Zavation IBF

K162206 · Zavation, LLC · MAX · Apr 4, 2017 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK162206
Device NameZavation IBF
ApplicantZavation, LLC
Product CodeMAX · Orthopedic
Decision DateApr 4, 2017
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3080
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (definded as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. For all the above indications the Zavation IBF implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including Zavation Pedicle Screw System and Zavation Cervical Plate System.

Device Story

Intervertebral body fusion system; provides structural support for spinal fusion; configurations include ALIF, LLIF, TLIF, T-PLIF, PLIF, and CIF. Implants feature machined teeth for vertebral endplate engagement; tantalum markers for radiographic visualization. Used by surgeons in spinal fusion procedures; requires supplemental internal fixation (e.g., pedicle screws or cervical plates). Benefits include stabilization of spinal segments and facilitation of fusion in patients with discogenic pain or degenerative disc disease.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Mechanical testing performed per ASTM F2077 (static/dynamic axial compression, static/dynamic torsion). Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993.

Technological Characteristics

Materials: PEEK (ASTM F2026) and Tantalum alloy markers (ASTM F560). Configurations: ALIF, LLIF, TLIF, T-PLIF, PLIF, CIF. Features: Parallel and lordotic angles, machined teeth for endplate engagement. Non-active, implantable device.

Indications for Use

Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring spinal fusion with autogenous bone graft. Cervical: one level (C2-T1) for cervical disc disease (discogenic neck pain) after 6 weeks of failed non-operative treatment. Lumbar: one or two contiguous levels (L2-S1) for degenerative disc disease with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis after 6 months of failed non-operative treatment.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.

Special Controls

*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval. (c) *Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States. The seal features the department's name arranged in a circular pattern around a stylized emblem. The emblem consists of a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare, with three intertwined snakes and a staff. Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 April 4, 2017 Zavation, LLC Lawrence Walker Engineering Manager 220 Lakeland Pkwy Flowood, Mississippi 39232 Re: K162206 Trade/Device Name: Zavation IBF System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP Dated: March 2, 2017 Received: March 3, 2017 Dear Mr. Walker: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. {1}------------------------------------------------ If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Sincerely, # Mark N. Melkerson -S Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {2}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use K162206 510(k) Number: Device Name: Zavation IBF System Indications For Use: When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (definded as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. For all the above indications the Zavation IBF implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including Zavation Pedicle Screw System and Zavation Cervical Plate System. Prescription Use ___X_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ AND/OR Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) {3}------------------------------------------------ # 510K Summary | Date: | April 4, 2017 | |----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Submitter: | Zavation LLC<br>220 Lakeland Pkwy<br>Flowood, MS 39232<br>Phone: 601-919-1119<br>Fax: 800-447-1302 | | Contact person: | Lawrence Walker | | Type of 510(k) submission: | Traditional | | Trade name: | Zavation IBF System | | Common name: | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | | Classification regulation: | 888.3080 (MAX, ODP) | | Device classification: | Class II | | Classification Panel: | Orthopedic | | Product code: | MAX, ODP | #### Device Description: The Zavation IBF implants offers a variety of heights, widths and lengths. There are six main configurations: ALIF, LLIF, TLIF, T-PLIF, PLIF and CIF. The different configurations allow for multiple surgical technique options. The implants are manufactured from medical grade PEEK (Polyetheretherketone). The Zavation IBF implants are available in a range of sizes, as well as parallel and lordotic angled implants, to accommodate variations in patients' anatomy. In addition, tantalum beads or pins are embedded in the implants as an option to help allow for radiographic visualization. The ends of the implants have machined teeth which are designed to engage with the vertebral body end plates. #### Purpose of 510K: Addition of new supplier for raw material. #### Intended Use: When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature {4}------------------------------------------------ patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (definded as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Zavation IBF implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. For all the above indications the Zavation IBF implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including Zavation Spinal System and Zavation Cervical Plate System. #### Materials: The devices are manufactured from medical grade PEEK Zeniva ZA-500 or Superior Polymers Magnolia PEEK(ASTM F2026) with Tantalum alloy position markers (ASTM F560). #### Predicate Device: Primary -Zavation IBF System, Zavation LLC (K120576) Additional -LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (K091088) Additional -SeaSpine Inc, SeaSpine Spacer System (K082310) ## Technological Characteristics: The Zavation IBF System possesses the same technological characteristics as the predicates. These include similar heights, widths, lengths, and intended use. ## Performance Data: Mechanical test results demonstrated that the Zavation IBF System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. Testing was performed in accordance with: - 0 ASTM F2077, Test Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices - Static Axial Compression O - Dynamic Axial Compression O - Static Torsion (for cervical) O - Dynamic Torsion (for cervical) O Testing per ISO 10993 was completed to demonstrate biocompatibility. #### Basis for Substantial Equivalence: The Zavation IBF devices are similar to the predicate systems with respect to technical characteristics, performance and intended use. The information provided within this premarket notification supports substantial equivalence of the subject spacers to the predicate devices.
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%