.
Product Code
PSQ · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Dec 21, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.3470
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix is intended for pericardial reconstruction and repair and for epicardial support and repair.
Device Story
CardiaMend™ is a porous, acellular, single-layer (1 ply) matrix derived from fetal bovine dermis; consists of naturally woven collagen fibers. Used for soft tissue reinforcement, repair, and reconstruction of pericardium and epicardium. Supplied as a dry, sterile rectangular sheet in various sizes; physician trims to size and rehydrates with sterile saline before implantation. Device acts as a scaffold for tissue repair; resorbable; non-crosslinked. Used by surgeons in clinical settings. Provides structural support during healing; promotes cellular infiltration.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing included dimensional verification, tensile strength, elastic modulus, burst strength, suture pullout strength, cellular infiltration, porosity, and collagen denaturation. Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993. GLP ovine study compared CardiaMend™ to CorMatrix Pericardial Patch (K051405); all animals survived with no test article-related abnormalities or adverse events. Viral inactivation, sterilization, and biocompatibility data leveraged from reference device SurgiMend™ (K071807).
Technological Characteristics
Acellular fetal bovine dermis collagen matrix; single-ply; non-chemically crosslinked. Resorbable. Supplied dry, terminally sterilized via ethylene oxide. Dimensions: 4x7 cm to 10x15 cm; thickness 0.40-1.54 mm. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993. Packaging validation per ISO 11607-1/2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring pericardial reconstruction, repair, or epicardial support and repair.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intracardiac patch or pledget made of polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, or polytetrafluoroethylene is a fabric device placed in the heart that is used to repair septal defects, for patch grafting, to repair tissue, and to buttress sutures.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
December 21, 2021
Helios Cardio Inc. % Roshana Ahmed, President Quaras. LLC 2101 Camino Rey Fullerton, California 92833
Re: K210331
Trade/Device Name: CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3470 Regulation Name: Intracardiac Patch Or Pledget Made Of Polypropylene, Polyethylene Terephthalate, Or Polytetrafluoroethylene Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PSO Dated: November 23, 2021 Received: November 24, 2021
Dear Roshana Ahmed:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Rachel Neubrander Assistant Director DHT2B: Division of Circulatory Support, Structural and Vascular Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K210331
Device Name
CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix
### Indications for Use (Describe)
CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix is intended for pericardial reconstruction and repair and for epicardial support and repair.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
#### I. Submitter
Helios Cardio Inc. 11 Dellbrook Road Weston MA 02493 Phone: (617) 818-4008 Fax: N/A
Contact Person: Yiannis Monovoukas, President & CEO Date Prepared: December 17, 2021
#### II. Device
| Device Proprietary Name: | CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Intracardiac Patch |
| Classification Name: | Intracardiac Patch Or Pledget Made Of Polypropylene,<br>Polyethylene Terephthalate, Or Polytetrafluoroethylene |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.3470 |
| Product Code: | PSQ |
| Device Classification: | II |
#### III. Predicate Device
Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following devices:
- CorMatrix® Cor Patch, K181038, CorMatrix Cardiovascular, Inc. ●
- CorMatrix Pericardial Patch (currently marketed as ProxiCor for Pericardial Closure by Aziyo Biologics, Inc.), K051405, CorMatrix Cardiovascular, Inc.
The following devices are cited as reference devices within the submission:
- SurgiMend™ Collagen Matrix for Soft Tissue Reconstruction, K071807, TEI Biosciences Inc.
- Durepair Dura Regeneration Matrix, K041000, Medtronic Neurosurgery ●
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Device Description IV.
CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix is a porous acellular matrix derived from fetal bovine dermis designed to provide soft tissue reinforcement, repair, and reconstruction. The single-layer (1 ply) device is not chemically crosslinked and consists of a naturally woven network of collagen fibers.
The single use device is supplied terminally sterilized via ethylene oxide and is available in a variety of sizes to be trimmed by the physician to meet individual patient needs. The following sizes are provided:
- 4 x 7 cm (thickness 0.40 0.75 mm) ●
- 5 x 6 cm (thickness 0.75 1.54 mm) ●
- 6 x 12 cm (thickness 0.75 = 1.54 mm) .
- 8 x 12 cm (thickness 0.40-0.75 mm) ●
- 8 x 16 cm (thickness 0.75-1.54 mm) ●
- 10 x 15 cm (thickness 0.75 1.54 mm) ●
#### V. Indications for Use
CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix is intended for pericardial reconstruction and repair and for epicardial support and repair.
#### VI. Technological Characteristics
The technological characteristics of CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix are substantially equivalent to the cleared CorMatrix® Pericardial Patch (K051405) and CorMatrix Cor Patch (K181038). A comparison of the devices is provided in the table below.
| | CardiaMend™<br>Pericardial and<br>Epicardial<br>Reconstruction<br>Matrix | CorMatrix® Cor<br>Patch<br>(K181038) | CorMatrix<br>Pericardial Patch<br>(K051405;<br>marketed as<br>ProxiCor for<br>Pericardial<br>Closure) | Analysis |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
| Indications for<br>Use | Pericardial<br>reconstruction and<br>repair, and<br>epicardial support<br>and repair. | The CorMatrix Cor<br>Patch is intended for<br>epicardial tissue<br>support and repair. | The CorMatrix<br>Pericardial Patch is<br>intended for the<br>reconstruction and<br>repair of the<br>pericardium. | Same |
| | CardiaMend™<br>Pericardial and<br>Epicardial<br>Reconstruction<br>Matrix | CorMatrix® Cor<br>Patch<br>(K181038) | CorMatrix<br>Pericardial Patch<br>(K051405;<br>marketed as<br>ProxiCor for<br>Pericardial<br>Closure) | Analysis |
| Reusable or<br>single use | Rx Only, Single-Use | Rx Only, Single-Use | Rx Only, Single-Use | Same |
| Material Type | Collagen,<br>Extracellular Matrix | Collagen,<br>Extracellular Matrix | Collagen, Extracellular<br>Matrix | Same |
| Animal Tissue<br>Source | Fetal bovine dermis | Porcine small<br>intestinal submucosa<br>(SIS) | Porcine small intestinal<br>submucosa (SIS) | Different |
| Chemical<br>Crosslinking | No | No | No | Same |
| Acellular | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Resorbable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Shape | Rectangular sheet | Rectangular sheet | Rectangular sheet | Same |
| Size(s) | ● 4 x 7 cm<br>● 5 x 6 cm<br>● 6 x 12 cm<br>● 8 x 12 cm<br>● 8 x 16 cm<br>● 10 x 15 cm | ● 4 x 7 cm<br>● 7 x 10 cm | ● 7 x 10 cm<br>● 7 x 15 cm | Different |
| Number of<br>Layers | Single-ply | Multi-ply | Multi-ply | Different |
| Thickness | 0.4 - 0.75 mm and<br>0.75 - 1.54 mm | ~0.4 mm | ~0.4 mm * | Different |
| Rehydration | Room temperature<br>sterile saline | Room temperature<br>sterile saline | Room temperature<br>sterile saline | Same |
| Sterilization | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene oxide | Same |
| Storage | Store dry, at room<br>temperature | Store dry, at room<br>temperature | Store dry, at room<br>temperature | Same |
| Biocompatibility | ISO 10993 | ISO 10993 | ISO 10993 | Same |
{5}------------------------------------------------
*as reported in the literature.
{6}------------------------------------------------
As seen in the table above, the primary differences between the subject and predicate device are the animal tissue source, the available product sizes, number of layers, and thickness. These differences do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness, and substantial equivalence to the predicate devices is demonstrated through verification and validation studies.
#### Performance Data VII.
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
- Sterilization validation/re-qualification ●
- · EO/ECH residuals per ISO 10993-7
- Packaging validation and shelf-life per ISO 11607-1 and ISO 11607-2 ●
- Device Characterization Testing
- o Dimensional verification
- Tensile Strength O
- Tensile Stiffness/Elastic Modulus O
- Burst Strength O
- Suture Pullout Strength O
- Cellular Infiltration O
- O Porosity
- o Collagen Denaturation
- Design Validations ●
- o Usability Validation
- GLP Study in an Ovine Model
- The performance and safety of CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial O Reconstruction Matrix was evaluated in an ovine model compared to the predicate device, CorMatrix Pericardial Patch (K051405; marketed as ProxiCor for Pericardial Closure).
- All study objectives were met. The sheep did not exhibit any test article-related o abnormalities throughout the study. At the completion of the study, all animals survived and were evaluated as being in excellent health. There were no adverse events in any of the animals.
In addition, existing viral inactivation, sterilization, and biocompatibility data were leveraged from the reference SurgiMend™ Collagen Matrix for Soft Tissue Reconstruction (K071807) device, as the subject and reference devices are identical in material source, thickness, manufacturing, sterilization processes, and packaging.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## VIII. Conclusion
The subject device design was evaluated through biocompatibility, animal studies, and other performance testing to provide evidence of safe and effective use of CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix. CardiaMend™ Pericardial and Epicardial Reconstruction Matrix is substantially equivalent to the specified predicate devices based on comparisons of device functionality, technological characteristics, and indications for use.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.