The Neocis Guidance System (NGS) is a computerized navigational system intended to provide assistance in both the planning (pre-operative) and the surgical (intra-operative) phases of dental implantation surgery. The system provides software to preoperatively plan dental implantation procedures and provides navigational guidance of the surgical instruments.
Device Story
NGS is a stereotaxic medical device for dental implant surgery. Input: patient CT scan. Operation: surgeon uses planning software to place virtual implants; system provides physical, visual, and audible guidance during site preparation. Physical guidance: Guidance Arm grips dental drill, constraining motion to the surgical plan while allowing manual surgeon control. Visual guidance: 3D/2D real-time display of drill position relative to plan. Patient tracking: Patient Splint (attached to teeth) and Patient Tracker (mechanical feedback) relay movement data to software, which adjusts cutting angle/position in real-time to maintain accuracy. Used in dental clinics by surgeons. Benefits: prevents deviation from plan, avoids critical anatomical structures, maintains accuracy despite patient movement. Surgeon retains final clinical decision-making authority.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing and simulated use validation. Testing included total system accuracy verification, end-user validation using typodonts, software/system verification (registration, boundary conditions, error injection, CT scan verification), and mechanical safety testing (Guidance Arm accuracy/repeatability, F/T sensor verification, patient motion tracking).
Technological Characteristics
Stereotaxic navigational system. Components: Guidance Arm, Patient Splint, Patient Tracker. Materials: Biocompatible per ISO 10993. Energy: 120V AC, 60Hz. Sterilization: Steam. Connectivity: System software integrates CT data with real-time mechanical tracking. Accuracy: RMS < 1 mm (lateral/depth), RMS < 6.0° (angular). Software: Class II medical device software per IEC 62304.
Indications for Use
Indicated for dental implantation surgery planning and intra-operative navigational guidance of surgical instruments.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone cutting instrument and accessories is a metal device intended for use in reconstructive oral surgery to drill or cut into the upper or lower jaw and may be used to prepare bone to insert a wire, pin, or screw. The device includes the manual bone drill and wire driver, powered bone drill, rotary bone cutting handpiece, and AC-powered bone saw.
Predicate Devices
Neocis Guidance System (NGS) with Chairside Splint (K182776)
Reference Devices
Aseptico VCT Versatile Control Technology Model AEU-925 (K030163)
Montblanc Implantology Contra-angle Control (K070084)
Neocis Guidance System with Chairside Splint (K173402)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym along with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration," written out next to it.
September 11, 2019
Neocis Inc. Thomas Claiborne Regulatory Affairs Manager 2800 Biscayne Blvd Suite 600 Miami, Florida 33137
Re: K191605
Trade/Device Name: Neocis Guidance System (NGS) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4120 Regulation Name: Bone Cutting Instrument And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PLV Dated: June 12, 2019 Received: June 17, 2019
Dear Thomas Claiborne:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
for Srinivas Nandkumar, PhD Acting Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic. Anesthesia. Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
#### Indications for Use
| 510(k) Number (if known) | K191605 |
|--------------------------|------------------------|
| Device Name | Neocis Guidance System |
| Indications for Use (Describe) |
|--------------------------------|
|--------------------------------|
The Neocis Guidance System (NGS) is a computerized navigational system intended to provide assistance in both the
Nocis Guidance System (NGS) is a computerized navigational system intended to provide assistance in both the planning (pre-operative) and the surgical (intra-operative) phases of dental implantation surgery. The system provides software to preoperatively plan dental implantation procedures and provides navigational guidance of the surgical instruments.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D),
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Submitter Name:
Neocis Inc. 2800 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 600 Miami, FL 33137 Tel: 1-855-9NEOCIS
## Contact Person:
Thomas Claiborne, Ph.D. 2800 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 600 Miami. FL 33137 Tel: 1-855-9NEOCIS
Date Prepared: September 11, 2019
Trade Name: Neocis Guidance System (NGS)
Common Name: Dental Stereotaxic Instrument
Classification Name: Bone cutting instrument and accessories (21 CFR 872.4120)
Classification: Class II
Product Code: PLV
Predicate Device: Neocis Guidance System (NGS) with Chairside Splint (K182776)
Reference Devices: Aseptico VCT Versatile Control Technology Model AEU-925 (K030163), Montblanc Implantology Contra-angle Control (K070084), Neocis Guidance System (K161399), and Neocis Guidance System with Chairside Splint (K173402)
## Indications for Use:
The Neocis Guidance System (NGS) is a computerized navigational system intended to provide assistance in both the planning (pre-operative) and the surgical (intra-operative) phases of dental implantation surgery. The system provides software to preoperatively plan dental implantation procedures and provides navigational guidance of the surgical instruments.
## Device Description:
The Neocis Guidance System (NGS) is a stereotaxic medical device that guides surgeons during dental implant surgery. The system allows the user to plan the surgery virtually in software using a CT scan of the patient, and the plan is used by a quidance system to provide physical, visual, and audible feedback to the surgeon during the implant site preparation.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The implant process occurs in two phases. First, the dental surgeon plans the surgical procedure with the planning software. A virtual implant is placed at the desired location in the CT scan, allowing the dental surgeon to avoid interfering with critical anatomical structures during implant surgery. Second, when the implant plan is optimally positioned, the NGS provides accurate quidance of the dental surgical instruments according to the pre-operative plan.
Physical quidance is provided via the Guidance Arm. The Guidance Arm grips a standard dental drill from the back end, allowing the surgeon to grip the drill as normal. The Guidance Arm does not move unless the surgeon applies a manual force to the drill. The Guidance Arm will constrain the surgeon to drill according to the prescribed surgical plan, preventing deviation. The surgeon is constantly in control of the drilling.
Visual guidance is provided by 3D graphics and 2D cross sections that indicate the position and orientation of the drill in relation to the pre-operative plan and scan. The visual feedback is updated in real-time so any relative motion between the dental handpiece and the patient properly update the visualization.
The patient tracking portion of the NGS is comprised of the Patient Splint and the Patient Tracker. The Patient Splint is attached to the contralateral side of the patient's mouth. The Patient Splint is placed on the patient prior to the CT scan. A fiducial array with fiducial markers is placed on the Patient Splint prior to the CT scan so the virtual plan can be related to the physical space of the system. The Patient Tracker is a mechanical feedback system that is connected to the Patient Splint on the patient, which relays information to the control software in order to track patient movement. If patient movement occurs during the surgical procedure, the system will respond by altering the prescribed surgical cutting angle and position to accommodate the patient movement, which will maintain the accuracy of the drill placement.
Several steps are required for calibration and measurement during the procedure. The drill is calibrated using the Calibration Drill Bit inserted into a precise position on the Patient Tracker. During the surgery, each drill bit must be measured with the Depth Gauge to determine the proper length of the bit. These measurements complete the loop so the entire NGS is accurate to the tip of the drill.
The NGS is a supporting device, providing additional information and guidance to the decision- making process during the surgical procedure. It is not intended to replace the surgeon's judqment. The final clinical decisions are the sole responsibility of the surgeon. The surgeon can at any time during the surgical procedure modify the planned implant positions. Under no circumstances does the device relieve the surgeon of his or her ultimate clinical responsibility.
The subject device is the same as the NGS cleared under K182776 (the predicate device), except for a change to the dental drill supplier and dental drill collar design. The dental handpiece and motor have received previous 510(k) clearance under K070084
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### and K030163.
The splint is a key component for patient tracking for the NGS. The patient tracking portion of the NGS is comprised of the Chairside Splint and the Patient Tracker. The Chairside Splint is attached to the contralateral side of the patient's mouth. The Chairside Splint is affixed to the patient's teeth using dental materials specified in the labeling. The Chairside Splint is placed on the patient prior to the CT scan. A fiducial array with fiducial markers is placed on the Chairside Splint prior to the CT scan so the virtual plan can be related to the physical space of the system. The Patient Tracker is a mechanical feedback system that is connected to the Patient Chairside on the patient, which relays information to the control software in order to track patient movement. If patient movement occurs during the surgical procedure, the system will respond by altering the prescribed surgical cutting angle and position to accommodate the patient movement, which will maintain the accuracy of the drill placement.
## Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
This submission involves a modification to the dental drill supplier and to the dental drill collar design. Otherwise, all performance characteristics of the NGS are the same. The differences introduced by this modification are detailed in the table 1 below.
| Technological | NGS | NGS with Chairside Splint | | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Characteristics | Subject Device | Predicate Device (K182776) | Comments | |
| Indications for Use | | | | |
| Indications for<br>Use | The Neocis Guidance System<br>(NGS) is a computerized<br>navigational system intended to<br>provide assistance in both the<br>planning (pre-operative) and the<br>surgical (intra- operative) phases of<br>dental implantation surgery. The<br>system provides software to<br>preoperatively plan dental<br>implantation procedures and<br>provides navigational guidance of<br>the surgical instruments. | The Neocis Guidance System<br>(NGS) is a computerized<br>navigational system intended to<br>provide assistance in both the<br>planning (pre-operative) and the<br>surgical (intra- operative) phases<br>of dental implantation surgery.<br>The system provides software to<br>preoperatively plan dental<br>implantation procedures and<br>provides navigational guidance<br>of the surgical instruments. | No difference | |
| Technology / Performance Characteristics | | | | |
| Supply Voltage | 120 V | 120 V | No difference | |
| Phases | 1 | 1 | No difference | |
| Type of Current | AC | AC | No difference | |
| Rated Frequency<br>(Hz) | 60 Hz | 60 Hz | No difference | |
| Technological<br>Characteristics | NGS<br>Subject Device | NGS with Chairside Splint<br>Predicate Device (K182776) | Comments | |
| Rated Power<br>Input (VA) | 600 VA | 600 VA | No difference | |
| Types and<br>Ratings of<br>external<br>accessible fuses | 5.0 A for 240 V | 5.0 A for 240 V | No difference | |
| Type of Protection<br>against Electric<br>Shock | Class I Equipment | Class I Equipment | No difference | |
| Degree of<br>Protection against Type BF<br>Electric Shock | Type BF | Type BF | No difference | |
| Equipment<br>Suitable for use in<br>the presence of<br>Flammable<br>Mixtures? | No | No | No difference | |
| Mode of<br>Operation | Continuous Operation | Continuous Operation | No difference | |
| System Lateral<br>Accuracy | RMS < 1 mm | RMS < 1 mm | No difference | |
| System Depth<br>Accuracy | RMS < 1 mm | RMS < 1 mm | No difference | |
| System Angular<br>Accuracy | RMS < 6.0° | RMS < 6.0° | No difference | |
| CT Scan Quality<br>Requirements | 0.3 mm Voxel, 0.3 mm Slice<br>Thickness, Matrix 512x512, Full<br>13cm 21 sec, Multi 2 DICOM<br>format. | 0.3 mm Voxel, 0.3 mm Slice<br>Thickness, Matrix 512x512, Full<br>13cm 21 sec, Multi 2 DICOM<br>format. | No difference | |
| F/T Sensor Force<br>Measurement<br>Range | +/- 30 N | +/- 30 N | No difference | |
| F/T Sensor<br>Torque<br>Measurement Ra<br>nge | +/- 2 Nm | +/- 2 Nm | No difference | |
| F/T Sensor Single<br>Axis Force<br>Overload Limit | 200 N | 200 N | No difference | |
| F/T Sensor Single<br>Axis Torque<br>Overload Limit | 20 Nm | 20 Nm | No difference | |
| Upper limit<br>specification for<br>Guidance Arm<br>Translation Speed | 1.25 m/s | 1.25 m/s | No difference | |
| Technological<br>Characteristics | NGS<br>Subject Device | NGS with Chairside Splint<br>Predicate Device (K182776) | Comments | |
| Storage<br>Requirements | Store powered at Room<br>Temperature (68°F to 76°F or 20°C<br>to 24.4°C) and standard ambient<br>humidity (5% to 95%) in a dust free,<br>clean environment. | Store powered at Room<br>Temperature (68°F to 76°F or 20°C<br>to 24.4°C) and standard<br>ambient humidity (5% to 95%) in<br>a dust free, clean environment. | No difference | |
| Splint Attachment | Chairside Splint can be attached<br>chairside with use of acrylic or<br>developed with acrylic on a patient<br>model in a dental lab. | Chairside Splint can be attached<br>chairside with use of acrylic or<br>developed with acrylic on a<br>patient model in a dental lab. | No difference | |
| Dental materials<br>(acrylics or resins) | Alike (K942670-GC Pattern Resin) Cool Temp Natural (K041098) 3M ESPE ProTemp Plus (K033022-Protemp 3 Garant) Visalys Core (UV light curable) (K143104) EZ Pickup (UV light curable) (K984341-SternVantage Varnish LC Model 221001) Ufi Gel hard C (K030916) Triad C&B Material (UV light curable) (K850911) | Alike (K942670-GC Pattern Resin) Cool Temp Natural (K041098) 3M ESPE ProTemp Plus (K033022-Protemp 3 Garant) Visalys Core (UV light curable) (K143104) EZ Pickup (UV light curable) (K984341-<br>SternVantage Varnish LC Model 221001) Ufi Gel hard C (K030916) Triad C&B Material (UV<br>light curable) (K850911) | No difference | |
| | Splint Removal | Chairside Splint may be removed<br>either by cutting bridges along a<br>seam of the splint or manually<br>pulling off. | Chairside Splint may be<br>removed either by cutting<br>bridges along a seam of the<br>splint or manually pulling off. | No difference |
| | Fiducial Array<br>Attachment to<br>Splint | The Fiducial Array attaches to the<br>splint during the CT scan to provide<br>a reference in the image. | The Fiducial Array attaches to<br>the<br>splint during the CT scan to<br>provide a reference in the<br>image. | No difference |
| | Kinematic Mount<br>Attachment to<br>Splint | The Kinematic Mount attaches to<br>the splint to provide a mounting<br>point for the Fiducial Array and<br>Patient Tracker. | The Kinematic Mount attaches<br>to the splint to provide a<br>mounting point for the Fiducial<br>Array and Patient Tracker. | No difference |
| | Splint Shape and<br>Kinematic Mount<br>Location | The shape of the splint and the<br>location of the Kinematic Mount<br>attachment point are designed to<br>allow for proper ergonomic<br>approach of the Patient Tracker and<br>Guidance Arm. | The shape of the splint and the<br>location of the Kinematic Mount<br>attachment point are designed to<br>allow for proper ergonomic<br>approach of the Patient Tracker<br>and Guidance Arm. | No difference |
| | Safety Features | | | |
| | Biocompatibility | Yes (ISO 10993-1, -5, -10, -11, -<br>12) | Yes (ISO 10993-1, -5, -10, -11, -<br>12) | No difference |
| Technological<br>Characteristics | NGS<br>Subject Device | NGS with Chairside Splint<br>Predicate Device (K182776) | Comments | |
| Sterilization | Steam | Steam | No difference. | |
| Components | | | | |
| Patient Tracking<br>Device | Patient Tracker | Patient Tracker | No difference | |
| Patient Tracking<br>Attachment<br>System | Chairside Splint | Chairside Splint | No difference | |
| Dental Drill Motor<br>and Hand Piece | Aseptico Drill Motor (Model<br>●<br>No. AEU-7000LNE-70V)<br>(K030163)<br>Anthogyr Mont Blanc<br>●<br>handpiece (Aseptico Model<br>No. AHP-85MBFO-CX)<br>(K070084) | W&H Implant Med Electric Drill<br>Motor (Implant Med SI 95<br>Series), and an Anthogyr<br>Impulsion handpiece (Model No.<br>14400BP) | Brand change,<br>functionally<br>equivalent | |
| Drill Motor Collar | ● Geometry to fit Aseptico<br>● Increased size<br>● Compression collet to<br>improve rigidity | ● Geometry to fit W&H<br>● Smaller size<br>● Tension clamp for<br>rigidity | Increased<br>robustness of the<br>design to<br>improve rigidity<br>and to<br>accommodate<br>different drill<br>brand | |
## Table 1: Summary of Technological Characteristics Comparison
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
# Prior Performance Testing from K173402:
Chairside splint verification and validation testing from K173402 is described below in Table 2.
| Verification / Validation<br>Type | Description |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Simulated Use (End User<br>Validation) | Run through of typical splint affixation cases using typodonts, performed by<br>Surgeons. |
| Total System Accuracy | The Total System was evaluated for accuracy via simulated use with a<br>typodont as simulation of a patient with three osteotomies per typodont in<br>four locations (Upper Right / Upper Left / Lower Right / Lower Left). |
| Patient Tracker and Splint<br>Mounting Verifications | Evaluating the effect of 2x Patient Tracker weight as total downward force<br>on a standard splint mounted on a typodont per the IFU. In addition,<br>evaluation of kinematic mount repeatability and patient anatomy<br>accommodation analysis. |
|--|
# Prior Performance Testing from K161399:
{9}------------------------------------------------
#### Biocompatibility Testing
The biocompatibility evaluation for NGS components was conducted in accordance with
- . Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff Document issued on: June 16, 2016
- . ANSI AAMI ISO 10993-1:2009/(R)2013 Biological evaluation of medical devices -Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
The components of the NGS are considered tissue/dentin contacting for a duration of less than 24 hours.
## Electrical Safety
ANSI AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012 (Consolidated Text) Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (IEC 60601-1:2005. MOD)
#### Software and System Verification and Validation
- ANSI AAMI IEC 62304:2006 Medical device software Software life cycle ● processes
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Guidance for the Content of Premarket ● Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices Document issued on: May 11, 2005
Software testing summary is in table 3.
| Verification / Validation Type | Description |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Simulated Use | Run through of Typical Use Case |
| Boundary Condition | Testing of all potential boundary parameters in the Application<br>Software |
| Registration | Testing of registration process |
| Verification / Validation Type | Description |
| Case File Contents | Simulated use testing of features associated with saving / loading<br>Cases |
| Error Case Injection | Simulating all error messages and pop-ups. |
| CT Scan Verification | Verification of the resolution and validity of CT Scans |
| Control SW Boundary Condition<br>Testing | Testing the mechanical boundaries of the Control Software and<br>Guidance Arm. |
| Control Software Gravity<br>Calibration Verification | Verifying that the Gravity Calibration is effective over multiple start-up<br>shut down cycles |
| Work Volume and Floor Grid<br>Verification | Verifying the design and functionality of the Work Volume and Floor<br>Grid features in the application software. |
| Accuracy Verification: Patient<br>Tracker | The Patient Tracker was evaluated for accuracy per ASTM F2554. |
| Guidance Arm Accuracy /<br>Repeatability | The positional accuracy of the Guidance Arm was evaluated by<br>collecting 27 data points in spaces within two work volumes (54 total<br>points) against a calibrated CMM. |
| Communication Rate Verification | Force-Torque (F/T) Sensor to Control Software, Patient Tracker to<br>Control Software, Guidance Arm to Control Software and<br>communication between Application Software and Control Software<br>rates were evaluated for appropriate speed. |
| End User Calibration Verification | Dimensional analysis and verification of Calibration Materials<br>(Calibration Drill Bit and Calibration End Effector Divot) |
| F/T Sensor Verification | Guidance Arm speed limit testing and drift / idle F/T Sensor<br>verification, intended to evaluate safety mitigations for Guidance Arm<br>motion. |
| Start-Up / Shutdown Process<br>Verification | Qualitative evaluation of all start-up / shutdown steps performed in a<br>simulated clinical environment. |
| Verification / Validation Type | Description |
| Start-Up Joint Position<br>Identification | Verification to ensure system integrity of Guidance Arm in case any<br>joint motion that may have occurred while system was not powered. |
| User Emergency Safety<br>Verification | Evaluation of time required for a Guidance Arm emergency shutdown,<br>and emergency disconnection of the patient. |
| Guidance Arm Adjustment to<br>Patient Motion | Simulation of Patient Tracker motion while system is in Drill Mode, and<br>drill bit is in simulated bone block |
| Work Volume Verification | Assessment of physical design and cable management throughout<br>available work volumes. |
| Speed Trap Verification | Evaluation of the Guidance Arm and Patient Tracker speed trap safety<br>mitigations. |
| End User Validation of User<br>Requirements | Validation of User Requirements as they pertain to NGS Design and<br>Development, and Software Lifecycle Design and Development,<br>performed by End User in simulated environment. |
| End User Validation of User<br>Requirements for Splint<br>Application and Removal | An addendum to the NGS End User Validation to repeat validation<br>steps associated with changes made to the design and instructions for<br>the use of the NGS Splint. |
| End User Validation of User<br>Requirements for Changes made<br>to Patient Tracker End Effector | An addendum to the NGS End User Validation to repeat validation<br>steps associated with changes made to the design, and procedural<br>steps associated with the Patient Tracker End Effector |
#### Table 3: Summary of all software and system verification and validation
{10}------------------------------------------------
{11}------------------------------------------------
# Performance Testing Submitted with this Submission
- . ANSI AAMI ISO 14971:2007/(R)2010 (Corrected 4 October 2007) Medical devices - Applications of risk management to medical devices
- . ANSI AAMI IEC 60601-1-2:2014 Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance -- Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances -- Requirements and tests
- ANSI AAMI ISO 17665-1:2006/(R)2013 Sterilization of health care products --. Moist heat -- Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation, and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
- Neocis-Total system accuracy verification
- Neocis-End user validation
- Simulated procedure on typodont
# Conclusion:
{12}------------------------------------------------
The indications for use are unchanged. The technological changes do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. The new parts perform in a substantially equivalent manner to the predicates.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.