The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are indicated for use as vascular prostheses. The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are intended for use as subcutaneous arteriovenous conduits for blood access, bypass, or reconstruction of peripheral arterial blood vessels.
Device Story
exGraft and exGraft Carbon are single-use, sterile ePTFE vascular grafts; intended for subcutaneous arteriovenous access, bypass, or peripheral arterial reconstruction. Devices feature radiopaque ink on outer surface for visualization; exGraft Carbon variant includes carbon coating on inner graft wall. Grafts implanted by surgeons in clinical settings. Radiopaque ink allows for identification/positioning; carbon coating aims to improve hemocompatibility. Performance verified via bench testing (burst strength, suture retention, tensile strength, porosity, kink radius, ink wear) and biocompatibility assessments (ISO 10993).
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by biocompatibility evaluation (ISO 10993-1) and extensive bench testing, including probe burst strength, suture retention, tensile strength, water entry pressure, porosity, puncture strength, kink radius, ink thickness/wear, and MRI safety.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: ePTFE, radiopaque ink, carbon coating. Form factor: tubular vascular graft. Sterilization: same as predicate. Connectivity: N/A (mechanical implant).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring vascular prostheses for subcutaneous arteriovenous conduits for blood access, bypass, or reconstruction of peripheral arterial blood vessels.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vascular graft prosthesis is an implanted device intended to repair, replace, or bypass sections of native or artificial vessels, excluding coronary or cerebral vasculature, and to provide vascular access. It is commonly constructed of materials such as polyethylene terephthalate and polytetrafluoroethylene, and it may be coated with a biological coating, such as albumin or collagen, or a synthetic coating, such as silicone. The graft structure itself is not made of materials of animal origin, including human umbilical cords.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for Vascular Prostheses 510(k) Submissions.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration" in blue text.
August 21, 2018
PECA Labs Doug Bernstein Chief Executive Officer 4424 Penn Ave. Suite 201 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224
Re: K180957
Trade/Device Name: exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3450 Regulation Name: Vascular Graft Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DSY Dated: July 13, 2018 Received: July 16, 2018
Dear Doug Bernstein:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrl/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Brian D. Pullin -S
for Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180957
Device Name
exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are indicated for use as vascular prostheses.
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are intended for use as subcutaneous arteriovenous conduits for blood access, bypass, or reconstruction of peripheral arterial blood vessels.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </div> | <div> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </div> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for PECA Labs. The logo is in a dark purple color. The word "PECA" is in a bold, sans-serif font, while the word "labs" is in a lighter, sans-serif font.
## K180957
### 510(k) Summary
(as required by 21 CFR 807.92)
#### l. SUBMITTER
PECA Labs, Inc. 4424 Penn Avenue Suite 201 Pittsburgh, PA 15224
Phone: (412) 482-3755
Contact Person: Doug Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer Date Prepared: August 16, 2018
- II. DEVICE
| Name of Device: | exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Vascular Graft |
| Classification Name: | 21 CFR 870.3450 |
| | Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, of 6 mm and Greater Diameter |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | DSY |
#### III. PREDICATE DEVICE
Impra Carboflo ePTFE Vascular Grafts, K004011 and Impra ePTFE Vascular Grafts, K954582
The predicates have not been subject to a design-related recall.
#### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are single use sterile vascular grafts constructed of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) with a radiopaque ink applied to the outer surface. The exGraft Carbon ePTFE vascular grafts also contain a carbon coating impregnated into the inner surface of the graft wall.
- V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are indicated for use as vascular prostheses.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are intended for use as subcutaneous arteriovenous conduits for blood access, bypass, or reconstruction of peripheral arterial blood vessels.
### VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The proposed exGraft and exGraft Carbon and the predicate devices Impra Carboflo and Impra ePTFE vascular graft have the following similarities:
- Same basic design and material
- . Sterilized using the same material and processes
- Same packaging material and construction
- Carbon impregnated and non-carbon impregnated
The proposed exGraft and exGraft Carbon and the predicate devices Impra Carboflo and Impra ePTFE vascular graft have the following differences:
- exGrafts include radiopaque ink applied to the outer surface
The radiopaque ink is considered a technological difference. However, there are no new questions of safety and effectiveness raised by the addition of the ink.
### VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
Biocompatibility and bench testing were performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
### Biocompatibility Evaluation
The biocompatibility evaluation for the exGraft and exGraft Carbon was conducted in accordance with FDA Guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process" issued on June 16, 2016 and International Standard ISO 10993-1:2009 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process," as recognized by FDA. The battery of testing included the following tests:
- Cytotoxicity
- Sensitization
- Irritation or Intracutaneous Reactivity
- Acute Systemic Toxicity
- Material-Mediated Pyrogen Testing
- . Implantation
- Hemocompatibility ●
{5}------------------------------------------------
Chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment were used to address the following endpoints:
- Subacute/Subchronic Systemic Toxicity
- . Chronic Systemic Toxicity
- Genotoxicity
- Carcinogenicity
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon are single use devices and are considered blood contact implant devices with a contact duration of permanent (greater than 30 days).
### Bench Testing
Bench testing of the exGraft and exGraft Carbon included the following tests:
- Probe Burst Strength
- Suture Retention Strength
- Longitudinal Tensile Strength ●
- Circumferential Tensile Strength
- Water Entry Pressure
- . Microscopic Porosity (Upper and Lower Limit)
- Strength After Repeated Puncture
- Kink Radius
- Ink Thickness ●
- Accelerated Ink Wear ●
- MRI Safety Evaluation
### CONCLUSION
The exGraft and exGraft Carbon ePTFE Vascular Grafts are substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Impra Carboflo ePTFE Vascular Graft (K004011) and Impra ePTFE Vascular Graft (K954582).
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.