K191290 · Ancora Medical Technology · BSP · Feb 6, 2020 · Anesthesiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K191290
Device Name
Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set
Applicant
Ancora Medical Technology
Product Code
BSP · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Feb 6, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 868.5150
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set, consisting of the peripheral nerve block needle, catheter, and related dressing accessory, is intended to provide, via percutaneous administration, continuous and/or intermittent infusion of local anesthetics and analgesics for peripheral plexus anesthesia and pain management.
Device Story
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set is a sterile, single-use, disposable device for continuous peripheral nerve blocks. It consists of a 21-gauge needle and 18-gauge catheter in a catheter-over-needle design with a twist-lock connection. Physicians use the device in clinical settings to locate peripheral nerves by transferring electrical impulses from a nerve stimulator or via ultrasound visualization. The device features an anchor and decoupler assembly to stabilize the catheter position. Once placed, the catheter remains indwelling for up to 72 hours to deliver local anesthetics or analgesics. The output is the successful placement of the catheter for pain management. The device utilizes NRFit connectors for infusion. It benefits patients by providing continuous or intermittent regional anesthesia, facilitating post-operative pain control.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including electrical performance (continuity, current transfer), flow rate, occlusion, kink resistance, joint bond strength, leakage, penetration force, echogenicity, and corrosion resistance. Biocompatibility testing was conducted per ISO 10993-1 for limited and prolonged duration contact.
Technological Characteristics
Catheter-over-needle design; 21G stainless steel needle; 18G catheter (polyimide inner sheath, spring coil, Pebax outer sheath). NRFit connectors (ISO 80369-6). Echogenic needle and catheter. Electrical insulation via catheter construction. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide (ISO 11135). Standards: ISO 20698, EN 13868, ISO 7864, ISO 10555-1/5, ASTM D4169-16.
Indications for Use
Indicated for surgical pain management during pre-operative, perioperative, and post-operative periods associated with general and orthopedic surgery in adult patients. Allows peripheral nerve location via electrical nerve stimulation or ultrasound visualization. Catheter may remain indwelling for up to 72 hours.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An anesthesia conduction needle is a device used to inject local anesthetics into a patient to provide regional anesthesia.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services. To the right of the seal is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below.
Ancora Medical Technology % Terri Bogucki Consultant Decus Biomedical Inc 2342 Shattuck Ave #333 Berkeley, California 94704
Re: K191290
Trade/Device Name: Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5150 Regulation Name: Anesthesia Conduction Needle Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: BSP Dated: January 6, 2020 Received: January 8, 2020
## Dear Terri Bogucki:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Todd Courtney Assistant Director DHT1C: Division of ENT, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthesia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191290
Device Name Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set is indicated for surgical pain management during the pre-operative, perioperative and post-operative periods associated with general and orthopedic surgery. The device allows physicians to locate peripheral nerves by transferring electrical impulses from a nerve stimulator and/or through ultrasound visualization of the device. The catheter may remain in dwelling for up to 72 hours.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 5 510(k) Summary
| Submitter's Name: | Ancora Medical Technology |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 333 Ravenswood Ave<br>Menlo Park, CA 94025 |
| Contact Person: | Terese Bogucki |
| Title: | Regulatory Consultant |
| Telephone Number: | 650-488-7799 |
| Fax Number: | 650-227-2264 |
| Email: | terri@decusbiomedical.com |
| Date Summary Prepared: | 9 May 2019 |
| Device Proprietary Name: | Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set |
| Model Number: | 10-04-SET1 |
| Common Name: | Peripheral Nerve Block Needle |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 868.5150 |
| Product Code: | BSP |
| Device Class: | II |
| Predicate Device | Trade name: Braun Contiplex® C<br>Manufacturer: B Braun Medical Inc.<br>Address: 901 Marcon Boulevard<br>Allentown, PA 18109-9341<br>Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5150<br>Regulation Name: Needles, Conduction, Anesthetic, W/Wo introducer<br>Device Class: Class II<br>Product Code: BSP<br>510(k) Number: K121846<br>510(k) Clearance Date: November 20, 2012 |
#### 5.1 Description of the Device
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set is a sterile, single-use, disposable device, intended for delivery of local anesthetic for continuous peripheral nerve blocks, in adult patients.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set is intended to be placed with the use of nerve stimulation and/or ultrasound guidance. The device has a catheter-over-needle design, which consists of a 21-gauge needle and 18-gauge catheter with a twist lock connection between them. The device design includes an anchor and decoupler to help maintain the catheter position. Both the needle and catheter have NRFit connection for infusion. The device set includes two sizes of dressings.
#### 5.2 Intended Use
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set, consisting of the peripheral nerve block needle, catheter, and related dressing accessory, is intended to provide, via percutaneous administration, continuous and/or intermittent infusion of local anesthetics and analgesics for peripheral plexus anesthesia and pain management.
#### Indications for Use 5.3
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set is indicated for surgical pain management during the pre-operative, perioperative and post-operative periods associated with general and orthopedic surgery. The device allows physicians to locate peripheral nerves by transferring electrical impulses from a nerve stimulator or through ultrasound visualization of the device. The catheter may remain in dwelling for up to 72 hours.
#### 5.4 Summary of Technological Characteristics Comparison
The Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set has the same intended use as the Contiplex C Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Needle (K121846). The proposed device and predicate device both incorporate insulated needles to locate targeted nerve bundles by stimulation or ultrasound guidance in order to perform peripheral nerve block procedures. Both devices are used to place an indwelling catheter in position local to the target nerve and are intended to remain indwelling up to 72 hours. Both devices include a catheter over needle design.
Table 5-1 shows the similarities and differences between the two products. The differences in the technological characteristics of the devices result from the Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set's features that enable the catheter to remain in position so that the anesthetics or analgesics are delivered to the targeted nerve. The Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Needle secures the catheter to the patient's skin using the Perifix Pinpad. In the subject device, the decoupler assembly, anchor, and dressing work together to stabilize the catheter and catheter tip. While these characteristics are different, the testing demonstrates that they do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.
| Technological<br>Characteristic | Predicate | Subject Device | Differences |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Design | Catheter over needle | Same | None |
| Technological<br>Characteristic | Predicate | Subject Device | Differences |
| Echogenic | Yes (catheter) | Yes (needle and<br>catheter) | None - ultrasound can be<br>used with the both devices<br>to determine and confirm<br>the correct catheter<br>placement |
| Needle Gauge | 25G | 21G | The subject device has a<br>larger diameter needle,<br>which makes it easier to<br>control but does not impact<br>clinical use (other similar<br>devices on the market have<br>needles as large as 18G);<br>needle testing has<br>demonstrated it meets<br>standards |
| Needle Length | 190 mm | 100 mm | Minimal - the subject<br>device's shorter needle is<br>easier to manage |
| Needle Type | Straight | Same | None |
| Needle Bevel | 30 degree | Same | None |
| Needle<br>Material | Stainless steel | Same | None |
| Compatible<br>with Nerve<br>Stimulators | Yes -Stimuplex®<br>HNS 12 SENSe<br>nerve stimulators | Yes - used with<br>stimulators with a<br>2 mm touchproof<br>electromedical<br>connector and<br>delivering a<br>maximum current<br>of 5 mA | None – the subject device<br>uses a standard connector<br>(that can be used with the<br>HNS 12 stimulator);<br>subject device testing has<br>demonstrated the needle<br>can tolerate a much higher<br>current than would be<br>applied clinically |
| Stimulation<br>Wire<br>Conduction<br>Material | Unknown | Copper | Conduction materials do<br>not contact the patient; any<br>material differences would<br>not impact safety or<br>effectiveness |
| Technological<br>Characteristic | Predicate | Subject Device | Differences |
| Needle<br>Electrically<br>Insulated? | Yes - parylene<br>coating insulates the<br>needle (except for<br>the bevel tip) | Yes - catheter<br>construction<br>(effectively 5<br>layers) insulates<br>the needle (except<br>for the tip) | The predicate device used<br>a coating on the needle, but<br>the subject device has no<br>insulation attached to the<br>body of the needle. While<br>the catheter provides<br>insulation, it isn't adhered<br>to the needle. |
| Catheter Gauge | 19G | 18G | Size difference is minimal |
| Catheter<br>Construction | Polyamide and<br>polyeurethane | Polyimide inner<br>sheath with inner<br>spring coil, Pebax<br>outer sheath | Both devices are<br>echogenic; subject device<br>construction with a coil<br>and air gap between<br>sheaths enhances the<br>catheter's echogenicity |
| Catheter<br>Effective<br>Length | 187 mm | 95 mm | Minimal - shorter catheters<br>are said to make<br>securement easier, reduce<br>the likelihood of catheter<br>knotting, and reduce the<br>potential for the catheter to<br>accidentally leave the<br>sterile field during<br>placement |
| Catheter Tip | Open tapered tip | Open smooth,<br>rounded, tapered<br>tip | Minimal - the shapes of<br>the tips do not impact<br>safety or effectiveness |
| Infusion Set<br>Connector<br>Type | Catheter clamp with<br>yellow connector<br>(likely NRFit) | NRFit | Subject device does not<br>require extra step of<br>attaching clamp to the end<br>of the catheter; NRFit is<br>designed to meet ISO<br>80369-6, an FDA-<br>recognized consensus<br>standard related to small<br>bore connectors for<br>neuraxial applications. The<br>yellow connector on the<br>predicate implies it is also<br>NRFit. |
| Technological<br>Characteristic | Predicate | Subject Device | Differences |
| Catheter<br>Fixation | Perifix PinPad is a<br>skin fixation device<br>for the Perifix EF<br>filter (which<br>attaches to and<br>stabilizes the<br>catheter) | Decoupler<br>assembly, anchor<br>and dressing | Testing demonstrates the<br>decoupler and anchor do<br>not impact safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Infusion Filter | Includes Perifix EF<br>filter (0.2µm) | Not included | Filters are used to address<br>concerns the anesthetic is<br>non-sterile or<br>contaminated, for example,<br>as result of disconnection.<br>However, the two<br>additional connection<br>points have raised clinical<br>concerns that filters<br>actually increase the risk<br>for disconnection and<br>infection. Separate filters<br>are widely available and<br>could be attached to the<br>subject catheter. |
| Compatible<br>Infusion Pump | Luer connector,<br>flow rate maximum<br>35mL/hr | NRFit connector,<br>flow rate<br>maximum 33<br>ml/min | Minimal - the subject<br>device's labeling indicates<br>the maximum flow rate<br>supported by the catheter,<br>as does the predicate.<br>Subject devices maximum<br>flow rate is higher than the<br>predicate, and therefore<br>matches or exceeds<br>compatibility. |
| External<br>Dressing | Not included or<br>specified | Small and large<br>dressing sizes<br>provided in set | The dressing serves to<br>protect the skin at the<br>catheter insertion point,<br>contain the decoupler and<br>secure the catheter;<br>standard practice is to<br>apply a dressing over the<br>insertion site. |
| Technological<br>Characteristic | Predicate | Subject Device | Differences |
| Device<br>Insertion Aid | Control Grip | Ridged edges on<br>the hubs | The moveable Control Grip<br>on the predicate device is<br>intended to facilitate<br>insertion of the needle and<br>catheter together at 2 cm<br>intervals. This is needed<br>because of the predicate's<br>thinner and longer needle.<br>The ridged edges on the<br>subject device's hubs help<br>stabilize the two<br>components during<br>insertion. The subject<br>device's thicker needle<br>does not need additional<br>support for insertion.<br>These differences have no<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Packaging | Individually<br>packaged kits<br>provided in a case of<br>5 units | Individually<br>packaged kits<br>provided in<br>dispenser carton<br>of 6 units | Minimal difference in<br>number of units has no<br>impact on safety or<br>effectiveness |
## Table 5-1. Summary of Technological Characteristics Comparison
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### Non-Clinical Performance Data 5.5
Testing was performed with the Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set to support substantial equivalence to the predicate device. Testing included performance testing, biocompatibility, sterilization, and shelf-life testing.
Performance testing completed included the following functional tests: electrical performance (continuity, current transfer), flow rate, occlusion, kink resistance, resistance to breakage, joint bond strength, leakage, penetration force, echogenicity, corrosion resistance.
The following standards were utilized in the evaluation:
- ISO 20698, Catheter systems for neuraxial application -- Sterile and singleuse catheters and accessories
- EN 13868, Catheters - Test methods for kinking of single lumen catheters and medical tubing
{9}------------------------------------------------
- . ISO 7864, Sterile hypodermic needles for single use
- ISO 10555-1, Intravascular catheters -- Sterile and single-use catheters -- Part 1: General requirements
- ISO 10555-5. Intravascular catheters -- Sterile and single-use catheters -- Part . 5: Over-needle peripheral catheters
- . ASTM D4169-16, Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems
In addition, Ancora Medical Technology conducted performance testing to demonstrate the subject device conforms with the following test standards:
- . ISO 80369-6:2016, Small bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications -- Part 6: Connectors for neuraxial applications
- . ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11135:2014, Sterilization of health-care products -Ethylene oxide - Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
Results of performance testing indicate that the needle and catheter, in the Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set meet applicable sections of the standards referenced and are safe and effective for their intended use. Based upon the results of this testing, it was determined the Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set performance was substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
#### 5.5.1 Biocompatibility Testing
Biocompatibility testing was performed based on the nature and duration of patient contact outlined in ISO 10993-1: "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" and the FDA guidance document: "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"". The needle assembly was tested per the ISO 10993-1 requirements for an externally communicating device with tissue contact for a limited duration (< 24 hours). The catheter and the decoupler were tested per the requirements of ISO 10993-1 as an externally communicating device with tissue contact for a prolonged duration (>24 hours to 30 days). The dressing was tested per the requirements of ISO 10993-1 as a skin contacting device with skin contact for a prolonged duration (>24 hours to 30 days). Results of testing demonstrates that the materials used in the construction of the needle and catheter in the proposed Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set are safe for their intended use.
#### 5.6 Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
An analysis of the subject and predicate devices shows that the Intended Use and Indications for Use, principles of operation, and conditions of use are identical, and that differences in technical characteristics do not raise different questions of safety and
{10}------------------------------------------------
effectiveness. Therefore, one can conclude that the Ancora Nerve Block Catheter Set is substantially equivalent to the predicate Contiplex C Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Needle device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.