BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended for use as superstructures of a multiple-unit endosseous dental implant system, attaching directly to implants or abutments, to support a prosthetic device in a partially or fully endentulous patient for the purpose of restoring chewing function. Implant-level bars are compatible with all BioHorizons Internal and Tapered Internal implant systems. Implant-level bars are compatible with Zimmer Dental Screw-Vent® and Tapered Screw Vent® implants with 3.5mm, 4.5mm and 5.7mm internal hex connection mating platform diameters and are intended to be used with straight bar cylinders only. Abutment-level bars are compatible with BioHorizons Multi-unit Abutments. All digitally designed BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended to be sent to a BioHorizons-validated milling center for manufacture.
Device Story
BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are patient-specific dental superstructures designed via CAD software and manufactured via precision milling. Input data includes digital scans of laboratory models, implant/abutment positions, soft tissue, and diagnostic wax-ups. Clinicians design the bar using validated implant libraries; design data is transmitted to a BioHorizons-validated milling center for production. The device, fabricated from titanium alloy, attaches to endosseous implants or abutments to support fixed or removable prostheses. Used in dental clinics, the device is operated by dental professionals. The clinician verifies the fit intra-orally and secures the bar using screws at specified torque values. The device restores chewing function for edentulous patients by providing a stable, screw-retained framework for prosthetic teeth.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing including dynamic mechanical fatigue testing per ISO 14801 on worst-case configurations, dimensional analysis of abutment-level bars, and compatibility verification with Zimmer Screw-Vent/Tapered Screw-Vent implants. Biocompatibility is supported by historical data on the same ASTM F136 titanium alloy.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (ASTM F136). Design: CAD/CAM milled superstructure. Connection: Implant-level (passive, non-indexing) or abutment-level. Compatibility: BioHorizons Internal/Tapered Internal and Zimmer Screw-Vent/Tapered Screw-Vent systems. Sterilization: Moist heat (BS EN ISO 17665-1).
Indications for Use
Indicated for partially or fully edentulous patients requiring multiple-unit endosseous dental implant superstructures to support prosthetic devices and restore chewing function.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant abutment is a premanufactured prosthetic component directly connected to the endosseous dental implant and is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 28, 2018
BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. Michael Davis Director, Regulatory Affairs 2300 Riverchase Center Birmingham, Alabama 35244
Re: K180998
Trade/Device Name: BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3630 Regulation Name: Endosseous dental implant abutment Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NHA Dated: August 28, 2018 Received: August 30, 2018
Dear Michael Davis:
We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Andrew I. Steen -S
for Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180998
Device Name BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended for use as superstructures of a multiple-unit endosseous dental implant system, attaching directly to implants or abutments, to support a prosthetic device in a partially or fully endentulous patient for the purpose of restoring chewing function. Implant-level bars are compatible with all BioHorizons Internal and Tapered Internal implant systems. Implant-level bars are compatible with Zimmer Dental Screw-Vent® and Tapered Screw Vent® implants with 3.5mm, 4.5mm internal hex connection mating platform diameters and are intended to be used with straight bar cylinders only. Abutment-level bars are compatible with BioHorizons Multi-unit Abutments.
All digitally designed BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended to be sent to a BioHorizons-validated milling center for manufacture.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary 21 CFR 807.92
## Submitter's Name & Address
| Manufacturer: | BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| | 2300 Riverchase Center |
| | Birmingham, AL 35244 |
| | Phone (205) 967-7880 |
| | Fax (205) 870-0304 |
| Official contact: | Michael Davis, Director, Regulatory Affairs |
| Date prepared: | September 28, 2018 |
## Name of the Device
| Trade Name: | BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Dental implant abutment |
| Classification Name: | Endosseous dental implant abutment |
| Classification Number: | Class II (21 CFR 872.3630) |
| Primary Product Code : | NHA |
## Predicate Devices
Primary Predicate Device: K080864, Biomet 3i CAM StructSURE® Precision Milled Bars, July 21, 2008
### Device Description
The BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are computer aided designed (CAD), precision computer aided milled (CAM) superstructures manufactured for individual patients. The BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars provide support for a fixed or removable prosthetic device. The BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars will be provided in a fixed shape configuration (e.g. Dolder®, Hader, Round) or a free form shape configuration (e.g. Freeform/Milled, Hybrid, Montreal, Paris, Wrap Around), both configurations designed to fit the individual needs of the patient. The BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars will be provided with either an implant-level or abutment-level connection interface. Implant-level CAD/CAM bars will include passive, non-indexing connection geometry with seating on the coronal (top) surface of the implant. Abutment-level CAD/CAM bars will include passive, non-indexing connection geometry with seating on the restorative platform of the abutment. The occlusal surface of the CAD/CAM bars may include connection geometry (e.g. female threads) to accept overdenture attachments. Bar material is titanium alloy as specified in ASTM F136 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy (UNS R56401) for Surgical Implant Applications.
The CAD/CAM Bars are provided non-sterile, and they are packaged using materials known in the industry to be appropriate for medical device packaging.
When used with BioHorizons Internal and Tapered Internal implant systems, the BioHorizons CAD/CAM bars allow for up to 40° divergence between bar cylinders, with no individual bar cylinder angulated greater than 20° from the vertical axis. Only straight bar cylinders are compatible with the Zimmer Dent® and Tapered Screw Vent® implants with 3.5mm. 4.5mm and 5.7mm internal hex connection mating platform diameters.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Minimum and Maximum Size Ranges
| Implant Level Bars | | | |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|---------|------------------|
| | Description | Minimum | Maximum |
| A | Platform Seating Diameter | 3.0mm | 5.7mm |
| B | Total Cylinders | 2 | 10 |
| C | Bar Span Between Cylinders | 0mm | 30mm |
| D | Bar Height incl. Cylinder | 2.5mm | 11mm |
| E | Maximum Angulation Per Cylinder* | 0° | 20° |
| F | Cylinder Diameter | 3.0mm | 10.0mm |
| G | Distal Extension | 0mm | 1.5x AP** Spread |
*Does not apply to third-party compatible implant lines.
** Anterior-Posterior
| Abutment Level Bars | | | |
|---------------------|----------------------------------|---------|------------------|
| | Description | Minimum | Maximum |
| A | Platform Seating Diameter | 4.8mm | 7mm |
| B | Total Cylinders | 2 | 10 |
| C | Bar Span Between Cylinders | 0mm | 30mm |
| D | Bar Height incl. Cylinder | 2.5mm | 11mm |
| E | Maximum Angulation Per Cylinder* | 0° | 20° |
| F | Cylinder Diameter | 3.0mm | 10.0mm |
| G | Distal Extension | 0mm | 1.5x AP** Spread |
*Does not apply to third-party compatible implant lines.
** Anterior-Posterior
### Indications for Use
BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended for use as superstructures of a multiple-unit endosseous dental implant system, attaching directly to implants or abutments, to support a prosthetic device in a partially or fully endentulous patient for the purpose of restoring function. Implantlevel bars are compatible with all BioHorizons Internal internal implant systems. Implant-level bars are compatible with Zimmer Dental Screw-Vent® and Tapered Screw Vent® implants with 3.5mm, 4.5mm and 5.7mm internal hex connection mating platform diameters and are intended to be used with straight bar cylinders only. Abutment-level bars are compatible with BioHorizons Multi-unit Abutments.
All digitally designed BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended to be sent to a BioHorizonsvalidated milling center for manufacture.
# Comparison of Indications for Use
The primary difference in the Indications for Use statements between the subject device and the primary predicate device is with regard to the claimed compatibility with competitor implant connections (compatibility with Zimmer Dental in the case of the subject device versus no claim of competitor implant compatibility for the predicate device). BioHorizons conducts routine competitive device compatibility assessment in accordance with internal procedural requirements. Both devices are intended to support multiple tooth prostheses in the mandible or maxilla. No other substantive differences exist between the Indications for Use statements between the subject and primary predicate devices.
# Technological Characteristics
The fundamental scientific technology of the BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars that are the subject of this 510(k) is substantially equivalent to the referenced primary predicate device. Both the subject device and predicate device include similar features such as bar base material, bar-implant/barabutment connection tailored to the endosseous dental implant(s) and multi-unit restorative
{5}------------------------------------------------
abutment component(s) with which the device is intended to be used, prosthetic platform sizes and mode of prosthetic retention which thereby demonstrates substantial equivalence in their respective designs. Any specific differences related to bar shape, prosthetic platform connection geometry, maximum implant span and wording in the indications for use between the subject device and the predicate device have been mitigated based on the performance testing conducted on the worst-case manufactured dimensions which supports the determination that the subject devices are appropriate for their intended use and do not render the devices not substantially equivalent.
The following CAD/CAM workflow describes the steps involved to achieve the final prosthesis:
- 1. Utilizing a desktop dental scanner with the appropriate scan bodies, digitally capture the verified laboratory model, implant or abutment analog positions, soft tissue, and diagnostic wax-up.
- 2. Import the digital data into dental CAD software and utilize the corresponding implant library to design the bar within the design parameters per the instructions for use.
- a. If the customer is designing the bar, the design data is to be sent to a registered and listed BioHorizons-validated milling center for milling.
- 3. The BioHorizons-validated milling center will export the CAM data from the dental CAD/CAM software and proceed with milling the bar.
- 4. The milled bar is sent to the customer for the appropriate laboratory processing to create the final prosthesis.
The clinician delivers the final prosthesis intra-orally, verifies fit, and secures using the corresponding screws at the recommended torque values per the instructions for use.
The features, similarities and differences are further summarized in tabular format in the Summary Table of Substantial Equivalence following in this section, and are briefly discussed below:
- 1. Bar shapes for both the Subject Device and the predicate device are typical industry designs and are substantially equivalent.
- 2. Platform seating diameters of 3.0mm-5.7mm for the Subject Device, compared to 3.4mm-6.1mm of the predicate device, are based the manufacturers' designed implant platform geometries.
- 3. Minimum number of two (2) cylinders is equivalent.
- 4. Minimum cylinder wall thickness of 0.3mm for the Subject Device is based on design requirements; the predicate device specification is unknown.
- 5. Maximum anterior-posterior spread of 1.5 for the Subject Device is based on design requirements; the predicate device specification is unknown.
- 6. Maximum implant span between cylinders of 30mm for the Subject Device, compared to 23.5mm for Type I Bars and 27mm for Type II Bars of the predicate device, is based on the manufacturers' established design requirements.
- 7. Screw-retained mode of retention for both devices is equivalent.
The Subject Device worst case design was validated with performance bench testing in accordance with Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments, May 12, 2004 and ISO 14801, and the differences noted or otherwise not accounted for by comparison to the predicate device are demonstrated by the performance bench testing, and do not render the Subject Device not substantially equivalent.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Summarv of Testing
Dynamic mechanical fatigue testing was performed in accordance with the Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments, May 12, 2004 and ISO 14801. A worst-case 3.0mm prosthetic platform, singleunit endosseous dental implant system test configuration was prepared for the implant-level CAD/CAM bars to simulate a single bar cylinder being subjected to occlusal loading without the support of additional bar cylinders or supports/connectors to share the load. Results of the testing demonstrate that the worst-case configuration performs in accordance with the subject device's intended use. Evaluation of the abutment-level CAD/CAM bars was conducted by dimensional analysis of a cross-sectioned model of the CAD/CAM abutment-level bar configuration at least material condition (LMC) in the region of the implant-abutment connection compared to the BioHorizons Multi-unit Titanium Coping. Historical testing of the Multi-unit Titanium Coping combined with dimensional analysis demonstrated that the abutment-level CAD/CAM bar design is sufficient for its intended use.
Compatibility verification has been previously performed on a representative subset of Zimmer® Screw-Vent® and Tapered Screw-Vent® implants. The subset included the following Zimmer® item numbers: TSV4B8, TSV4B10, TSVWH10, TSVWB10, TSVWB11, TSVWH11, TSVT6B10, TSV6H11. TSV6H13 and TSV6H16. This testing verifies compatibility of BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars connection with all Zimmer® Screw-Vent® and Tapered Screw-Vent® items based on equivalent mating platform geometry.
BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are provided non-sterilization by the end user is achieved using one of the validated steam sterilization cycles as specified in the Instructions for Use. Sterilization cycles were validated in accordance with BS EN ISO 17665-1:2006, Sterilization of health care products – Moist heat – Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation, and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices.
Finally, BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars meet the chemical requirements of ASTM F136. This grade of Titanium is commonly used in surgical implant applications thus no special biocompatibility testing was conducted for the proposed devices. Historical biocompatibility testing conducted on representative BioHorizons dental implant devices that used the same ASTM F136 titanium allov material that is used exclusively in the manufacture of BioHorizons dental implant and restorative abutment devices included cytotoxicity, irritation and sensitization testing. Test results concluded that the test articles were non-cytotoxic, non-irritating and negative for evidence of dermal sensitization under the test conditions employed.
# Conclusion
The data presented in this submission demonstrates that the proposed devices are substantially equivalent with respect to performance and intended use. The proposed devices perform as well as the legally marketed predicate devices. Furthermore, the proposed devices do not pose any new or increased risks as compared to the legally marketed predicate devices.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Table 1. Summary Table of Substantial Equivalence
| | Subject Device | Primary Predicate Device |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc.<br>CAD/CAM Bars | Biomet 3i<br>CAM StructSURE® Precision Milled Bars<br>K080864 |
| Intended Use | BioHorizons CAD/CAM Bars are intended for<br>use as superstructures of a multiple-unit<br>endosseous dental implant system, attaching<br>directly to implants or abutments in the<br>mandible or maxilla, to support a prosthetic<br>device in a partially or fully endentulous patient<br>for the purpose of restoring chewing function.<br>Implant-level bars are compatible with all<br>BioHorizons Internal and Tapered Internal<br>implant systems. Implant-level bars are<br>compatible with Zimmer Dental Screw-Vent®<br>and Tapered Screw Vent® implants<br>with<br>3.5mm, 4.5mm and 5.7mm internal hex<br>connection mating platform diameters and are<br>intended to be used with straight bar cylinders<br>only. Abutment-level bars are compatible with<br>BioHorizons Multi-unit Abutments.<br>All digitally designed BioHorizons CAD/CAM<br>Bars are intended to be sent to a BioHorizons-<br>validated milling center for manufacture. | The CAM StructSURE Precision Milled<br>Bars are intended for use as an accessory<br>to an endosseous dental implant to support<br>a prosthetic device in a partially or<br>edentulous patient. It is intended for use to<br>support multiple tooth prostheses in the<br>mandible or maxilla. The prostheses can<br>be screw retained. |
| Design | | |
| Bar shape | Fixed shape (Dolder®, Hader, Round)<br>Freeform shape (Freeform/Milled, Hybrid,<br>Montreal, Paris, Wrap Around) | Type I (Dolder, Hader, Primary)<br>Type II (Combination Primary, Hybrid,<br>Wraparound, Freeform, Canada,<br>Copymilled) |
| Platform seating diameter | 3.0mm, 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.7mm | 3.4mm - 6.1mm |
| Min. number of cylinders | 2 | 2 |
| Min. cylinder wall thickness | 0.3mm | Not known |
| Max. anterior-posterior<br>spread | 1.5 | Not known |
| Max. implant span | 30mm | 27mm (Type I)<br>23.5mm (Type II) |
| Mode of retention | Screw-retained | Screw-retained |
| Material and Manufacturing | | |
| Bar material | Ti-6Al-4V (ASTM F136) | Ti-6Al-4V (ASTM F136) or<br>Grade 4 Titanium |
| Packaging | Poly/Tyvek pouch | Not known |
| Sterilization | Moist heat | Not known |
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.