The EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca Analyzer is intended for in-vitro diagnostic testing of sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Chloride (CL), and Ionized Calcium (Ca++) without pH correction. The ionized calcium test on the EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium ions (Ca++) in human serum, plasma and whole blood in clinical laboratories. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms).
Device Story
EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca Analyzer is an in-vitro diagnostic device for clinical laboratories. It measures sodium, potassium, chloride, and ionized calcium (Ca++) in human serum, plasma, and whole blood. The device utilizes ion-selective electrode (ISE) technology to perform quantitative analysis. Operators (laboratory personnel) introduce patient samples into the analyzer; the system processes the electrochemical signals to determine ion concentrations. Results are displayed for clinicians to aid in diagnosing and managing parathyroid disease, bone disorders, and tetany. The device provides rapid electrolyte and ionized calcium assessment to support clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (serum and whole blood). Linearity evaluated per CLSI EP6-A (0.07–6.20 mmol/L). LoB/LoD/LoQ determined per CLSI EP17-A. Analytical specificity tested against 19 substances per CLSI EP7-A2. Method comparison performed against predicate using 78 serum, 50 whole blood, and 50 plasma samples; regression analysis showed high correlation (r=0.998–1.000).
Technological Characteristics
Ion-selective electrode (ISE) technology for electrolyte and ionized calcium measurement. Analyzes human serum, plasma, and whole blood. Standalone clinical laboratory analyzer.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of ionized calcium in human serum, plasma, and whole blood for patients requiring diagnosis/treatment of parathyroid disease, bone diseases, chronic renal disease, or tetany.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A calcium test system is a device intended to measure the total calcium level in serum. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms).
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k152327
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modifications of the Calcium test of the previously cleared device (k112788) to perform the ionized calcium test at room temperature (temperature 22 – 25 °C) instead of at 37°C and to no longer provide a corrected ionized calcium result with pH correction.
C. Measurand:
Ionized calcium (Ca++)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, ion-selective electrode
E. Applicant:
Medica Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca Analyzer
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JFP | II | 862.1145, Calcium Test System | 75-Chemistry |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
{1}
The EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca Analyzer is intended for in-vitro diagnostic testing of sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Chloride (CL), and Ionized Calcium (Ca++) without pH correction.
The ionized calcium test on the EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium ions (Ca++) in human serum, plasma and whole blood in clinical laboratories.
Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer
I. Device Description:
The EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer is an automated, microprocessor-controlled analyzer for the measurement of sodium, potassium, chloride and ionized calcium. All measurands used specific ion selective electrode for the measurement of the analytes. Calibration of the measurands is automatic and all the calibration solutions are contained in the standard calibration solutions, which are listed below.
The EasyLyte Solution Pack includes:
800 mL Calibrant A
140 mmol/L Na+, 4.00 mmol/L K+, 125 mmol/L Cl-, 1.25mmol/L Ca++, 1.0 mmol/L Li+, buffer, preservative, wetting agent
180 mL Calibrant B
35.0 mmol/L Na+, 16.00 mmol/L K+, 41.0 mmol/L Cl-, 2.50mmol/L Ca++, 0.4 mmol/L Li+, buffer, preservative, and wetting agent
80 mL Wash Solution
0.1 mmol/L Ammonium Bifluoride
There are two modifications made to the current ionized calcium test in the current submission when compared against the previously cleared ionized calcium test in k112788. First modification is no pH corrected ionized calcium result is provided to the user. The second modification is the ionized calcium test is conducted at room temperature (22 – 25 °C) instead of at 37°C.
2
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
EasyLyte Na/K/Ca/pH analyzer
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k112788
3. Comparison to predicate
| Items | EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer for the measurement of ionized calcium (Candidate Device) | EasyLyte Na/K/Ca/pH analyzer for the measurement of ionized calcium (Predicate Device: k112788) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarity/Differences | | |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of Ionized calcium in serum, plasma, and whole blood samples | Same |
| | Clinical laboratory use | Same |
| Sample modes | Syringe mode or capillary mode | Same |
| Sample volumes | 100 μL for both syringe and capillary modes | Same |
| Measuring Range | 0.1 – 6.0 mmol/L | Same |
| Sensor type | Ion specific electrode | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum, Plasma, whole blood | Same |
| Menu | Fully configurable test menu based on above sensors | Same |
| Test Temperature | 72 – 77 F (22 – 25 °C) | 99 F (37 °C) |
| pH Correction | No | Yes |
{3}
4
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP9-A2-IR: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline – CLSI EP25-A
L. Test Principle:
The Ionized calcium is measured by ion selective electrode. An electrical potential is developed according the Nernst Equation for a specific ion. When compared to a reference electrode, this electrical potential is translated into voltage and then in to the ion concentration of the sample.
The ionized calcium result reported is an un-normalized ionized calcium result. If normalized ionized calcium result is needed, the user can use the following equation to calculate the normalized ionized calcium result:
$$
[\mathrm{Ca}^{++}]_{\mathrm{pH7.40}} = [\mathrm{Ca}^{++}]_{\mathrm{pHx.xx}} \times 10^{-(0.23 \times (7.40 - x.xx))}
$$
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Serum Precision
Within-run and total precision were determined following CLSI EP5-A2. Three levels of Medica’s EasyQC material (cleared under k990971) were tested on one EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer twice a day over a twenty-day period. The precision data are summarized below.
{4}
| Sample | Mean (mmol/L) | N | Within-run SD | Within-run %CV | Total precision SD | Total precision %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 | 1.47 | 40 | 0.006 | 0.4% | 0.012 | 0.8% |
| Level 2 | 0.93 | 40 | 0.005 | 0.6% | 0.011 | 1.1% |
| Level 3 | 2.05 | 40 | 0.010 | 0.5% | 0.016 | 0.8% |
# Whole blood Precision
Whole blood samples (with Sodium Heparin) were analyzed twenty consecutive times on two EasyLyte analyzers using two different lots of calibrants and sensors. Only within-run precision was evaluated because of the instability of the whole blood samples. The within-run precision data are summarized below.
| Sample | Mean (mmol/L) | N | Within-run SD | Within-run %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 | 0.99 | 20 | 0.012 | 1.2% |
| Level 2 | 1.29 | 20 | 0.019 | 1.5% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A linearity study was evaluated using stripped human serum spiked with Calcium according to CLSI-EP6-A. Twelve (12) concentration levels (0.07, 0.13, 0.60, 1.0, 1.81, 2.32, 2.88, 3.45, 4.10, 4.99, 5.74, 6.20 mmol/L) were analyzed on one EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzer. Linear regression was performed on the results using expected values based on the highest spiked sample prepared. The linearity results are presented in the table below.
$\mathrm{Ca}++$ Linearity on the EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca
| Parameter | total # levels | Sample range tested | Claimed measuring range | Slope | Intercept | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ca++ | 12 | 0.07 – 6.20 mmol/L | 0.10-6.0 mmol/L | 0.9543 | 0.0212 | 0.9996 |
The data provided in the linearity studies supports the sponsor's claimed measuring range from 0.10 to $6.0\mathrm{mmol / L}$
{5}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability
The ionized calcium calibration solutions were traceable to an internal prepared standard which is traceable to a highly purified commercially available material. The ionized calcium calibration solutions had been previously cleared in k112788.
d. Detection limit:
Refer to the linearity study data above in M. 2.b. for the measuring range claim of $\mathrm{Ca^{++}}$ . In addition, the sponsor conducted a Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) according to the CLSI EP-17A guideline using human serum.
Limit of Blank (LoB) - Stripped human serum solution was analyzed 20 times on three EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzers and the results were rank ordered to determine the LoB.
Limit of Detection (LoD) – A serum sample was prepared with a calcium value above the LoB. It was analyzed 20 times on three EasyLyte Na/K/Cl/Ca analyzers to determine the typical precision of the low concentration sample. The average standard deviation of the low concentration sample was subsequently used, in conjunction with the previously calculated LoB to determine the LoD. The LoD is equal to the LoB plus 1.653 times the average standard deviation of the low concentration sample based on the calculation formula according to the CLSI EP17-A.
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) – LoQ was analyzed by using four low concentrations of ionized calcium samples at low concentrations over at least five runs. From this data, the LoQ is calculated based on a CV of $10\%$ or less. Results are summarized in the table below.
| | LoB | LoD | LoQ | Claimed Measurement Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ca++ | 0.07 mmol/L | 0.09 mmol/L | 0.10 mmol/L | 0.1 – 6.0 mmol/L |
e. Analytical specificity:
Human serum samples were used in the interference study. For the initial testing, each interferent was spiked at 20 times the recommended concentration by CLSI EP-7 A2 guideline. Each sample containing interferent was evaluated against the same serum sample without the interferent. If interference was observed, the study was repeated with lower levels to establish the concentration above which interference
{6}
occurred. The sponsor's definition of significant interference is within $\pm 10\%$ bias. The following table represents substances that were tested without demonstrating a significant interference on test results:
| Substance | Highest Concentration Tested |
| --- | --- |
| Ethosuximide | 25.0 mg/dL |
| Valproic Acid-Na salt | 60.0 mg/dL |
| Chlorpromazine-HCl | 5.0 mg/dL |
| Nortrityline-HCl | 0.25 mg/dL |
| Procainamide-HCl | 3 mg/dL |
| Imipramine-HCl | 0.25 mg/dL |
| Dopamine-HCl | 0.25 mg/dL |
| Acetaminophen | 0.25 mg/dL |
| Salicyclic acid | 30 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicyclic acid (Aspirin) | 80 mg/dL |
| Erythromycin | 6.0 mg/dL |
| Ampicillin | 5.5 mg/dL |
| Na-Thiocyanate | 42 mg/dL |
| Benzalconium Chloride | 8.0 mg/dL |
| Magnesium Acetate | 6.2 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL |
| Intralipid | 1000 mg/dL |
| Conjugated (Direct) Bilirubin | 20 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated (Total) Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparisons to the predicate device were performed with whole blood, plasma (sodium heparin), and serum patient samples per CLSI EP9-A2 guideline. Some samples were spiked or diluted to fully span the claimed measuring ranges.
A total of 78 human serum samples were and used for the serum comparison study, among them eighteen samples were either spiked with $\mathrm{CaCl}_2$ or diluted with deionized water to obtain samples spanning the entire measuring range of the ionized calcium assay. All serum samples were tested using the candidate device and predicate device.
A second method comparison study with a total of 42 volunteers that contributed to collection of whole blood and plasma (sodium heparin plasma) specimens. In addition to the native patient/donor samples eight (8) more samples were either spiked or diluted to obtain samples spanning the entire measuring range. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate on two candidate devices. The samples were also analyzed in triplicate on two
{7}
predicate devices. Only one singlet set of results from the candidate device was used to perform the linear regression analysis. The regression results are summarized below:
| Total # samples | Sample range tested | Slope | Intercept | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Serum | | | | |
| 78 | 0.18 – 5.61 mmol/L | 0.963 | 0.075 | 0.998 |
| Whole Blood | | | | |
| 50 | 0.54 – 5.23 mmol/L | 0.917 | 0.076 | 1.000 |
| Plasma (Sodium heparin) | | | | |
| 50 | 0.22 – 5.38 mmol/L | 0.923 | 0.085 | 1.000 |
b. Matrix Comparison:
Assay performance in all claimed matrices is addressed in the method comparison studies described above.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor has provided the following expected values in the Operator's Manual based on the literature:
Ionized Calcium: 1.15 - 1.33 mmol/L for whole blood, plasma, serum when sample is handled anaerobically or with pH correction.
{8}
References:
Tietz, N.W. (ed.) Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 6th ed. (2008), p. 840.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
9
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.