K180739 · Baxter Healthcare Corporation · FPA · May 28, 2019 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K180739
Device Name
Clearlink System Solution Set
Applicant
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Product Code
FPA · General Hospital
Decision Date
May 28, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5440
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, 3rd-Party Reviewed
Indications for Use
For the administration of fluids from a container into the patient's vascular system through a vascular access device.
Device Story
Clearlink System Solution Sets are intravascular administration sets used to deliver fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system. The sets include components such as a spike (vented or non-vented), drip chamber, tubing (non-DEHP), clamps (slide/roller), and a Clearlink Luer activated valve (LAV). The device is used in clinical settings by healthcare providers to facilitate continuous or intermittent fluid administration. The system is compatible with infusion pumps, including the Sigma Spectrum. The device maintains a sterile fluid path, with some configurations including check valves or minidrip adapters. The healthcare provider connects the set to a fluid container and the patient's vascular access device; the flow is regulated via clamps or an infusion pump. The device benefits patients by providing a reliable, sterile, and biocompatible pathway for intravenous therapy.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence is supported by extensive bench testing, including functional performance (flow rate, occlusion, bubble tests), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1, -4, -5, -10, -11, -17), sterility validation (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137), and microbial ingress testing.
Technological Characteristics
Materials include PVC (non-DEHP), ABS, polycarbonate, silicone, and polyethylene. Components include non-vented/vented spikes, drip chambers, and Luer activated valves. Connectivity is via standard Luer locks. Sterilization is via radiation (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137). Complies with ISO 594-1:1986 and 594-2:1998 for Luer connectors. Non-fluid path components include LLDPE/HDPE spike protectors and Luer caps.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the administration of fluids from a container into the patient's vascular system through a vascular access device.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravascular administration set is a device used to administer fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system through a needle or catheter inserted into a vein. The device may include the needle or catheter, tubing, a flow regulator, a drip chamber, an infusion line filter, an I.V. set stopcock, fluid delivery tubing, connectors between parts of the set, a side tube with a cap to serve as an injection site, and a hollow spike to penetrate and connect the tubing to an I.V. bag or other infusion fluid container.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for pharmacy compounding systems within this classification is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Pharmacy Compounding Systems; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers.” Pharmacy compounding systems classified within the intravascular administration set are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of this part and subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
May 28, 2019
Baxter Healthcare Corporation % Mark Job Responsible Third Party Official Regulatory Technology Services, LLC 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 510k Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114
Re: K180739
Trade/Device Name: Clearlink System Solution Set Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5440 Regulation Name: Intravascular administration set Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FPA Dated: April 4, 2019 Received: April 5, 2019
Dear Mark Job:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Tina Kiang, Ph.D Director DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and General Hospital Devices, and Human Factors OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
#### K180739
Device Name Clearlink System Solution Sets
Indications for Use (Describe)
For the administration of fluids from a container into the patient's vascular system through a vascular access device.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.qov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# axter
Section 5. 510(k) Summary
May 24, 2019
#### OWNER:
Baxter Healthcare Corporation One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, Illinois 60015
## CONTACT PERSON:
Jeanette Licata Sr. Regulatory Affairs Associate, Regulatory Affairs 32650 N. Wilson Road Round Lake, IL 60073 Telephone: (224) 948 3996 Fax: (224) 270 4119
## IDENTIFICATION OF THE DEVICE:
Trade/Device Name: Clearlink System Solution Sets Classification Panel: 80 General Hospital Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5440 Regulation Name: Set, Administration, Intravascular Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FPA
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Table 1. Code Numbers for Clearlink System Solution Set
| Code Number | Name |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| 2R8519 | Clearlink System Non-DEHP Continu-Flo Solution Set |
| 2R8537 | Clearlink System Non-DEHP Continu-Flo Solution Set |
| 2R8546 | Clearlink System Non-DEHP Continu-Flo Solution Set |
| 2R8401 | Clearlink System Non-DEHP Solution Set |
| 2R8875 | Clearlink System Solution Set with Duo-Vent Spike |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE:
#### Table 2. Predicate Device
| Device | Company | Predicate 510(k) | Clearance Date |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------|------------------|
| Clearlink Luer Activated Valve, Clearlink System<br>Non-DEHP Catheter Extension Sets | Baxter Healthcare Corporation | K112893 | October 18, 2011 |
#### REASON FOR SUBMISSION:
The changes identified as the basis of this submission apply to all the proposed devices included in this application (2R8519, 2R8537, 2R8546, 2R8401, and 2R8875). Specifically, the changes include the following:
- · A change to the packaging configuration, specifically the design and materials of the male Luer cap and spike tip protector which are used to maintain the sterile fluid path. Both are non-fluid path components.
- Differences in components and materials
{5}------------------------------------------------
- Inclusion of the expiry date for the new packaging configuration .
- Minor rewording of the Indications for Use and Intended Use statements .
- . An update to the pump compatibility statement
- · Labeling updates with other clarifying information to comply with Baxter's labeling standards.
These modifications do not impact the intental scientific technology of the devices or raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
Table 3 provides details on the design and materials of the current and proposed spike tip protector and male Luer cap.
## DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE:
The Clearlink System Non-DEHP Solution Set (2R8401) consists of a spike tip protector, non-vented spike, non-DEHP drip chamber, non-DEHP tubing, slide clamp, regulating roller clamp, Clearlink Luer activated valve (LAV), two-piece male Luer lock and male Luer cap. The Clearlink System Solution Set with Duo-Vent Spike (2R8875) consists of a spike tip protector, vented spike, non-DEHP drip chamber , non-DEHP tubing, tri-layer tubing, slide clamp, on-off roller clamp, Clearlink Luer activated valve (LAV), one-piece male Luer lock and male Luer cap.
The Clearlink System Non-DEHP Continu-Flo Solution Set (2R8519, 2R8546) consists of a spike tip protector, nonvented spike, non-DEHP drip chamber , non-DEHP tubing, check valve, slide clamp, regulating roller clamp, Clearlink Luer activated valve (LAV), two-piece male Luer cap. Configurations of these sets differ in drip chamber flow rate (60 drops/mL or 10 drops/ mL).
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The word is slightly slanted to the right, giving it a dynamic appearance. The font is sans-serif and the color is a vibrant blue.
| Component | Current Design; Material | Proposed Design; Material | Assessment of Differences |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Spike Tip Protector | Vented; Low Density<br>Polyethylene | Non-Vented; Linear Low Density<br>Polyethylene | Spike tip protector and male Luer cap are<br>removed before set use and are non-fluid<br>path components. Additional testing has<br>confirmed the different technological<br>characteristics of the new device do not<br>raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Male Luer Cap | Vented; Low Density<br>Polyethylene, Blue | Non-Vented Filtered; High Density<br>Polyethylene (housing), Acrylic with<br>Non-Woven Nylon Substrate (filter<br>material) | |
## INDICATIONS FOR USE:
For the administration of fluids from a container into the patient's vascular system through a vascular access device.
## TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:
The proposed devices are substantially equivalent to the previously cleared under 510(k) premarket notification K112893 on October 18, 2011. The intended use and function of the proposed devices are equivalent to the predicate device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The font appears to be sans-serif. The word is slightly italicized, giving it a dynamic appearance.
Table 4 is a device comparison table outlining the differences between the predicate and proposed devices.
| Features | Predicate Device<br>Cleared under K112893 | Proposed Devices (2R8519,<br>2R8537, 2R8546, 2R8401,<br>2R8875) | Assessment of Differences |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | For use with a vascular access<br>device for the administration of<br>drugs and solutions. The<br>Clearlink Luer Activated Valve<br>is an in-line injection site, which<br>can be connected to the standard<br>male Luer adapters (e.g.,<br>syringes or sets) for continuous<br>or intermittent fluid<br>administration or the<br>withdrawal of fluid. | For the administration of fluids<br>from a container into the<br>patient's vascular system<br>through a vascular access<br>device. | Same<br>Minor rewording of the Intended Use statement has<br>been made to better align with 21 CFR 880.5440<br>and for the purpose of streamlining the information<br>provided to the user.<br>The general purpose of the device and its function<br>remain unchanged.<br>The minor rewording of the Intended Use statement<br>does not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Indication for Use | For use with a vascular access<br>device for the administration of<br>drugs and solutions. The<br>Clearlink Luer Activated Valve<br>is an in-line injection site, which<br>can be connected to the standard<br>male Luer adapters (e.g.,<br>syringes or sets) for continuous<br>or intermittent fluid<br>administration or the<br>withdrawal of fluid. | For the administration of fluids<br>from a container into the<br>patient's vascular system<br>through a vascular access<br>device. | Same<br>Minor rewording of the Indications for Use<br>statement has been made to better align with 21<br>CFR 880.5440 and for the purpose of streamlining<br>the information provided to the user.<br>This minor modification does not alter the disease<br>or condition the device will diagnose, treat, prevent,<br>cure/mitigate, or the patient population for which<br>the device is intended to be used. In addition, the<br>minor rewording does not reflect a different<br>anatomical site from which a disease state or<br>population may be inferred. |
| Features | Predicate Device<br>Cleared under K112893 | Proposed Devices (2R8519,<br>2R8537, 2R8546, 2R8401,<br>2R8875) | Assessment of Differences |
| Sterile | Yes | Same | The minor rewording of the Intended Use statement<br>does not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Non-Pyrogenic | Yes | Same | N/A |
| Single Use | Yes | Same | N/A |
| Pump Compatibility | Yes, compatible with Flo-Gard<br>and Colleague | Yes, compatible with Sigma<br>Spectrum and other Baxter<br>infusion pumps | Compatible pumps reference has been updated to<br>align with Baxter's marketed infusion pumps.<br>Testing has been performed to confirm pump<br>compatibility with Sigma Spectrum infusion pumps. |
| Components/Materials | | | |
| Non-Vented Spike<br>(2R8519, 2R8537,<br>2R8546 and 2R8401) | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene | Same | N/A |
| Non-DEHP Drip<br>Chamber | Polyvinyl Chloride | Same | N/A |
| Non-DEHP Set Tubing<br>(2R8537, 2R8546) | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Tris (2-Ethylhexyl) Trimellitate | Same | N/A |
| Clearlink Luer Activated<br>Valve | Polycarbonate [Inlet/Outlet<br>Housing]<br><br>Silicone (Gland) | Same | N/A |
| Features | Predicate Device<br>Cleared under K112893 | Proposed Devices (2R8519,<br>2R8537, 2R8546, 2R8401,<br>2R8875) | Assessment of Differences |
| Two-Piece Male Luer<br>Lock<br>(2R8519, 2R8537,<br>2R8546 and 2R8401) | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene<br>Polycarbonate [Center Post] | Same | N/A |
| Vented Spike<br>(2R8875) | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene | Same | N/A |
| Capped Vent Filter<br>(Vented Spike)<br>(2R8875) | Acrylic copolymer with nylon<br>substrate (filter material)<br>High density polyethylene<br>(housing) | Same<br>Same | N/A |
| Spike Tip Protector<br>(2R8519, 2R8537,<br>2R8546, 2R8401 and<br>2R8875) | Low Density Polyethylene | Linear Low Density<br>Polyethylene | The spike tip protector has passed functional testing<br>for its intended use and is a non-fluid path<br>component. Additional testing has confirmed<br>maintenance of the sterile fluid path. The different<br>technological characteristics of the new device do<br>not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness.a |
| Male Luer Cap<br>(2R8519, 2R8537,<br>2R8546, 2R8401 and<br>2R8875) | Low Density Polyethylene | Acrylic with non-woven Nylon<br>Substrate (Filter material)<br>High Density Polyethylene<br>(Luer cap) | The filter and male Luer cap have passed functional<br>testing for their intended uses and are non-fluid<br>path. Additional testing has confirmed maintenance<br>of the sterile fluid path. The different technological<br>characteristics of the new device do not raise<br>different questions of safety and effectiveness.a |
| Features | Predicate Device<br>Cleared under K112893 | Proposed Devices (2R8519,<br>2R8537, 2R8546, 2R8401,<br>2R8875) | Assessment of Differences |
| Non-DEHP Pump Tubing<br>(2R8519, 2R8537,<br>2R8546, 2R8401 and<br>2R8875) | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Tris (2-Ethylhexyl) Trimellitate | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Di (2-Ethylhexyl) terephthalate | Both the predicate and proposed device contain<br>PVC tubing. The proposed device's tubing uses a<br>different plasticizer. Design control activities have<br>been conducted and have confirmed that the<br>different technological characteristics of the new<br>device do not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Non-DEHP Set Tubing<br>(2R8519, 2R8537,<br>2R8646, 2R8401) | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Tris (2-Ethylhexyl) Trimellitate | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Di (2-Ethylhexyl) terephthalate | Both the predicate and proposed device contain<br>PVC tubing. The proposed device's tubing uses a<br>different plasticizer. Design control activities have<br>been conducted and have confirmed that the<br>different technological characteristics of the new<br>device do not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Set Tubing<br>(2R8875) | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Tris (2-Ethylhexyl) Trimellitate | Tri-Layer:<br>Linear low density polyethylene<br>(inner layer)<br>Polyolefin (middle layer)<br>Polyvinyl Chloride (outer layer) | Both the predicate and proposed device contain<br>tubing. The proposed device contains tri-layer<br>tubing. Design control activities have been<br>conducted and have confirmed that the different<br>technological characteristics of the new device do<br>not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Check Valve<br>(2R8519, 2R8537 and<br>2R8546) | Not Applicable | Polymethyl methacrylate<br>(Acrylic) [Inlet and Outlet]<br>Silicone Rubber [Disk] | The predicate device does not have a check valve.<br>Design control activities have been conducted and<br>have confirmed that the different technological<br>characteristics of the new device do not raise<br>different questions of safety and effectiveness.b |
| Features | Predicate Device<br>Cleared under K112893 | Proposed Devices (2R8519,<br>2R8537, 2R8546, 2R8401,<br>2R8875) | Assessment of Differences |
| Minidrip Adapter<br>(2R8546) | Not Applicable | Rubber (Synthetic<br>Polyisoprene) [Blue Plug]<br>Stainless Steel [Cannula] | The predicate device does not have a minidrip<br>adapter. Design control activities have been<br>conducted and have confirmed that the different<br>technological characteristics of the new device do<br>not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness.b |
| Non-DEHP Bushing<br>Tubing<br>(2R8875) | Not Applicable | Material: Polyvinyl Chloride<br>Plasticizer:<br>Tris (2-Ethylhexyl) Trimellitate | The predicate device does not have Non-DEHP<br>bushing tubing. Design control activities have been<br>conducted and have confirmed that the different<br>technological characteristics of the new device do<br>not raise different questions of safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| One-Piece Male Luer<br>Lock<br>(2R8875) | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene | Both the predicate and proposed devices contain an<br>ABS One-Piece male Luer lock. The proposed<br>device's component has a slightly different design.<br>Design control activities have been conducted and<br>have confirmed that the different technological<br>characteristics of the new device do not raise<br>different questions of safety and effectiveness. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/0 description: The image contains the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The text is the primary focus of the image and is centrally aligned. The background is plain white, which makes the text stand out.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/0 description: The image contains the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The word is slightly italicized, giving it a dynamic appearance. The font is sans-serif, and the overall design is simple and modern. The background is plain white.
{10}------------------------------------------------
# Baxter
{11}------------------------------------------------
# Baxter
## Table 4. Device Comparison
ª Although this component is non-fluid path, it's used to maintain sterility of the fluid path and has been included as it is the basis of this premarket application.
b Due to the use of a singular predicate for this submission table identifies that this is a new component from the predicate device. However, the proposed set configuration with this component was originally cleared in K961225. Additionally, this component has since been replaced with another version which has the same functional purpose, same/similar intended use and duration of contact.
{12}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/12/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The letters are slightly italicized, giving the word a sense of movement. The font is sans-serif and appears to be a company logo.
## DISCUSSION OF NONCLINICAL TESTS:
Baxter Healthcare Corporation conducts risk analyses and design verification tests based on the result of these analyses. All test results meet their acceptance criteria and support that the proposed devices are appropriately designed for their intended use.
## Performance Data:
The following bench tests (Table 5) were conducted to evaluate the functional performance of the Clearlink System Solution Sets. We have included testing information supporting all of the specific changes which are the basis of submission but have also included all testing information in this application to provide a comprehensive package of testing information applicable to the proposed devices.
| Test | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Male Luer Cap/Spike Tip Protector Removal Force Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Male Luer Cap/Spike Tip Protector Retention Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Continuous Bubble Test (Pump Compatibility)a | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Accumulated Bubble Test (Pump Compatibility) a | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Administration Set Integrity After Maximum Delivery (Pump<br>Compatibility) a | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Upstream Occlusion (Pump Compatibility) a | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Downstream Occlusion (Pump Compatibility) a | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Flow Rate Accuracy (Pump Compatibility) a | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Solvent Bond Tensile Strength Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Solvent Bond Pressure Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Top End Tubing Assembly Clear Passage | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Spike Assembly Visual Inspection | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Drop Volume Accuracy, 10 drops/mL | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Drop Volume Accuracy, 60 drops/mL | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Cannula Pull Out Force | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Spike Assembly Insertion Force Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Spike Assembly Removal Force Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Slide Clamp Shut Off Test (Fixtured Slide Clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Slide Clamp Shut Off Test - Post 24 hours (Fixtured Slide Clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
#### Table 5. Performance Data
{13}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/13/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The font appears to be italicized, slanting slightly to the right. The word is the only element in the image, and it is set against a white background.
| | | Table 5. Performance Data | |
|--|--|---------------------------|--|
|--|--|---------------------------|--|
| Slide Clamp 7 Day Subsystem and Tubing Damage Test (Fixtured Slide<br>Clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Slide Clamp Flow Stability Test (Fixtured Slide Clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Slide Clamp Tug Stability Test (Fixtured Slide Clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Slide Clamp Shut Off Test (plastic slide clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Slide Clamp 7 Day Subsystem and Tubing Damage Test (plastic slide<br>clamp) | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Control Range Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Force Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Shut Off Test -Post 24 hours | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp 7 Day Subsystem and Tubing Damage Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Flow Stability Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Tug Stability Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Tubing Leak Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Shut-Off Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Roller Clamp Force Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Check Valve Back Flow Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Check Valve High Pressure Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Clearlink Y-Site Valve Performance Post 100 Actuations | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Clearlink Y-Site Valve Performance Post 96 Hour Indwell | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Clearlink Y-Site Clear Air Passage | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Clearlink Y-Site Back Pressure Leak Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Clearlink Y-Site Luer Connection Leak Test | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Clearlink Y-Site Basic 10-Cycle Actuation Sequence | Per Baxter Test Method |
| ISO Luer Tests on Male Luer Connectors | ISO 594-1:1986 and 594-<br>2:1998 |
| ISO Luer Tests on Clearlink Connectors | ISO 594-2:1998 |
| (Unscrewing Torque, Separation, Resistance to Overriding and Ease of<br>Assembly Tests) | Per Baxter Test Method |
| Non-DEHP Claim Verification | Per Baxter Test Method |
ª All pump compatibility testing was performed with the Sigma Spectrum infusion pump.
All tests met the acceptance criteria.
{14}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/14/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The font is sans-serif and appears to be slightly italicized. The word is the logo for the healthcare company Baxter International.
## Biocompatibility:
The spike tip protector and male Luer cap components are not considered part of the fluid path of the sets. The fluid path materials in these sets have been used in similar Baxter cleared devices with the same/similar intended use and with the same type and duration of contact.
For the device fluid path, biocompatibility assessments were conducted based on ISO-10993-1, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices for prolonged duration, external communicating device, indirect blood path and Blue Book Memorandum G95-1 "Use of International Standard ISO-10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing,''' as recommended in the IV Administration Sets guidance, "Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Intravascular Administration Sets Premarket Notification Submissions [510(k)]." Biocompatibility assessments were conducted on a worst case/representative final, finished device for all materials of Clearlink System Solution Sets. The following tests were conducted as part of the biocompatibility testing for the device fluid path of the Clearlink System Solution Sets:
- Cytotoxicity ISO 10993-5
- Sensitization ISO 10993-10
- Intracutaneous (Irritation) Reactivity ISO 10993-10
- Systemic Toxicity (acute and repeat dose) ISO 10993-11 ●
- Toxicological Assessment of Extractable Profile ISO 10993-17
- Materials Mediated Pyrogen ISO 10993-11
- Hemolysis ISO 10993-4
- USP Physiochemical USP <661> (Buffering capacity, Heavy metals, Non-Volatile Residue)
Based upon the results of this prolonged duration, external communicating, indirect blood path testing, the Clearlink System Solution Sets have been shown to be biocompatible and appropriate for their intended use.
## Sterility:
The Clearlink System Solution Sets are sterilized with radiation. The Minimum Sterilizing Dose (MSD) required to provide a 106 Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) for this (sub) category was established and validated at the manufacturing facility as described in ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-2, "Sterilization of health care products -
{15}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/15/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Baxter" in a bold, blue font. The font appears to be sans-serif and slightly italicized. The word is presented against a white background, making the blue text stand out prominently. The overall impression is a clean and professional logo or branding element.
Radiation-Part 2: Establishing the Sterilization Dose." The sterilization process for the proposed devices is also compliant to ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1, Sterilization of health care products-Radiation-Part 1; Requirements for Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization process for Medical Devices.
## Shelf-Life:
Baxter has performed aging testing to support a shelf-life claim of 2 (two) years.
## Microbial Ingress Testing:
Baxter has conducted testing on all potential points of microbial entry into the sterile fluid pathway of the Clearlink Intravascular Administration sets subject to this premarket notification. Microbial ingress testing was conducted on the Clearlink Luer Activated Device (LAD) following section 8 of FDA's Guidance for Industry and Staff, Intravascular Administration Sets Premarket Notification Submissions [510(k)], issued July, 11, 2008. The Spike Area and the Luer Connector Site were tested following Baxter's test method. All test results meet their acceptance criteria and support that the proposed devices are appropriately designed for their intended use.
## CONCLUSION:
The non-clinical data demonstrate that the subject devices are substantially equivalent and perform comparably to the predicate device that is legally marketed for the same intended use.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.