K162815 · Aesculap, Inc. · KCT · Jul 13, 2017 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K162815
Device Name
SterilContainer S System
Applicant
Aesculap, Inc.
Product Code
KCT · General Hospital
Decision Date
Jul 13, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.6850
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The SterilContainer S System is a reusable sterilization container system (consisting of perforated bottoms and perforated lids with filter retention plates, and single use polypropylene filters) intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider. This container system has been validated with stainless steel and Teflon lumens, hinged, and knurled instruments. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed device and also maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used. This container system is compatible for use with the TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System. The SterilContainer S System includes accessories such as silicone mats, baskets, trays, racks, eyepiece holders and sleeve holders.
Device Story
Reusable sterilization container system; consists of perforated non-anodized aluminum bottoms/lids, filter retention plates, and single-use polypropylene filters. Used by healthcare providers in clinical settings to enclose medical instruments (lumens, hinged, knurled) during sterilization cycles. Compatible with TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System (Ozone/H2O2). Accessories include silicone mats, baskets, trays, racks, and holders. Device functions as a protective barrier; allows sterilant penetration while maintaining sterility post-processing. Output is a sterile-contained instrument set for clinical use. Benefits include standardized, validated sterilization and storage of surgical instruments.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validated using biological overkill method (Geobacillus stearothermophilus) achieving 12-log reduction and SAL 10^-6. Additional testing: bacterial filtration efficiency, 180-day event-related sterility maintenance, material compatibility (100 cycles), biocompatibility, and aerosol microbial challenge.
Technological Characteristics
Non-anodized aluminum container; perforated design; single-use polypropylene filters. Compatible with TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System (Ozone/H2O2). Accessories: silicone mats, stainless steel baskets/racks. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by healthcare providers to enclose medical devices (stainless steel/Teflon lumens, hinged, knurled instruments) for sterilization and maintenance of sterility until use. Compatible with TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A sterilization wrap (pack, sterilization wrapper, bag, or accessories, is a device intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a health care provider. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical device and also to maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used.
Predicate Devices
Aesculap SterilContainer S for use in V-Pro 60 Flexible Cycle (K151242)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized caduceus symbol, which features a staff with a serpent entwined around it. The logo is encircled by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 13, 2017
Aesculap, Inc Paul Amudala Regulatory Affairs Specialist 3773 Corporate Pkwy Center Valley, Pennsylvania 18034
Re: K162815
Trade/Device Name: SterilContainer™ S System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6850 Regulation Name: Sterilization Wrap Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KCT Dated: June 9, 2017 Received: June 12, 2017
Dear Paul Amudala:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
# Tara A. Ryan -S
for
Lori Wiggins Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K162815
K102813
Device Name SterilContainer™ S System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The SterilContainer S System is a reusable sterilization container system (consisting of perforated bottoms and perforated lids with filter retention plates, and single use polypropylene filters) intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider. This container system has been validated with stainless steel and Teflon lumens, hinged, and knurled instruments. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed device and also maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used. This container system is compatible for use with the TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System. The SterilContainer S System includes accessories such as silicone mats, baskets, trays, racks, eyepiece holders and sleeve holders.
| Load #1 (31.2 lb) | Flexible endoscopes load accommodating three single channel flexible endoscopes, one per container:<br>• Internal channel diameter of 1 mm and length of 850 mm. |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Load #2 (29.4 lb) | Semi-rigid and rigid channel devices load accommodating three double channel semi-rigid endoscopes, one per container, and one length of medical grade stainless steel tubing.<br>• Length of tubing:<br>➤ Internal channel diameter of 1.0 mm and length of 500 mm.<br>• Double channel semi-rigid endoscope<br>➤ Internal channel diameters of 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm, and length of 500 mm |
| Load #3 (10.2 lb) | Worst-case volume to surface perforation area ratio using a perforated container including two stacked baskets. Each basket was covered with a full length silicone mat. At least one inoculated medical device was added per level of the container. |
| Load #4 (25 lb) | Worst-case volume to surface perforation area ratio using a perforated container with maximum weight of instrument, for a total mass of 25 lb. At least three inoculated medical devices were added in the container. |
| Load #5 (75 lb) | Heavy weight load composed of three perforated containers, with a total mass of 25 lb per container. The heavy validation load was prepared based on the Aesculap SterilContainer™ S container lethality studies (PRO-169) and adapted to include a maximum weight in a single load. |
#### Table 1: Validated TS03 Sterilizer Flexible Cycle Load Configurations
#### Table 2: TS03 -Sterilizer Flexible Cycle Compatible SterilContainer S Container Systems
| Lid | Bottom | Description | Total Loaded Container<br>Weight (if container does not<br>contain a flexible endoscope<br>or bronchoscope)* |
|-----|--------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----|--------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
{3}------------------------------------------------
| JM489 | JM440 | Full Size 90mm (4 ¼") | |
|-------|-------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| | JM441 | Full Size 120mm (5 ½") | 25 lbs for one container in the chamber |
| | JM442 | Full Size 135mm (6") | |
| | JM444 | Full Size 187mm (8") | |
| JM789 | JM740 | ¾ Size 90mm(4 ¼") | |
| | JM741 | ¾ Size 120mm (5 ½") | |
| | JM742 | ¾ Size 135mm (6") | |
| JM389 | JM340 | ½ Size 90mm (4 ¼") | |
| | JM341 | ½ Size 120mm (5 ½") | |
| | JM342 | ½ Size 135mm (6") | |
*Loads containing a flexible endoscope or bronchoscope should follow Table 1 recommendations
## Table 3: TS03 Sterilizer
#### Cycle Compatible Accessories
| Accessories | TS03 Cycle |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Stainless Steel baskets,<br>basket lids, and dividers | Yes |
| Instrument Organization System (Silicone and Stainless Steel racks,<br>brackets, holders, and clamps) | Yes |
| Silicone mats | Yes |
| Stainless Steel racks, trays, holders, clamps, brackets, and platforms | Yes |
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY (as required by 21 CFR 807.92)
SterilContainer™ S System
July 7, 2017
| COMPANY: | Aesculap®, Inc.<br>3773 Corporate Parkway<br>Center Valley, PA 18034<br>Establishment Registration Number: 291671- |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CONTACT: | Paul Amudala<br>610-984-9303 (phone)<br>610-791-6882 (fax) |
| TRADE NAME: | SterilContainer S System |
| COMMON NAME: | Sterilization Container Wrap |
| CLASSIFICATION NAME: | Sterilization Wrap |
| REGULATION NUMBER: | 880.6850 |
| PRODUCT CODE: | KCT |
| DEVICE CLASS: | Class II per 21 CFR §880.6850 |
# SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
Aesculap®, Inc. believes that the SterilContainer™ S System for use in TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System is substantially equivalent to Aesculap SterilContainer" S for use in V-Pro 60 Flexible Cycle via K151242.
# DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The SterilContainer™ S System is a container system that will allow for sterilization and storage of medical devices. This container system can be used in the TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System. The SterilContainer" S System rigid containers are made from non-anodized Aluminum and utilize disposable (single use) polypropylene filters. The SterilContainer" S System includes accessories such as mats, baskets, trays, holders, organizers, filters, indicator cards and tamper proof locks.
## Indications for Use:
The SterilContainer S System is a reusable sterilization container system (consisting of perforated bottoms and perforated lids with filter retention plates, and single use polypropylene filters) intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider. This container system has been validated with stainless steel and Teflon
{5}------------------------------------------------
lumens, hinged, and knurled instruments. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed device and also maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used. This container system is compatible for use with the TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System. The SterilContainer S System includes accessories such as silicone mats, baskets, trays, racks, eyepiece holders and sleeve holders.
| Load #1 (31.2 lb) | Flexible endoscopes load accommodating three single channel flexible endoscopes, one per container:<br>• Internal channel diameter of 1 mm and length of 850 mm. |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Load #2 (29.4 lb) | Semi-rigid and rigid channel devices load accommodating three double channel semi-rigid endoscopes, one per container, and one length of medical grade stainless steel tubing.<br>• Length of tubing:<br>➤ Internal channel diameter of 1.0 mm and length of 500 mm.<br>• Double channel semi-rigid endoscope<br>➤ Internal channel diameters of 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm, and length of 500 mm |
| Load #3 (10.2 lb) | Worst-case volume to surface perforation area ratio using a perforated container including two stacked baskets. Each basket was covered with a full length silicone mat. At least one inoculated medical device was added per level of the container. |
| Load #4 (25 lb) | Worst-case volume to surface perforation area ratio using a perforated container with maximum weight of instrument, for a total mass of 25 lb. At least three inoculated medical devices were added in the container. |
| Load #5 (75 lb) | Heavy weight load composed of three perforated containers, with a total mass of 25 lb per container. The heavy validation load was prepared based on the Aesculap® SterilContainer™ S container lethality studies (PRO-169) and adapted to include a maximum weight in a single load. |
#### Table 1: Validated TS03 Sterizone VP4 Cycle Load Configurations
| | | Table 2: TS03 Sterilizer Cycle Compatible SterilContainer S Container Systems | |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Lid | Bottom | Description | Total Loaded Container<br>Weight (if container does not<br>contain a flexible endoscope<br>or bronchoscope)* |
|-------|--------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| JM489 | JM440 | Full Size 90mm (4 1/4") | |
| | JM441 | Full Size 120mm (5 1/2") | 25 lbs for one container in the |
| | JM442 | Full Size 135mm (6") | chamber |
| | JM444 | Full Size 187mm (8") | |
| JM789 | JM740 | 3/4 Size 90mm(4 1/4") | |
| | JM741 | 3/4 Size 120mm (5 1/2") | |
| | JM742 | 3/4 Size 135mm (6") | |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| JM389 | JM340 | ½ Size 90mm (4 ¼") | |
|-------|-------|---------------------|--|
| | JM341 | ½ Size 120mm (5 ½") | |
| | JM342 | ½ Size 135mm (6") | |
*Loads containing a flexible endoscope or bronchoscope should follow Table 1 recommendations
| Accessories | TS03 Cycle |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Stainless Steel baskets,<br>basket lids, and dividers | Yes |
| Instrument Organization<br>System (Silicone and<br>Stainless Steel racks,<br>brackets, holders, and clamps) | Yes |
| Silicone mats | Yes |
| Stainless Steel racks, trays,<br>holders, clamps, brackets, and<br>platforms | Yes |
## Table 3: TS03 Sterilizer Cycle Compatible Accessories
## TECHNOLIGICAL CHARACTERISTICS (compared to predicate)
The SterilContainer S System that can be used in the TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Sterilization cycle is the same container system that was cleared in K151242. The materials and design have not changed.
| System | SterilContainer S System<br>(not assigned) | SterilContainer S System<br>(K151242) |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Sterilization<br>process | TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low<br>Temperature Sterilization<br>System 46 min cycle,<br>Ozone (O3), H2O2 | V-PRO 60 38 min Low Temperature<br>Flexible Cycle, H2O2 |
| Material | Non-anodized aluminum | Non-anodized aluminum |
| Container type | Perforated | Perforated |
| Filter type | Polypropylene | Polypropylene |
## PERFORMANCE DATA
The Aesculap SterilContainer S System has been validated for the TS03 Sterizone VP4 Low Temperature Sterilization System. These validations were conducted by a qualified testing laboratory. The performance testing demonstrates substantial equivalence to the predicate devices. The following performance testing has been completed to ensure substantial equivalence.
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Performance Properties | Results |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Sterilization Efficacy/<br>Lethality Study | Testing demonstrated a 12 log reduction and a sterility<br>assurance level (SAL) of 10-6 using the biological (BI)<br>overkill method and half-cycle validation. The SAL was<br>achieved by placing at least 1.0 x 106 spores of Geobacillus<br>stearothermophilus in the worst-case sterilization location<br>through the containers and processing at one-half the<br>expected full cycle exposure time. Following exposure, the<br>Bi's were aseptically transferred to culture media and<br>incubated as required. This testing was performed in<br>triplicate on the Aesculap rigid container. The full cycle<br>therefore results in a 12-log reduction of spores and<br>produce a 10-6 SAL, which reflects a one-in-a-million<br>chance of non-sterile item. |
| Bacterial Filtration<br>Efficiency | The evaluation of the microbial barrier properties of the<br>Aesculap® polypropylene filters demonstrates that the<br>bacterial filtration efficiency is maintained by the filter after<br>being processed in the Cycle 1 of the STERIZONE®<br>Sterilizer. |
| Event Related Sterility<br>Maintenance | Testing demonstrated the ability to provide an effective<br>barrier for maintaining sterility of the contents after<br>processing followed by a 180 day event related storage<br>under conditions which simulate hospital sterile package<br>handling and storage conditions. |
| Material<br>Compatibility/Reuse Test | After 100 cycles of processing no visible or functional<br>changes were observed |
| Biocompatibility | This study is conducted to evaluate the biocompatibility<br>properties of the Aesculap® polypropylene filters when<br>processed in Cycle 1 of the STERIZONE® VP4 Sterilizer.<br>The Aesculap® polypropylene filters have been proven to<br>be biocompatible and can be safely processed in Cycle 1<br>of the STERIZONE® Sterilizer. |
| Aerosol Microbial Challenge | The contents of container were negative for growth<br>following exposure of the containers to aerosolized<br>microbial challenge test conditions |
# Conclusion:
The Aesculap SterilContainer S System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.