Parietex Surgical Mesh (modified into Parietex Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh), Parietex Composite Mesh (PCO and PCO-OS references), Parietex Optimized Composite Mesh (PCO-X, PCO-FX and PCO-OSX references)
K173796 · Sofradim Production · FTL · Mar 9, 2018 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K173796
Device Name
Parietex Surgical Mesh (modified into Parietex Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh), Parietex Composite Mesh (PCO and PCO-OS references), Parietex Optimized Composite Mesh (PCO-X, PCO-FX and PCO-OSX references)
Applicant
Sofradim Production
Product Code
FTL · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh is intended for the reinforcement of tissue during surgical repair. Parietex™ Composite Mesh is intended for the reinforcement of tissue during surgical repair. Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh is intended for the reinforcement of tissue during surgical repair.
Device Story
Surgical mesh devices used for reinforcement of soft tissues during hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction. Devices consist of non-absorbable 3D multifilament polyester (polyethylene terephthalate) textile for long-term support. Composite versions include an absorbable hydrophilic film (porcine collagen, glycerol, and/or polyethylene glycol) on one side to minimize visceral tissue attachment. Some variants include 2D textile flaps for fixation or pre-placed monofilament sutures. Used by surgeons in clinical settings (laparoscopic or open procedures). The mesh provides mechanical reinforcement to the abdominal wall; the absorbable film degrades over time (e.g., <1 month for Optimized Composite). Benefits include tension-free repair and reduced risk of adhesions in cases of direct visceral contact.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence demonstrated via bench testing in accordance with FDA guidance for surgical mesh, including mechanical performance testing and biocompatibility assessment.
Indicated for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias, abdominal wall repair, and parietal reinforcement of tissues.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
March 9, 2018
Sofradim Production % Ms. Angela Arsdale Regulatory Affairs Manager Coviden 60 Middletown Avenue North Haven, Connecticut 06473
Re: K173796
Trade/Device Name: Parietex Surgical Mesh (modified into Parietex Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh), Parietex Composite Mesh (PCO and PCO-OS references), Parietex Optimized Composite Mesh (PCO-X, PCO-FX and PCO-OSX references) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical Mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FTL Dated: January 8, 2018 Received: January 9, 2018
Dear Ms. Arsdale:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may; therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good
{1}------------------------------------------------
manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# David Krause -S
for Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173796
Device Name
Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh
Indications for Use (Describe)
Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh is intended for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Druq Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173796
#### Device Name
ParietexTM Composite Mesh (PCO and PCO-OS references)
Indications for Use (Describe)
Parietex™ Composite Mesh is used for the reinforcement of tissues during surgical repair. It is indicated for the treatment of incisional hernias, abdominal wall repair and parietal (i.e. pertaining to the walls) reinforcement of tissues. The nonabsorbable three-dimensional polyester mesh provides long term reinforcement of soft tissues. On the opposite side, the absorbable hydrophilic film minimizes tissue attachment to the mesh in case of direct contact with the viscera.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:10px">☒</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size:10px">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Druq Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173796
Device Name
Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh (PCO-X, PCO-FX, and PCO-OSX references)
Indications for Use (Describe)
Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh is used for the reinforcement of tissues during surgical repair. It is indicated for the treatment of incisional hernias, abdominal wall repair and parietal (i.e. pertaining to the walls) reinforcement of tissues. The non-absorbable threedimensional polyester mesh provides long term reinforcement of soft tissues. On the opposite side, the absorbable hydrophilic film minimizes tissue attachment to the mesh in case of direct contact with the viscera.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> </span> <span>Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> </div> | <div> <span> </span> <span>Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> </div> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Druq Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{5}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92, Covidien is hereby submitting the 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for 510(k) number K173796 as of December 06, 2017.
| Date Prepared: | February 26, 2018 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter: | Sofradim Production (subsidiary of Covidien llc)<br>116, avenue du Formans<br>01600 Trevoux, France<br>Telephone: +33 (0)4 74 08 90 00<br>Fax: +33 (0) 4 74 08 90 02 |
| Contact: | Angela Van Arsdale<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>60 Middletown Avenue<br>North Haven, CT 06473<br>Phone: (203) 492-5787<br>Fax: (203) 492-5029<br>Email: angela.vanarsdale@medtronic.com |
| Name of device:<br>Trade/Proprietary name: | Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh<br>Parietex™ Composite Mesh<br>Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh |
| Common name:<br>Classification name: | Surgical Mesh<br>Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric<br>Product code: FTL<br>Regulation number: 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| Predicate Devices:<br>Trade/Proprietary name<br>(510(k) Number) | Parietex ® Surgical Mesh (new names Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D,<br>3D, Anatomical Mesh) (K982532)<br>Parietex™ Composite Mesh (K040998, K050187)<br>Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh (K110663, K110815,<br>K110816)<br>No reference devices were used in this submission. |
| Common name:<br>Classification name: | Surgical Mesh<br>Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric<br>Product code: FTL<br>Regulation number: 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| Manufacturer: | Sofradim Production<br>116, avenue du Formans<br>01600 Trevoux, France |
# Device Description:
Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh
{6}------------------------------------------------
The two-dimensional mesh, with rectangular pores, is available in two different textures: a standard version (TEC references) and a rigid version (TECR references). The textures and transparencies of this mesh make them particularly suitable for the treatment of parietal affections, in particular inguinal hernias, through laparoscopic approach.
The three-dimensional mesh (TET references) has hexagonal pores. The flexibility, porosity and low density of this mesh make it particularly suitable for the treatment of parietal affections, in particular incisional and inguinal hernias, through open approach.
The Parietex™ hydrophilic 2-dimensional mesh, hydrophilic 3-dimensional mesh and hydrophilic anatomical mesh has been adapted for various techniques of abdominal repair. The rectangular mesh is designed for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias in a preperitoneal or pre-muscular approach.
The pre-cut and slit mesh is suitable for the repair of inguinal hernias via anterior approach using the tension free technique.
The folding mesh (in two-dimensional textile) is designed for the repair of direct or indirect inguinal hernias through a laparoscopic approach (trans-abdominal or pre-peritoneal or totally extra-peritoneal). Some codes have a slit for the passage of the cord.
The anatomical mesh is mainly designed for the repair of inguinal hernias via laparoscopic or posterior open procedures and is available for the left and/or right side.
Parietex™ Composite Mesh is a composite mesh made out of a three-dimensional (3D) multifilament polyester textile for wall reinforcement, covered with an absorbable, continuous and hydrophilic film on one of its sides. This film is made up of collagen from porcine origin, polyethylene glycol and glycerol and juts out 5 mm over the edge of the reinforcement. For some references, a bi-dimensional (2D) multifilament polyester textile flap is attached to the 3D reinforcement and helps place and fixate the mesh (PCO-OS references).
Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh is made out of a three-dimensional (3D) multifilament polyester for wall reinforcement, covered with an absorbable, continuous and hydrophilic film on one of its sides. This film is made up of collagen from porcine origin and glycerol and juts out 5 mm over the edge of the reinforcement. The film is essentially degraded in less than 1 month. For some references, a bi-dimensional (2D) multifilament polyester textile flap is attached to the three-dimensional reinforcement and helps place and fixates the mesh (PCO-OSX references). For some references, one or many non-absorbable color monofilaments are tied (pre-placed sutures) to the three-dimensional mesh (PCO-FX references).
This change is a vendor change only, there are no changes to the material composition. Both the original material and the new materials are derived from the same base material.
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Intended Use:
Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh is intended for the reinforcement of tissue during surgical repair1.
Parietex™ Composite Mesh is intended for the reinforcement of tissue during surgical repair.
Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh is intended for the reinforcement of tissue during surgical repair.
### Indications for use:
Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh is intended for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias.
Parietex™ Composite Mesh is used for the reinforcement of tissues during surgical repair. It is indicated for the treatment of incisional hernias, abdominal wall repair and parietal (i.e. pertaining to the walls) reinforcement of tissues. The non-absorbable three-dimensional polyester mesh provides long term reinforcement of soft tissues. On the opposite side, the absorbable hydrophilic film minimizes tissue attachment to the mesh in case of direct contact with the viscera.
Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh is used for the reinforcement of tissues during surgical repair. It is indicated for the treatment of incisional hernias, abdominal wall repair and parietal (i.e. pertaining to the walls) reinforcement of tissues. The non-absorbable threedimensional polyester mesh provides long term reinforcement of soft tissues. On the opposite side, the absorbable hydrophilic film minimizes tissue attachment to the mesh in case of direct contact with the viscera.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Summary comparing the the technological characteristics of the subject and predicate device:
The proposed modified devices Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh, ParietexTM Composite Mesh and ParietexTM Optimized Composite Mesh manufactured with the two new polyester (polyethylene terephthalate) multifilament yarns from the two new suppliers, are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices ParietexTM Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh (K982532), Parietex™ Composite Mesh (K040998, K050187) and Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh (K110663, K110815, K110816) in terms of :
- Indications
- Material
- . Performance characteristics
- Biocompatibility ●
- Stability ●
- Design
Materials: The biocompatibility of the proposed modified Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh, Parietex™ Composite Mesh and Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh has been evaluated and found compliant with ISO Standard 10993-1:2009 (FDA recognition number #2-220).
Performance data: This change consists of the addition of two new polyester (polyethylene terephthalate) multifilament yarns from two new suppliers for the subject devices. These yarns are used to manufacture the textiles of the devices. The following performance data is provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
- In vitro (bench) tests have been performed in accordance . with the FDA Guidance: "Guidance for the Preparation of a Premarket Notification Application of a Surgical Mesh" dated March 2, 1999 to evaluate the performance characteristics of the subject devices. The following mesh characteristics were assessed:
- Pore size -
- Thickness -
- Surface density -
- Bursting strength -
- -Bursting distension
- -Breaking strength
- -Elongation at break
- -Tear strength
- Suture pull-out strength -
Suture pull-out tests were performed on the pre-placed sutures of the proposed modified Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh (for PCO-FX references) to assess the
{9}------------------------------------------------
strength of the textile/suture assembly. Seam strength tests were performed on the textiles assemblies of the proposed modified Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D and Anatomical Mesh (for TECR1410DP2 and TECT references). Parietex™ Composite Mesh and Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh (for PCO-OS, PCO-OSX references) to assess the strength of the textiles assembly.
- Stability studies were conducted and the shelf life of the ● proposed modified devices was demonstrated.
- . Biocompatibility evaluation was performed and confirmed that the proposed modified Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh, Parietex™ Composite Mesh and Parietex™ Optimized Composite Mesh are compliant with ISO Standard 10993-1:2009 (FDA recognition number #2-220) for their intended patient contact profile.
This premarket submission did not rely on the assessment of clinical performance data to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
# Conclusion:
All testing demonstrates that the proposed modified devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices Parietex™ Hydrophilic 2D, 3D, Anatomical Mesh (K982532), Parietex™ Composite Mesh (K040998, K050187) and ParietexTM Optimized Composite Mesh (K110663, K110815, K110816).
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.