A retrospective evaluation of 25 clinical cases was used to provide additional evidence regarding the safety and technical success of the GoBack Catheter for recanalization of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in the iliac/femoropopliteal arteries.
Retrospective clinical cases; Chronic total occlusion; Technical success; Safety
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Retrospective evaluation of 25 subjects; Retrospective clinical case review; Follow-up/Duration: 24 hours post index procedure
Subjects with claudication or critical limb ischemia (Rutherford Category 2-5) and a de novo or re-occluded CTO (99-100%) lesion in a native iliac/femoropopliteal artery.; Sample Size: 25; Number of Sites: 2
Not applicable for this study
Primary safety: composite rate of major adverse events (MAEs) through 24 hours. Primary effectiveness: device technical success (placement of guidewire in true lumen distal to CTO).
Indications for Use
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is intended to be used in conjunction with steerable guidewires to access discrete regions of the peripheral vasculature. It may be used to facilitate placement and exchange of guidewires. The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is not intended for use in the coronary, cerebral or carotid vasculature.
Device Story
Single-lumen support catheter; used in peripheral vasculature to access discrete regions and facilitate guidewire placement/exchange. Device comprises reinforced polyimide shaft, stainless steel tip, and internal PTFE-coated nitinol hypotube. Distal end features pre-shaped lancet tip; proximal end features luer hub. Operator uses sliding handle knob to move internal nitinol tube, causing lancet tip to protrude (max 11 mm) for navigation. Radiopaque marker on needle identifies tip location and curve direction. Used by physicians in clinical settings. Output is mechanical navigation of guidewires through peripheral lesions, including chronic total occlusions. Benefits include improved technical success in crossing complex lesions where conventional methods fail.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective evaluation of 25 subjects (mean age 67, 80% male) with chronic total occlusions (CTO) in iliac/femoropopliteal arteries. Primary effectiveness endpoint: technical success (guidewire placement in true lumen distal to CTO) achieved in 92% (23/25) of cases. Primary safety endpoint: composite rate of major adverse events (MAEs) at 24 hours was 0%. All patients showed improvement of at least one Rutherford category post-procedure.
Technological Characteristics
Single-lumen catheter; 120 cm length; 1.4 mm OD. Materials: reinforced polyimide shaft, stainless steel tip, PTFE-coated nitinol hypotube. Biocompatible per ISO 10993-1. Sterilization: ISO 11135. Mechanical features: sliding knob for needle protrusion, radiopaque marker on needle. Manual operation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use with steerable guidewires to access discrete regions of the peripheral vasculature and facilitate guidewire placement/exchange. Not for use in coronary, cerebral, or carotid vasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
May 23, 2019
Upstream Peripheral Technologies, Ltd. % Janice Hogan Regulatory Counsel Hogan Lovells US LLP 1735 Market Street, 23rd Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Re: K182937
Trade/Device Name: Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PDU Dated: April 22, 2019 Received: April 22, 2019
Dear Janice Hogan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
for Kenneth Cavanaugh, Ph.D. Director (Acting) DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Interventional Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement on last page
510(k) Number (if known)
K182937
Device Name
Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter Indications for Use (Describe)
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is intended to be used in conjunction with steerable quidewires to access discrete regions of the peripheral vasculature. It may be used to facilitate placement and exchange of guidewires.
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is not intended for use in the coronary, cerebral or carotid vasculature.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
区 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801
#### Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (7/17)
Page 1 of 1 FDA
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K182937
# 510(k) SUMMARY
# Upstream Peripheral Technologies Ltd's Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter
#### Applicant Information
Upstream Peripheral Technologies Ltd. ARAN Building P.O. Box 3067 43 Haeshel Street Caesarea 38900 Israel
| Phone: | (972) 4-6239014 |
|-----------------|-----------------|
| Facsimile: | (972) 4-6273260 |
| Contact Person: | Dan Rottenberg |
| Date Prepared: | May 22, 2019 |
# Device Information
| Trade Name: | Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Catheter for Crossing Total Occlusions |
| Classification: | Class II per 21 CFR 870.1250 |
| Product Code: | PDU |
| Predicate Device: | Cordis Outback Catheter (K001577) |
| Reference Device: | ReFlow Wingman Crossing Catheter (K151880) |
#### Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is intended to be used in conjunction with steerable guidewires to access discrete regions of the peripheral vasculature. It may be used to facilitate placement and exchange of guidewires.
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is not intended for use in the coronary, cerebral or carotid vasculature.
# Device Description
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is a sterile, single lumen support catheter, that consists of a reinforced polyimide shaft with a stainless steel tip, and PTFE polymer coated nitinol hypotube inside the shaft. The nitinol tube has a pre-shaped lancet tip at the distal end and a hub at the proximal end for guidewire access. The nitinol tube can move at limited displacement inside the shaft, by moving a sliding knob in the catheter handle.
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is intended for use with 0.014" and 0.018" non-coated quidewires and the effective length of the catheter is 120 cm with an outer diameter of 1.4 mm.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The GoBack Catheter, the OutBack catheter and the Wingman Crossing Catheter have very similar technological features. Each of the devices is a single-lumen, sterile, single-use catheter comprised of biocompatible materials. The GoBack Catheter, the OutBack catheter and the Wingman Crossing Catheter shafts are composed of braided polymer tubes of three layers - a middle layer composed of metal stainless steel wires, with an outer polymer jacket and an inner polymer liner. A slide-able flexible metal tube is located inside the shaft of all devices. Further, the GoBack Catheter, the predicate and reference devices all incorporate a distal lancet tip of the slide-able metal tube, and proximal female luer hub. The slide-able metal tubes are coated with PTFE or Teflon coating to permit smooth tracking of the metal tube inside the shaft.
Although there are minor differences between the GoBack Catheter and the predicate device, none of these differences raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions. The GoBack Catheter needle tip is curved with a maximal needle tip protrusion of 11 mm whereas the predicate device consists of a curved needle tip with a maximal tip protrusion of 8 mm. This difference does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness as both devices consist of adequate device mechanisms for device needle navigation through the peripheral vasculature, which has been confirmed by bench testing.
The GoBack Catheter radiopague marker is mounted directly on the needle and serves to identify the needle tip location and needle curve direction. while the predicate's similar radiopaque marker is mounted on the catheter shaft and serves to identify only the needle curve direction. This minor technological difference does not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness because the key question of device detection using radiopaque markers during clinical procedures is the same for both the subject and predicate device.
The dimensions of the GoBack Catheter are within the range of dimensions of the predicate. The GoBack Catheter is 120 cm in length. The OutBack catheter length is 80 cm and 120 cm, while the Wingman Crossing Catheter is available in several length sizes, including 65 cm, 90 cm, 135 cm, and 150 cm. The outside diameter of the GoBack Catheter is 1.4 mm, the OutBack catheter is 2.0 mm, and the Wingman catheter has outside diameters of 1.3-1.5 mm. Thus, the dimensions of the GoBack Catheter do not raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions because the length and outside diameter of the GoBack Catheter are within the range of dimensions of the cleared predicate and reference devices.
Furthermore, all verification testing conducted with the GoBack Catheter demonstrates that the device meets its intended design and performance specifications, and that minor differences in technological features do not impact safety or effectiveness. Therefore, any minor technological differences do not raise new questions of safety or efficacy of the device and it satisfies the second criterion for substantial equivalence based on the technological characteristics compared to the predicate device.
# Performance Testing Summary
The following nonclinical performance testing has been conducted to support the substantial equivalence of the Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter to its predicate device. In all instances, the Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter functioned as intended.
- . Sterilization validation was established in accordance with ISO 11135 and EN 868-5.
- . Packaging integrity and accelerated aging studies were completed in accordance with ISO 11607-1, ISO 11607-2, ASTM F1980-07, and ASTM F1929.
{5}------------------------------------------------
- Biocompatibility of the patient-contacting components of the device was established in accordance with ISO 10993-1 and included cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation/intracutaneous reactivity, systemic toxicity (acute), hemocompatibility (hemolysis and thromboresistance), pyrogenicity, and complement activation.
- . Functional bench testing was conducted on sterile devices (air leakage test, liquid leakage test, force at break test, surface test, catheter dimensions test, catheter delivery and kink testing, catheter torque testing, needle tip protrusion testing, marker movement test, torque at break test, bending to kink test, transfer of torsional force, needle penetration force catheter radio-opaque testing, corrosion testing, catheter hydration testing, catheter environmental testing, and packaging sealing testing).
In addition, a retrospective evaluation of 25 subjects was conducted based on clinical cases performed at Leipzig University Medical Center and at Bad-krozingen Heart-Center, both in Germany, to provide additional clinical data regarding the safety and technical success of the GoBack Catheter for recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the iliac/femoropoptiteal arteries.
Study subjects were required to have claudication or critical limb ischemia (Rutherford Category 2-5) and a de novo or re-occluded CTO (99-100%) lesion in a native iliac/femoropopliteal artery. The indication for intervention in these cases included claudication and critical limb ischemia. In all cases, conventional recanalization could not be successfully achieved.
The primary safety endpoint was a composite rate of major adverse Endpoints events (MAES) related to the GoBack Catheter through 24 hours post index procedure including: death, perforation reguiring intervention and clinically significant peripheral embolism. The primary effectiveness endpoint was device technical success, defined as the placement of a guidewire in the true lumen distal to a CTO as confirmed by the angiography core lab.
Of the subjects enrolled, 20 of 25 (80%) were male. The average age was 67 ± 10 years (range: 39 -82). The average lesion length was 21 ± 12 cm (range: 4 – 55). Investigators achieved a 92% percent (23/25) technical success rate using the GoBack Catheter to cross CTOs in the iliac/femoropopliteal arteries. At 24 hours post procedure (pre-discharge), all patients experienced an improvement of at least one category in the Rutherford classification, a six-stage scale commonly used to assess the severity of symptoms associated with PAD. No device-related adverse event was seen during the procedures or at 24 hours post procedure. These results support the substantial equivalence of the GoBack Crossing Catheter
# Substantial Equivalence
The Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter and the predicate device have the same intended use and very similar indications, technological characteristics and principles of operation. The minor technological differences between the Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter and its predicate raise no new types of safety or effectiveness questions. Performance testing demonstrates that the Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter performs as intended and meets all design specifications with respect to its mechanical and handling characteristics, and that its materials are biocompatible. Thus, the Upstream GoBack Crossing Catheter is substantially equivalent to the Cordis Outback Catheter predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.