K203612 · Immucor, Inc. · LJO · Mar 22, 2021 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K203612
Device Name
Capture-CMV
Applicant
Immucor, Inc.
Product Code
LJO · Microbiology
Decision Date
Mar 22, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3175
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Capture-CMV® is an in vitro qualitative solid phase red cell adherence test system for the detection of antibodies (IgG plus IgM) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) in human serum or plasma. Capture-CMV® is intended to be used in screening of patients for serological evidence of previous infection by CMV using manual and semiautomated methods, NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO®.
Device Story
Capture-CMV is a solid-phase red cell adherence assay for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies to CMV in human serum or plasma. The device uses microtitration wells coated with inactivated CMV antigen. Patient samples are incubated in these wells; specific antibodies bind to the immobilized viral proteins. After washing, anti-IgG/anti-IgM-coated indicator red cells are added. Centrifugation forces indicator cells toward the well bottom. In positive samples, antibody bridges between the viral antigen and indicator cells impede migration, causing cells to adhere across the well surface. In negative samples, cells pellet at the bottom. The assay is performed on the Galileo NEO or NEO Iris instruments, which are microprocessor-controlled systems that automate test processing, result interpretation, and data management. The system is used in clinical laboratories to screen patients for prior CMV infection, helping identify potential risks for immunocompromised individuals or those requiring blood/organ transplants. Healthcare providers use the qualitative results to inform clinical decisions regarding donor selection and patient management.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical studies were performed. Evidence relies on data from K183571 comparing the assay on NEO Iris and Galileo NEO. Method comparison across four sites (N=501 patient specimens) showed 100% sensitivity (98.7% LCI) and 97.8% specificity (95.0% LCI). Reproducibility studies across three sites using 10 coded samples (5 positive, 5 negative) demonstrated 99.8% overall concordance (99.2% LCI). Cross-reactivity testing against various viral and autoimmune markers (EBV, HSV, Hepatitis A, ANA, RF, etc.) showed minimal interference.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase red cell adherence assay. Components: CMV-coated microtitration wells (strain AS 169), anti-IgG/anti-IgM-coated indicator red cells, Capture-LISS buffer. Instrumentation: Galileo NEO/NEO Iris microprocessor-controlled automated platform. Software: NEO Iris Install Set 3.0.1.0 U. Connectivity: Automated data management. Sterilization: Not applicable (in vitro reagents).
Indications for Use
Indicated for screening patients for serological evidence of previous CMV infection. Suitable for use with human serum or plasma. Not for use in neonates without clinical interpretation of passively transferred maternal antibodies.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Cytomegalovirus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to cytomegalovirus in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by cytomegaloviruses (principally cytomegalic inclusion disease) and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Cytomegalic inclusion disease is a generalized infection of infants and is caused by intrauterine or early postnatal infection with the virus. The disease may cause severe congenital abnormalities, such as microcephaly (abnormal smallness of the head), motor disability, and mental retardation. Cytomegalovirus infection has also been associated with acquired hemolytic anemia, acute and chronic hepatitis, and an infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K203612
B Applicant
Immucor, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Capture-CMV
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LJO | Class II | 21 CFR 866.3175 - Cytomegalovirus Serological Reagents | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Intent to market the Capture-CMV® assay for use with Galileo NEO® instrument intended for screening of patients for CMV infection.
B Measurand:
Adherence of the indicator red cells over the surface of the microtitration well, to indicate presence of IgM and IgG antibodies to CMV.
C Type of Test:
Qualitative; solid phase red cell adherence antibody system.
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below
B Indication(s) for Use:
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
Capture-CMV® is an in vitro qualitative solid phase red cell adherence test system for the detection of antibodies (IgG plus IgM) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) in human serum or plasma. Capture-CMV® is intended to be used in screening of patients for serological evidence of previous infection by CMV using manual and semi-automated methods, NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO®.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
The CMV assay is to be used with manual, semi-automated methods as well as with NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO® instruments.
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
Capture-CMV is a solid phase red cell adherence antibody detection system based on procedures of Plapp et al (1984;82:719).
The assay consists of Capture-CMV Microtitration Wells coated with glycine-extracted and purified CMV antigen obtained from cytomegalovirus strain AD 169 grown in human foreskin (HF) fibroblast cells.
Sold separately are the adjunct reagents to capture test wells and controls.
- Capture-CMV Indicator Red Cells: a suspension of human red blood cells coated with rabbit anti-human IgG plus goat anti-human IgM molecules;
- Capture LISS: a low ionic strength solution containing glycine, bromocresol purple dye and sodium azide
- Capture-CMV Positive Control Serum (weak): Human serum containing IgG antibodies to CMV viral proteins
- Capture-CMV Negative Control Serum: Human serum containing no antibodies to CMV
The CMV assay is to be used with manual, semi-automated methods as well as with NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO® instruments.
### B Principle of Operation:
This procedure is a modification of the mixed agglutination tests for antigen and antibody detection of Coombs et al. (1956;2:84) and Hogman (1959;4:12).
The assay procedure is a two-step solid phase red cell adherence test carried out in microtitration wells coated with inactivated CMV virus. The CMV antigen utilized in this test is obtained from the cytomegalovirus strain AD 169 grown in human foreskin (HF) fibroblast cells. The inactivated virus is coated onto microtitration wells. The wells are dried and supplied to users along with necessary reagents and controls. Serum or plasma samples are added to the viral-coated wells and incubated for five minutes during which antibodies specific for CMV proteins bind to immobilized viral proteins. Unbound immunoglobulins are washed from the wells and replaced with a suspension of anti-IgG and anti-IgM-coated indicator red cells. Centrifugation brings the indicator red cells in contact with antibodies bound to the immobilized viral proteins. In the case of a positive test, the migration of the indicator cells to the bottom of the well is impeded as the anti-IgG and anti-IgM bridges are formed between the indicator red cells and the viralbound antibodies. As a consequence, the indicator red cells adhere over the surface of the
K203612 - Page 2 of 10
{2}
test well. In contrast, in the absence of viral antigen-antibody interactions (i.e. a negative test) the indicator red cells are not impeded during their migration, and pellet to the bottom of the well as a packed, well-defined cell button.
The image of cells adhered in the well is captured and analyzed by an instrument. The plate reader uses IDS CMOS camera to capture an image of the microplate from underneath. The software calculates a reaction value for each well based on a multi feature image analysis then assigns a result and interpretation to the wells based on predefined criteria associated with the calculated reaction value.
## C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name:
The NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO® instruments
2. Specimen Identification:
The Gaileo NEO supports the use of the following barcode symbologies: Codabar; Code 128; ISBT 128 (Concatenated barcodes are not supported) and Code 39.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
A blood specimen is drawn using an acceptable phlebotomy technique. Serum or plasma (EDTA, CPD, CP2D, CPDA-1, ACD) may be used in this assay. Testing should be performed as soon as possible to minimize the chance that falsely positive or falsely negative reactions will occur due to improper storage or contamination of the specimen. Should delays in testing occur, serum or EDTA, CPD, and ACD anticoagulated whole blood specimens should be stored at 1-10°C for up to one week. Specimens collected in CP2D and CPDA-1 anticoagulants and stored as whole blood specimens at 1-10°C may be tested up to 42 days post-collection. Testing of CPDA-1 and ACD anticoagulated specimens stored at 18-25°C for five days is acceptable. Alternatively, serum or plasma can be separated from red cells and stored frozen at -20°C in a nondefrosting freezer refrigerator. Samples should not be repeatedly frozen and thawed.
The Galileo NEO is programmed to move microplates, liquid reagent fluids, and blood sample fluids to different bays and processing areas for a given assay in the correct sequence. Such bays and areas include incubator bays, the microplate washing station, the centrifuge, and the reader.
4. Calibration:
The instrument is calibrated at the site of manufacture using a reader verification plate (RVP). The plate is provided with the instrument to the end user, for calibration verification. Reader verification plate is stored in a protective case and should be replaced upon expiration that is three years from the calibration date which is the same as the release date provided on the Release Statement.
5. Quality Control:
Capture-CMV Positive Control Serum
Capture-CMV Negative Control Serum
The reactivity of the Capture-CMV® assay is evaluated at each run by inclusion of the negative and weak positive controls. If, in any test run, the Positive Control Serum (Weak) does not produce positive results and/or the Negative Control Serum does not produce negative results, the NEO Iris®/Galileo NEO® will invalidate the test run and all the tests
K203612 - Page 3 of 10
{3}
performed in the run must be repeated. Continued failure of the control sera to perform properly may indicate that either one or more of the test reagents has deteriorated.
K203612 - Page 4 of 10
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Capture-CMV®
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K183571
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
Table 1.
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K203612 | K183571 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Capture-CMV® | Capture-CMV® |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | Capture-CMV® is an in vitro qualitative solid phase red cell adherence test system for the detection of antibodies (IgG plus IgM) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) in human serum or plasma. Capture-CMV® is intended to be used in screening of patients for serological evidence of previous infection by CMV using manual and semi-automated methods, NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO®. | Capture-CMV® is an in vitro qualitative solid phase red cell adherence test system for the detection of antibodies (IgG plus IgM) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) in human serum or plasma. Capture-CMV is intended to be used in screening of blood and plasma donors or patients for serological evidence of previous infection by CMV. |
| Specimen/Sample | Serum or plasma | Serum or plasma |
| Test Principle | Same | Serum or plasma samples are added to the viral-coated wells. The samples are incubated for five minutes during which antibodies specific for CMV proteins bind to immobilized viral proteins. Unbound immunoglobulins are washed from the wells |
{4}
K203612 - Page 5 of 10
| | | and replaced with a suspension of anti-IgG-plus anti-IgM-coated indicator red cells. Centrifugation brings the indicator red cells in contact with antibodies bound to the immobilized viral proteins. In the case of a positive test, the migration of the indicator red cells to the bottom of the well is impeded as the anti-IgG and anti- IgM bridges are formed between the indicator red cells and the viral-bound antibodies. As a consequence, the indicator red cells adhere over the surface of the microtitration well. In contrast, in the absence of viral antigen-antibody interactions (ie, a negative test) the indicator red cells are not impeded during their migration, and pellet to the bottom of the well as a packed, well-defined cell button |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assay contents
Adjunct reagents purchased separately | Same | Capture-CMV Microtitration Wells
Capture-CMV Indicator Red Cells
Capture LISS
Capture-CMV Positive Control Serum (weak)
Capture-CMV Negative Control Serum |
| Shelf-life | Same | Test wells – 6 months
Controls – 15 months
Capture LISS – 12 months
Indicator Red Cells – 60 days |
| Camera | Same | IDS CMOS camera module |
{5}
K203612 - Page 6 of 10
| Software | Same | Instrument software version 3.0.1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Instrument | There is no difference between the two instruments except model name, the software setting that indicates the device name Galileo NEO® or NEO Iris® on the assay report and the exterior colors of the instruments. | |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
Not applicable
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
The Galileo NEO® instrument is identical to the NEO Iris® instrument, except branding and exterior colors. Thus, the CMV assay performance on Galileo NEO® is identical to the CMV assay performance on NEO Iris®. Consequently, the reproducibility data collected for the CMV assay on the NEO Iris® (K183571) were re-used in the current application and are summarized below.
Reproducibility of Capture-CMV® assay on NEO Iris® was determined at three test sites: two external sites and one internally at Immucor. A panel of ten coded samples was used: five CMV antibody positive and five CMV antibody negative. The samples were tested by two operators, in duplicate, two runs per day for five nonconsecutive days. A variance component analysis was performed based on the original raw scores. Reproducibility was assessed as concordance between the CMV assay result and the status of the sample. The summary of reproducibility results by site are presented in Table 2 below.
| Table 2. Reproducibility of the CMV assay. Concordance by Site | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Total Tests | Expected Positive | Observed Positive | % Concordance (95% LCI) | Expected Negative | Observed Negative | % Concordance (95% LCI) |
| 1 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 100.0% (98.5%) | 200 | 200 | 100.0% (98.5%) |
| 2 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 100.0% (98.5%) | 200 | 200 | 100.0% (98.5%) |
| 3 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 100.0% (98.5%) | 200 | 199 | 99.5% (97.7%) |
| Total | 1200 | 600 | 600 | 100.0% (98.5%) | 600 | 599 | 99.8% (99.2%) |
{6}
2. Linearity:
Not applicable; this is a qualitative assay with the output: reactive/nonreactive
3. Analytical Specificity/Cross Reactivity:
This study was performed to assess whether any cross reactivity occurs when testing samples that contain IgG antibodies to other viruses or conditions.
| Table 3. Analytical Specificity | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Category of Specimen | Number | Capture-CMV Positive |
| EBV (VCA) Epstein-Barr Virus (Viral Capsid Antigen) | 16 | 0 |
| HSV – Herpes Simplex Virus | Type I – 10
Type II – 13
IgM* – 2 | 0 |
| Hepatitis A | 5 | 1 |
| Parvovirus B19 | 4 | 0 |
| ANA – Anti-Nuclear Antibodies | 11 | 1 |
| RF – Rheumatoid Factor | 10 | 0 |
| VZ – Varicella Zoster | 8 | 0 |
| Rubella | 8 | 0 |
| Toxoplasma gondii | 4 | 0 |
*HSV Type not specified.
Assay limitations:
- Positive test results in symptomatic patients require careful interpretation since false-positive reactions or heterotypic IgM responses may occur with sera from patients with heterophile-positive mononucleosis or varicella zoster infection (see also the Product Insert)
- Care should be taken in interpreting test results of neonatal samples. A positive test usually indicates the presence of antibodies passively transferred from mother to fetus. A negative test may be helpful in excluding possible infection, but a diagnosis of active CMV infection may require viral culture.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable; this is a qualitative assay
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
There were no changes to Capture-CMV® assay reagents and controls since it has been cleared under K183571.
6. Detection Limit:
Not applicable; this is a qualitative assay with the output: reactive/nonreactive
7. Assay Cut-Off:
The cutoff for the CMV assay is a well score 45.5. The well score is based on a multi-feature image analysis performed by the camera and the related software.
K203612 - Page 7 of 10
{7}
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
The system verification activities for NEO Iris® included all testing performed related to the CMV assay as appropriate including assay performance for establishing equivalency. All documents generated to support the development, and operations of the system adhere to standard procedures. Testing was executed in accordance with the execution and test procedure instructions.
Additional detailed information about the system verification can be found under the NEO Iris premarket notification BK180243. The results of the verification have been found acceptable to confirm safety and performance.
9. Carry-Over:
There were no changes to Capture-CMV® assay reagents and controls since it has been cleared under K183571
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
No new clinical studies were performed as the NEO Iris® and the upgraded Galileo NEO® (software version 3.0.1) instruments are functionally identical. The data in the following tables were submitted for clearance of the NEO Iris® in K183571 and are included in the current submission to support clearance of the Capture-CMV® assay when used with the upgraded Galileo NEO® (software version 3.0.1). In these studies, the performance of the Capture-CMV® on NEO Iris® was compared with the performance of the assay on the original Galileo NEO® instrument (cleared in BK100033). For more information refer to K183571: Capture-CMV® (K183571 Decision Summary and 510(k) Summary).
The following section provides a summary of the previous study and results. Method comparison studies were performed at four clinical sites, three external sites and internally at Immucor, Inc. for donor specimens and at two external sites and internally at Immucor, Inc. for patient specimens. Specimens were tested on NEO Iris® and Galileo NEO®. Test results were evaluated for agreement between analyzers. Specimens with discordant results were further tested with a commercially available particle agglutination assay for total antibody (IgG and IgM) to CMV.
Specimen testing by sites:
Table 4.
| Sites | Patient Specimens | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Total | Serum | Plasma |
| 1 | 26 | 18 | 8 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 195 | 70 | 125 |
| 4 | 280 | 212 | 68 |
K203612 - Page 8 of 10
{8}
Table 5.
| CMV Initial Results Patient Sample N=501 | Galileo NEO® | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative |
| NEO Iris® | Positive | 272 | 5 |
| | Negative | 0 | 224 |
| CMV Resolved Results | Galileo NEO® / FDA cleared assay * | | |
| | | Positive | Negative |
| NEO Iris® | Positive | 272 | 5 |
| | Negative | 0 | 224 |
| Sensitivity 100.0% (98.7%, 95% 2-sided LCI) | | | |
| Specificity 97.8% (95.0%, 95% 2-sided LCI) | | | |
*Only discordant specimens were tested with FDA cleared IgG/IgM anti-CMV assay.
2. Matrix Comparison:
The clinical study performed in K183571 included data for EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid), CP2D (Citrate Phosphate Double Dextrose), CPDA-1 (Citrate Phosphate Dextrose Adenosine), ACD (Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose), AS-1 (Additive Solution 1), AS-3 (Additive Solution 3) and AS-5 (Additive Solution 5) as anticoagulants. The results demonstrated that these approved anticoagulants and additives did not adversely affect the data collection or sample results. Each anticoagulant is listed in the corresponding CMV package insert.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
The Galileo NEO® (with software v. 3.0.1) instrument is identical to the NEO Iris® instrument that operates under the same software. Thus, CMV assay performance on Galileo NEO® (software version 3.0.1) is identical to its performance on NEO Iris®. The clinical sensitivity and specificity data collected for the CMV assay on the NEO Iris® (BK183571) were re-used in the current application and are summarized in section B.1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device, above.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Clinical specificity data are summarized in section B.1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device, above.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
D Clinical Cut-Off:
The CMV assay cut-off is: Negative ≤ 45.5 < Positive
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not applicable; this is a qualitative assay
K203612 - Page 9 of 10
{9}
F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
Not applicable
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K203612 - Page 10 of 10
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.