K153577 · Nanoentek USA, Inc. · CDZ · Oct 14, 2016 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K153577
Device Name
FREND Testosterone Test System
Applicant
Nanoentek USA, Inc.
Product Code
CDZ · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 14, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1680
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K153577 · Oct 14, 2016
FREND Testosterone Test System
Nanoentek USA, Inc.
De-identified leftover clinical serum samples
Leftover clinical samples were used to perform a method comparison study against the predicate device (Abbott ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone Assay) to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
The FREND™ Testosterone test is a fluorescent nanoparticle immunoassay designed for in vitro quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma (K3EDTA and lithium heparin). Measurements of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, impotence in males and, in females, hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes. The FREND™ Testosterone microfluidic flow cartridge is designed for use in the FREND™ System fluorescent immunoassay reader. The FREND™ Testosterone Test System is intended for use in clinical laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The test is not intended for use in point-of-care settings.
Device Story
FREND™ Testosterone Test System is a rapid, two-step competitive fluorescence immunoassay for quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma. The system consists of a disposable microfluidic cartridge and a benchtop fluorescence reader. Operation involves manual incubation of a 70 µL patient sample with a pretreatment tube, followed by loading 35 µL into the cartridge. The cartridge uses microfluidic lateral flow where testosterone in the sample competes with testosterone-biotin fluorescent bead conjugates for binding sites in the test zone. The reader measures laser-induced fluorescence in the test and reference zones; the ratio of these intensities is inversely proportional to testosterone concentration. Results are calculated via a lot-specific calibration curve provided by a code-chip. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel to assist physicians in diagnosing androgen-related disorders. The system provides automated analysis, displaying results on a touchscreen, aiding clinical decision-making regarding hormone-related conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision study (CLSI EP5-A3) showed CVs 5.4-11.8%. Linearity established 20-1500 ng/dL (R²=0.994). LoQ 20 ng/dL. Interference and cross-reactivity testing performed per CLSI EP7-A2. Method comparison with predicate (n=155) yielded Passing-Bablok slope 0.983, intercept -2.353, r=0.977. Matrix comparison (serum vs. K3EDTA/Li-Heparin plasma) showed high correlation (r=0.989-0.993). Reference intervals established using 488 healthy adults.
Technological Characteristics
Fluorescence immunoassay using microfluidic lateral flow technology. Disposable plastic cartridge contains reagents; reader uses laser-induced fluorescence detection. Analyte quantification based on ratio of test zone to reference zone fluorescent intensity. Calibration via lot-specific code-chip. Benchtop form factor with touchscreen interface. Software controls hardware, data acquisition, and analysis. No specific ASTM material standards cited.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma (K3EDTA and lithium heparin) to aid in diagnosis/treatment of androgen-related disorders, including primary/secondary hypogonadism and impotence in males, and hirsutism/virilization in females. For prescription use only in clinical laboratories; not for point-of-care settings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A testosterone test system is a device intended to measure testosterone (a male sex hormone) in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurement of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males and, in females hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes.
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k153577
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Testosterone
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Fluorescence Immunoassay
E. Applicant:
NanoEnTek, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
FREND™ Testosterone Test System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1680 Testosterone Test System
2. Classification:
Class I, Reserved
3. Product code:
CDZ
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The FREND™ Testosterone test is a fluorescent nanoparticle immunoassay designed for in vitro quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma (K3EDTA and lithium heparin). Measurements of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, impotence in males and, in females, hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes.
The FREND™ Testosterone microfluidic flow cartridge is designed for use in the FREND™ System fluorescent immunoassay reader. The FREND™ Testosterone Test System is intended for use in clinical laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The test is not intended for use in point-of-care settings.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
Not for use in Point-of-Care settings
4. Special instrument requirements:
NanoEnTek FREND™ System
I. Device Description:
The FREND™ Testosterone Test System includes the following in the kit:
- FREND™ Testosterone cartridges (20)
- Testosterone Gold Antibody Pretreatment Tubes (20)
- Disposable pipette tips (30)
- FREND™ Testosterone Code Chip (1)
- FREND™ Testosterone Package Insert (1)
One cartridge contains:
- Monoclonal mouse anti-testosterone antibody: 32±3.2 ng
- Testosterone-Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA): 482.0±48.2 ng
- Fluorescent nanoparticles: 3.6±0.36 µg
{2}
One pretreatment tube contains:
- Gold antibody conjugates: 30±3.0 µg
The FREND Testosterone Code Chip contains all the calibration information stored electronically, and is specific for each lot of FREND Testosterone cartridge.
The FREND™ System was previously cleared in k124056 and is not provided with the kit but is required for the use of the FREND™ Testosterone test cartridge. The FREND System is a portable, bench top fluorescence reader.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Abbot ARCHTECT 2nd Generation Testosterone
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k120009
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device: FRENDTM Testosterone Test System (k153577) | Predicate Device: Abbott ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone (k120009) |
| Intended Use | In vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma (K_{3}EDTA and Lithium heparin) | Same |
| Sample Type | Human serum and plasma (K_{3}EDTA and Lithium heparin) | Same |
| Type of Test | Immunoassay | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device: FRENDTM Testosterone Test System (k153577) | Predicate Device: Abbott ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone (k120009) |
| Methodology | Fluorescent | Chemiluminescent |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device: FRENDTM Testosterone Test System (k153577) | Predicate Device: Abbott ARCHITECT 2^{nd} Generation Testosterone (k120009) |
| Sample Size | 70 μL for the first incubation step and 35 μL for running the test | 150 μL for the first Testosterone test and 100 μL for each additional test from the same test cup |
| Test Cartridge | Disposable single-use cartridge | No single-use cartridge |
| Measuring Range | 20 – 1500 ng/dL | 4.33 – 1500 ng/dL |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP06-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP09-A3, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP14-A3, Evaluation of Commutability of Processed Samples; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guidelines
CLSI EP28-A3C, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline
## L. Test Principle:
The FREND™ Testosterone Test is a single-use rapid “competitive” immunoassay utilizing fluorescent nanoparticle in microfluidic flow to capture and quantify total testosterone levels in human serum and plasma (K3EDTA and lithium heparin) specimens using the FREND™ system.
The FREND™ Testosterone Test System is a two-step competitive immunoassay with gold nanoparticles labeled with mouse monoclonal anti-testosterone antibody, testosterone-biotin
{4}
labeled with fluorescence nanoparticles and fluorescence detection by FREND™ System.
The FREND™ Testosterone test utilizes microfluidic technology and detects immune-complexes bound to testosterone. Firstly, a $70~\mu \mathrm{L}$ patient sample is incubated in the Testosterone Gold Antibody pretreatment tube, where the sample interacts with a proprietary mix of a pretreatment solution. Secondly, the Test Cartridge is placed on the warming platform of the heating block and $35~\mu \mathrm{L}$ of the mixture from Step 1 is manually loaded into the inlet of the cartridge. The cartridge remains on the warming platform for 30 seconds, while the sample hydrates the testosterone-biotin fluorescent bead conjugate and migrates along the test strip. During migration the bound testosterone in the sample and the testosterone-biotin fluorescent bead conjugates compete to form antigen-antibody complexes in the test zone. Unbound testosterone-biotin fluorescent conjugates flow through and bind to the anti-testosterone antibody that is immobilized on the surface in the reference zone. The cartridge is inserted into the FREND instrument for analysis where fluorescent signals in the test and reference zones are measured.
Testosterone quantification is based upon the ratio of the intensity of the test and reference zones. The magnitude of the fluorescent ratio is inversely proportional to the amount of testosterone in the sample.
There is no calibration needed by the user because each cartridge is coded with the calibration information generated by the manufacturer.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A single lot imprecision study was performed internally as described in the CLSI protocol EP5-A3. Three serum pools with low, intermediate and high testosterone levels were assayed in duplicate twice per day for 20 days (80 total measurements per level). The results are summarized below:
| Sample Pool | Mean Conc. (ng/dL) | Repeatability | | Within Laboratory | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| 1 | 39.723 | 4.5 | 11.2 | 4.7 | 11.8 |
| 2 | 202.965 | 16.7 | 8.2 | 17.3 | 8.5 |
| 3 | 1012.208 | 54.7 | 5.4% | 57.5 | 5.7 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was established according to CLSI-EP6-A in three reagent lots using seven levels of serum testosterone tested in quadruplicate. The range for analyte concentration was tested from $17\mathrm{ng / dL}$ to $1650\mathrm{ng / dL}$ using low and high serum pools. The low and high pools were mixed to make five intermediate levels. A total of seven concentrations were tested (17.5, 180.8, 527.2, 850.2, 1203.6, 1509.0, and $1736.6\mathrm{ng / dL}$ ). The following linear regression equation was obtained:
{5}
$$
\mathrm {Y} = 1. 0 3 8 \mathrm {X} - 4. 8 1 8, \mathrm {R} ^ {2} = 0. 9 9 4
$$
Linearity data supports the FREND™ Testosterone reportable range of 20 ng/dL to 1500 ng/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The standards/calibrators are prepared gravimetrically and confirmed by measurement on the ARCHITECT i 2nd Generation Testosterone assay (k120009), which is traceable to the USP testosterone. The calibrators are factory calibration.
There is no need for calibration by the operator as the calibration information is coded in the individual cartridge.
Controls: The sponsor recommends the use of commercially available quality control material that contains Testosterone as the measurand.
d. Detection limit:
LoB, LoD and LoQ studies were performed according to the CLSI EP17-A guideline using one lot of reagent.
LoB was performed with five different steroid depleted serum samples with 12 replicates each, which generated a total of 60 replicates.
The Limit of Detection (LoD) for the FREND™ Testosterone was established using five different low level samples. All samples were each assayed 12 times over a period of five days using a single reagent lot. Each sample has a total of 60 replicates.
LoQ was determined based on five low samples with concentration between 17 to 20 ng/dL. The sponsor obtained a LoQ value based on <20%CV at sample concentration of 20 ng/dL.
| LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9.46 ng/dL | 14.33 ng/dL | 20.0 ng/dL |
The claimed measuring range of this assay is 20 ng/dL to 1500 ng/dL.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference Studies
Potential interference from common endogenous substances was evaluated in accordance with CLSI EP7-A2. Interferents were added to normal human sera spiked with two levels of testosterone, and controls with no interferent were included. The sponsor defines significant interference as > ±10% difference. No significant interference was found if recoveries were between 90% to 110% of the expected
{6}
testosterone value. Results with non-significant interference substances are summarized in the table below.
| Class of substances tested | Interferent (Concentration Tested) |
| --- | --- |
| Endogenous Substances | Hemoglobin (500 mg/dL) |
| | Bilirubin, conjugated (30 mg/dL) |
| | Bilirubin, unconjugated (30 mg/dL) |
| | Triglyceride (3000 mg/dL) |
| | Total protein (12 g/dL) |
| | Biotin (30 ng/mL) |
| | Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (100 nmol/L) |
| Pharmaceuticals | Acetylcystein (415 μg/mL) |
| | Ampicillin-Na (50.3 μg/mL) |
| | Ascorbic acid (60 μg/mL) |
| | Ca-Dobesilate (40 μg/mL) |
| | Cyclosporine (3 μg/mL) |
| | Cefoxitin (66 μg/mL) |
| | Heparin (3,000 U/L) |
| | Levodopa (4 mg/mL) |
| | Methyldopa (15 μg/mL) |
| | Metronidazole (120 μg/L) |
| | Doxycycline (30 μg/mL) |
| | Acetylsalicylic Acid (250 μ/g/mL) |
| | Rifampin (640 μg/mL) |
| | Acetaminophen (200 μg/mL) |
| | Ibuprofen (250 μg/mL) |
| | Theophylline (400 μg/mL) |
| Heterophilic Antibodies | Rheumatoid Factor (RF) (1075 IU/mL) |
| | Human Anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) (70 ng/mL) |
Sponsor has included the following limitation in the labeling:
"Specimens from patients with heterophilic antibodies, such as anti-mouse (HAMA), anti-goat (HAGA), or anti-rabbit (HARA) antibodies, may show falsely elevated or depressed values or may result in an incomplete test. Patients routinely exposed to animals or animal serum products can be prone to these types of heterophilic interference."
## Cross Reactivity
The following substances were evaluated for potential cross-reactivity with the FREND™ Testosterone at two concentrations (low and high testosterone levels). Testing was done according to the CLSI protocol EP07-A2. Results of the percent cross reactivity are summarized in the table below.
{7}
| Cross-reactant | Cross-reactant Conc. (ng/dL) | % Cross-reactivity | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Testosterone Low | Testosterone High |
| Androstenedione | 50 nmol/L | 0.0032 | 0.0337 |
| Androsterone | 1,000 nmol/L | 0.0004 | 0.0158 |
| Cortisone | 1,000 nmol/L | 0.0077 | 0.0300 |
| Danazol | 1,000 nmol/L | 0.0007 | 0.0496 |
| Estradiol | 200 nmol/L | 0.0033 | 0.5160 |
| Estrone | 500 nmol/L | 0.0144 | 0.0378 |
| 17a-Ethynyl estradiol | 1,000 ng/mL | 0.0033 | 0.0081 |
| Progesterone | 2,000 nmol/L | 0.0007 | 0.0167 |
| Dexamethasone | 5 μmol/L | 0.0255 | 0.0122 |
| Ethisterone | 20 nmol/L | 0.0437 | 0.3840 |
| D(-) Norgestrel, | 20 ng/mL | 0.0125 | 0.1667 |
| Prednisolone | 2,000 nmol/L | 0.0001 | 0.0175 |
| Prednisone | 2,000 nmol/L | 0.0031 | 0.0040 |
| Spironolactone | 500 ng/mL | 0.0039 | 0.0172 |
| Cortisol | 10,000 nmol/L | 0.0004 | 0.0070 |
| DHEA | 50 nmol/L | 0.0178 | 1.0463 |
| DHEAS | 50 μmol/L | 0.0002 | 0.0009 |
| Dihydrotestosterone | 40 nmol/L | 0.2040 | 0.4134 |
| Epitestosterone | 100 nmol/L | 0.0467 | 0.1502 |
| Ethynodiol diacetate | 50 ng/mL | 0.0274 | 0.1280 |
% Cross-reactivity = 100 x ((Spiked value – unspiked value)/concentration of Cross-reactant)
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Comparison studies using 155 serum samples were performed externally. The comparator method was the Abbott ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone Assay (predicate device) run on the Abbott ARCHITECT i System. The samples spanned the measuring range of the FREND Testosterone Test System (20.84 to 1420.33 ng/dL). All samples were assayed using serum samples split between the candidate device and the comparator method.
Results from the FREND™ Testosterone on the FREND™ System (y) were compared with the comparator results (x) by Passing-Bablok regression analysis, giving a slope of 0.983 (95%CI: 0.944 to 1.00), an intercept of -2.353 (95%CI: -12.0 to 14.36) and a correlation coefficient of 0.977.
{8}
b. Matrix comparison:
The matrix comparison study was performed internally. Testosterone concentrations in the serum, lithium heparin plasma and K3EDTA plasma from 40 individuals were measured using the FREND™ Testosterone Test System. Regression analysis results when compared against the serum samples and are summarized in the table below.
| Parameter | K_{3}EDTA Plasma | Lithium Heparin Plasma |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Slope: (95% CI) | 1.006 (0.962 to1.066) | 1.010 (0.968 to 1.051) |
| y-Intercept: (95% CI) | -8.185 (-46.842 to 9.627) | 1.264 (-14.078 to 22.488) |
| Correlation, r | 0.989 | 0.993 |
| Sample range tested | 23.5 to 1356.2 ng/dL | 20.3 to 1343.6 ng/dL |
Sponsor has the following recommendation in the labeling:
Patient samples are "recommended to use the same specimen matrix when following patients because the results may not be interchangeable".
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Serum samples from a total of 488 normal, apparently healthy adult male and female individuals were assayed on 3 lots of the FREND™ Testosterone assay using two FREND™ Systems according to CLSI C28-A3 guidelines. The central 95th percentile range of each sample category was calculated by finding the 2.5th
{9}
ranked sample on the low end and the 97.5th ranked sample on the high end. The reference interval using 95% interval for the FREND™ Testosterone Test System, stratified by age range and gender, is provided in the table below.
| Gender (Age Range) | Testosterone, ng/dL | Number Tested |
| --- | --- | --- |
| F (21 – 49) | <20 – 107.5 | 120 |
| F (50 – 90) | <20 – 150.3 | 124 |
| M (21 – 49) | 170.1 – 1263.6 | 123 |
| M (50 – 88) | 152.4 – 1095.2 | 121 |
It is recommended that each laboratory establish its own expected values for testosterone as performed on the FREND System.
## N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
## O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.