K183605 · Brainlab AG · OLO · Aug 29, 2019 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K183605
Device Name
Spine & Trauma Navigation
Applicant
Brainlab AG
Product Code
OLO · Neurology
Decision Date
Aug 29, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The intended use of the Spine & Trauma Navigation System is to support the surgeon in an operating theater for spinal and trauma cases. The System enables the user to navigate different instruments and / or implants in 3D datasets. Spine & Trauma 3D is intended as an intraoperative image-guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery. It links a freehand probe, tracked by a passive marker sensor system to virtual computer image space on a patient's preoperative or Intraoperative 2D or 3D image data. Spine & Trauma 3D enables computer-assisted navigation of medical image data, which can either be acquired preoperatively or inter-operatively by an appropriate image acquisition system. The software offers screw implant size planning and navigation on rigid bone structures with precalibrated and additional individually-calibrated surgical tools. The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, the pelvis, a long bone or vertebra can be identified relative to the acquired image (CT, MR, 2D fluoroscopic image or 3D fluoroscopic image reconstruction) and/or an image data based model of the anatomy.
Device Story
Intraoperative image-guided localization system; uses infrared passive marker-based optical tracking to link physical surgical instruments to virtual 3D/2D patient image data (CT, MR, fluoroscopy). System consists of navigation software running on fixed/mobile platforms (e.g., Buzz, Kick, Curve) and hardware including tracking cameras and optional mechatronic arm (Cirq) for instrument positioning. Used in operating rooms by surgeons (orthopedic, spinal, trauma, neuro) to navigate instruments/implants relative to rigid bony structures. Surgeon views tracked instruments overlaid on patient anatomy on navigation display; facilitates minimally invasive procedures and screw trajectory planning. Benefits include improved surgical precision and navigation accuracy for complex bony anatomy.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Verification included software GUI testing, mechanical stability/holding force tests for the mechatronic arm, biocompatibility, reprocessing, and electromagnetic compatibility (AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1). Usability testing performed with surgeons and OR nurses in a simulated clinical environment using an MIS spine training model to validate workflow and navigation accuracy.
Technological Characteristics
Optical infrared passive marker tracking system. Software-based navigation platform (fixed/mobile). Components include mechatronic arm (Cirq) for instrument positioning, sterile drapes, and surgical instruments. Connectivity via navigation platform. Software developed per IEC 62304. Compliance with AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1 (safety/EMC). Biocompatible materials used for patient-contacting instruments.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring stereotactic surgery on rigid anatomical structures (skull, pelvis, long bone, vertebra) where image-guided localization is appropriate. Used for minimally invasive surgery, screw implant planning, and navigation. No specific age or gender contraindications listed.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Brainlab AG Hugo Morales Senior QM Consultant - Regulatory Affairs Olof-Palme-Str. 9 Munich, 81829 DE
Re: K183605
Trade/Device Name: Spine & Trauma Navigation Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: May 24, 2019 Received: May 31, 2019
August 29, 2019
## Dear Hugo Morales:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see
{1}------------------------------------------------
https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
For, Shumaya Ali, MPH Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair, and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name Spine & Trauma Navigation
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
### INDICATIONS FOR USE
Spine & Trauma 3D is intended as an intraoperative image-guided localization system to enable mimimally invasive surgery. It links a freehand probe, tracked by a passive marker sensor system to virtual computer image space on a patient's preoperative or Intraoperative 2D or 3D image data.
Spine & Trauma 3D enables computer-assisted navigation of medical image data, which can either be acquired preoperatively or intraoperatively by an appropriate image acquisition system.
The software offers screw implant size planning and navigation on rigid bone structures with precalibrated and additional individually-calibrated surgical tools. The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, the pelvis, a long bone or vertebra can be identified relative to the acquired image (CT, MR, 2D fluoroscopic image reconstruction) and/or an image data based model of the anatomy.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| <div> <input type="checkbox"/> </div> | <div> <input type="checkbox"/> </div> |
| | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K183605
# 510 (K) SUMMARY SPINE & TRAUMA NAVIGATION SYSTEM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF 21 CFR PART 807.92
| General Information | |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Brainlab AG |
| Establishment Registration # | 8043933 |
| Device name: | Spine and Trauma Navigation System |
| Trade name: | Spine and Trauma 3D Navigation |
| Classification name: | Stereotaxic instrument_21 CFR 882.4560 |
| Review Panel | Orthopedic |
| Product Code: | OLO |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Predicate Device: | K083310, Spine and Trauma iCT |
| Date of preparation | December 20, 2018 |
| Contact Information | |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Primary contact person | Alternate contact person |
| Chiara Cunico | Regulatory Affairs Brainlab |
| Manager RA | Email: regulatory.affairs@brainlab.com |
| phone: +49 89 99 15 68 1738 | phone: +49 89 99 15 68 0 |
| Email: Chiara.cunico@brainlab.com | fax: +49 89 99 15 68 5033 |
#### INTENDED USE: 1
The intended use of the Spine & Trauma Navigation System is to support the surgeon in an operating theater for spinal and trauma cases. The System enables the user to navigate different instruments and / or implants in 3D datasets.
### Indications for Use
Spine & Trauma 3D is intended as an intraoperative image-guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery. It links a freehand probe, tracked by a passive marker sensor system to virtual computer image space on a patient's preoperative or Intraoperative 2D or 3D image data.
Spine & Trauma 3D enables computer-assisted navigation of medical image data, which can either be acquired preoperatively or inter-operatively by an appropriate image acquisition system.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The software offers screw implant size planning and navigation on rigid bone structures with precalibrated and additional individually-calibrated surgical tools. The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of sterectactic surgery may be appropriate and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, the pelvis, a long bone or vertebra can be identified relative to the acquired image (CT, MR, 2D fluoroscopic image or 3D fluoroscopic image reconstruction) and/or an image data based model of the anatomy.
#### 2 DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
This navigation system consists of software and hardware components and is an image quided surgery system for navigated treatments in the fields of spine and trauma surgery, whereas the user may use 3D data based on CT, MR or XT. The Software may be installed on a fixed (e.g. Buzz Navigation (CM)) or mobile (e.g. Kick, Curve) navigation platform and supports the surgeon in clinical procedures by displaying tracked instruments in patient's image data. Such instruments can be held by a surgeon or by a mechatronic arm, which passively keeps the instrument in the position. (Mechatronic Vario Guide, "Cirq").
### Operator profile
The operator's profile for this devices are surgeons or their assistants having a 3D image acquisition system (such as CT or 3D C-arm) in combination with a Brainlab navigation system. All operators are performing surgeries with this system on bony structures (e.g. spine), independent of their original discipline. Therefore different kind of surgeons may perform such procedures, which also includes Orthopedic, Spinal, Trauma and Neuro surgeons.
### Patient population
The patient population includes any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the skull, the pelvis, a long bone or vertebra can be identified relative to the acquired image (CT, 3D fluoroscopic image reconstruction).
### Intended use environment
The application shall be used in an operating room / suite.
### Operating principle
Infrared passive marker based tracking as provided by the optical tracking camera unit of the navigation station is used to determine the instrument's and patient's position between the patient and the reference attached to the patient is realized with a registration (manually or automatic).
### Use scenarios
The system is placed in a way that the surgeon can easily watch the screen(s) and interact with the system during the procedure, but sterility is not compromised. The camera is positioned in a way that it has an unobstructed view on the surgical field.
The patient is positioned and draped in the usual manner, taking in to account that the reference geometry has to be attached to the relevant anatomical structure in a way that it is not disturbing the latter workflow. The surgical approach is performed. A reference array is attached to the relevant bony structure using conventional surgical techniques (either under sight or minimally invasive). The 3D dataset is either acquired or loaded and subsequently registered.
{5}------------------------------------------------
After the scan has been transmitted to the navigation system or the registration computation has been performed, the surgeon is asked to verify the success of the registration with a general instrument or a dedicated pointer.
After successful verification the surgeon is able to access pre-planned objects, to plan or re-plan screws / trajectories and to visualize manually or pre-calibrated surgical instruments.
### Intended part of the body or type of tissue applied to or interacted with
This system has different components, whereas most of them are software. Therefore, only instruments may get in contact with a patient, some instruments are included to perform the surgery. All Instruments are used temporarily for orientation within the situs or for preparations to be able to implant 3ºd party devices, which are not part of this system.
Such instruments can be used at rigid bony structures, such as a long bone or vertebra, where the user wants to use this navigation software according to the indications for use.
### Essential performance characteristics
The essential performance characteristic for this product is the overall registration and navigation accuracy of the system to ensure the safe and effective use according to the intended use.
#### VERIFICATION SUMMARY 8
The verification of the Spine & Trauma Navigation System has been carried out thoroughly both at the top level and on underlying modules according to the verification plan and following internal processes. The verification was done to demonstrate that the design specifications are met.
In general, verification includes different kinds of tests within the software, GUI based automatic software tests and explorative testing. Results are documented in corresponding test reports and summarized in the Verification Summary document. For hardware parts, mechanical or biocompatibility tests were performed and filed accordingly.
For the integration of the Mechatronic Vario Guide, hardware and software related tests were performed regarding the following aspects:
| Test | Description | Conclusion / Result |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Verification of<br>general<br>functions | Tests regarding accurate positioning as well as robust<br>alignment of a surgical instrument with the Mechatronic Vario<br>Guide have been conducted on an MIS Spine Training Model<br>in a simulated clinical environment and were performed by<br>spinal surgeons. | Verification of general<br>functions successful.<br>All requirements met. |
| General design<br>requirements | Verification of general functions to overall design, layout and<br>general behavior. | Verification of general<br>design requirements<br>successful. |
| Safety tests<br>regarding risk<br>analysis | Implementation and effectiveness of all risk control measures<br>specified for the Mechatronic Vario Guide are tested and<br>verified. | Risk control measures<br>are effective and<br>mitigate the<br>associated risks. |
| Human factors<br>/ Usability<br>Testing | Usability tests with surgeons and OR nurses were performed<br>in a simulated clinical environment covering the complete<br>clinical workflow with the Mechatronic Vario Guide in | System is safe and<br>effective to use. |
| | | |
| Product safety tests | combination with the spine navigation applications and<br>Brainlab navigation platform.<br>Compliance of Mechatronic Vario Guide including the<br>Surgical Base System and the drape with AAMI/ANSI<br>ES60601 -1:2005/(R)2012 for medical electrical equipment<br>has been tested.<br>Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential<br>performance<br>Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential<br>performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic<br>compatibility - Requirements and tests | Compliance with<br>standards<br>requirements<br>demonstrated, no<br>deviations. |
| Biocompatibility / Reprocessing | Material properties in relation to biocompatibility and their<br>response to cleaning, disinfection<br>and sterilization have been assessed and tested. | Biocompatibility<br>assessment and<br>reprocessing tests<br>successful. |
| Environmental tests | Tests regarding adherence to RoHS, REACH and WEEE<br>directives. | Environmental tests<br>successful. |
| Integration tests with the<br>spine<br>navigation<br>applications<br>and Brainlab<br>navigation<br>platforms | Verification integration of Mechatronic Vario Guide into the<br>spinal workflow and compatibility tests with the spinal<br>navigation applications and Brainlab navigation platform. | Integration and<br>compatibility tests<br>successful. |
| Mechanical tests | Mechanical stability tests and interface tests of the<br>components of the Mechatronic Vario Guide from fixating the<br>mechatronic arm to the OR table to holding a drill guide with<br>a defined holding force. | Mechanical tests<br>successful. |
| Integration tests of<br>Surgical Base<br>System | The Mechatronic Vario Guide integrates the Medineering<br>Surgical Base System.<br>Tested integration of surgical base system into the<br>Mechatronic Vario Guide including verification tests ensuring<br>that the specified braking concept and visual indicators are<br>correctly implemented and that in any position the expected<br>holding forces are met. | Surgical Base System<br>integration tests<br>successful. |
| Surgical Base<br>System<br>firmware<br>software<br>verification | Tested software according to IEC 62304 and "FDA Guidance<br>for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software<br>Contained in Medical Devices" | Surgical Base System<br>software verification<br>successful. |
| Integration<br>tests of sterile<br>drape | The Mechatronic Vario Guide integrates a drape to ensure<br>sterile environment to the surgical instruments.<br>Tested that the drape matches in form, fit and function with<br>the mechanical dimension onto the components of the<br>Mechatronic Vario Guide, ensures a sterile barrier and is<br>compatible with the navigation. | Drape integration tests<br>successful. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
All tests successfully passed demonstrating that the subject device performs as safely and effectively as the predicate device and supporting substantial equivalence.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE ব
The Spine & Trauma Navigation System has similar functionality, intended use, technological characteristics and typical users as the predicate device.
Additionally, the Mechatronic Vario Guide ("Cirq") has been included as a holding arm for Drill Guides to support the surgeon in pedicle screw placement procedures.
Other included minor changes do not affect the fundamental scientific technology of the device.
#### CONCLUSION 5
The comparison of the Spine & Trauma Navigation System with the predicate device shows that the Spine & Trauma Navigation System has similar functionality, intended use, technological characteristics, and typical users as the predicate device. Verification activities ensure that the design specifications are met and that the Spine & Trauma Navigation System does not introduce new issues concerning safety and effectiveness. Hence the Spine & Trauma Navigation System is a substantial equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.