K183680 · Abbott Point of Care, Inc. · JPI · Feb 28, 2020 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K183680
Device Name
i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System
Applicant
Abbott Point of Care, Inc.
Product Code
JPI · Hematology
Decision Date
Feb 28, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.6400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System is intended for use in the in vitro quantification of hematocrit in arterial or venous whole blood in point of care or clinical laboratory settings. Hematocrit measurements can aid in the determination and monitoring of normal or abnormal total red cell volume status that can be associated with conditions including anemia and erythrocytosis. The i-STAT Hematocrit test has not been evaluated in neonates.
Device Story
System comprises handheld i-STAT 1 Analyzer and single-use i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge; used by trained medical professionals in point-of-care or clinical laboratory settings. Input: 2-3 drops of lithium heparin anticoagulated whole blood. Principle: conductivity method; sensor measures electrical conductivity of calibrant then whole blood sample; hematocrit result calculated as ratio of sample to calibrant conductivity, corrected using measured sample electrolyte (sodium) concentration. Output: quantitative hematocrit result (%PCV) displayed on analyzer screen. Healthcare providers use output to assess red cell volume status and monitor conditions like anemia or erythrocytosis; aids clinical decision-making regarding patient blood status.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision studies (internal and multi-site) evaluated repeatability and reproducibility using aqueous controls and whole blood across hematocrit ranges. Linearity demonstrated over 15-75% PCV. Interference testing identified lithium bromide, total protein, and high WBCs as interferents. Method comparison study (N=194) against predicate device showed strong correlation (r=1.00) and acceptable bias at medical decision points.
Indicated for in vitro quantification of hematocrit in arterial or venous whole blood in point-of-care or clinical laboratory settings. Aids in monitoring red cell volume status (e.g., anemia, erythrocytosis). Not evaluated in neonates.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hematocrit measuring device is a system consisting of instruments, tubes, racks, and a sealer and a holder. The device is used to measure the packed red cell volume in blood to determine whether the patient's total red cell volume is normal or abnormal. Abnormal states include anemia (an abnormally low total red cell volume) and erythrocytosis (an abnormally high total red cell mass). The packed red cell volume is produced by centrifuging a given volume of blood.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 864.9.
Predicate Devices
i-STAT Hematocrit test with i-STAT Alinity System (K163342)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K183680
B Applicant
Abbott Point of Care Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JPI | Class II | 21 CFR 864.6400 - Hematocrit Measuring Device | HE - Hematology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of a previously cleared device — modification to the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge run on the i-STAT 1 Analyzer
B Measurand:
Hematocrit
C Type of Test:
Quantitative conductivity (electrical) measurement
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System is intended for use in the in vitro quantification of hematocrit in arterial or venous whole blood in point of care or clinical laboratory settings.
Hematocrit measurements can aid in the determination and monitoring of normal or abnormal total red cell volume status that can be associated with conditions including anemia and erythrocytosis.
The i-STAT Hematocrit test has not been evaluated in neonates.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
For point-of-care or clinical laboratory setting
D Special Instrument Requirements:
i-STAT 1 Analyzer
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The i-STAT 1 System consists of the i-STAT 1 Analyzer and the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges. The system is designed for use by trained medical professionals at the patient point of care or in the clinical laboratory and is for prescription use only.
The i-STAT 1 Analyzer (previously cleared under K103195 as the i-STAT 1 Wireless Analyzer) is a handheld analytical device designed to run i-STAT test cartridges. The instrument interacts with the cartridge to move fluid across the sensors and generate a quantitative result.
The single-use, disposable i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge contains test reagents to analyze whole blood at the point of care or in the clinical laboratory for hematocrit and other analytes. The cartridge format allows all the tests in the cartridge to be performed simultaneously. The cartridges contain the required sensors, a fluid pouch, a sample entry well and closure, fluid channels, waste chamber, and the necessary mechanical features for controlled fluid movement within the cartridge. Cartridges require two to three drops of whole blood, which are typically applied to the cartridge using a transfer device by the trained user before the cartridge is placed within the analyzer.
K183680 - Page 2 of 11
{2}
K183680 - Page 3 of 11
B Principle of Operation:
The Hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge uses the conductivity method. The measured conductivity of the sample is inversely proportional to the number of red blood cells in the sample. In a whole blood sample, the plasma conducts electrical current and blood cells act as insulators. The hematocrit sensor, contained in the test cartridge, first measures the electrical conductivity of the calibrant solution, followed by the conductivity of the whole blood sample. The hematocrit result (expressed as % packed cell volume or %PCV) is calculated from the ratio of the sample conductivity to the calibrant conductivity. The conductivity of the sample is also a function of the plasma electrolyte concentration. The i-STAT Hematocrit test algorithm uses the measured electrolyte concentration in the sample (e.g. the sodium concentration) in the calculation of the test result. As a measured electrolyte concentration is required to calculate a hematocrit result, the Hematocrit test is always paired with the Sodium test in the i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
i-STAT Hematocrit test with i-STAT Alinity System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K163342
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K183680 | K163342 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | i-STAT CHEM8+ Cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System (Hematocrit) | i-STAT Hematocrit Test on the i-STAT EC4+ Cartridge with the i-STAT Alinity System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The i-STAT CHEM8+ cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System is intended for use in the in vitro quantification of hematocrit in arterial or venous whole blood in point of care or clinical laboratory settings. Hematocrit | The i-STAT Hematocrit test is intended for use in the in vitro quantification of packed red blood cell volume fraction in arterial or venous heparinized whole blood, or in arterial or venous non-anticoagulated whole blood. |
{3}
K183680 - Page 4 of 11
| | measurements can aid in the determination and monitoring of normal or abnormal total red cell volume status that can be associated with conditions including anemia and erythrocytosis. The i-STAT Hematocrit test has not been evaluated in neonates. | Hematocrit measurements can aid in the determination and monitoring of normal or abnormal total red cell volume status that can be associated with conditions including anemia and erythrocytosis. The i-STAT Hematocrit test with the i-STAT Alinity System has not been evaluated in neonates. The i-STAT Hematocrit test with the i-STAT Alinity System is not for use with capillary samples. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Principle of Measurement | Hematocrit is measured using the conductivity method. | Same |
| Reportable Range | 15 – 75% packed cell volume (PCV) | Same |
| Analysis Time | ~ 2 minutes | Same |
| Reagent Format | Cartridge | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Sample Type | Lithium heparin anticoagulated arterial and venous whole blood | Lithium heparin anticoagulated and non-anticoagulated arterial and venous whole blood |
| Sample Volume | 95 μL | 65 μL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
{4}
CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI H7-A3: Procedure for Determining Packed Cell Volume by the Microhematocrit Method; Approved Standard – Third Edition
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
## A Analytical Performance:
### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
The study designs and analyses for precision studies were based on recommendations from CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition.
#### Internal site precision (aqueous control material)
A single site precision study using four concentration levels of commercially available calibration verification samples were tested using one lot of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges and eight i-STAT 1 analyzers. Each sample was measured in duplicates per run, with two runs per day for 20 days, resulting in a total of approximately 80 test results per level. The results are summarized below.
20-Day Internal Precision Study Results Summary:
| Level | N | Mean (%PCV) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| L2 | 80 | 20.5 | 0.20 | 1.0 | 0.08 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.22 | 1.1 |
| L3 | 80 | 32.4 | 0.29 | 0.9 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.31 | 1.0 |
| L4 | 81 | 53.2 | 0.94 | 1.8 | 0.26 | 0.5 | 0.30 | 0.6 | 1.02 | 1.9 |
| L5 | 80 | 63.9 | 0.79 | 1.2 | 0.31 | 0.5 | 0.18 | 0.3 | 0.87 | 1.4 |
#### Point of care precision (aqueous control material)
A three-site precision study using four concentration levels of aqueous control solutions were tested using one lot of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges and six i-STAT 1 analyzers. Each sample was tested at each site once per day for five days on six i-STAT 1 analyzers for a total of 90 measurements. The same operator conducted all testing at a given site, with a different operator at each site. The results were analyzed for within-day (contains between-analyzer) variance, within-site (contains within-day and between-day variance components) variance, and overall (summation of within-site and between-site variance components) variance and is provided in the table below for all sites combined.
Multi-Day Precision Study Results Summary (all sites combined):
| Level | N | Min (%PCV) | Max (%PCV) | Mean (%PCV) | Within-Day | | Within-Site | | Overall | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| L2 | 90 | 20 | 22 | 20.7 | 0.47 | 2.3 | 0.58 | 2.8 | 0.62 | 3.0 |
| L3 | 90 | 33 | 34 | 33.1 | 0.22 | 0.7 | 0.28 | 0.8 | 0.28 | 0.8 |
| L4 | 90 | 52 | 55 | 53.7 | 0.68 | 1.3 | 0.68 | 1.3 | 0.69 | 1.3 |
| L5 | 90 | 62 | 65 | 63.7 | 0.71 | 1.1 | 0.71 | 1.1 | 0.74 | 1.2 |
K183680 - Page 5 of 11
{5}
# Point of care precision (whole blood)
A venous whole blood precision study was performed using venous whole blood from patients collected in lithium heparin tubes, with samples either native or contrived, to generate the following hematocrit (%PCV) target ranges: $< 38\%$ , $38 - 51\%$ , and $>51\%$ . The study was performed at three point of care sites, by one operator at each site, with each sample tested in triplicate, on seven i-STAT 1 analyzers, for a total of 21 test results per sample. One lot of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges was used for the study. The abnormal low hematocrit specimens were contrived by adding plasma and the abnormal high hematocrit specimens were contrived by removing plasma. Within-analyzer (repeatability) variance and total (summation of between-analyzer and within-analyzer variance components) variance was determined for each sample at each site. Summaries of the results from this study are shown below.
Venous Whole Blood Precision Results by Sample Summary:
| | | | | Within-analyzer | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HCT range (%PCV) | Site | N | Mean (%PCV) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| < 38 | 01 | 21 | 34.2 | 1.09 | 3.2 | 1.09 | 3.2 |
| | 02 | 21 | 36.8 | 0.62 | 1.7 | 0.71 | 1.9 |
| | 03 | 21 | 37.7 | 0.53 | 1.4 | 0.56 | 1.5 |
| | 03 | 21 | 33.9 | 0.85 | 2.5 | 0.85 | 2.5 |
| 38 – 51 | 01 | 21 | 41.1 | 0.49 | 1.2 | 0.58 | 1.4 |
| | 01 | 21 | 42.5 | 0.62 | 1.5 | 0.62 | 1.5 |
| | 02 | 20* | 42.2 | 0.51 | 1.2 | 0.51 | 1.2 |
| | 02 | 14* | 47.2 | 1.22 | 2.6 | 1.22 | 2.6 |
| | 02 | 21 | 43.1 | 0.49 | 1.1 | 0.49 | 1.1 |
| | 02 | 21 | 38.9 | 0.38 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.0 |
| | 02 | 21 | 38.1 | 0.44 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 1.2 |
| | 03 | 21 | 43.9 | 0.69 | 1.6 | 0.69 | 1.6 |
| | 03 | 21 | 40.8 | 0.49 | 1.2 | 0.54 | 1.3 |
| | 03 | 21 | 41.5 | 0.53 | 1.3 | 0.53 | 1.3 |
| | 03 | 21 | 45.9 | 0.62 | 1.4 | 0.63 | 1.4 |
| > 51 | 01 | 21 | 55.1 | 0.38 | 0.7 | 0.44 | 0.8 |
| | 02 | 21 | 55.0 | 0.53 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.0 |
| | 03 | 21 | 55.0 | 0.44 | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.8 |
*excluded measurements for samples not tested within protocol-specified timeframe
Arterial whole blood repeatability was assessed using data collected across two point of care sites. An additional assessment of venous whole blood repeatability was determined using data collected at a single point of care site. Sixty-seven arterial samples, and 123 venous samples, collected during the method comparison study were measured in duplicate and repeatability estimates were calculated for each pair of duplicate results within three hematocrit ranges, $\leq 35\%$ PCV, $35 - 50\%$ PCV, and $>50\%$ PCV. Less than $10\%$ of samples were contrived to cover the high hematocrit range. Only samples with duplicate measurements were included in the assessment. The study included measurements from one lot of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges run on seven i-STAT 1 analyzers by multiple point of care operators at each site.
K183680 - Page 6 of 11
{6}
Venous Whole Blood Precision Results Summary:
| HCT Range (%PCV) | N | Mean (%PCV) | SD | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ≤ 35 | 48 | 28.6 | 0.44 | 1.6 |
| 35 – 50 | 66 | 42.5 | 0.60 | 1.4 |
| > 50 | 9 | 60.0 | 0.47 | 0.8 |
Arterial Whole Blood Precision Results Summary:
| HCT Range (%PCV) | N | Mean (%PCV) | SD | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ≤ 35 | 40 | 27.2 | 1.93 | 7.1 |
| 35 – 50 | 21 | 39.9 | 0.82 | 2.0 |
| > 50 | 6 | 62.9 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
2. Linearity:
The linearity of the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge was evaluated following the recommendations in CLSI EP06-A – Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. Venous whole blood was collected in a lithium heparin tube obtained from a healthy subject and the specimen was altered to produce a high hematocrit sample and a low hematocrit sample (via concentration or dilution with plasma, respectively). A series of 11 samples with varying hematocrit levels (< 15% PCV to > 75% PCV) were created by mixing different proportions of the high and low hematocrit samples. The low and high samples were value assigned for hematocrit using 20 i-STAT CG8+ (white) cartridges on i-STAT 1 analyzers. Each sample was measured in replicates of 20 using five lots of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges on i-STAT 1 analyzers. An assessment of linearity was performed and polynomial regression analyses for first-, second-, and third-order polynomials were determined. The third-order model was determined to have the best fit and was used for the assessment of the degree of non-linearity. For all test samples, the absolute value of the degree of non-linearity met the pre-defined acceptance criteria and linearity was demonstrated over the reportable range of 15 – 75% PCV.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The analytical specificity of the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge was established by conducting interference testing following the recommendations in CLSI EP07-A2 - Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition. Interference from certain exogenous and endogenous substances was assessed using lithium heparin venous whole blood samples at two hematocrit levels: low hematocrit (26.5% – 31.5% PCV) and high hematocrit (57 – 63% PCV). Each low and high sample was further divided into two aliquots: control (with no added interferent) and test (with added interferent). Each sample was measured in replicates of 10 using one lot of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges. A substance was identified as an interferent if the point estimate of the difference between the test sample and the control sample was outside of the pre-defined allowable error of ±10.8% PCV. For any substances identified as an interferent, a dose-response analysis was performed to determine the degree of interference as a function of the substance concentration. Based on this method of interferent determination, substances listed
K183680 - Page 7 of 11
{7}
in the table below were found not to interfere with the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge at the concentration indicated.
Non-Interfering Substances:
| Substance | Highest concentration at which no interference was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | 0.342 mmol/L and 20.01 mg/dL |
| Nithiodote (Sodium Thiosulfate) | 16.7 mmol/L and 264.04 mg/dL |
| Triglyceride | 37.0 mmol/L and 3233.80 mg/dL |
| White Blood Cells (WBCs) | 50,000 cells/μL |
| Intralipid | 5296 mg/dL |
Lithium bromide, total protein and high levels of white blood cells (WBC) were identified as interferents to the hematocrit test for samples with certain hematocrit levels, as summarized in the table below:
Interfering Substances:
| Substance | Concentration | Interference |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium bromide | ≥ 14.0 mmol/L | Decreased HCT results |
| Total Protein | ≥ 10.2 g/dL | Increased HCT results |
| Total Protein | ≤ 5.3 g/dL | Decreased HCT results |
| White Blood Cells | > 50,000 cells/μL | Increased HCT results |
Additionally, factors that affect the sodium measurement on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge will also affect hematocrit measurements, as the electrolyte concentration from the sample is used to correct the measured conductivity prior to reporting hematocrit results.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
See Section A.2 Linearity
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
For the measurement of hematocrit, the i-STAT 1 System can be customized to agree with methods calibrated by the microhematocrit reference method using either K₃EDTA or K₂EDTA anticoagulant. Mean cell volumes of K₃EDTA anticoagulated blood are approximately 2 – 4% less than K₂EDTA anticoagulated blood (CLSI H7-A3: Procedure for Determining Packed Cell Volume by the Microhematocrit Method; Approved Standard – Third Edition). While the choice of sample anticoagulant affects the result of the microhematocrit method (to which all hematocrit methods are calibrated), results on hematology analyzers are independent of the anticoagulant used because these methods dilute the sample. Since most clinical hematology analyzers are calibrated by the microhematocrit method using K₃EDTA anticoagulant, the i-STAT 1 System default customization is K₃EDTA.
K183680 - Page 8 of 11
{8}
6. Detection Limit:
Detection capability studies of limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) for the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge with the i-STAT 1 analyzer were conducted following the recommendations in CLSI EP17-A2 – Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition.
LoB
The LoB study was conducted over three days using two lots of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges and whole blood samples collected in lithium heparin tubes from four unique subjects. The whole blood from each subject was altered to create a ‘blank’ hematocrit level sample for LoB testing. Since whole blood is not stable over time, each of the three days, a fresh whole blood blank sample was created from a unique specimen. Each of the four LoB samples was measured in 20 replicates on each of the two cartridge lots for a total of approximately 80 measurements per cartridge lot. The LoB was determined based on the maximal LoB value obtained for the cartridge lots tested. The LoB for the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge was determined to be 0.66% PCV.
LoD
The LoD study was conducted over three days using two lots of i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges and evaluated whole blood samples collected in lithium heparin tubes from four unique subjects. The whole blood from each subject was altered to create four low-level hematocrit samples. Since whole blood is not stable over time, each of the three days, four fresh whole blood low-level hematocrit samples were created from a unique specimen. Each of the four low-level samples from each of the four subjects was measured in 10 replicates on each of the two cartridge lots for a total of approximately 160 measurements per cartridge lot. The LoD was determined based on the maximal LoD value obtained for the cartridge lots tested. The LoD for the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge was determined to be 1.38% PCV.
LoQ
The LoQ for hematocrit was evaluated using lithium heparin venous whole blood collected on each day, over the course of three days, from unique healthy subjects. The whole blood was altered to produce four low-level hematocrit samples below the lower limit of the reportable range (< 15% PCV). Each of the four samples was measured in 15 replicates on each of two i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge lots for a total of 60 measurements per cartridge lot. The LoQ was determined to be 12.4% PCV, which is below the lower limit of the i-STAT Hematocrit test reportable range (15 – 75% PCV).
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
K183680 - Page 9 of 11
{9}
A method comparison study was performed comparing the performance of the hematocrit test on CHEM8+ (blue) cartridges run on the i-STAT 1 analyzer compared to the hematocrit test on the EC4+ cartridge run on the i-STAT Alinity analyzer (K163342). A total of 194 specimens from subjects $\geq 19$ years old were tested across three point of care sites by operators representative of point of care operators. Specifically, 124 lithium heparin venous whole blood specimens and 70 lithium heparin arterial whole blood specimens were evaluated in the study. Less than $10\%$ of all specimens used in the study were contrived to supplement the lowest and highest hematocrit specimens. The data was analyzed separately for venous whole blood and arterial whole blood specimens by Passing-Bablok regression analyses comparing the first replicate from the candidate device to the mean of duplicate measurements from the predicate device for each specimen. Data was also analyzed for venous and arterial whole blood specimens combined, as the data was demonstrated to be poolable. Results are presented in the tables below.
Passing-Bablok Regression Analyses Summary
| Specimen Type | N | HCT Range Tested (%PCV) | r (95% CI) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Venous + Arterial (All Sites Combined) | 194 | 16 – 75 | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.030 (1.000, 1.043) | -0.530 (-1.087, 0.750) |
| Venous (Site 1) | 124 | 16 – 75 | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.032 (1.000, 1.048) | -0.597 (-1.238, 1.000) |
| Arterial (All Sites Combined) | 70 | 19 – 74 | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) | 1.033 (1.000, 1.064) | -0.617 (-1.733, 1.000) |
| Arterial (Site 2) | 31 | 23 – 74 | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.000 (1.000, 1.051) | 1.000 (-1.368, 1.000) |
| Arterial (Site 3) | 38 | 19 – 40 | 0.99 (0.97, 0.99) | 1.056 (1.000, 1.125) | -1.254 (-3.375, 0.750) |
Predicted biases at medical decision points for hematocrit (33% PCV, 53% PCV, 56% PCV, and 70% PCV) were also determined for venous and arterial whole blood, with results demonstrating acceptable performance.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable. Lithium heparin whole blood is the only acceptable sample type for this device.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
K183680 - Page 10 of 11
{10}
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Expected values for the hematocrit test on the i-STAT CHEM8+ (blue) cartridge are cited from literature.
Adult Reference Ranges
| Analyte | Unit | Adult Reference Ranges†
Arterial and Venous | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hematocrit/HCT** | %PCV
(packed cell volume) | Female | Male |
| | | 38–46 | 43–51 |
| | Fraction | 0.38–0.46 | 0.43–0.51 |
Pediatric Reference Ranges by Age (and Gender)
| Age | Reference Range, %PCV‡ |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | 33–55 |
| 2 months | 28–42 |
| 4 months | 32–44 |
| 6 months | 31–41 |
| 9 months | 32–40 |
| 12 months | 33–41 |
| 1-2 years | 32–40 |
| 3-5 years | 32–42 |
| 6-8 years | 33–41 |
| 9-11 years | 34–43 |
| 12-14 years | Female: 34–44; Male: 35–45 |
| 15-17 years | Female: 34–44; Male: 37–48 |
†B.E. Statland, Clinical Decision Levels for Lab Tests (Oradell, NJ: Medical Economics Books, 1987).
‡Wu, Alan H.B. Tietz, Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests – Fourth Edition (St. Louis, MO: W. B. Saunders Elsevier, 2006).
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K183680 - Page 11 of 11
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.