K160615 · Tomy, Inc. · NJM · Aug 26, 2016 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K160615
Device Name
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1
Applicant
Tomy, Inc.
Product Code
NJM · Dental
Decision Date
Aug 26, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.5470
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are indicated for orthodontic movement of natural teeth.
Device Story
Orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded to natural teeth by dental professionals; used to connect with orthodontic wires to facilitate tooth movement. Device consists of polycrystalline alumina ceramic body with archwire slot, tiewings, and optional metal clip for self-ligating functionality. Designed to improve tooth alignment. Clinician uses device to exert pressure on teeth via archwires. Benefits include correction of tooth position.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical or animal studies performed. Performance verified through shear bond strength and torque strength testing in accordance with ISO 27020.
Technological Characteristics
Polycrystalline (translucent) alumina ceramic. Mechanical lock base. Archwire slot, tiewings, and optional metal clip for self-ligation. Non-sterile, single-use. Conforms to ISO 27020.
Indications for Use
Indicated for orthodontic movement of natural teeth in patients requiring orthodontic treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
August 26, 2016
Tomy, Inc. c/o Ms. Carolyn Primus Consultant Primus Consulting 7046 Owls Nest Terr Bradenton, Florida 34203
Re: K160615
Trade/Device Name: Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets 1.1 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NJM Dated: July 24, 2016 Received: July 28, 2016
Dear Ms. Carolyn Primus:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Michael J. Ryan -S
for Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES<br>Food and Drug Administration | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Expiration Date: January 31, 2017<br>See PRA Statement below. |
| 510(k) Number ( <i>if known</i> ) | K16 0615 |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 |
| Indications for Use (Describe) | ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are indicated for orthodontic movement of natural teeth. |
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span> <label><input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</label> </div> | <div> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span> <label><input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</label> </div> |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete
and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/14) Page 1 of 1 PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
Premarket Notification
Tomy Inc. ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary per 21CFR807.92
#### I. SUBMITTER
TOMY. Inc. Tenko Bldg. 3-16-7 Midoricho, Fuchu City, Tokyo 183-0006 Japan
PHONE: 81-246-42-3883 FAX #: 81-246-42-2275
Contact Person: Mr. Jinichi Watanabe Date Prepared: August 24, 2016
## II. DEVICE
Name of Device: ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 Common or Usual Name: Bracket, Ceramic, Orthodontic Classification Name: Orthodontic plastic bracket (21 CFR 872.5470) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: NJM
#### III. PREDICATE DEVICES
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS are substantially equivalent to the following predicate devices with respect to intended use, materials, and design:
| 510(k) # | Device | Manufacturer |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------|
| K102803<br>(primary) | Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets | 3M Unitek Corp. |
| K123094<br>(secondary) | Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets | TOMY, Inc. |
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are equivalent to Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets (K102803) with regard to indications for use, materials, technological characteristics, and device design. ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 have been slightly modified from TOMY Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets (K123094) to allow for the inclusion of the use of brackets for the mandibular bicuspid.
Premarket Notification
Page 25 of 160
{4}------------------------------------------------
## IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are designed to move teeth to improve their alignment.
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are bonded to natural teeth by dental professionals to connect with orthodontic wires to cause tooth movement to a more preferred position.
#### V. INDICATIONS FOR USE:
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are indicated for orthodontic movement of natural teeth.
#### VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICES
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are composed of a polycrystalline alumina ceramic, and have an orthodontic bracket design, which includes an archwire slot and tiewings. The self-ligating ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 have a metal clip so that no other ligation of the archwire is needed.
Bench testing was performed to ensure that the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 performance was achieved and verified.
The ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 were not evaluated for biocompatibility because the materials are the same as the legally marketed predicates. TOMY made no material changes or manufacturing process changes since the clearance of their already marketed Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets (K123094). Therefore, no new questions of substantial equivalence are raised with the subject devices.
We believe the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified above. The difference between the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 and the Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets (K123094) that TOMY currently markets is the INCLUSION of the brackets for the mandibular bicuspid. Additionally, the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 have the same intended use, composition, design, function, physical properties, and performance of the predicate device, 3M Unitek Corp.'s Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets (K102803). However, the difference being that the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 includes both self-ligating and non-self-ligating, whereas Clarity Advanced are non-self-ligating. However, self-ligating brackets would not be expected to impact the intended use
{5}------------------------------------------------
or performance of the brackets on the mandibular bicuspids.
We believe that the performance data provided herein support the substantial equivalence of the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1.
Table VI-1 below provides a comparison of the subject devices and the predicate devices.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | Subject Device<br>ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC<br>BRACKETS 1.1 | Primary Predicate Device<br>Clarity Advanced Ceramic<br>Brackets | Secondary Predicate Device<br>Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets | | |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number | N/A | K102803 | K123094 | | |
| Manufacture | TOMY Inc. | 3M Unitek Corp. | TOMY Inc. | | |
| Device Name | Bracket, Ceramic, Orthodontic | Bracket, Ceramic, Orthodontic | Bracket, Ceramic, Orthodontic | | |
| Description | Orthodontic ceramic bracket | Orthodontic ceramic bracket | Orthodontic ceramic bracket | | |
| Medical Specialty | Dental | Dental | Dental | | |
| Product Code | NJM | NJM | NJM | | |
| Rag Number | 872.5470 | 872.5470 | 872.5470 | | |
| Class | 2 | 2 | 2 | | |
| Materials | Polycrystalline (translucent)<br>alumina | Polycrystalline (translucent)<br>alumina | Polycrystalline (translucent)<br>alumina | | |
| Base | Mechanical Lock Base | Glass-grit roughened Base | Mechanical Lock Base | | |
| Design | Archwire slot, tiewings for ligature<br>and identification marks for<br>placement<br>Hooks for ligation, for additional<br>tooth movement<br>Molded ceramic body with rounded<br>corners and edges<br>Slot to hold orthodontic wires | Archwire slot, tiewings for ligature<br>and identification marks for<br>placement<br>Hooks for ligation, for additional<br>tooth movement<br>Molded ceramic body with rounded<br>corners and edges<br>Slot to hold orthodontic wires | Archwire slot, tiewings for ligature<br>and identification marks for<br>placement<br>Hooks for ligation, for additional<br>tooth movement<br>Molded ceramic body with rounded<br>corners and edges<br>Slot to hold orthodontic wires | | |
| Ligation | Non-Self-Ligating | Non-Self-Ligating | Non-Self-Ligating | | |
| | Self-Ligating | | Self-Ligating | | |
| Indications for<br>Use | ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC<br>BRACKETS 1.1 are indicated for<br>orthodontic movement of natural<br>teeth. | Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets<br>are intended for use in orthodontic<br>treatment. The brackets are affixed<br>to teeth so that pressure can be<br>exerted on the teeth. | Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets are<br>indicated for orthodontic movement<br>of natural teeth, excluding<br>mandibular bicuspid teeth. | | |
| | Sterility | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile | |
| | Utility | Single-use Only | Single-use Only | Single-use Only | |
| | | Subject Device<br>ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC<br>BRACKETS 1.1 | | Primary Predicate Device<br>Clarity Advanced Ceramic<br>Brackets | Secondary Predicate Device<br>Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets |
| | Picture of Device | Non-Self-Ligating<br>Mandibular<br>Bicuspid<br><br>Image: Non-Self-Ligating Mandibular Bicuspid Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket<br><br>Self-Ligating<br>Mandibular<br>Bicuspid<br><br>Image: Self-Ligating Mandibular Bicuspid Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket | Non-Self-Ligating for all<br>other Teeth<br><br>Image: Non-Self-Ligating Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket for all other teeth<br><br>Self-Ligating for<br>all other Teeth<br><br>Image: Self-Ligating Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket for all other teeth | Non-Self-Ligating<br><br>Image: Clarity Advanced Ceramic Bracket | Non-Self-Ligating<br><br>Image: Non-Self-Ligating Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket<br><br>Self-Ligating<br><br>Image: Self-Ligating Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket |
Table VI-1. Comparison of Subject ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 to Predicates (3M Unitek Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets, K102803 and TOMY Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets, K123094)
Premarket Notification
Tomy Inc. ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 Page 28 of 160
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
# VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 conform to the following Recognized Consensus Standard:
- . ISO 27020 First edition 2010-12-15 Dentistry - Brackets and Tubes for use in Orthodontics
ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 were tested for Shear Bond Strength and Torque Strength.
All of the components found in the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 have been used in legally marketed devices. ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 have the same composition as the predicate devices. Therefore, further biocompatibility testing is not necessary.
No animal studies or clinical testing have been required for these devices.
## VIII. CONCLUSIONS
There are no known substantial differences in terms of composition and mechanical properties between the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 and the predicate devices. This new 510(k) includes Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets (K123094) and their modified brackets. The difference in the modified brackets is the addition of the mandibular bicuspid brackets. Thus, the indication of use is equivalent to the predicate device Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Brackets (K102803). The technological characteristics and materials are identical to Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets (K123094). Therefore, we believe that the information provided herein demonstrates that the ORTHODONTIC CERAMIC BRACKETS 1.1 are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in design, principles of performance, and intended use.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.