VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion System, VariLift-C Interbody Fusion System
K180822 · Wenzel Spine, Inc. · MAX · Jan 28, 2019 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K180822
Device Name
VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion System, VariLift-C Interbody Fusion System
Applicant
Wenzel Spine, Inc.
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jan 28, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Wenzel Spine VariLift® Cervical Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level. The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System is used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the cervical spine and is placed in a unilateral fashion via an anterior approach at the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System may be used with or without supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral fusion device. The Wenzel Spine VariLift® Interbody Fusion System (VariLift®-L/LX and VariLift®-A) is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. VariLift®-L/LX is designed to be implanted bi-laterally via a posterior (PLIF) approach or as a single device via a transverse (TLIF) approach. VariLift®-L/LX may be implanted with or without supplemental fixation and is intended for use with autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion. VariLift®-A is designed to be implanted bi-laterally via an anterior (ALIF) approach. VariLift®-A may be implanted with or without supplemental fixation and is intended for use with autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion.
Device Story
Self-tapping, expandable interbody fusion devices; cylindrical-ovoid shape; interior sliding wedge mechanism; posterior end cap (LX model); fenestrated for bone graft contact. Implanted in cervical spine (unilateral anterior approach) or lumbar spine (bilateral posterior, transverse, or anterior approaches). Used with autograft/allograft to facilitate fusion; optional supplemental fixation. Intended for surgical implantation by orthopedic or neurosurgeons to stabilize spinal segments and promote fusion in DDD patients. Benefits include structural support and facilitation of bone growth across vertebral endplates.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical performance evaluated via static compression, compression shear, torsion (ASTM F2077-14), subsidence (ASTM F2267-04), and expulsion testing.
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine (C3-C7) with radicular symptoms (at least 6 weeks non-operative treatment) or lumbar spine (L2-S1) with back pain (at least 6 months non-operative treatment). Includes patients with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 5, 2021
Wenzel Spine, Inc. Erik Emstad VP of Product Development 1130 Rutherford Lane, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78753
Re: K180822
Trade/Device Name: VariLift®-LX Interbody Fusion System, VariLift®-C Interbody Fusion System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP
Dear Erik Emstad:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending this letter to notify you of an administrative change related to your previous substantial equivalence (SE) determination letter sent January 28, 2019. Specifically, FDA is updating this SE Letter because incorrect SE elements were emailed in the original communication.
Please note that the 510(k) submission was not re-reviewed. For questions regarding this letter please contact Brent Showalter, Ph.D., OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices, (240) 402-1840, Brent.Showalter@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
# Brent Showalter -S
Brent L. Showalter, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image contains two logos. On the left is the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. On the right is the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA logo is in blue and features the FDA acronym in a blue square, followed by the full name of the agency in a larger, bolder font.
August 5, 2021
Wenzel Spine, Inc. Erik Emstad VP of Product Development 1130 Rutherford Lane, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78753
Re: K180822
Trade/Device Name: VariLift®-LX Interbody Fusion System, VariLift®-C Interbody Fusion System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP Dated: January 11, 2019 Received: January 15, 2019
Dear Erik Emstad:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of January 28, 2019.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/ofdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE(@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Brent Showalter -S
Brent L. Showalter, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 06/30/2020
See PRA Statement below.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
#### 510(k) Number (if known) K180822
#### Device Name
VariLift®-C Interbody Fusion System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Wenzel Spine VariLift® Cervical Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level.
The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System is used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the cervical spine and is placed in a unilateral fashion via an anterior approach at the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System may be used with or without supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral fusion device.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span> ☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> | <span> ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 06/30/2020
See PRA Statement below.
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180822
#### Device Name
VariLift®-LX Interbody Fusion System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Wenzel Spine VariLift® Interbody Fusion System (VariLift®-L) is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies.
VariLift@-L/LX is designed to be implanted bi-laterally via a posterior (PLIF) approach or as a single device via a transverse (TLIF) approach. VariLift®-L/LX may be implanted with or without supplemental fixation and is intended for use with autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion. VariLift@-A is designed to be implanted bi-laterally via an anterior (ALIF) approach. VariLift@-A may be implanted with or without supplemental fixation and is intended for use with autograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <div> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> </div> |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | <div> <input type="checkbox"/> </div> |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.#### This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Wenzel Spine. The word "wenzel" is in blue, with a yellow arc above the "zel" portion of the word. The word "spine" is also in blue, and is to the right of the word "wenzel". Below the words is the phrase "simple. dependable. proven."
## 510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR § 807.92.
| Preparation Date: | January 25, 2019 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Applicant/Sponsor: | Wenzel Spine, Inc.<br>1130 Rutherford Lane, Suite 200<br>Austin, TX 78753 |
| Contact Person: | Erik Emstad<br>Vice President of Product Development<br>Phone : 952-221-3213<br>Fax : 512-469-0604<br>Email : eemstad@wenzelspine.com) |
| Trade Name:<br>Common Name:<br>Device Class:<br>Classification Name:<br>Device Panel: | VariLift®-LX Interbody Fusion System<br>Interbody Fusion Device (MAX)<br>Class II<br>MAX, 888.3080 – Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Lumbar<br>Orthopedic |
| Trade Name:<br>Common Name:<br>Device Class:<br>Classification Name:<br>Device Panel: | VariLift®-C Interbody Fusion System<br>Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (ODP)<br>Class II<br>ODP, 888.3080 – Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Cervical<br>Orthopedic |
## Device Description & Technological Characteristics
## VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device
The VariLift-LX is a self-tapping, expandable device with an interior sliding wedge and a posterior end cap. The devices are cylindrical-ovoid in shape, which is adapted to the general shape of the vertebral endplates. The VariLift-LX devices are made of titanium alloy (Ti6AI4V ELI per ASTM F136) and are provided sterile. The VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device may be implanted bi-laterally via a posterior lumbar (PLIF) approach or as a single device via a transverse (TLIF) approach.
## VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device
The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System is a self-tapping, expandable device with an interior sliding wedge. The devices are cylindrical-ovoid in shape, which is adapted to the general shape of the vertebral end plates. All components are composed of Titanium-6A1-4V ELI alloy that conforms to ASTM F136. The VariLift Cervical device is grooved and fluted with large fenestrations (graft windows) positioned between each of its four quadrants that provide bony contact with the endplates. The device is supplied sterile.
## Indications for Use
## VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device
The Wenzel Spine VariLift® Interbody Fusion System (VariLift®-L/LX and VariLift®-A) is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one level or two contiguous
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Wenzel Spine. The words "wenzel spine" are written in blue, with a yellow arc above the "el sp" portion of the text. Below the company name, the words "simple. dependable. proven." are written in a smaller font.
levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies.
VariLift®-L/LX is designed to be implanted bi-laterally via a posterior (PLF) approach or as a single device via a transverse (TLIF) approach. VariLift®-L/LX may be implanted with or without supplemental fixation and is intended for use with autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion. VariLift®-A is designed to be implanted bi-laterally via an anterior (ALIF) approach. VariLift®-A may be implanted with or without supplemental fixation and is intended for use with autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion.
## VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device
The Wenzel Spine VariLift® Cervical Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level.
The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System is used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the cervical spine and is placed in a unilateral fashion via an anterior approach at the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graff. The Wenzel Spine VariLift Cervical Interbody Fusion System may be used with or without supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment with an intervertebral fusion device.
## Predicate Devices
## VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device
Primary Predicate: VariLift®-L Interbody Fusion Device, K151900 Additional Predicate: Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices, K160924
VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device
Primary Predicate: VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device, K120603 Additional Predicate: Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices, K160924
## Summary of Technological Characteristics
VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device
The technological characteristics of the subject VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device remain the same as, or similar to, the predicate VariLift-L Interbody Fusion Device (K151900) in regards to intended use, Indications for Use, design, manufacturing methods, fundamental technology, materials, and principles of operation.
## VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device
The technological characteristics of the subject VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device remain the same as, or similar to, the predicate VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device (K120603) in regards to intended use, Indications for Use, design, manufacturing methods, fundamental technology, materials, and principles of operation.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Wenzel Spine. The words "wenzel spine" are in blue, with a yellow arc over the "el sp" portion of the name. Below the name, in smaller font, are the words "simple. dependable. proven."
# Summary of Performance Testing
## VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device
The substantial equivalence of the VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device to the predicate devices is evidenced by having the same, or similar, intended use, Indications for Use, materials, principles of operation, and fundamental technology.
# VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device
The substantial equivalence of the VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device to the predicate devices is evidenced by having the same, or similar, intended use, Indications for Use, materials, principles of operation, and fundamental technology. Non-clinical testing was conducted on the smallest new size to determine substantial equivalence to the predicate VariLift-C smallest size.
Static compression, compression shear, torsion testing, and dynamic compression testing per ASTM 2077-14: "Test Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices"; subsidence testing per ASTM F2267-04: "Standard Test Method for Measuring Load Induced Subsidence of Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Under Static Axial Compression"; and expulsion testing demonstrated that the subject VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of mechanical performance.
# Conclusion
## VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device
Based on the comparison to the predicate devices, the subject VariLift-LX Interbody Fusion Device has been shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
## VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device
Based on the comparison to the predicate devices, the subject VariLift-C Interbody Fusion Device has been shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.