Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (CMFD)
K170818 · Synthes USA Products, LLC · PBJ · Dec 7, 2017 · Neurology
Device Facts
| Record ID | K170818 |
| Device Name | Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (CMFD) |
| Applicant | Synthes USA Products, LLC |
| Product Code | PBJ · Neurology |
| Decision Date | Dec 7, 2017 |
| Decision | SESE |
| Submission Type | Traditional |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 882.5330 |
| Device Class | Class 2 |
| Attributes | Therapeutic, Pediatric |
Intended Use
The DePuy Synthes CMF Distraction System is intended for use as a bone stabilizer and lengthening (and/or transport) device. The DePuy Synthes CMF Distraction System is indicated for correction of congenital deficiencies or post-traumatic defects of the cranium, where gradual bone distraction is required in adults and pediatric patients. Cranium The 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm mesh and cloverleaf footplates and screws are intended for infants, children, and adults.
Device Story
Modular distraction system for cranial reconstruction; consists of distractor body, footplates, extension arms, and bone screws. Surgeon secures distractor body to bone via footplates/screws; percutaneous activation performed by rotating advancement/lead screw using activation instrument. System features reversing prevention mechanism. Used in hospital or home settings. Provides gradual bone distraction to correct congenital or post-traumatic defects; benefits patient through bone lengthening/stabilization.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical trials conducted. Literature review of seven articles identified regarding use of previous design (K060138) in cranial distraction osteogenesis; evidence provided via narrative descriptions, x-rays, and images.
Technological Characteristics
Modular metallic construct. Materials: TAN (ASTM F1295), L605 (ASTM F90), CoCrMo (ASTM F1537), MP35N (ASTM F562), CP Titanium (ASTM F67), Silicone (ASTM F2042). Sensing/Actuation: Mechanical lead screw advancement. Sterilization: Steam (moist-heat) to SAL 10^-6 per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 17665-1.
Indications for Use
Indicated for correction of congenital deficiencies or post-traumatic defects of the cranium requiring gradual bone distraction in adults, adolescents, children, and infants.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A preformed nonalterable cranioplasty plate is a device that is implanted in a patient to repair a skull defect and is constructed of a material, e.g., stainless steel or vitallium, that cannot be altered or reshaped at the time of surgery without changing the chemical behavior of the material.
Predicate Devices
- Zurich Distraction System's Arnaud Distractor (K010139)
- Synthes Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (K060138)
Related Devices
- K162594 — Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (CMFD) · Synthes USA Products, LLC · May 8, 2017
- K972166 — GUERRERO - BELL DISTRACTOR · Howmedica Leibinger, Inc. · Aug 11, 1997
- K092743 — THE LEIBINGER ADVANCE INTERNAL MIDFACE DISTRACTION SYSTEM · Stryker Craniomaxillofacial · Jan 15, 2010
- K121304 — OSTEOMED CRANIAL DISTRACTION SYSTEM · Osteomed · Aug 22, 2012
- K031708 — OSTEOMED MAXILLARY/LEFORT III DISTRACTION SYSTEM · Osteomed LP · Nov 3, 2003
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized eagle. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, with "ADMINISTRATION" underneath.
December 7, 2017
Synthes USA Products, LLC Nicholas Fountoulakis Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1301 Goshen Parkway West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
Re: K170818
Trade/Device Name: Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (CMFD) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5330 Regulation Name: Preformed Non-alterable Cranioplasty Plate Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PBJ Dated: November 8, 2017 Received: November 9, 2017
Dear Mr. Fountoulakis:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976. the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Carlos L. Pena -S
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K170818
Device Name
Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (CMFD)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The DePuy Synthes CMF Distraction System is intended for use as a bone stabilizer and lengthening (and/or transport) device.
The DePuy Synthes CMF Distraction System is indicated for correction of congenital deficiencies or post-traumatic defects of the cranium, where gradual bone distraction is required in adults and pediatric patients.
Cranium
The 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm mesh and cloverleaf footplates and screws are intended for infants, children, and adults.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 1. 510(k) Summary
Date Prepared: November 7, 2017
#### 1.1.Submitter
Primary Contact: Nicholas Fountoulakis Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist DePuy Synthes 1301 Goshen Parkway West Chester, PA 19380 Phone: (610) 719-6553 nfounto@its.jnj.com
#### Alternate Contact:
Susan Lewandowski Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs DePuy Synthes 1301 Goshen Parkway West Chester, PA 19380 Phone: (610) 719-5852 slewand2@its.jnj.com
## 1.2.Device
Name of Device: Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (CMFD) Common or Usual Name(s): Cranial Distraction System Classification Name(s): Preformed nonalterable cranioplasty plate Regulatory Class: Class II - 882.5330 Product Code: PBJ Review Panel: Neurology
#### 1.3.Predicate Devices
Primary Predicate: Zurich Distraction System's Arnaud Distractor (K010139) Additional Predicate: Synthes Craniomaxillofacial Distraction System (K060138)
#### 1.4.Indications for Use
The DePuy Synthes CMF Distraction System is intended for use as a bone stabilizer and lengthening (and/or transport) device.
The DePuy Synthes CMF Distraction System is indicated for correction of congenital deficiencies or post-traumatic defects of the cranium, where gradual bone distraction is required in adults and pediatric patients.
Cranium
- . The 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm mesh and cloverleaf footplates and screws are intended for infants, children, adolescents, and adults.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 1.5.Device Description
DePuy Synthes Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) Distraction System is a modular distractor system intended for correction and reconstruction of the cranium in adults, adolescents, children, and infants. The distractor construct consists of the distractor body, footplates, extension arms, and bone screws, all of which are available in multiple configurations to meet patient and surgeon needs as detailed in the table below.
| | Distractor Body | Footplates | Extension Arms | Bone Screws |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Dimensions | 10, 15, 20, 25,<br>30, 35, and 40<br>mm lengths | Cloverleaf and<br>mesh designs<br>Accept 1.5, 2.0,<br>and 2.4 mm<br>diameter screws | Rigid lengths are<br>20, 40, and 60<br>mm<br>Flexible lengths<br>are 30, 40, and<br>60 mm | 1.5, 2.0, and 2.4<br>mm diameter<br>4 – 12 mm<br>lengths |
| Materials | TAN (ASTM F1295) L605 (ASTM F90) CoCrMo (ASTM F1537) MP35N (ASTM F562) | CP2 and CP4 Titanium (ASTM F67) | TAN (ASTM F1295) L605 (ASTM F90) MP35N (ASTM F562) Silicone (ASTM F2042) | CP Titanium (ASTM F67) TAN (ASTM F1295) |
The distractor body is first secured to bone using footplates and screws, and then activation of the distractor is accomplished through the rotation of an advancement/lead screw with an activation instrument percutaneously.
{5}------------------------------------------------
# 1.6.Comparison to Predicate Devices
| System/Device Name | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System | KLS Zurich Distraction System's<br>Arnaud Distractor | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System (previous<br>design) |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications | The DePuy Synthes CMF<br>Distraction System is intended for<br>use as a bone stabilizer and<br>lengthening (and/or transport)<br>device.<br><br>The DePuy Synthes CMF<br>Distraction System is indicated for<br>correction of congenital<br>deficiencies or post-traumatic<br>defects of the cranium, where<br>gradual bone distraction is<br>required in adults and pediatric<br>patients. DePuy Synthes CMF<br>Distraction System is intended for<br>single use only.<br><br>Cranium<br>The 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm<br>mesh and cloverleaf<br>footplates and screws are<br>intended for infants,<br>children, adolescents, and<br>adults. | The Zurich Distraction System<br>includes devices intended as a<br>bone stabilizer and lengthening<br>(and/or transport) device when<br>correction of congenital<br>deficiencies or post traumatic<br>defects of the mandible (including<br>ramus, body, alveolar ridge, palate,<br>symphysis), midface, and cranial<br>bones require gradual distraction. | The Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System (CMF<br>Distraction System) is intended for<br>use as a bone stabilizer and<br>lengthening (and/or transport)<br>device for correction of congenital<br>deficiencies or post-traumatic<br>defects of the mandibular body<br>and ramus where gradual bone<br>distraction is required.<br><br>The Synthes CMF Distraction<br>System is intended for single use<br>only. The Synthes Pediatric CMF<br>Distraction System is intended for<br>use as a bone stabilizer and<br>lengthening (and/or transport)<br>device for correction of congenital<br>deficiencies or post-traumatic<br>defects of the mandibular body<br>and ramus where gradual bone<br>distraction is required in children<br>under the age of 12 months. The<br>Synthes Pediatric CMF Distraction<br>System is intended for single use<br>only. |
| Contraindications | The Synthes CMF Distraction<br>System is contraindicated for | | Use of the Synthes CMF Distraction<br>System is contraindicated in |
| System/Device Name | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System | KLS Zurich Distraction System's<br>Arnaud Distractor | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System (previous<br>design) |
| | patients sensitized to nickel, cobalt<br>chromium, silicone or<br>molybdenum. | | patients previously sensitized to<br>nickel |
| Where Used | Hospital, home | Hospital, home | Hospital, home |
| System Features | Modular design includes body,<br>plates, and removable activation<br>arms | Pre-assembled distractor body and<br>plates with removable and non-<br>removable activation arm | Modular design includes body,<br>plates, and removable activation<br>arms |
| | Surgeon and Patient Facing<br>Instrumentation | Surgeon and Patient Facing<br>Instrumentation | Surgeon and Patient Facing<br>Instrumentation |
| Distractor Body<br>Specifications | End and center translating 10 - 40 mm lengths | End and center translating 20 mm and 30 mm lengths | End and center translating 10 - 40 mm lengths |
| | Accommodates left and right<br>placement Available with or without<br>universal joint Spring clip to prevent<br>inadvertent reversing | Accommodates left and right<br>placement Available with or without<br>universal joint (2.0 mm size) | Accommodates left and right<br>placement Available with or without<br>universal joint |
| Plate Specifications | Cloverleaf and mesh designs Symmetric design May be cut and bent Fixed with 1.5, and 2.0 mm | Mesh design Symmetric design May be cut and bent Fixed with 1.5, and 2.0 mm | Cloverleaf, mesh, and elevated<br>mesh designs Symmetric design May be cut and bent Fixed with 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, and 2.0 mm |
| System/Device Name | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System | KLS Zurich Distraction System's<br>Arnaud Distractor | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System (previous<br>design) |
| | Fixed with 2.0 and 2.4 mm Emergency Screws Fixed with 2.0 mm Locking Screws | Fixed with 1.8, and 2.3 mm Emergency Screws | Fixed with 1.2, 1.7, 2.0, 2.4 mm PlusDrive Emergency Screws Fixed with 2.0 mm Locking Screws |
| Extension Arm<br>Specifications | Point of activation moved away from distractor for patient access Rigid and flexible options May be removed without surgical procedure Rigid lengths are 20, 40, and 60 mm Flexible lengths are 30, 40, and 60 mm May be combined to increase length | Point of activation moved away from distractor for patient access Rigid and flexible options (2.0 mm size) May be removed without surgical procedure (2.0 mm size) Rigid lengths are 25, 33, 35, 43, 45, 50, and 53 mm Flexible lengths are 30, 33, 40, and 50 mm (2.0 mm size) May be combined to increase length (2.0 mm size) | Point of activation moved away from distractor for patient access Rigid and flexible options May be removed without surgical procedure Rigid lengths are 20, 40, and 60 mm Flexible lengths are 30, 40, and 60 mm May be combined to increase length |
| Operating Principle(s) | Advancement/lead screw<br>adjustment of metallic plate and<br>screw construct to achieve<br>distraction osteogenesis | Advancement/lead screw<br>adjustment of metallic plate and<br>screw construct to achieve<br>distraction osteogenesis | Advancement/lead screw<br>adjustment of metallic plate and<br>screw construct to achieve<br>distraction osteogenesis |
| Materials | Distractor Bodies:<br>Titanium Alloy TAN (ASTM F1295) Chromium Cobalt L605 (ASTM F90) CoCrMo (ASTM F1537) MP35N (ASTM F562) | Distractor Body:<br>Titanium Alloy TAV (ASTM F136) | Distractor Bodies:<br>Titanium Alloy TAN (ASTM F1295) Chromium Cobalt L605 (ASTM F90) |
| System/Device Name | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System | KLS Zurich Distraction System's<br>Arnaud Distractor | Synthes Craniomaxillofacial<br>Distraction System (previous<br>design) |
| | Plates:<br>CP2 or CP4 Titanium (ASTM F67)<br><br>Extension Arms:<br>Titanium Alloy<br>• TAN (ASTM F1295)<br>Chromium Cobalt<br>• L605 (ASTM F90)<br>• MP35N (ASTM F562)<br>Silicone (ASTM F2042) | Plates:<br>CP Titanium (ASTM F67)<br><br>Extension Arms:<br>Titanium Alloy<br>• TAV (ASTM F136) | Plates:<br>CP2 or CP4 Titanium (ASTM F67)<br><br>Extension Arms:<br>Titanium Alloy<br>• TAN (ASTM F1295)<br>Chromium Cobalt<br>• L605 (ASTM F90)<br>• MP35N (ASTM F562)<br>Silicone (ASTM F2042) |
| | Screws:<br>• TAN (ASTM F1295) | Screws:<br>• CP Titanium (ASTM F67) | Screws:<br>• CP Titanium (ASTM F67)<br>• TAN (ASTM F1295) |
| Sterility | Nonsterile<br>Sterilized to SAL of 10-6 via steam<br>(moist-heat) prior to use | Nonsterile<br>Sterilized via steam (moist-heat)<br>prior to use | Nonsterile<br>Sterilized to SAL of 10-6 via steam<br>(moist-heat) prior to use |
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
#### 1.6.1. Summary Comparison of Intended Use
Both the subject DePuy Synthes CMFD System and the KLS Zurich Distraction System's Arnaud Distractor (K010139) are indicated for correction of congenital deficiencies or post-traumatic defects of the cranium where gradual bone distraction is required. Additionally, clinical literature is provided in this submission discussing the effective use of the previous design of Synthes CMF Distraction System (K060138) in cranial distraction osteogenesis. The proposed use of the subject CMFD in the cranium does not constitute a new intended use not already addressed by the predicate device.
## 1.6.2. Summary Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The major technological differences between the subject CMFD in comparison to predicate KLS Zurich Distraction System's Arnaud Distractor (K010139) are:
- The subject device features a reversing prevention mechanism while the predicate does ● not. Non-clinical performance data of the reversing prevention mechanism demonstrates its efficacy.
- . The subject device is made of commercially pure titanium alloy (TAN), cobalt chromium alloys (L605, MP25N, and CoCrMo), and silicone while the predicate is made of titanium and titanium alloy (TAV). However, these materials were used in other implantable components of the previous design of CMFD and are materials with established biocompatibility.
# 1.7.Non-clinical performance data
Non-clinical performance data demonstrates that the technological differences of the CMFD System do not raise new questions of safety and efficacy with respect to the predicate devices, and therefore support substantial equivalence:
| Test Name | Test Method Summary | Results |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Reversing Prevention | Anatomically simulated<br>spinning and vibration of the<br>subject distractor and the<br>previous design of CMFD. | The subject device does not<br>reverse unintentionally under<br>the same conditions where<br>the previous design of CMFD<br>reversed. |
| Construct bending strength | Four-point bend test setup of<br>a subject device construct in<br>comparison to the predicate<br>KLS Zurich Distraction<br>System's Arnaud Distractor,<br>and analysis comparing the<br>subject design to the<br>previous design of CMFD. | The CMFD construct is<br>stronger than the predicate<br>KLS Arnaud distractor, and<br>the design changes relative<br>to the previous design in<br>K060138 do not affect the<br>strength of the distractor<br>construct. |
| Torque Input/Force Output<br>and Construct Torsional<br>Strength | This testing challenged the<br>construct in torsion by<br>applying an increasing torque<br>(torque input) to the<br>activation end of the device<br>through an extension arm<br>until failure of the device<br>occurred. | The device is capable of<br>outputting the force required<br>to distract bone in the<br>cranium without failing. |
| Extension arm interface<br>tensile strength | This testing challenged the<br>interface between the<br>distractor and extension arm<br>to ensure the interface can<br>withstand a tensile force<br>based on a human factors<br>benchmark. | The redesigned CMFD meets<br>the same human factors<br>benchmark as the previous<br>design of CMFD. |
| Biocompatibility | All subject devices with the<br>exception of the modified<br>distractor bodies utilize the<br>same materials and<br>manufacturing processes as<br>the predicate devices cleared<br>in K060138, and therefore<br>biocompatibility testing was<br>not provided.<br>For the modified distractor<br>bodies, a risk based<br>assessment per ISO 10993-1<br>was conducted, and<br>supporting biocompatibility<br>testing was provided. | The results of<br>biocompatibility risk<br>assessment and testing<br>demonstrate that the<br>material change to the<br>distractor body does not<br>raise new questions of safety<br>or efficacy with respect to<br>biocompatibility. |
| Steam Sterilization Validation | The sterilization parameters<br>were validated using the<br>"overkill" method as<br>referenced in Annex D of<br>ANSI/AAMI/ISO 17665-1 in<br>order to assure a Sterility<br>Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6. | The devices may be<br>effectively steam sterilized by<br>the proposed parameters,<br>which are the same<br>parameters as the previous<br>design of CMFD. |
| Endotoxin Testing | Endotoxin levels for finished<br>subject devices were<br>quantified using a Kinetic<br>Turbidimetric method. | The subject devices meet the<br>maximum endotoxin testing<br>limit of 2.15 EU/device. |
{10}------------------------------------------------
{11}------------------------------------------------
# 1.8.Clinical performance data
Clinical literature discussing the application of the previous design of CMFD (K060138) in the cranium is provided in this submission. A literature review was conducted and seven articles were identified discussing the use of the previous design of CMFD (K060138) in the cranium. The previous design of CMFD (K060138) was identified through narrative descriptions, x-rays, and/or images within the articles.
# 1.9.Substantial Equivalence
Results of non-clinical performance testing, discussions of clinical literature, and comparison to predicate devices included in this submission demonstrate that:
- Technological differences of the CMFD System in comparison to the predicate devices does not raise new questions of safety and efficacy
- The proposed CMFD System has the same intended use as the predicate devices
It is concluded that the information provided in this submission supports substantial equivalence.