K173846 · Dermascalp, LLC · OAP · Mar 21, 2018 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K173846
Device Name
DermaScalp Laser Cap
Applicant
Dermascalp, LLC
Product Code
OAP · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Mar 21, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 890.5500
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices are indicated to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in Males who have Norwood Hamilton Classifications of IIa to V patterns of hair loss and to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in Females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-1 to I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal; both with Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
Device Story
Hands-free, portable, non-invasive low-level laser therapy (LLLT) device; treats Androgenetic Alopecia; promotes hair growth. Device consists of concave scalp covering containing multiple red laser modules (650 nm wavelength, <5 mW output power per module). Operates via continuous wave (CW) output; delivers distributed laser energy to scalp via bio-stimulation. Intended for home use by patients. User places cap on head for timed treatments. Output is therapeutic red light; no complex data processing or clinical decision support. Benefits include non-invasive hair growth stimulation. Safety profile consistent with Class 3R laser systems.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical efficacy trials were conducted. Evidence includes bench testing for electrical safety (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2), laser safety (IEC 60825-1), and home-use safety (IEC 60601-1-11). Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993-1 and ISO 10993-5. A usability study with 116 adult subjects demonstrated a 93% pass rate for self-selection and 99.4% pass rate for user instruction comprehension, supporting Over-the-Counter (OTC) use.
Technological Characteristics
Hands-free, portable LLLT device. Emits 650 nm red laser light via multiple diodes (50-272 count). Output power <5 mW per diode; total output <1,760 mW. Continuous wave (CW) mode. Materials tested per ISO 10993-1 and ISO 10993-5. Class 3R laser system per IEC 60825-1. Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1; EMC per IEC 60601-1-2; home-use safety per IEC 60601-1-11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for males (Norwood Hamilton IIa-V) and females (Ludwig/Savin I-1 to I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal) with Androgenetic Alopecia and Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-IV to promote hair growth.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An infrared lamp is a device intended for medical purposes that emits energy at infrared frequencies (approximately 700 nanometers to 50,000 nanometers) to provide topical heating.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an infrared therapeutic heating lamp, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 890.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration logo is on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. The words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are written in blue to the right of the square.
March 21, 2018
DermaScalp LLC John Carullo Managing Member 190 E. Stacy Rd Suite 306-291 Allen, Texas 75002
Re: K173846
Trade/Device Name: D DermaScalp Laser Cap Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5500 Regulation Name: Infrared Lamp Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OAP Dated: December 14, 2017 Received: December 19, 2017
Dear John Carullo:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing, practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
> Sincerely. Jennifer R. Stevenson -S3
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173846
Device Name DermaScalp Laser Cap
Indications for Use (Describe)
The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices are indicated to treat Androgenetic Alpopecia and promote hair growth in Males who have Norwood Hamilton Classifications of IIa to V patterns of hair loss and to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in Females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-1 to I-4, II-2, or frontal; both with Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## ATTACHMENT 2
# 510(k) SUMMARY
| 510(k) Owner: | DermaScalp LLC<br>190 E. Stacy Rd.<br>Suite 306-291<br>Allen, TX 75002<br>Contact: John Carullo<br>Phone: 214-683-0724 | | | | | | |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------|
| Date Summary Prepared: | December 14, 2017 | | | | | | |
| Device: | <table><tr><td>Trade Name:</td><td>DermaScalp Laser Caps</td></tr><tr><td>Common/Classification Name:</td><td>Light Therapy Hair System<br/>Product Code OAP<br/>21 C.F.R. § 890.5500 (Infrared lamp)</td></tr><tr><td>Classification:</td><td>Class II</td></tr></table> | Trade Name: | DermaScalp Laser Caps | Common/Classification Name: | Light Therapy Hair System<br>Product Code OAP<br>21 C.F.R. § 890.5500 (Infrared lamp) | Classification: | Class II |
| Trade Name: | DermaScalp Laser Caps | | | | | | |
| Common/Classification Name: | Light Therapy Hair System<br>Product Code OAP<br>21 C.F.R. § 890.5500 (Infrared lamp) | | | | | | |
| Classification: | Class II | | | | | | |
| Predicate Devices: | iGrow II Hair Growth System - Apira Science Inc - K152019<br>Capillus82, Capillus202, Capillus272 Pro, 272 OfficePro, Capillus302, Capillus312, and Capillus352 – Capillus LLC – K163170<br>Transdermal LaserCap80, LaserCap120, LaserCap224, LaserCap300 – K161875 | | | | | | |
| Reference Device: | DermaScalp Laser Cap - DermaScalp LLC - K152587 (Previously FDA cleared) | | | | | | |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Device<br>Description: | The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices are a hands-free, portable, non-<br>invasive, low-level laser device intended to treat Androgenetic Alopecia (Hair<br>Loss) and to promote hair growth in Males and Females. The DermaScalp<br>Laser Cap devices provide distributed red laser light dispersing from a<br>"Concave" scalp covering utilizing laser modules with a 650 nm wavelength,<br><5 mW output power, producing a continuous wave "CW" output beam. The<br>"Concave" scalp covering is designed to maximize the delivery of the coherent<br>laser light to effectively cover the entire scalp of the user during treatment. |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use: | The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices are indicated to treat<br>Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in Males who have Norwood<br>Hamilton Classifications of IIa to V patterns of hair loss and to treat<br>Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in Females who have Ludwig<br>(Savin) Scale I-1 to I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal; both with Fitzpatrick Skin Types I<br>to IV. |
| Technological<br>Characteristics: | The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices are a hands-free portable device<br>that produce red laser energy dispersed from a "Concave" scalp covering as it<br>rests upon a user's head and creates a laser field that covers the users entire<br>scalp area. The devices produce timed treatments of equally distributed laser<br>energy to the full scalp area. The treatment received from the laser energy<br>promotes hair growth in both Males and Females and treats Androgenetic<br>Alopecia (Hair Loss) by the therapeutic modality of bio-stimulation. |
| Biocompatibility<br>Data: | The construction of the family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices do not raise<br>any biocompatibility issues. All the materials used in the construction of the<br>DermaScalp devices were tested and adhere to the requirements of ISO 10993-<br>1:2009, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and<br>Testing within a Risk Management Process, as well as, adhere to the<br>requirements of ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices --<br>Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. |
| Performance<br>Data: | The evaluation of the perfomance data presented confirms that the family of<br>DermaScalp Laser Cap devices have the same or similar Laser Wavelength,<br>Laser Power, Laser Energy Type, Output Mode, Treatment Time, Output<br>Beam, Laser Field Treatment Area, Consumer Usage Focal Length as the FDA<br>Cleared predicate devices.<br><br>Testing to IEC 60601-1 and 60601-1-2 confirm the devices adherence to LVD<br>electrical and EMC safety requirements. Testing to IEC 60825-1 certifies the<br>laser system to classifaction 3R, which is the same as the predicate devices.<br>Testing to IEC 60601-1-11:2015 confirms the basic safety and essential |
{5}------------------------------------------------
performance of medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems for use in the home.
DermaScalp used a third party group to to administer a self-selection and usibility study to determine the user comprehension of user instructions, warnings, and precaustions. The testing was administered to 116 adult subjects of any age (>18) of diverse race, age, and educational background. The DermaScalp usibility test demonstrated a pass rate of 93% (self-selection) and 99.4% pass rate for the user instruction questionnaire, satisfying the FDA's requirements for clearance (sale) as Over-the-Counter Intended Use.
Performance Testing is conducted to confirm compliance to design specifications; all functions were verified to operate as designed. The DermaScalp devices met all acceptance criteria in the performance testing.
Substantial The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices referenced in this application are Equivalance: the same technology used by the LLLT devices cleared under device code OAP. The DermaScalp Laser Caps are as safe and effective as the predicate devices, as well as other reference devices in its class.
> The sponsor believes that the difference in the physical appearance, number of diodes, or in the method of delivering the radiant energy of the systems is of no consequence and does not affect the therapeutic value or the safety profile. All compliant LLLT systems which use red light diode lasers are classified as class 3R laser systems according to the IEC standard for allowable emission levels, which is a recognized standard by the FDA as well, and the adverse event profile is the same.
| DermaScalp Devices | Capillus Devices | Transdermal Devices | iGrow | OAP Devices (General) |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| To Be Determined | K163170 | K161875 | K152019 | N/A |
| LLLT Device | LLLT Device | LLLT Device | LLLT Device | LLLT Device |
| OTC | OTC | Prescription | OTC | Prescription and OTC |
| Intended Use-<br>Androgenetic Alopecia | Intended Use-<br>Androgenetic Alopecia | Intended Use-<br>Androgenetic Alopecia | Intended Use-<br>Androgenetic Alopecia | Intended Use-<br>Androgenetic Alopecia |
| Cap Design | Cap Design | Cap Design | Helmet Design | Helmet/Cap, Comb, Brush or Panel Design |
| 650nm | 650nm | 650nm | 655nm | 635-678nm |
| Marketing Clearance for Males & Females | Marketing Clearance for Males & Females | Marketing Clearance for Males & Females | Marketing Clearance for Males & Females | Marketing Clearance for Males & Females |
| Passive Use (hands free) | Passive Use (hands free) | Passive Use (hands free) | Passive Use (hands free) | Passive Use (hands free or comb) |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Diode Count- 50, 80,<br>120, 148, 180, 202,<br>224, 272 | Diode Count- 82,<br>202, 272, 302, 312,<br>352 | Diode Count- 80,<br>120, 224, 300 | Diode Count- 51 | Diode Count- Ranges<br>from<br>1 to 352 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification: OAP | Classification: OAP | Classification: OAP | Classification: OAP | Classification: OAP |
| Fitzpatrick Skin<br>Phototypes - I-IV | Fitzpatrick Skin<br>Phototypes - I-IV | Fitzpatrick Skin<br>Phototypes - I-IV | Fitzpatrick Skin<br>Phototypes - I-IV | Fitzpatrick Skin<br>Phototypes - I-IV |
| Ludwig-Savin I-II<br>(females) | Ludwig-Savin I-II<br>(females) | Ludwig-Savin I-II<br>(females) | Ludwig-Savin I-II<br>(females) | Ludwig-Savin I-II<br>(females);<br>Norwood Hamilton<br>IIA-V (males);<br>or both genders |
| Norwood Hamilton IIA-<br>V (males) | Norwood Hamilton<br>IIA-V (males) | Norwood Hamilton<br>IIA-V (males) | Norwood Hamilton<br>IIA-V (males) | |
| Treatment- 17weeks,<br>every other day<br>(indefinite) | Treatment- 17weeks,<br>every other day<br>(indefinite) | Treatment-<br>17weeks, every<br>other day (indefinite) | Treatment-<br>17weeks, every<br>other day<br>(indefinite) | Treatment-<br>approximately<br>17weeks, every<br>other day (indefinite) |
| Total Laser Energy<br>Output: <250mW,<br><400mW, <600mW,<br><740mW, <900mW,<br><1,010mW,<1,120mW,<br><1,360mW | Total Laser Energy<br>Output: <410mW,<br><1,010mW,<br><1,360mW,<br><1,510mW,<br><1,560mW, and<br><1,760mW | Total Laser Energy<br>Output: <400mW,<br><600mW,<br><1,120mW,<br><1,500mW | Total Laser Energy<br>Output: <255mW | Total Laser Energy<br>Output: Ranges from<br><5mW to <1,760mW |
| Device Class II | Device Class II | Device Class II | Device Class II | Device Class II |
For these reasons, the family of DermaScalp Laser Caps satisfy the FDA's substantial equivalence requirements with respect to intended use, technological and design characteristics. With reference to all devices cleared through the OAP device classification, the sponsor respectfully proposes that the FDA has acknowledged that Low-Level Laser/Light Therapy is a viable modality for treating androgenic alopecia in both genders and that the red light lasers in class 3R, used in the DermaScalp devices referenced in this application are substantially equivalent to the predicates. Additionally, no new safety or efficacy concerns are raised due to the minor differences present between devices.
- Conclusions: The family of DermaScalp Laser Cap devices are as safe and effective as the FDA Cleared predicate devices for male and female treatment, and is thefore Substantial Equivalent to the FDA Cleared predicate devices with respect to intended use, technological characteristics and safety characteristics.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.