Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solutions, 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10%
K210126 · The Ritedose Corporation · CAF · Dec 3, 2021 · Anesthesiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K210126
Device Name
Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solutions, 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10%
Applicant
The Ritedose Corporation
Product Code
CAF · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Dec 3, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 868.5630
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP is used in conjunction with a nebulizer. The contents of these vials are for the induction of sputum production where sputum production is indicated.
Device Story
Device consists of sterile, preservative-free Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution (3%, 3.5%, 7%, 10%) in 4 mL single-use low-density polyethylene (LDPE) vials. Used in hospital, sub-acute care, or home settings. Operated by clinicians or patients. Solution is administered via nebulizer to induce sputum production. Output is the physical induction of sputum for diagnostic or clinical purposes. Benefits include facilitating sputum collection for patient assessment.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evidence includes design verification (identity, assay, pH, sterility, fill weight, vial function), biocompatibility assessment per ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-18, ISO 10993-17, and ISO 10993-12, and material-mediated pyrogenicity testing per USP <151>. All results met predetermined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Sterile, preservative-free Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution (USP). Primary container: single-use low-density polyethylene (LDPE) vials. Manufacturing: Aseptic Blow-Fill-Seal technology. Concentrations: 3%, 3.5%, 7%, 10%. Fill volume: 4 mL. No electronic components, software, or energy sources.
Indications for Use
Indicated for any patient population (adult or child) requiring sputum induction via nebulizer.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nebulizer is a device intended to spray liquids in aerosol form into gases that are delivered directly to the patient for breathing. Heated, ultrasonic, gas, venturi, and refillable nebulizers are included in this generic type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" in a square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in a sans-serif font.
12/3/2021
The Ritedose Corporation Linda Valentine Director of Regulatory Affairs 1 Technology Circle Columbia, South Carolina 29203
Re: K210126
Trade/Device Name: Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solutions, 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10% Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5630 Regulation Name: Nebulizer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: CAF Dated: November 4, 2021 Received: November 5, 2021
Dear Linda Valentine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Brandon Blakely, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT1C: Division of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthesia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) 210126
Device Name
Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10%
Indications for Use (Describe)
Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP is used in conjunction with a nebulizer. The contents of the induction of sputum production where sputum production is indicated.
Concentrations of 3%, 3.5%, 7%, and 10%.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="font-family: Arial;"></span> <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif;"> </span> <span style="font-family: Arial;"> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial;"></span> <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif;"> </span> <span style="font-family: Arial;">Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
## I. SUBMITTER
The Ritedose Corporation 1 Technology Circle Columbia, SC 29203
Phone: (803) 806-3300 (803) 935-4644 Fax:
Contact Person: Linda Valentine, Director of Regulatory Affairs Date Prepared: March 3, 2021
## II. DEVICE
Name of Device: Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP, 3%, 3.5%, 7%, and 10% Common or Usual Name:
- Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP, 3%, 3.5%, 7%, and 10% -
- Saline Solution -
Classification Name: Nebulizer (21 CFR 868.5630) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: CAF
## III.PREDICATE DEVICE
PharmaCaribe Inhaled saline solutions 3%, 3.5%, 6%, 7%, and 10%, K101424
No reference devices were used in this submission.
## IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The proposed device is a sterile, preservative-free Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP, provided in concentrations of 3%, 3.5%, 7%, and 10% with a nominal fill volume of 4 mL and supplied in single-use low density polyethylene (LDPE) vials.
## V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Sodium Chloride Inhalation Solution, USP is used in conjunction with a nebulizer. The contents of these vials are for the induction of sputum production where sputum production is indicated.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
## VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The induction of sputum production is the technological principle for both the proposed and predicate devices when used in conjunction with a nebulizer. The technological characteristics when compared to the predicate device are detailed below.
| | | Predicate Device | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Technological<br>Characteristics Compared to the<br>Predicate Device: | Proposed Device | PharmaCaribe (K101424) | Comparison | |
| Product Name: | Sodium Chloride Inhalation<br>Solution, USP, 3%, 3.5%, 7%,<br>and 10% | PharmaCaribe Inhaled saline<br>solutions 3%, 3.5%, 6%, 7%,<br>and 10%. | The proposed device follows<br>the established name<br>provided in the USP<br>Monograph; whereas, the<br>predicate device uses a<br>proprietary name. | |
| Design: | Sterile, preservative-free<br>Sodium Chloride Inhalation<br>Solutions supplied in single-<br>use vials. | Sterile, preservative-free<br>Sodium Chloride Inhalation<br>Solutions supplied in single-<br>use vials. | Same | |
| Material/Chemical Composition: | Water for Injection, USP<br>Sodium Chloride, USP | Sterile Water for Injection,<br>USP<br>Sodium Chloride, USP | Sterile Water for Injection is<br>used for the PharmaCaribe<br>device. No impact as the final<br>solution is sterilized via<br>filtration. | |
| Concentrations | 3%, 3.5%, 7%, and 10% | 3%, 3.5%, 6%, 7%, and 10% | The concentrations of the<br>proposed device are within<br>the range of the predicate. | |
| Technological<br>Characteristics Compared to the<br>Predicate Device: | Proposed Device | Predicate Device<br>PharmaCaribe (K101424) | Comparison | |
| Indications for Use: | Sodium Chloride Inhalation<br>Solution, USP is used in<br>conjunction with a nebulizer.<br>The contents of these vials are<br>for the induction of sputum<br>production where sputum<br>production is<br>indicated. | PharmaCaribe inhaled saline<br>solutions are used in<br>conjunction with a nebulizer.<br>The contents of these vials are<br>for the induction of sputum<br>production where sputum<br>production is indicated. | The proposed device uses<br>the established name and<br>uses "is" instead of "are." | |
| | Concentrations of 3%, 3.5%,<br>7%, and 10% | Concentrations of 3%, 3.5%,<br>6%, 7%, and 10% | | |
| Prescription: | Yes | Yes | Same | |
| Environment of Use: | Hospital, sub-acute care or<br>home | Hospital, sub-acute care or<br>home | Same | |
| Patient Population: | Any patient population where<br>sputum production is<br>indicated. | Any patient population where<br>sputum production is<br>indicated. | Same | |
| Used with a Nebulizer: | Yes | Yes | Same | |
| Contraindications: | None | None | Same | |
| Vial Labeling: | Embossed with identifying<br>product text, lot number, and<br>expiration date | Embossed with identifying<br>product text, lot number, and<br>expiration date | Same | |
| Shelf Carton Labeling: | Includes instructions for use<br>and UDI requirements. | Includes instructions for use<br>and UDI requirements. | Same | |
| Technological<br>Characteristics Compared to the<br>Predicate Device: | Proposed Device | Predicate Device<br>PharmaCaribe (K101424) | Comparison | |
| Sterility: | Contents are sterile | Contents are sterile | Same | |
| Primary Container Closure<br>System: | LDPE vial with twist-off cap | LDPE vial with twist-off cap | Same | |
| Fill Volume: | 4 mL | 4 mL | Same | |
| Compliance with Compendia: | United States Pharmacopeia | United States Pharmacopeia | Same | |
| Manufacturing Process: | Aseptic Processing using<br>Blow-Fill-Seal Technology | Aseptic Processing using<br>Blow-Fill-Seal Technology | Same | |
| Shelf Life: | 24 months | unknown | | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
{6}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
## Summary
The proposed device is identical in both indications for use and technological characteristics when compared to the predicate device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
#### VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
- -Design Verification: Design verification testing was conducted to ensure the device met the predetermined acceptance criteria for the following tests: Identity, Assay, pH, endotoxin, sterility, fill weight, vial attributes, and vial function (i.e., vial separation, cap removal, occluded orifice, etc.). All results met the predetermined acceptance criteria.
- Biocompatibility: A biocompatibility risk assessment was performed in accordance with the FDA Guidance Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process." Chemical characterization was performed on the final LDPE containers per ISO 10993-18. "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 18: Chemical characterization of medical device materials within a risk management process" and assessed extractable constituents based on the principles of ISO 10993-17:2002, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 17: Establishment of allowable limits for leachable substances." The extraction solvent was selected in alignment with the recommendations of ISO 10993-12:2021, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials." A toxicological risk assessment was performed on the chemicals observed during the chemical characterization study. The organic chemicals extracted above the threshold of 1.5 µg/day, are considered to have a low potential for toxicity (low potency) and the calculated margin of safety is acceptable. Therefore, the chemicals observed do not pose significant systemic, genotoxic, or carcinogenic toxicological safety risks to all patients (adult and child). Additionally, material-mediated pyrogenicity testing was performed in accordance with USP <151> and met the requirements for the absence of material-mediated pyrogens under the conditions employed.
## Summary
The safety and effectiveness of the proposed device is demonstrated to be equivalent to the predicate device based on the results of the design verification testing, biocompatibility risk assessment, and material-mediated pyrogenicity testing.
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary
## VIII. CONCLUSION
Based on a comparison of composition, technological characteristics, intended use, design verification testing, biocompatibility risk assessment, and material-mediated pyrogenicity testing, it is concluded that the proposed device is as safe and effective and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.