K201271 · Penumbra, Inc. · DQY · Jun 11, 2020 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K201271
Device Name
Benchmark BMX96 Access System
Applicant
Penumbra, Inc.
Product Code
DQY · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Jun 11, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Benchmark BMX96 System is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Device Story
Benchmark BMX96 System is a three-component percutaneous catheter system consisting of a delivery catheter, Neuron 6F Select catheter, and a dilator. Used by trained physicians in interventional procedures to access peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature. The dilator facilitates atraumatic skin-to-vessel entry. The delivery catheter, used with a 0.038-inch guidewire or the Neuron 6F Select catheter, provides a conduit for interventional devices. The system is single-use and ethylene oxide sterilized. Physicians operate the device under fluoroscopic guidance to navigate the vasculature. Output is the physical access path created for subsequent interventional tools, enabling minimally invasive treatment of vascular conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical or animal data were provided. Substantial equivalence was established through bench testing, including dimensional/visual testing, friction, fluoroscopy, simulated use (flow model/vessel entry), particulate, hub air aspiration, tensile/elongation, burst, and corrosion resistance testing. Biocompatibility was verified per ISO 10993 and USP standards, including cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, and hemocompatibility testing.
Technological Characteristics
Three-component system: delivery catheter (single lumen, variable stiffness, stainless steel hypotube reinforcement), Neuron 6F Select catheter (braid-reinforced, variable stiffness), and dilator. Materials include polyurethane and polyether block amide. Features radiopaque marker bands and Luer hubs. EO sterilized per ISO 11135. Shelf life 36 months. Compatible with 0.038 in. guidewires.
Indications for Use
Indicated for introduction of interventional devices into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature in patients requiring such procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
June 11, 2020
Penumbra, Inc. Matthew Benenati Regulatory Affairs Specialist II One Penumbra Place Alameda, California 94502
Re: K201271
Trade/Device Name: Benchmark BMX96 System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QJP, DQY Dated: May 11, 2020 Received: May 12, 2020
Dear Matthew Benenati:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Xiaolin Zheng, Ph.D., M.S. Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K201271
Device Name Benchmark BMX96 System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Benchmark BMX96 System is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Penumbra" in a red font. To the right of the word is a red circle with a white "P" inside. The "P" is stylized with a horizontal line extending from the right side of the "P" to the edge of the circle. The logo is simple and modern.
### 510(k) Summary
### K201271
(as required by 21 CFR 807.92)
Pursuant to Section 12, Part (a)(i)(3A) of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, Penumbra, Inc. is providing the summary of Substantial Equivalence for the subject Benchmark BMX96 Access System
### 1.1 Submitter
Penumbra, Inc. One Penumbra Place Alameda, CA 94502 USA
Contact Person: Matthew Benenati Regulatory Specialist II Tel: (510) 995-9705 Fax: (510) 217-6414 E-mail: mbenenati@penumbrainc.com
Date of Preparation: June 9, 2020
### 1.2 Subject Device
Benchmark BMX96 System
Regulatory Class: II Classification Panel: Neurology Classification Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Product Codes: QJP, DQY
### 1.3 Predicate Device
Neuron MAX System (K111380)
This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
No reference devices were used in this submission.
### 1.4 Device Description
The Benchmark BMX96 System is a three-component system comprised of the Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter, Neuron 6F Select Catheter, and a Dilator. The
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Penu
Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter can be used individually with a 0.038 in. [0.97 mm] guidewire or together with the Neuron 6F Select Catheter to access the desired anatomy.
### Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter
The Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter is a single lumen, variable stiffness catheter with a radiopaque marker band on the distal end and a Luer hub on the proximal end. The Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter dimensions are included on the individual device label. The Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter is compatible with introducer sheaths appropriately sized for the outer diameter of Benchmark BMX96.
## Neuron 6F Select Catheter
The Neuron 6F Select Catheter is a single lumen, braid-reinforced, variable stiffness catheter with a radiopaque distal end and a Luer hub on the proximal end. The Neuron 6F Select Catheter is available in four tip shapes (SIM, H1, BER, or SIM-V). The Neuron 6F Select Catheter tip shape and dimensions are included on the individual device label. The Neuron 6F Select Catheter is compatible with the Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter.
### Dilator
The Dilator is a single lumen, radiopaque catheter with a tapered distal end and a Luer hub on the proximal end. The Dilator is compatible with the Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter. The Dilator facilitates the percutaneous entry of the Benchmark BMX96 Delivery Catheter by forming an atraumatic transition from the skin through the subcutaneous tissue to the vessel.
The Benchmark BMX96 System is a single-use, ethylene oxide (EO) sterilized system.
The Benchmark BMX96 System should be used in interventional procedures by trained physicians.
#### Indications For Use 1.5
The Benchmark BMX96 System is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Penumbra" in red font, followed by a red circle with a white "P" inside. The "P" is outlined in silver. The logo is simple and modern. The word "Penumbra" is written in a sans-serif font.
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device 1.6
The subject device Benchmark BMX96 System has similar technological characteristics to the previously cleared predicate device. At a high level, the subject and predicate devices are based on the following same technological elements:
- . Delivery Catheter dimensions (outer diameter (OD), maximum effective length, distal flexible length)
- Delivery Catheter tip shapes .
- . Sterilization method (EO)
- . 36-month shelf life
The following technological differences exist between the subject and predicate devices:
- Stainless steel hypotube shaft reinforcement (replaced braided coil reinforcement) ●
- Catheter Inner Diameter (0.096 in.) ●
- Shorter effective length options .
- Slightly longer hydrophilic coating length ●
- Modified catheter extrusions to include additional polyurethane and polyether ● block amide materials
- . Dilator OD, length
#### 1.7 Performance Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
- Design Verification ●
- Biocompatibility ●
- Shelf Life ●
- Sterilization
- Packaging
The subject device met all established requirements.
#### Design Verification Testing 1.7.1
- . Dimensional/Visual Testing
- Friction Testing
- Fluoroscopy Testing
- Simulated Use Testing (Flow Model and Vessel Entry) .
- . Particulate Testing
- Hub Air Aspiration Testing .
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image contains the word "Penumbr" in a bold, sans-serif font, colored in a dark red hue. To the right of the word is a circular logo, also in dark red, featuring a stylized letter "P" formed by a white line against the red background. The logo is simple and modern, complementing the clean typography of the wordmark.
- Tensile and Elongation Testing ●
- Burst Testing
- Corrosion Resistance ●
- Shelf life ●
- Packaging ●
- Sterilization in accordance with ISO 11135 and ISO 10993-7 ●
#### 1.7.2 Biocompatibility
The biocompatibility evaluation for Benchmark BMX96 System was conducted in accordance with ISO 10993-1, USP standards, and FDA Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) as recognized by FDA. The battery of testing included the following tests:
- In vitro Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution) ●
- Sensitization: Magnusson-Kligman Method
- Irritation: Intracutaneous Toxicity ●
- Systemic Toxicity: Acute Systemic Injection ●
- Systemic Toxicity: Material Mediated Pyrogen ●
- Hemocompatibility .
- In vitro Thrombogenicity o
- Prothrombin Time (PT) O
- Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) o
- Complement Activation o
- Hemolysis (indirect contact) o
- Hemolysis (direct contact) o
Biocompatibility test results demonstrate biological safety per ISO 10993 and USP requirements.
#### Performance Data - Animal, Clinical 1.7.3
No animal or clinical study was conducted as bench testing was determined sufficient for verification and validation purposes.
#### Conclusions 1.8
The subject Benchmark BMX96 System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device Neuron MAX. The subject device has identical intended use as the predicate device. The device testing described in the 510(k) Summary demonstrate the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate device in regard to operating principle, design concept, fundamental technology and device performance.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.