Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex reagent cartridge, Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator
K151529 · Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. · CDZ · Feb 11, 2016 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K151529
Device Name
Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex reagent cartridge, Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator
Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
CDZ · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Feb 11, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1680
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K151529 · Feb 11, 2016
Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex reagent cartridge, Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Clinical laboratory patient samples
Clinical patient samples were used to establish reference intervals for the testosterone assay across different age groups and Tanner stages in healthy populations.
Reference Intervals; Clinical Samples; Healthy Population
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Reference Interval Study; Observational study to establish reference intervals; Follow-up/Duration: Not applicable
Healthy males and females across various age groups (2-21 years) and Tanner stages (I-V); Sample Size: Multiple cohorts ranging from 19 to 174 samples per category
Not applicable for this study
Establishment of 2.5th and 97.5th percentile reference intervals for total testosterone
Indications for Use
The Dimension Vista® LOCI Total Testosterone Flex® reagent cartridge is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma on the Dimension Vista® System. Measurements of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males, and in females, hirsutism (excessive hair), and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes.
Device Story
The Dimension Vista® LOCI Total Testosterone Flex® reagent cartridge is an in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for use on the Dimension Vista® System. It utilizes LOCI® (Luminescent Oxygen Channeling Immunoassay) technology, a competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay. The device processes human serum or plasma samples by competing patient testosterone with a testosterone-analog-coated chemibead for a limited amount of labeled testosterone antibody. Sensibeads, coated with streptavidin, bind to the biotinylated antibody to form immunocomplexes. Illumination at 680 nm triggers singlet oxygen diffusion from Sensibeads to Chemibeads, inducing chemiluminescence measured at 612 nm. The signal is inversely proportional to testosterone concentration. The system is operated by laboratory personnel in a clinical setting. Results are used by clinicians to diagnose and monitor androgen-related disorders. The device provides quantitative data to assist in clinical decision-making regarding hormonal health.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical diagnostic studies were performed. Evidence consists of analytical bench testing, including precision (n=80 per sample), linearity (R²=0.996-0.999), and interference/cross-reactivity studies. Method comparison against the CDC ID-LC/MS/MS reference method (n=113) yielded a regression slope of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) and r=0.994. Reference intervals were established for adult and pediatric populations (Tanner stages and age-based) following CLSI EP28-A3c.
Technological Characteristics
Competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay (LOCI® technology). Reagents: synthetic beads (Chemibeads with testosterone analog/chemiluminescent dye; Sensibeads with streptavidin/photosensitive dye) and biotinylated sheep monoclonal antibody. Form factor: 12-well Flex® reagent cartridge. Energy source: 680 nm light excitation. Connectivity: Integrated with Dimension Vista® System. Software: Embedded firmware for automated analysis. Standards: CLSI EP05-A2, EP06-A, EP07-A2, EP09-A3, EP17-A2, EP25-A, EP28-A3c, EP32-R.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma to aid in diagnosis and treatment of androgen-related disorders, including primary/secondary hypogonadism, delayed/precocious puberty, male impotence, and female hirsutism/virilization due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, or adrenogenital syndromes.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A testosterone test system is a device intended to measure testosterone (a male sex hormone) in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurement of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males and, in females hirsutism (excessive hair) and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes.
Predicate Devices
Roche Elecsys Testosterone II Assay (k093421)
Roche Elecsys Testosterone Calset II (k003411)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k151529
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Total Testosterone
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative Chemiluminescent Immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex reagent cartridge
Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1680, Testosterone Test System
21 CFR 862.1150, Calibrator
2. Classification:
Class I, reserved
Class II
{1}
3. Product code:
CDZ
JIT
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex reagent cartridge is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma on the Dimension Vista System. Measurements of testosterone are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving the male sex hormones (androgens), including primary and secondary hypogonadism, delayed or precocious puberty, impotence in males, and in females, hirsutism (excessive hair), and virilization (masculinization) due to tumors, polycystic ovaries, and adrenogenital syndromes.
The Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the Total Testosterone (TTST) assay on the Dimension Vista System.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
The assay is intended for use on the Dimension Vista System
I. Device Description:
The Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex reagents are liquid and are contained in reagent wells of a Flex reagent cartridge. There are twelve wells in each Flex reagent cartridge. The reagents for the assay are assigned to wells as described below:
2
{2}
Wells 1 through 4 each contain 31.3 ng/mL Testosterone biotinylated antibody reagent (sheep monoclonal) at a concentration of 31.3 ng/mL testosterone and 1200 ng/mL of displacer, as well as buffers, stabilizers and preservatives.
Wells 5 through 8 each contain 100 µg/mL of Testosterone Chemibead Reagent, as well as buffers, stabilizers and preservatives.
Wells 9 through 12 each contain 400 µg/mL of Testosterone Sensibead Reagent, as well as buffers, stabilizers and preservatives.
The Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator (TTST CAL) is a lyophilized human serum based calibrator set containing testosterone and preservatives. Within each set of twelve vials there are two 1.0 mL amber glass vials for each calibrator level. There are six calibrator levels, labeled A-F, which span the assay range. The total testosterone concentrations of the six levels are listed below:
- Calibrator A: 0 ng/dL
- Calibrator B: 20 ng/dL
- Calibrator C: 50 ng/dL
- Calibrator D: 100 ng/dL
- Calibrator E: 200 ng/dL
- Calibrator F: 1100 ng/dL
The calibrator material contains human source material. Each donor unit used in the preparation of this product was tested by FDA-approved methods for the presence of antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) and Type 2 (HIV-2), as well as for Hepatitis B surface Antigen and antibody to Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), and found to be negative (not repeatedly reactive).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Roche Elecsys Testosterone II Assay
Roche Elecsys Testosterone Calset II
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
- k093421
- k003411
{3}
3. Comparison with predicate:
Assay
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex Reagent Cartridge (k151529) | Predicate Device Roche Elecsys Testosterone II Assay (k093421) |
| Intended Use | In vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of total testosterone in human serum and plasma. | Same |
| Method | Competitive immunoassay | Same |
| Antibodies | Sheep monoclonal | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone Flex Reagent Cartridge (k151529) | Predicate Device Roche Elecsys Testosterone II Assay (k093421) |
| Technology | Chemiluminescent LOCI | Electrochemiluminescence ECLIA |
| Sample size | 10 μL | 20 μL |
| Sample type | Serum, Lithium Heparin plasma, Na Heparin plasma, K2-EDTA plasma. | Serum, Lithium Heparin plasma, K2- and K3-EDTA plasma. |
| Measuring range | 8.0- 1000 ng/dL | 2.5-1500 ng/dL |
Calibrators
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator (k151529) | Predicate Device Roche Elecsys Testosterone Calset II (k003411) |
| Intended use | An in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the testosterone assay. | Same |
| Calibrator form | Lyophilized | Same |
| Calibrator matrix | Human serum | Same |
| Traceability | ID-LC/MS/MS (CDC reference method) | ID-GC/MS |
| Levels | Six: | Two: |
{4}
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator (k151529) | Predicate Device Roche Elecsys Testosterone Calset II (k003411) |
| | Calibrator A: 0 ng/dL
Calibrator B: 20 ng/dL
Calibrator C: 50 ng/dL
Calibrator D: 100 ng/dL
Calibrator E: 200 ng/dL
Calibrator F: 1100 ng/dL | Calibrator 1: <1.0 ng/mL
Calibrator 2: 13.0 ng/mL |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents, Approved Guideline
CLSI EPO5-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Measurement Procedure: A Statistical Approach, Approved Guideline
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
CLSI EP09-A3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples, Approved Guideline, Third Edition
CLSI EP28-A3c, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory, Approved Guideline, Third Edition
CLSI EP32-R, Metrological Traceability and Its Implementation, A Report; February 17, 2006.
L. Test Principle:
The Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone (TTST) Flex method is a homogeneous, competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay based on LOCI technology. LOCI reagents include two synthetic bead reagents and labeled testosterone antibody. The first bead reagent (Chemibeads) is coated with a testosterone analog and contains a chemiluminescent dye.
{5}
The second bead reagent (Sensibeads) is coated with streptavidin and contains photosensitive dye. Chemibeads and labeled testosterone antibody are added sequentially to the reaction vessel. Testosterone from the patient sample competes with the testosterone-analog-chemibeads for a limited amount of labeled testosterone antibody. Sensibeads are then added and bind to the biotinylated portion of the labeled testosterone antibody to form bead pair immunocomplexes. Illumination of the complex by light at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen for the Sensibeads which diffuses to the Chemibeads triggering a chemiluminescent reaction. The resulting signal is measured at 612 nm and is an inverse function of the concentration of total testosterone in the sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision testing was performed in accordance with CLSI EP05-A2 guidance. Three serum and one plasma pools, and three levels of human serum based commercial controls were run using one reagent lot and one analyzer in duplicate, twice a day for 20 days for a total of 80 measurements per sample. A result summary of the precision study is shown in the table below:
| | | Within-Run | | Total (n=80) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (ng/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Serum 1 | 13 | 0.7 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 7.3 |
| Serum 2 | 75 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Serum 3 | 767 | 13.8 | 1.8 | 18.2 | 2.4 |
| Li-heparin Plasma | 384 | 14.3 | 3.7 | 15.8 | 4.1 |
| Control 1 | 71 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| Control 2 | 441 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 5.6 | 1.3 |
| Control 3 | 855 | 13.2 | 1.6 | 16.9 | 2.0 |
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity studies were performed for serum and Li-heparin, Na-heparin, and K2-EDTA plasma samples. One high sample and one low pool for each sample type were combined in varying ratios to produce ten dilutions across the claimed measuring range of 8.0 to 1000 ng/dL. The expected values were calculated based on the dilution factor used. The following linear regression equations were obtained:
{6}
Serum: y=0.97x + 0.1, R²=0.998
Li-Heparin: y= 0.98x + 0.0, R²=0.999
Na-Heparin: y= 0.98x + 0.1, R²=0.996
K2-EDTA: y= 0.96x + 0.1, R²=0.999
The linearity data supports the claimed measuring range of 8.0-1000 ng/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: The Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator is traceable to a primary reference method, CDC Reference Method: ID-LC/MS/MS. Traceability was verified by serum sample method comparison on the Dimension Vista against the CDC reference method, ID-LC/MS/MS.
The sponsor has obtained certification in the CDC Hormone Standardization (HoST) program. Please see CDC Hormone Standardization program at http://www.cdc.gov/labstandards/hs.html.
Value Assignment: Each lot of calibrator is assigned during manufacturing with a Testosterone Masterpool, which is traceable to CDC ID-LC/MS/MS. The lot value assignment of the calibrators are determined by measuring 5 replicates of each calibrator, during 3 runs, over 3 days, using 3 reagent lots and 3 analyzers. The calibrator results must meet internal specifications before release. The calibrator target concentrations are as follows:
Level A: 0 ng/dL
Level B: 20 ng/dL
Level C: 50 ng/dL
Level D: 100 ng/dL
Level E: 200 ng/dL
Level F: 1100 ng/dL
Stability: Real-time open-vial and shelf-life stability studies were performed to determine the stability of the Dimension Vista Testosterone Calibrator. The study protocol and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The stability studies support the sponsor's shelf-life stability claim of 12 months when stored at -15 to -25°C. Once reconstituted, the calibrators are stable for 14 days when stored on board the Dimension Vista System. Reconstituted calibrators are stable for 30 days when recapped immediately after use and stored at 2-8°C.
The sponsor recommends the use of commercially available control material in the package insert labeling.
7
{7}
# d. Detection limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB):
The LoB was estimated using a nonparametric approach. Six blank samples (testosterone stripped serum) were tested on three reagent lots on one analyzer over three days, for a total of 90 measurements. The LoB for each lot was taken as the rank position at the $95^{\text{th}}$ percentile calculated from the following equation, Rank position $= 0.5 + 0.95\mathrm{B}$ , where $\mathrm{B} =$ total number of replicates. The largest result across lots was taken as the LoB. The LoB was determined to be $1.1\mathrm{ng/dL}$ .
Limit of Detection (LoD):
The LoD was calculated parametrically for each of three reagent lots using 8 individual serum samples with low endogenous testosterone (0.6 to $8.5\mathrm{ng / dL}$ ). For each reagent lot tested, 120 replicate determinations were made over three days. The LoD was calculated using the following equation: $\mathrm{LoD} = \mathrm{LoB} + \mathrm{c_pSD_L}$ , where $\mathbf{c}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is a multiplier to give the $95^{\mathrm{th}}$ percentile of a normal distribution and L is the total number of all low level ample results across all reagent lots. The maximum observed LoD across all reagent lots was taken as the LoB estimate value. The LoD was determined to be $2.4\mathrm{ng / dL}$ .
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ):
The LoQ was determined using 8 individual low-level serum samples (0.6-8.5 ng/dL) and 5 low-level plasma samples for each plasma sample type (Li-Hep, Na-Hep, K2-EDTA). All sample types were analyzed in duplicate, twice a day for 20 days for a total of 80 measurements per sample. The LoQ is defined as the lowest analyte concentration that can be reproducibly measured with a total precision CV of $\leq 20\%$ .
The maximum LoQ for two lots tested for serum was $4.5\mathrm{ng / dL}$
The maximum LoQ for the two lots tested for sodium-heparin and lithium-heparin sample types was $6.0\mathrm{g / dL}$ ; and for the K2-EDTA sample type was $5.0\mathrm{ng / dL}$
The sponsor lists the following detection limits in the assay package insert labeling:
| LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4.0 ng/dL | 5.0 ng/dL | 8.0 ng/dL |
The claimed measuring range of the assay is 8.0 to $1000\mathrm{ng / dL}$
# e. Analytical specificity:
# Interference:
The Testosterone assay was evaluated for interference according to CLSI EP7-A2. Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia and several specific interferents were tested using a
{8}
paired-difference approach. Serum and plasma samples containing the substance to be tested and control sample not containing the substances were spiked with approximately 50 and 300 ng/dL of testosterone. Five replicates were tested for each test and control sample. The sponsor defines significant interference as greater than 10% difference in the test sample results as compared to the control samples. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Substance | Highest Tested Concentration at which no significant interference (≤±10%) was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 1000 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (unconjugated) | 60 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (conjugated) | 60 mg/dL |
| Lipemia (intralipid) | 1000 mg/dL |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Acetylcysteine | 150 mg/L |
| Amikacin | 8 mg/dL |
| Ampicillin | 5.3 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 6 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 100 μg/mL |
| Calcium Dobesilate | 200 mg/dL |
| Caffeine | 6 mg/dL |
| Carbamazepine | 3 mg/dL |
| Cefoxitin | 2500 mg/dL |
| Chloramphenicol | 5 mg/dL |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 1 mg/dL |
| Chlorpromazine | 0.2 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 503 mg/dL |
| Cimetidine | 2 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 30 mg/dL |
| Cyclosporine | 5 mg/L |
| Dextran 40 | 5000 mg/dL |
| Diazepam | 0.51 mg/dL |
| Digoxin | 6.1 ng/mL |
| Doxycycline | 50 mg/L |
| Enoxaparin Sodium | 60 mg/L |
| Erythromycin | 6 mg/L |
| Ethanol | 400 mg/dL |
| Ethosuximide | 25 mg/dL |
| Furosemide | 6 mg/dL |
| Gentamicin | 1 mg/dL |
| Heparin | 3 U/mL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
{9}
| Immunoglobulin G | 4 g/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Levodopa | 20 mg/L |
| Lidocaine | 1.2 mg/dL |
| Lithium | 2.2 mg/dL |
| Leuprolide | 200 ng/mL |
| Methyldopa | 20 mg/L |
| Metronidazole | 200 mg/L |
| Nicotine | 0.1 mg/dL |
| Penicillin G | 25 U/mL |
| Pentobarbital | 10 mg/dL |
| Phenobarbital | 15 mg/dL |
| Phenylbutazone | 400 mg/dL |
| Phenytoin | 5 mg/dL |
| Primidone | 4 mg/dL |
| Propoxyphene | 0.16 mg/dL |
| Protein, albumin | 5 g/dL |
| Protein, total | 10.5 g/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 1110 IU/mL |
| Rifampicin | 60 mg/L |
| Salicylic Acid | 60 mg/dL |
| Theophylline | 4 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 900 mg/dL |
| Urea | 500 mg/dL |
| Uric Acid | 20 mg/dL |
| Valproic Acid | 50 mg/dL |
| Vancomycin | 10 mg/dL |
The sponsor includes the following interference limitations in the assay package insert labeling:
Albumin at 6 g/dL decreased TTST results by 19% at a testosterone concentration of 50 ng/dL.
Immunoglobin G at 5 ng/dL increased TTST results 27% at a testosterone concentration of 300 ng/dL.
Triglycerides at 1000 mg/dL decreased TTST results by 11% at a testosterone concentration of 300 ng/dL.
**Cross-Reactivity:**
The following substances in the amounts indicated in the table below were evaluated and found to have insignificant cross reactivity with the TTST method when present in serum and plasma containing 0 ng/dL and 300 ng/dL testosterone. The sponsor defines significant cross reactivity as a bias in results greater to or equal to 10%.
{10}
The percent cross-reactivity was calculated as follows:
% Cross Reactivity = [measured TTST conc.] - [control TTST conc.] x100
[cross reactant conc.]
| Substance | Substance concentration (ng/mL) | Maximum % Cross Reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5α-dihydro-testosterone | 500 | 0.3 |
| 5α-Androstane-3β,17β-diol | 1000 | -0.03 |
| 5-androstene-3β,17β-diol | 1000 | 0.2 |
| 5 β -androstene-3β,17β-diol | 100 | -0.2 |
| 11 β- hydroxytestosterone | 1000 | 1.9 |
| 11-dexoycortisol | 1000 | 0.01 |
| 11-ketotestosterone | 1000 | 1.6 |
| 17 α-methyltestosterone | 100 | 4.2 |
| 17 β-estradiol | 1000 | -0.02 |
| Andostenedione | 100 | 0.2 |
| Androsterone | 1000 | 0.004 |
| Corticosterone | 1000 | 0.001 |
| Cortisol | 1000 | 0.01 |
| Danazol | 1000 | 0.1 |
| Dehydroepiandosterone | 1000 | -0.01 |
| DHEA-Sulfate | 50000 | 0.03 |
| Dexamethasone | 2000 | 0.003 |
| Esterone | 1000 | -0.01 |
| Ethisterone | 1000 | 0.1 |
| Norethindrone | 50 | 0.5 |
| Norgestrel | 1000 | 0.1 |
| Oxymetholone | 100 | 0.02 |
| Progesterone | 1000 | 0.0 |
| Testosterone propionate | 100 | 0.0 |
| Prednisone | 1000 | 0.01 |
| Prednisolone | 1000 | -0.002 |
| Cortisone | 2000 | 0.003 |
The sponsor includes the following cross-reactivity claims in the assay package insert labeling:
"Nandrolone decanoate (19-nortestosterone) shows significant cross-reactivity with the TTST assay. Do not use samples from patients under Nandrolone treatment."
{11}
# HAMA interference study:
Human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) interference was evaluated according to CLSI EP07-A2 guideline. Samples tested consisted of individual human serum samples with low and high endogenous HAMA. The samples were spiked with two levels of testosterone, approximately $150\mathrm{ng / dL}$ and $700 - 800\mathrm{ng / dL}$ testosterone. The sponsor defined significant interference as $\geq \pm 10\%$ difference between the tested sample and the control sample. Five replicates were run on each sample. The results are summarized in the table below:
| HAMA Concentration | Testosterone Level | % Interference |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1248 ng/mL | 149 ng/dL | -4% |
| 285 ng/mL | 156 ng/dL | -2% |
| 1248 ng/mL | 887 ng/dL | -6% |
| 285 ng/mL | 746 ng/dL | -5% |
The sponsor includes the following limitation in the labeling regarding heterophilic antibody (HAMA) interference:
"Patient samples may contain heterophilic antibodies, of which human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) are the most commonly encountered. Heterophilic antibodies such as HAMA may cause falsely decreased or elevated results in immunoassay tests. Siemens characterized the impact of HAMA in accordance with CLSI EP7-A2 and this testing indicated $\leq 10\%$ bias with the TTST assay. While the TTST reagent has been designed to mitigate interference from heterophilic antibodies, complete elimination of these interferences from all patient specimens cannot be guaranteed. A test result that is inconsistent with the patient's clinical presentation and history should be interpreted with caution."
The sponsor includes the following literature references in the labeling regarding interference from other patient specific interferents such as anti-dextran or anti-streptavidin antibodies:
1. Ismail AA, Walker PL, Cawood ML and Barth JH: Interference in immunoassay is an underestimated problem. Ann. Clin. Biochem 2002; 39; 366-373.
2. Rulander NJ, Cardamone D, Senior M, et. al. Interference from Anti-Streptavidin Antibody. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137: 1141-1146.
3. Anastase S. et al, Affinity chromatography of human anti-dextran antibodies. Isolation of two distinct populations. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1996 Nov 15; 686(2):141-50.
4. Larsson A. et al, Destruction of dextran-coated target cells by normal human lymphocytes and monocytes. Induction by a human anti-dextran serum with IgG antibodies restricted to the IgG2 subclass. Scand J Immunol. 1975; 4(3):241-52.
{12}
5. Kennel A. et al, Serum anti-dextran antibodies in IgA nephropathy. Clin Nephrol. 1995 Apr; 43(4):216-20.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was conducted to compare the Dimension Vista TTST assay to the predicate device, the Roche Elecsys Testosterone II assay. Two-Hundred and fifteen (215) unaltered patient serum samples were tested using one reagent lot. The sample results on the candidate device ranged from 11.0 to $982\mathrm{ng / dL}$ . Passing Bablok was used to analyze the data and the following regression data was obtained:
$$
y = 0. 9 0 x - 2. 6, r = 0. 9 9
$$
The slope showed an approximate bias of $-10\%$ between the candidate device and the predicate device; however, this shift is expected because the purpose of the device modification was to adjust the calibration to better align with the CDC reference sample concentration target levels. Therefore, test results from the candidate device do not, and are not expected to, directly correlate with test results from the predicate device. An additional method comparison study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy between the candidate device and the CDC reference method. The method comparison against the CDC reference method was the basis of the substantial equivalence determination.
A method comparison study was performed between the Dimension Vista TTST assay and the CDC reference method, ID-LC/MS/MS. One hundred thirteen (113) native serum samples were run in singlet on the candidate and comparator methods. The test results as measured by the candidate device ranged from 8.0 to $949\mathrm{ng / dL}$ . Regression analysis was performed using Passing-Bablok to obtain the following regression equation:
| Slope | 95% CI | Intercept | 95% CI | r | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.93 | 0.92-0.95 | 4.0 | 0.4-5.7 | 0.994 | 113 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Fifty nine sample sets were collected and analyzed by Deming weighted regression to compare testosterone results obtained from serum to serum collected in a serum separator tube (SST), Li-Heparin plasma, Na-Heparin plasma, and K2-EDTA plasma. Results from the serum samples ranged from 12 to $924\mathrm{ng / dL}$ . The regression equations are summarized in the following table:
{13}
| Comparative Sample type to Serum (n=59) | Slope | Intercept | Correlation coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Li-Hep plasma | 0.98 | -1.6 | 0.998 |
| Na-Hep plasma | 0.99 | -1.4 | 0.996 |
| K2-EDTA plasma | 1.00 | -1.1 | 0.998 |
| SST serum | 0.97 | -0.7 | 0.995 |
The matrix comparison study results support the use of SST serum, Li-heparin, Na-heparin, and K2-EDTA plasma with this assay.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
A reference interval study was performed for the Dimension Vista LOCI Total Testosterone assay. The sample groups tested consisted of males, > 50 years old (n=146); males between the ages of 21 to 50 years old (n=174); post-menopausal females, ages 48 to 85 years (n=146); and pre-menopausal females, ages 21 to 60 years (n=189). The central 95th percentile range of each sample category was calculated by finding the 2.5th ranked sample on the low end and the 97.5th ranked sample on the high end. The follow reference intervals were obtained for each category:
Adult males (21 to 50 yrs): 113 to 1065 ng/dL
Adult males (>50 yrs): 95 to 948 ng/dL
Pre-menopausal females: 9 to 53 ng/dL
{14}
Post-menopausal females: $< 8$ to $48\mathrm{ng / dL}$
A reference range study was performed on the pediatric population following CLSI EP28-A3c. Male and female pediatric patient samples were obtained spanning multiple age ranges and Tanner Stages. Serum specimens were obtained prospectively at eight sites located across the US. Each category of samples was analyzed separately. The reference intervals are presented in tables below for both Tanner Stages and age range:
Male Pediatric Reference Ranges According to Tanner Stage
| Tanner Stage | Gender | N | Lower 2.5% (ng/dL) | Upper 97.5% (ng/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stage I | Male | 39 | <8 | 64 |
| Stage II | Male | 41 | <8 | 166 |
| Stage III | Male | 42 | <8 | 609 |
| Stage IV | Male | 42 | 43 | 756 |
| Stage V | Male | 42 | 66 | 841 |
Female Pediatric Reference Range According to Tanner Stage
| Tanner Stage | Gender | N | Lower 2.5% (ng/dL) | Upper 97.5% (ng/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stage I | Female | 45 | <8 | 79 |
| Stage II | Female | 41 | <8 | 45 |
| Stage III | Female | 39 | <8 | 49 |
| Stage IV | Female | 40 | 8 | 54 |
| Stage V | Female | 41 | 14 | 71 |
Male Pediatric Reference Ranges According to Age
| Age | Gender | N | Lower (ng/dL) | Upper (ng/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2-10 years | Male | 44 | <8 | 31 |
| 11 years | Male | 21 | <8 | 321 |
| 12 years | Male | 24 | <8 | 531 |
| 13 years | Male | 20 | <8 | 609 |
| 14 years | Male | 30 | 23 | 652 |
| 15 years | Male | 20 | 126 | 792 |
| 16-21 years | Male | 44 | 116 | 779 |
Female Pediatric Reference Ranges According to Age
| Age | Gender | N | Lower (ng/dL) | Upper (ng/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2-10 years | Female | 40 | <8 | 80 |
| 11-15 years | Female | 125 | <8 | 49 |
| 16-21 years | Female | 35 | 20 | 56 |
Data Analysis: Each category of samples was analyzed separately. Due to the limited
{15}
availability of pediatric samples, the sample analysis method varied depending on the number of samples in each subgroup. The table below shows the relative percentiles reported based on available sample number.
| Number of Samples | Percentile Reported | Calculation Method |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 19≤N≤38 | 5thand 95th (Central 90th) | Non-parametric |
| N=39 | 2.5thand 97.5th (Central 95th) | Non-parametric |
| 40≤N≤119 | 2.5thand 97.5th (Central 95th) | Robust measure of location and spread, Horn PS, Pesce AJ Reference Intervals: A Users Guide. Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2005 |
| N≥120 | 2.5thand 97.5th (Central 95th) | None-parametric in accordance with CLSI guideline EP28-A3, Defining, Establishing and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory: Approved Guideline, 3rdedition. |
# N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
# O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.