Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port
Applicant
Cedic S.R.L.
Product Code
PIO · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Apr 2, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5980
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is intended for connecting a male oral tip syringe or a male Luer slip tip syringe to an enteral giving set or enteral catheter with an ENFit medication port.
Device Story
Transition connector facilitating interconnection between legacy enteral feeding device fittings and new ISO/IEC 80369-3 compliant ENFit fittings. Device features mating components at each end: one side connects to male oral tip or Luer slip tip syringes; other side connects to ENFit medication ports on enteral sets/catheters. Used in clinical settings to enable enteral feeding when incompatible connector generations coexist. Not intended for patient contact, though accidental contact possible. Central fluid path allows flow during feeding. Operated by clinicians/healthcare staff. Benefits patient by ensuring compatibility between diverse enteral feeding components, preventing misconnections, and maintaining continuity of care during transition to new standards.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Testing included enteral connector misconnection assessment, human factors, fluid leakage, stress cracking, resistance to separation (axial load/unscrewing), and resistance to overriding. Luer components tested for compliance with ISO 594-1. Risk analysis provided per ISO 14971:2007.
Technological Characteristics
Injection-molded ABS HF 380; end cap colored with Remafin Violet PE43076356-ZT. Rigid/semi-rigid material construction. Complies with ISO 80369-1:2010 and ISO/IEC AAMI/CN3 (PS):2014. Mechanical interface for enteral fluid path. No software or electronics.
Indications for Use
Indicated for connecting male oral tip or male Luer slip tip syringes to enteral giving sets or catheters featuring ENFit medication ports. Intended for prescription use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gastrointestinal tube and accessories is a device that consists of flexible or semi-rigid tubing used for instilling fluids into, withdrawing fluids from, splinting, or suppressing bleeding of the alimentary tract. This device may incorporate an integral inflatable balloon for retention or hemostasis. This generic type of device includes the hemostatic bag, irrigation and aspiration catheter (gastric, colonic, etc.), rectal catheter, sterile infant gavage set, gastrointestinal string and tubes to locate internal bleeding, double lumen tube for intestinal decompression or intubation, feeding tube, gastroenterostomy tube, Levine tube, nasogastric tube, single lumen tube with mercury weight balloon for intestinal intubation or decompression, and gastro-urological irrigation tray (for gastrological use).
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The barium enema retention catheter and tip with or without a bag that is a gastrointestinal tube and accessory or a gastronomy tube holder accessory is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I (general controls) for the dissolvable nasogastric feed tube guide for the nasogastric tube. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 876.9.
Predicate Devices
Cedic Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port (K140581)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes entwined around it. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 2, 2015
Cedic S.r.1. % Roger Gray VP. Ouality and Regulatory Donawa Lifescience Consulting S.r.1. Piazza Albania, 10 Rome, 00153 Italy
Re: K150010 Trade/Device Name: Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port Regulation Number: 21 CFR§ 876.5980 Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal tube and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: PIO Dated: December 29, 2014 Received: January 2, 2015
Dear Roger Gray,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Benjamin R. Fisher -S
Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
### K150010
#### Device Name
Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for is intended for connecting a male oral tip syringe or a male Luer slip tip syringe to an enteral giving set or enteral catheter with an ENFit medication port.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span> <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> | <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
***DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Cedic" in a stylized, cursive font. The letters are white with a subtle shadow effect, giving them a three-dimensional appearance. The background is a solid teal color, providing a clean and contrasting backdrop for the text.
# 510(k) Summary
| Device Name: | Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for<br>Medication Port |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Type of 510(k) submission: | Traditional |
| Date of Submission: | 29 December 2014 |
| Manufacturer: | Cedic S.r.l.<br>Biomedical Division<br>Via Liberazione, 63/9<br>20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI)<br>Italy |
| 510(k) Owner and Contact: | Ms Tiziana Melis<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>Cedic S.r.l.<br>Biomedical Division<br>Via Liberazione, 63/9<br>20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI)<br>Italy |
| Phone:<br>Fax:<br>Email: | +39 02 5530 0174<br>+39 02 5530 1487<br>tiziana.melis@cedicbio.com |
| FDA Registration Number: | 3003593728 |
| Owner/Operator Number: | 9063446 |
| 510(k) Submitter and Contact: | Mr Roger Gray<br>VP Quality and Regulatory<br>Donawa Lifescience Consulting<br>Piazza Albania 10<br>00153 Rome<br>Italy |
| Phone:<br>Fax:<br>Email: | +39 06 578 2665<br>+39 06 574 3786<br>rgray@donawa.com |
| FDA Product Code: | PIO |
| FDA Regulation Number: | 876.5980 |
| FDA Classification Name: | Enteral Specific Transition Connectors |
| Classification Panel: | Gastroenterology and Urology |
| Common Name: | Transition Connectors for Enteral Applications |
| FDA Classification: | Class II |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image features the word "Cedic" in a stylized, cursive font. The word is white and has a slight glow or shadow effect, making it stand out against the background. The background is a gradient of teal, with the color becoming slightly darker towards the bottom of the image.
### Device Description
The introduction of new connectors to devices and accessories for enteral feeding applications, in order to help avoid misconnections with devices intended for other clinical applications, has resulted in the short-term need to connectors that will allow devices with existing ('legacy') end connectors to be connected with newer devices having end connectors meeting the relevant requirements of the ISO/IEC 80369 series of standards.
Cedic is already marketing the Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port in the US following FDA clearance, this device being for connecting a male oral tip syringe to an enteral giving set or enteral catheter with an ENFit medication port. This connector is available with and without end сар.
Cedic is now planning to introduce a very similar transition connector into the US market, this being the Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port, for connecting a male oral tip syringe or a male Luer slip tip syringe to an enteral giving set or enteral catheter with an ENFit medication port. This connector is also available with and without end cap.
The Cedic ENFit Transition Connectors are intended for prescription use only.
#### Indications for Use/Intended Use
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is intended for connecting a male oral tip syringe or a male Luer slip tip syringe to an enteral giving set or enteral catheter with an ENFit medication port.
#### Principle of operation, mechanism of action, and interaction with the patient:
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port operates by providing a means of interconnecting incompatible enteral feeding device end fittings together, so that patient enteral feeding can take place when 'new generation' end fittings in accordance with ISO/IEC 80369-3 need to be connected to previous designs of end fitting.
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port provides the mating components at each end of the connector that allow connection with the 'new' end of the connector, and connection with 'old' end fittings at the other.
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port will be used in combination with legally marketed enteral giving sets, enteral catheters, oral tip syringes or Luer slip tip syringes.
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is not intended to come into contact with the patient, but accidental contact may occur. The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port has a central fluid path through which flow during the feeding process.
#### Device Specification
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is for connecting a male oral tip syringe or a male Luer slip tip syringe to an enteral giving set or enteral catheter with an ENFit medication port. This connector is available with and without end cap.
The PGLock end of the connector is designed in compliance with ISO 80369-1:2010 and ISO/IEC AAMI/CN3 (PS):2014.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Cedic" in a stylized, cursive font. The word is white and has a slight glow around it, making it stand out against the teal background. The "e" in "Cedic" is stylized with a circle around it, giving it a unique look. The overall design is simple and modern.
#### Manufacture
The Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is manufactured by injection molding from ABS HF 380. Where fitted, the end cap is colored with Remafin Violet PE43076356-ZT (2%). These materials are identical to those used for the selected predicate device.
#### Performance Data:
In relation to performance data for such ENFit Transition Connectors, according to the FDA publication 'Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Safety Considerations for 510(k) Submissions to Mitigate the Risks of Misconnections with Small-bore Connectors Intended for Enteral Applications', July 27, 2012:
"Adapters are used to connect enteral devices and provide additional connection points where misconnection events can occur. To mitigate misconnection via adapters, the FDA recommends that adapters be treated similarly to enteral connectors, as described in Section VI.A, B, and C within this guidance. This means that they should be made of rigid or semi-rigid materials, and mechanical testing should be performed according to recommendations described in AAMI/ANSI/ISO 80369-1, or an equivalent alternative, to demonstrate that adapters are specific and compatible for enteral applications only and are non-interconnectable with the connectors of non-enteral devices."
The FDA draft guidance includes in Section VI. A, B and C the following recommendations:
#### A. Connector materials
"FDA recommends that enteral connectors be made of rigid or semi-rigid materials, as described in AAMI/ANS//ISO 80369-1, Clause 4, with testing according to ASTM D747 or ASTM D790, or equivalent. Use of rigid or semi-rigid materials will reduce the likelihood of forced fits between flexible connectors that are not intended to connect with each other."
In this respect, the Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is made of the appropriate rigid or semi-rigid materials.
#### B. Mechanical testing of enteral connectors to assess incompatibility
"FDA recommends mechanical force testing of enteral connectors following AAMI/ANSVISO 80369-1, Clause 5.8, Annex B methods, or an equivalent alternative, to demonstrate that enteral connectors are non-interconnectable with connectors from other health care applications."
Bench tests have been carried out on samples of the Cedic Oral/Luer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port. The tests carried out include:
- Enteral connector misconnection assessment ●
- Human factors
- . Fluid leakage
- Stress cracking
- . Resistance to separation from axial load
- Resistance to separation from unscrewing
- Resistance to overriding
- . Disconnection by unscrewing
The above tests include testing of the Luer part of the transition connector to demonstrate compliance with the relevant clauses of ISO 594-1.
#### C. Enteral connector risk assessment
"When an applicant submits a new 510(k) application, they should provide a risk assessment to demonstrate they have effectively mitigated the risk of misconnection with their new product. There should be objective evidence that risks have been reduced to acceptable levels according to ISO
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Cedic" in a stylized, cursive font. The word is white and has a slight shadow effect, making it appear to be slightly raised from the background. The background is a gradient of blue, with the top being a lighter shade and the bottom being a darker shade. The "e" in Cedic has a circle around it.
14971:2007 or equivalent. For example, the applicant may provide evidence of selection of appropriate material (Section VI.A, above) and quantitative mechanical testing data to demonstrate that the proposed enteral connector has a reduced risk of forming stable attachments to connectors routing into non-enteral devices (Section VI.B, above)."
In this respect, this 510(k) submission includes a copy of the risk analysis for the subject transition connector.
#### Predicate device
The Predicate Device selected for comparison with the Subject Device is the Cedic Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port
| Sponsor: | Cedic Srl |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number: | K140581 |
| Clearance Date: | 17 October 2014 |
| FDA Product Code: | PIO |
| Classification Name: | Enteral specific transition connectors |
| Regulation No: | 876.5980 |
The Subject Device and the Predicate Device both share many identical or similar properties and features, and none of the differences have any significant effect on safety or effectiveness of the Subject Devices.
#### Conclusion:
Based on the information contained within this submission, it is concluded that the Cedic OrallLuer Enteral ENFit Transition Connector for Medication Port is substantially equivalent to the identified predicate device already in interstate commerce within the USA.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.