SmartGrid

K180667 · Carestream Health, Inc. · MQB · Apr 13, 2018 · Radiology

Device Facts

Record IDK180667
Device NameSmartGrid
ApplicantCarestream Health, Inc.
Product CodeMQB · Radiology
Decision DateApr 13, 2018
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeSpecial
Regulation21 CFR 892.1680
Device ClassClass 2

Intended Use

SmartGrid feature is a software option that provides, upon request, a diagnostic radiograph image with a reduction in visible x-ray scatter similar to the effect of an anti-scatter grid.

Device Story

SmartGrid II is a software feature for Carestream digital radiography systems; it processes radiographic images acquired without a physical anti-scatter grid. The software uses an algorithm to estimate and remove scatter, improving image contrast and reducing scatter appearance. Users select the processing via the DirectView application either before or after image acquisition. The software operates on the system's workstation; it does not require external cloud processing. Radiologists view the processed images to perform clinical diagnoses. By simulating the effect of a physical anti-scatter grid, the device allows for diagnostic-quality imaging without the physical hardware, potentially simplifying workflows and reducing patient dose associated with grid usage.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Verification and validation included installation testing, image quality assessment (noise reduction, contrast/brightness), regression testing, integration testing, and error handling. A clinical evaluation was performed using existing research images processed by both the predicate and SmartGrid II; a board-certified radiologist confirmed that images processed with SmartGrid II were equivalent in diagnostic quality to those processed with the predicate device.

Technological Characteristics

Optional software component for digital radiography systems. Functions via scatter factor estimation, scatter correction, noise reduction, and image rendering. Operates on Carestream DirectView application software. No physical materials or energy sources; purely algorithmic image processing.

Indications for Use

Indicated for use in diagnostic radiography to reduce visible x-ray scatter in images acquired without a physical anti-scatter grid.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and below that, the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font, also in blue. Carestream Health, Inc. % Ms. Diane Koetter Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Systems 150 Verona Street ROCHESTER NY 14608 April 13, 2018 Re: K180667 Trade/Device Name: SmartGrid Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MOB Dated: March 12, 2018 Received: March 14, 2018 Dear Ms. Koetter: We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. {1}------------------------------------------------ (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100). Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone Sincerely, Michael D'Hara For Robert Ochs. Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ ## Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known) K180667 Device Name SmartGrid Indications for Use (Describe) "SmartGrid feature is a software option that provides, upon request by user, a diagnostic radiograph image with a reduction in visible x-ray scatter similar to the effect of an anti-scatter grid." Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) #### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. #### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: > Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." {3}------------------------------------------------ # Carestream # "510(k) Summary" | 510(k) Owner Name: | Carestream Health, Inc. | |------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| | 510(k) Owner Address: | 150 Verona Street | | | Rochester, New York 14608 | | 510(k) Owner Phone: | 585 627-6505 | | 510(k) Owner Fax: | 585 627-8802 | | Contact Person & Info: | Diane Koetter | | | Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Systems | | | diane.koetter@carestream.com | | | 585-627-6505 | | Date Summary Prepared: | April 11, 2018 | | Device Trade Name: | SmartGrid | | Device Common Name: | Flat Panel Digital Detector System | | Classification Name: | Stationary x-ray system | | Device Class: | II | | Device Code: | MQB | | Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 892.1680 | | Predicate Device: | SmartGrid | | | Manufactured by: Carestream Health, Inc. | | | 510(k) No.: K163157 (March 21, 2017) | Please Note: The marketing name for the modified SmartGrid device is not expected to change. The modified device is referred to as "SmartGrid II" within this submission for clarity. #### Device Description: The SmartGrid II software is designed to improve contrast and reduce the appearance of scatter in radiographic images that have been acquired without a physical grid. SmartGrid II encapsulates an algorithm for estimating and removing scatter from radiographic images. The SmartGrid II software feature is accessible through the DirectView application software. Users will be able to select SmartGrid II processing before an image is acquired, or to change whether SmartGrid II processing is applied to a previously acquired image. {4}------------------------------------------------ #### Indications for Use / Intended Use: The Indications for Use for the device, as described in its labeling, are: "SmartGrid feature is a software option that provides, upon request, a diagnostic radiograph image with a reduction in visible x-ray scatter similar to the effect of an anti-scatter grid." The intended use for this device, as determined by descriptions and the proposed labeling contained in this submission, is similar to the Indications for Use statement provided above. The Indications for Use for the subject device is the same as for the predicate device and the intended use remains unchanged. Any variation in features or technical specifications have been identified and addressed through testing (described below) to support a substantial equivalence determination. #### Comparison of Technological Characteristics: Based upon information provided within this submission, we believe that the SmartGrid II software is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed SmartGrid (predicate device). SmartGrid II has the same technological characteristics as SmartGrid (predicate device). Both are optional software components that allow for reduction in visible x-ray scatter in radiographic images. Both devices use: - Scatter Factor Estimation ● - Scatter Correction - Noise Reduction and Image Rendering . The predicate device differs from the investigational device in the methods used for Scatter Estimation and Scatter Correction. For instance, the original SmartGrid feature estimated and corrected scatter based on the exposed area within the collimation field. SmartGrid II estimates and corrects scatter based on the full detector field rather than the collimated subregion. In addition, the SmartGrid and SmartGrid II algorithms differ slightly to further improve the scatter estimation and correction. #### Discussion of Testing: The performance characteristics and operation / usability of the SmartGrid II software were evaluated in non-clinical (bench) testing. These studies demonstrated the intended workflow, related performance, overall function, verification and validation of requirements for intended use, and reliability of the software. Non-clinical test results have demonstrated that the device conforms to its specifications. Predefined acceptance criteria were met and demonstrated that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the predicate device. {5}------------------------------------------------ Specifically, the following "bench" testing was performed as described below: - Installation testing was performed to verify successful installation of the SmartGrid ● II software component onto the representative system. - Specific test cases were implemented to verify that SmartGrid II image processing . consistently produces a diagnostic quality image - . Specific test cases were implemented to verify that image noise was sufficiently reduced and image contrast/brightness were sufficient for clinical diagnosis - . Regression testing was performed using manual and automated test case execution - Integration tests were performed to ensure proper performance of the SmartGrid II ● software feature when integrated into the Carestream application software - Error handling was observed for proper function through monitoring of event logs - Ad Hoc testing was performed as considered applicable to help ensure no . unexpected negative effects In addition to bench testing, existing clinical research images processed with both the original SmartGrid and SmartGrid II software were evaluated by a board certified radiologist. This clinical evaluation was intended to confirm no unexpected negative effects with respect to diagnostic image quality associated with the use of the improved algorithm. The reader study demonstrated that images processed with SmartGrid II were equivalent in diagnostic quality to images processed with the predicate device, SmartGrid. #### Summary: The differences between SmartGrid II and the predicate device do not affect the intended use of the device or alter the fundamental scientific technology of the device. Performance testing results support a substantial equivalence determination of SmartGrid II to the predicate device. ### FDA Reference Materials: The following FDA guidance documents were consulted in the development of the SmartGrid II software feature: - . General Principles of Software Validation – Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; issued 01/11/2002 - Off-The-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices – Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers, and Compliance; issued 09/09/1999 - Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical ● Devices - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; issued 10/02/2014 - . Deciding When to submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device -Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; issued 10/25/2017 - Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in . Medical Devices: issued 05/11/2005
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%