Single-lumen endoscopes used clinically in a hospital setting
Not applicable for this study
Sterilization effectiveness for single-lumen endoscopes
Indications for Use
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is intended for use in hospitals and other human healthcare settings. It is designed to sterilize reusable medical devices that are sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation. The 3 hour cycle at 50°C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide sterilization of medical devices as well as for the sterilization of single-lumen flexible endoscopes.
Device Story
EOGas 4 is an ethylene oxide (EO) gas sterilizer for heat/moisture-sensitive reusable medical devices. System uses a gas-impervious flexible sterilization bag as the chamber and a unit-dose 100% EO cartridge. Operated in hospitals/healthcare settings. Process parameters: 17.6g EO, 50°C, 35-70% relative humidity, 3-hour exposure. Integrated process challenge device (AN7408.14) with Bacillus atrophaeus biological indicator (AN2203) monitors cycle efficacy; AN1087 Dosimeters provide cumulative gas exposure measurement. Healthcare providers load devices into the bag, initiate the cycle, and perform mandatory post-sterilization aeration (12-24 hours depending on material). Successful inactivation of the biological indicator confirms sterility. Benefits include effective sterilization of delicate instruments without heat or moisture damage.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validation performed per FDA 1993 guidance. Testing confirmed SAL of 10^-6 for metal, fabric, plastic, and single-lumen endoscopes. Process challenge device (AN7408.14) demonstrated resistance exceeding worst-case loads. Residue analysis confirmed compliance with AAMI/ANSI/ISO 10993-7. Electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety verified.
Technological Characteristics
Ethylene oxide gas sterilizer; unit-dose 100% EO cartridge; flexible gas-impervious sterilization bag chamber. Critical parameters: 50°C, 35-70% RH, 3-hour exposure. Includes AN1087 Dosimeters and Humidichips. Electrical safety/EMC compliant. Sterilization monitoring via integrated process challenge device with Bacillus atrophaeus biological indicator.
Indications for Use
Indicated for sterilization of reusable medical devices sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation in human healthcare settings. Includes surface sterilization and single-lumen flexible endoscopes (e.g., gastrovideoscopes, bronchoscopes, cystoscopes).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An ethylene gas sterilizer is a nonportable device intended for use by a health care provider that uses ethylene oxide (ETO) to sterilize medical products.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with a triple helix-like design extending from the profiles.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 18, 2015
Andersen Sterilizers, Inc. Dr. William Andersen President 3154 Caroline Drive Haw River, North Carolina 27258
Re: K150646
Trade/Device Name: EOgas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6860 Regulation Name: Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FLF Dated: October 20, 2015 Received: October 22, 2015
Dear Dr. William Andersen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Erin | Keith -S
Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
## 510(k) Number (if known) K150646
### Device Name
EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, AN4000.01 and AN4000.11
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is intended for use in hospitals and other human healthcare settings. It is designed to sterilize reusable medical devices that are sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation.
The 3 hour cycle at 50°C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide sterilization of medical devices as well as for the sterilization of single-lumen flexible endoscopes. The critical process parameters for the cycle are summarized in Table 1.
| | | | Table 1. Critical parameters for the 3 hour cycle in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer | |
|-------------|-------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| EO Amount | Temperature | Relative Humidity | EO Exposure Time | Total Cycle Time |
| 17.6 g ± 5% | 50°C + 3°C | 35-70% | 3 hours | 3.5 hours |
Maximum loads of specific materials and devices that have been validated are listed in Table 2. All validated maximum loads were processed without additional devices in the sterilizer.
Table 2. Load and material types validated in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer
| Device Type | Maximum Load | Device Examples | Required Aeration |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Metal | 24 lbs (11 kg) | Surgical instruments,<br>delicate sharps, including those<br>with hinges and mated surfaces | Metal instruments do not absorb EO;<br>Follow pouch or wrap manufacturer's<br>instructions (Example: Tyvek® pouches and<br>Sterisheet® wrap require $\ge$ 6 hours at 50°C) |
| Plastic | 7.0 lbs (3.2 kg) | Reusable power cords, trocars | 24 hours at 50°C; |
| Fabric | 6.1 lbs (2.8 kg) | Reusable cloth gowns, towels | Follow manufacturer's instructions |
| Single-lumen<br>Endoscope(s) | One (1) $\ge$ 2.0mm ID<br>$\le$ 1100mm length;<br>No additional devices<br>Four (4) $\ge$ 1.2 mm ID<br>$\le$ 700 mm length;<br>No additional devices | Gastrovideoscopes, gastrointestinal<br>videoscopes<br>Bronchoscopes, bronchovideoscopes,<br>cystoscopes, ureteroscopes,<br>choledocoscopes | 12 hours at 50°C;<br>Follow manufacturer's instructions |
Reusable medical devices must be aerated following the instructions of the device manufacturer and the packaging material manufacturer, then released for use after sterilization of an EZTest®- Gas Biological Indicator in the Andersen EOGas 4 SteriTest process challenge device.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
## FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| 5.1 | Applicant's Name and Address<br>Andersen Sterilizers, Inc.<br>3154 Caroline Drive<br>Haw River, NC 27258 |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 5.2 | Contact Person<br>William K. Andersen, BE, MD, FAAOS<br>President<br>Phone: 336-376-8622, Fax: 336-376-5428 |
| 5.3 | Date of Preparation<br>November 17, 2015 |
#### 5.4 Device
| Proprietary Name | EOGas 4® Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
| | Models AN4000.01 and AN4000.11 |
| Common Name | Ethylene oxide gas sterilizer |
| Classification | Class II (21 CFR 880.6860) |
| Medical Specialty | General Hospital |
| Product Code | FLF |
The refill kits for the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, including the accessories (sterilization bags, EOGas 4 cartridges, AN1087 Dosimeters®, and Humidichips®), are registered with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA #69340-7).
5.5 Predicate Device - Sterijet
| Device Name | Sterijet Ethylene Oxide Sterilization System |
|---------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) number | NA |
| Manufacturer | Andersen Products, Inc. |
The Sterijet sterilization system is a pre-amendment predicate (marketed for hospital use in the United States prior to the Medical Device Act). It has been in continuous use for commercial ethylene oxide sterilization since the early 1970's, although it was taken off the hospital market due to changes in EPA regulation of ethylene oxide-chlorofluorocarbon mixtures.
The purpose for this submission is to modify the sterilization bag and the ethylene oxide delivery method compared to the pre-amendment device. No modifications were made to the technology or intended use.
{5}------------------------------------------------
ર્ટ રે Predicate Device - Steri-Vac 4XL
| Device Name | Steri-VacTM 4XL Gas Sterilizer |
|---------------|--------------------------------|
| 510(k) number | K812867 |
| Manufacturer | 3MTM Company |
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Sterilizer uses a flexible sterilization bag as a sterilization chamber, whereas the predicate device has a fixed sterilization chamber. The principles of operation, intended use, and technology are otherwise substantially equivalent.
#### 5.7 Device Description
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, model AN4000.01 (115V) or AN4000.11 (230V), is intended to sterilize moisture, temperature, chemical corrosion, or radiation-sensitive reusable medical devices in healthcare facilities. The sterilant is a unit dose of 100% ethylene oxide contained in a cartridge, and the sterilization chamber is a gas-impervious flexible sterilization bag. Each sterilization cycle is monitored using cumulative gas exposure measurement (AN1087 Dosimeter), as well as a Bacillus atrophaeus biological indicator (AN2203) inserted into a process challenge device (AN7408.14 Andersen EOGas 4 Steritest) that is integrated into the sterilizer.
#### 5.8 Indications for Use
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is intended for use in hospitals and other human healthcare settings. It is designed to sterilize reusable medical devices that are sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation.
The 3 hour cycle at 50℃ in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is for surface sterilization of medical devices as well as for the sterilization of single-lumen flexible endoscopes. The critical process parameters for the cycle are summarized in Table 5-1.
| EO Amount | Temperature | Relative<br>Humidity | EO Exposure<br>Time | Total Cycle<br>Time |
|-------------|-------------|----------------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| 17.6 g ± 5% | 50°C ± 3°C | 35-70% | 3 hours | 3.5 hours |
## Table 5-1. Critical parameters for the 3 hour cycle in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer
{6}------------------------------------------------
Maximum loads of specific materials and devices that have been validated are listed in Table 5-2. All validated maximum loads were processed without additional devices in the sterilizer.
| Device Type | Maximum Load | Device Examples | Required Aeration |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Metal | 24 lbs (11 kg) | Surgical instruments,<br>delicate sharps, including<br>those with hinges and<br>mated surfaces | Metal instruments do not<br>absorb EO;<br>Follow pouch or wrap<br>manufacturer's instructions<br>for aeration requirements<br>(Examples: Tyvek® pouches<br>and Sterisheet® wrap require<br>$\u2265$ 6 hours aeration at 50°C). |
| Plastic | 7.0 lbs (3.2 kg) | Reusable power cords,<br>trocars | 24 hours at 50°C; Follow<br>manufacturer's instructions |
| Fabric | 6.1 lbs (2.8 kg) | Reusable cloth gowns,<br>towels | 24 hours at 50°C; Follow<br>manufacturer's instructions |
| Single-lumen<br>Endoscope(s) | One (1)<br>$\u2265$ 2.0 mm internal<br>diameter<br>$\u2264$ 1100 mm length;<br>No additional devices | Gastrovideoscopes,<br>gastrointestinal videoscopes | 12 hours at 50°C; Follow<br>manufacturer's instructions |
| | Four (4)<br>$\u2265$ 1.2 mm internal<br>diameter<br>$\u2264$ 700 mm length;<br>No additional devices | Bronchoscopes,<br>bronchovideoscopes,<br>cystoscopes, ureteroscopes,<br>choledocoscopes | 12 hours at 50°C; Follow<br>manufacturer's instructions |
Table 5-2. Load and material types validated in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer
Reusable medical devices must be aerated following the instructions of the device manufacturer and the packaging material manufacturer, then released for use after sterilization based on successful inactivation of an EZTest - Gas Biological Indicator in the Andersen EOGas 4 SteriTest process challenge device.
#### ર તે Substantial Equivalence Comparison
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices: the Sterijet Ethylene Oxide Sterilization System and the Steri-Vac 4XL Gas Sterilizer, because all three sterilizers are intended for the same use, designed in a similar way, use the same technology, and perform substantially equivalently.
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer differs from the predicate Sterilizer in the use of a sterilization bag that is ethylene oxide impermeable and gas delivery from a cartridge rather than direct injection. The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer differs from the predicate Steri-Vac 4XL sterilizer in the use of a flexible sterilization bag rather than a fixed sterilization chamber, and the use of approximately 20% of the ethylene oxide per cycle that is used in the predicate. These differences raise no issues related to safety or effectiveness of the subject device sterilization cycle. A comparison among the sterilizers is listed in Table 5-3.
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | Sterijet System | 4XL Sterilizer | EOGas 4 Sterilizer | Comparison |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Indoor ethylene oxide sterilizer in a healthcare setting | | | Same |
| Indications<br>for Use | Sterile processing of<br>reusable medical<br>devices using ethylene<br>oxide | Sterilization of heat<br>and/or moisture<br>sensitive devices<br>using ethylene<br>oxide | Sterilization of reusable<br>medical devices that are<br>sensitive to moisture,<br>heat, chemical<br>corrosion, or radiation | Equivalent |
| Design | Gas injection cabinet<br>and aerator<br>Injection of EO from a<br>tank; amount<br>depending on bag size | Similar design for exterior and cabinet<br>Unit dose EO | Unit dose EO | Equivalent. Similar<br>designs with flexible<br>chamber and unit dose EO<br>in the EOGas 4 sterilizer |
| | Flexible sterilization<br>chamber | Fixed sterilization<br>chamber | | |
| | Gas-diffusion bag | EO impervious<br>chamber | EO impervious bag | |
| | | | | |
| Technology | Use EO as sterilant;<br>EPA registered | | | Same |
| | Critical parameters: EO concentration, RH, temperature, and time | | | |
| Biological<br>Monitoring | N/A | 3MTM AttestTM EO<br>Pack placed in the<br>load; resistance<br>equivalent to an<br>AAMI routine syringe<br>test pack | AN7408.14 process<br>challenge device<br>integrated into the<br>sterilizer; resistance<br>greater than the<br>validated worst-case<br>loads in the sterilizer | Equivalent:<br>confirm<br>appropriate<br>sterilization<br>parameters<br>have been<br>met. |
| Safety | Verify compliance for electromagnetic compatibility and electrical<br>safety | | | Same |
| Performance | Sterilize reusable medical devices as labeled to a SAL of 10-6 with<br>reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness | | | Equivalent |
Table 5-3. Comparison among the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, the Sterijet Ethylene Oxide Sterilization System, and the Steri-Vac 4XL Gas Sterilizer
#### રું 10 Performance Testing
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer has been validated using applicable tests in the FDA 1993 "Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions for Sterilizers Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities".
The maximum loads of metal, fabric, plastic, and single-lumen flexible endoscopes that may be routinely sterilized in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer were defined and validated. Using the 3 hour cycle at 50°C, the EOGas 4 sterilization system reproducibly and effectively sterilizes 24 lbs of metal instruments with or without mated surfaces, 6.1 lbs of fabric, 7.0 lbs of
{8}------------------------------------------------
plastic devices, and four 1.2 x 700 mm endoscopes or one 2 x 1100 mm endoscope, achieving a minimum sterility assurance level of 10°. All validated maximum loads were processed without additional devices in the sterilizer.
The Andersen process challenge device, consisting of a BI receptacle with a self-contained biological indicator, was developed for the 3 hr cycle at 50°C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer. It represents a rigorous challenge to the EOGas 4 sterilization process as it impedes gas diffusion, heating, and humidification. Its resistance characteristics are greater than the same BI placed in the worst-case location in each of the worst-case validation loads.
The validation testing demonstrated that exposure to EO gas under the defined loads and physical parameters achieved a minimum sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10th for surfaces, mated surfaces, and endoscope lumens. The effectiveness of the sterilization process for the loads was confirmed by successful sterilization in simulated-use testing using instruments with mated surfaces as well as endoscope lumens. In addition, in-use testing confirmed the ability of the cycle to sterilize single-lumen endoscopes used clinically in a hospital setting.
Process residue analysis showed that the majority of EO or ethylene chlorohydrin residuals remaining on even the most absorbent materials tested in the study met the requirements of AAMI/ANSI/ISO 10993-7, demonstrating that the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer and its accessories are safe to use if the guidance and instructions are followed. The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer was tested to verify compliance with requirements for electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety.
Physical performance tests demonstrated that the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, EOGas cartridges, sterilization bags, and Humidichips met their performance specifications. The EOGas 4 sterilization system achieved and maintained the cycle specifications for EO concentration, temperature, time, and relative humidity. Both the sterilizer and the accessories consistently operated in accordance with predetermined criteria. The 3 hour cycle at 50℃ in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer was repeatable and reliable under the indicated test load conditions.
## Conclusion:
The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.