K192586 · DiaSorin, Inc. · CGN · May 6, 2020 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K192586
Device Name
LIAISON® Folate
Applicant
DiaSorin, Inc.
Product Code
CGN · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
May 6, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1295
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The DiaSorin LIAISON® Folate assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of Folic acid in human serum. Folic acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of anemias. Assay results should be used in conjunction with other clinical or laboratory data to assist the clinician in making individual patient management decisions. The assay must be performed on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
Device Story
The LIAISON® Folate assay is a competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) performed on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer. It measures Folic acid in human serum samples. The process involves dissociating Folic acid from its binding protein using a high pH buffer, followed by competitive binding of Folic acid to a Folate Binding Protein on magnetic particles and a Folic acid-isoluminol derivative conjugate. After washing, starter reagents initiate a flash chemiluminescent reaction. A photomultiplier measures the light signal (relative light units), which is inversely proportional to the Folic acid concentration. The device is used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results are provided to clinicians to aid in the diagnosis and management of anemias, such as megaloblastic anemia, in conjunction with other clinical data.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison study (n=157) against a commercially available method showed Passing & Bablok regression y = 0.96x - 0.61 (R=0.948). Precision studies (n=160) across 20 days showed total %CV ranging from 4.3% to 7.0%. Linearity (R=0.999) and recovery (97.6%–110.4%) were verified. Analytical specificity and interference testing (including hemoglobin, bilirubin, triglycerides, biotin, and various drugs) showed no significant interference. LoQ is 1.6 ng/mL.
Technological Characteristics
Competitive CLIA; solid phase: magnetic particles coated with bovine folate binding protein; conjugate: Folic acid-isoluminol derivative; energy source: chemiluminescent reaction; platform: LIAISON® XL Analyzer; sample type: human serum; storage: 2-8°C; traceability: WHO IS 03/178.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of Folic acid in human serum to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of anemias in adult patients. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A folic acid test system is a device intended to measure the vitamin folic acid in plasma and serum. Folic acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of megaloblastic anemia, which is characterized by the presence of megaloblasts (an abnormal red blood cell series) in the bone marrow.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
May 6, 2020
DiaSorin Inc. Mari Meyer Vice President of Regulatory & Clinical Affairs 1951 Northwestern Ave Stillwater, MN 55082-0285
### Re: K192586
Trade/Device Name: Liaison® Folate Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1295 Regulation Name: Folic Acid Test System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: CGN Dated: May 1, 2020 Received: May 4, 2020
## Dear Mari Meyer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Marianela Perez-Torres, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192586
Device Name LIAISON® Folate
Indications for Use (Describe)
The DiaSorin LIAISON® Folate assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of Folic acid in human serum. Folic acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of anemias. Assay results should be used in conjunction with other clinical or laboratory data to assist the clinician in making individual patient management decisions.
The assay must be performed on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> | <span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
## LIAISON® Folate
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
## 1. 510(k) Number: K192586
## 2. Applicant:
Mari Meyer Vice President of Regulatory and Clinical Affairs DiaSorin Inc. 1951 Northwestern Avenue, P.O. Box 285, Stillwater, MN 55082-0285 Office Number: 651-351-9710; Fax Number: 651-351-5669 Email: mari.meyer@diasorin.com
### 3. Date: May 5, 2020
## 4. Proprietary and Established Names:
LIAISON® Folate
## 5. Regulatory Information:
Classification Name: Folic acid test system Trade Name: LIAISON® Folate Common Name: Folate Regulation: 21 CFR 862.1295 Classification: Class II Panel: Clinical Chemistry (75) Product Code: CGN
### 6. Predicate Devices:
The predicate device used to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the LIAISON® Folate Assay is the Abbott Laboratories, ARCHITECT Folate, (K092740).
## 7. Device Description:
The LIAISON® Folate assay is a competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for quantitative determination of Folic acid in serum. During the first incubation, Folic acid is dissociated from its binding protein. After five (5) minutes, a high pH buffer is added to prevent re-association to the binding protein. After five (5) minutes, Folic acid binds to a Folate Binding Protein on the solid phase, which competes with a Folic acid linked to an isoluminol derivative. After a third incubation, the unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. Subsequently, the starter reagents are added to initiate a flash chemiluminescent reaction. The light signal is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) and is inversely proportional to the concentration of Folic acid present in calibrators, controls, or samples.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 8. Intended Use:
The DiaSorin LIAISON® Folate Assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of Folic acid in human serum. Folic acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of anemias. Assay results should be used in conjunction with other clinical or laboratory data to assist the clinician in making individual patient management decisions.
The assay must be performed on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
# 9. Indication(s) for Use:
Same as Intended Use
## 10. Substantial Equivalence Information:
A comparison of the similarities and differences between the LIAISON® Folate and the predicate is provided below:
| Assay - Similarities and Differences | | |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Characteristic | Candidate Device | Predicate Device |
| | LIAISON® Folate | Abbott Laboratories, ARCHITECT Folate (K092740) |
| Intended Use | The DiaSorin LIAISON® Folate assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of Folic acid in human serum. Folic acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of anemias. Assay results should be used in conjunction with other clinical or laboratory data to assist the clinician in making individual patient management decisions.<br><br>The assay must be performed on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer. | The ARCHITECT Folate assay is a chemiluminescent microparticle Folate Binding Protein assay for the quantitative determination of folate in human serum and plasma on the ARCHITECT iSystem.<br><br>Folate measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of megaloblastic anemia. |
| Measured Analyte | Folate | Same |
| Assay Type | Chemiluminescence Immunoassay | Same |
| Results | Quantitative | Same |
| Sample Type | Human Serum | Human Serum & Plasma |
| Sample size | 50 μL | 150 μL |
| Storage | 2-8°C | Same |
| Operating Principle | Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) | Same |
| Solid Phase | Magnetic particles coated with bovine folate binding protein | Microparticles coated with mouse monoclonal antibodies bound to bovine folate binding protein |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Assay - Similarities and Differences | | |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Characteristic | Candidate Device | Predicate Device |
| Conjugate | LIAISON® Folate<br>Folic acid conjugated to an<br>isoluminol derivative | Abbott Laboratories,<br>ARCHITECT Folate (K092740)<br>Acridinium labeled pteroic acid |
| Analytical<br>Measuring Range | 1.6 ng/mL - 20 ng/mL | Same |
#### Standard/quidance Document Reference: 11.
- CLSI Guideline EP5-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement o Procedures; Approved Guideline.
- CLSI Guideline EP15-A3, User Verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; O Approved Guideline.
- CLSI Guideline EP07-A2. Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry. Approved O Guideline.
- CLSI Guideline EP06-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement o Procedures: A Statistical Approach: Approved Guideline.
- CLSI Guideline EP 17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical O Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline.
- CLSI EP37-A: Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical o Chemistry; First Edition, April 2018.
- CLSI Guideline EP09-A3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias O Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline.
- CLSI Guideline EP28-A3C, Defining, Establishing and Verifying Reference o Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline.
## 12. Performance Characteristics:
## Method Comparison
A total of 157 human serum samples spanning the assay range, were tested by the LIAISON® Folate and by another commercially available method following CLSI EP9-A3. The study yielded the following Passing & Bablok regression analysis: LIAISON® Folate = (y = 0.96x - 0.61); R = 0.948
| Medical Decision<br>level | Bias | 95% confidence interval |
|---------------------------|--------------|-------------------------|
| 4.41 ng/mL | -0.772 ng/mL | -1.550 to -0.130 ng/mL |
# Bias at the medical decision level:
## Expected Values
It is recommended that each laboratory establish its own range of expected values for the population taken into consideration.
To assess the expected reference range for the LIAISON® Folate assay, a study was performed with prospectively collected serum samples from 166 apparently healthy Section 5 Page 3 of 6
{6}------------------------------------------------
adults 21 - 59 years of age from mixed ethnic backgrounds (30% Caucasian, 32% African Americans and 38% Hispanics) who were fasting for at least eight (8) hrs. Apparently healthy status was determined by subjects who had no history of anemias, Folic acid or B12 deficiency, IBD or suspected IBD, celiac disease, gastrointestinal malabsorption disorders, or eating disorders. No oral contraceptive use within three (3) months and no alcohol within 48 hours of blood draw. No pregnant women or anyone taking folic acid supplementation were included in the study population.
Based on the 95% Confidence Interval the following values were established according to CLSI guideline C28-A3.
| Observed Reference Ranges | | | |
|---------------------------|--------------|----------------------------------------|-------|
| Population (n=166) | Median | Observed<br>2.5th to 97.5th Percentile | Range |
| United States | 8.22 (ng/mL) | 3.96 ng/mL – 16.70 (ng/mL) | |
#### Precision
Two (2) kit controls and six (6) samples containing concentrations of analyte prepared to span the range of the assay were assaved twice per day in duplicate, over 20 operating days using two (2) reagent lots, to determine repeatability and reproducibility of the LIAISON® Folate assay.
Results Table for Combined Lots
| | | mean | Repeatability<br>(Between-Lot) | | Reproducibility<br>(Total Across Lots) | |
|-------------------|-----|---------|--------------------------------|------|----------------------------------------|------|
| Sample ID | n | (ng/mL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Kit Control 1 | 160 | 4.79 | 0.14 | 2.9% | 0.25 | 5.3% |
| Kit Control 2 | 160 | 12.33 | 0.23 | 1.8% | 0.52 | 4.3% |
| Precision Serum 1 | 160 | 2.90 | 0.18 | 6.4% | 0.20 | 7.0% |
| Precision Serum 2 | 160 | 4.57 | 0.18 | 3.9% | 0.27 | 5.8% |
| Precision Serum 3 | 160 | 7.87 | 0.14 | 1.8% | 0.40 | 5.1% |
| Precision Serum 4 | 160 | 10.2 | 0.04 | 0.4% | 0.50 | 4.9% |
| Precision Serum 5 | 160 | 12.1 | 0.08 | 0.7% | 0.64 | 5.3% |
| Precision Serum 6 | 160 | 14.1 | 0.22 | 1.6% | 0.72 | 5.1% |
### Results Table for Single Lot
| Sample<br>ID | n | mean<br>(ng/mL) | Within-Run | | Run-to-Run | | Day-to-Day | | TOTAL<br>(Within-lot) | |
|--------------|----|-----------------|------------|------|------------|------|------------|------|-----------------------|------|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control 1 | 80 | 4.69 | 0.22 | 4.7% | 0.05 | 1.0% | 0.13 | 2.9% | 0.26 | 5.6% |
| Control 2 | 80 | 12.49 | 0.29 | 2.3% | 0.29 | 2.3% | 0.40 | 3.2% | 0.57 | 4.6% |
| Serum 1 | 80 | 2.77 | 0.11 | 4.1% | 0.14 | 5.2% | 0.10 | 3.7% | 0.21 | 7.6% |
| Serum 2 | 80 | 4.44 | 0.13 | 3.0% | 0.21 | 4.7% | 0.10 | 2.3% | 0.27 | 6.0% |
| Serum 3 | 80 | 7.77 | 0.20 | 2.6% | 0.20 | 2.5% | 0.35 | 4.5% | 0.45 | 5.8% |
| Serum 4 | 80 | 10.24 | 0.26 | 2.5% | 0.16 | 1.6% | 0.50 | 4.9% | 0.58 | 5.7% |
| Serum 5 | 80 | 12.10 | 0.30 | 2.5% | 0.46 | 3.8% | 0.53 | 4.4% | 0.76 | 6.3% |
| Serum 6 | 80 | 14.24 | 0.33 | 2.3% | 0.32 | 2.2% | 0.73 | 5.1% | 0.84 | 6.1% |
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Linearity
One neat high serum sample containing endogenous Folate, above the measuring range of the assay at 20 ng/mL, was diluted with a contrived low serum sample for preparing the dilution series. The dilution series was analyzed by the LIAISON® Folate assay following CLSI EP6-A. The results were analyzed by regression of observed concentration versus expected concentration.
The resulting equation is: Serum: Observed Folate = 1.011 (Expected) - 0.147; R = 0.999
## Recovery
Seven (7) neat high concentration serum samples were analyzed with the LIAISON Folate assay. Recovery samples were then prepared by diluting the samples with the LIAISON Endocrinology Diluent according to the IFU. The results are provided in the following table.
| Sample | Neat (ng/mL) | Calculated dilution 1:3<br>(ng/mL) | Diluted 1:3<br>(ng/mL) | % recovery |
|--------|--------------|------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|
| S1 | 22.9 | 5.73 | 5.83 | 101.8% |
| S2 | 30.6 | 7.65 | 7.71 | 100.8% |
| S3 | *18.5 | 4.63 | 4.95 | 107.0% |
| S4 | *19.6 | 4.90 | 4.86 | 99.2% |
| S5 | 38.4 | 9.60 | 10.6 | 110.4% |
| S6 | 27.9 | 6.98 | 6.81 | 97.6% |
| S7 | 23.4 | 5.85 | 5.87 | 100.3% |
### Analytical Specificity
### Cross-Reactivity
Controlled Studies of potentially cross-reacting substances were performed on the LIAISON® Folate assay at the concentrations listed below. The testing was based on CLSI-EP7-A2.
| Cross-Reactant | Spiked<br>Concentration | % Cross<br>Reactivity |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|
| Aminopterin | 490 ng/mL | 0.488% |
| Phenytoin | 201,400 ng/mL | 0.000% |
| Methotrexate<br>(Amethopterin) | 1,000 ng/mL | 0.781% |
| Folinic Acid (Leucovorin) | 500 ng/mL | 1.730% |
### Interfering Substances
Controlled studies of potentially interfering substances performed serum at 2 levels showed no interference in the LIAISON® Folate at the highest concentration for each substance listed below. The testing was based on CLSI-EP7-A2.
| Drug/Substance | Concentration Tested |
|----------------|----------------------|
|----------------|----------------------|
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Hemoglobin | 30 mg/dL |
|--------------------------|-------------|
| Bilirubin (conjugated) | 35 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (unconjugated) | 40 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 3,000 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 500 mg/dL |
| Albumin | 9 g/dL |
| Human IgG | 7.5 g/dL |
| HAMA | 807 ng/mL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 1000 IU/mL |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 65 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 2.5 mg/mL |
| Acetylcysteine | 283 mg/dL |
| Ampicillin Na | 1000 mg/dL |
| Cefoxitin | 660 mg/dL |
| Cyclosporin | 5 mg/dL |
| Doxycycline hyclate | 6.25 mg/dL |
| Levodopa | 20 mg/dL |
| Methyldopa | 20 mg/dL |
| Metronidazole | 25 mg/dL |
| Phenylbutazone | 40 mg/dL |
| Rifampicin | 7.5 mg/dL |
| Theophylline | 5 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 44 mg/dL |
Limit of Blank, Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation
The Limit of Blank, Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation were determined according to CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline June 2012- Second Edition.
The following limits were determined with the LIAISON® Folate assay:
The limits are reported in the following table:
| LoB | LoD | LoQ |
|------------|-----------|-----------|
| ≤1.2 ng/mL | 1.4 ng/mL | 1.6 ng/mL |
Stability
| Product | Storage Conditions | | Claimed stability |
|-------------------|--------------------|-------|-------------------|
| Reagent Integral | Open vial | 2-8°C | 6 weeks |
| Calibration curve | N/A | N/A | 21 days |
Traceability
The LIAISON® Folate Calibrators are traceable to the WHO IS 03/178 (pg/mL).
#### 13. Conclusion:
The LIAISON® Folate assay is substantially equivalent in principle and performance to the Abbott Laboratories, ARCHITECT Folate.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.