The Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augment is intended for use in primary or revision total knee arthroplasty where there is a femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal defect secondary to trauma, failed previous prosthesis, or severe degeneration. The Triathlon Cone Augment is intended to be affixed to the mating femoral and/or tibial component using bone cement. The cones are intended for fixation as an assembled construct in the distal femur and/or proximal tibia, with or without bone cement.
Device Story
Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augments are sterile, single-use orthopedic accessories for primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Used to address metaphyseal bone defects in the distal femur or proximal tibia caused by trauma, failed implants, or severe degeneration. Devices are manufactured from commercially pure titanium; designed to be cemented to Triathlon® TS femoral components or Universal baseplates; implanted into the bone with or without cement. Surgeons use these to reconstruct bone voids, providing structural support for the primary knee prosthesis. Benefits include restoring joint stability and enabling successful TKA in patients with significant bone loss. Operated by orthopedic surgeons in hospital settings.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical bench testing: cantilever fatigue (10 million cycles per ASTM F1800), torque testing, impaction/plastic deformation analysis, and comparative micromotion testing against predicate devices in simulated tibial/femoral cavities. Material chemistry and mechanical properties verified against ASTM F67 and FDA guidance for porous-coated implants.
Technological Characteristics
Commercially pure titanium (ASTM F67, ASTM F1580). Porous-coated surface for bone/cement apposition. Available in femoral, symmetric tibial, and asymmetric tibial designs. Single-use, sterile. Mechanical fixation via cement or press-fit. Complies with FDA guidance for porous-coated uncemented prostheses.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with painful, disabling knee joint disease (degenerative, rheumatoid, or post-traumatic arthritis), post-traumatic loss of joint function, moderate varus/valgus/flexion deformity, revision of failed knee replacement, or distal femur/proximal tibia fractures. Specifically indicated for patients with bone loss requiring metaphyseal reconstruction, femoral/tibial bone voids, or extensive resection due to severe degeneration or trauma.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device is designed to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement. This identification includes fixed-bearing knee prostheses where the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene tibial bearing is rigidly secured to the metal tibial base plate.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance: “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 888.1 for the availability of this guidance.
Predicate Devices
Zimmer Trabecular Metal Knee System Augments (K053340)
Triathlon® Tritanium® Metal Backed Patella (K132624)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's name in a circular arrangement around a stylized symbol. The symbol consists of a stylized human figure with three faces in profile, layered on top of each other. The faces are connected to a flowing, ribbon-like shape at the bottom.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
January 13, 2015
Stryker Orthopaedics Ms. Margaret Klippel Associate Strategic Regulatory Affairs Manager 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, New Jersey 07430
Re: K143393 Trade/Device Name: Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augments Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3565 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MBH, JWH Dated: November 25, 2014 Received: November 26, 2014
Dear Ms. Klippel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Lori A. Wiggins -S
for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
#### 510(k) Number (if known) K143393
Device Name
Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augments
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications:
· Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
· Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function.
• Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability.
· Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure.
• Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be standard fracture -management techniques.
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Total Knee System components are indicated for both uncemented use.
The Triathlon® Total Knee System beaded with Peri-Apatite components are intended for uncemented use only.
The Triathlon® All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only.
Additional Indications for Posterior Stabilized (PS) and Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- · Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint.
- · Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament.
- · Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint.
Additional Indications for Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
· Severe instability of the knee secondary to compromised collateral ligament integrity or function.
Indications for Bone Augments:
• Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee secondary to: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis, complicated by the presence of bone loss.
· Salvage of previous unsuccessful total knee replacement or other surgical procedure, accompanied by bone loss.
Additional Indications for Cone Augments:
· Severe degeneration or trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement
- · Femoral and Tibial bone voids
- · Metaphyseal reconstruction
The Triathlon TS Cone Augments are intended for cemented or cementless use.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary
| Sponsor | Stryker Orthopaedics<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430 |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person | Margaret Klippel<br>Associate Strategic Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>Howmedica Osteonics Corp<br>Margaret.klippel@stryker.com<br>Ph: 201-831-5559<br>Fax: 201-831-4559 |
| Date Prepared: | November 25, 2014 |
| Proprietary Name: | Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augments |
| Common Name: | Total Knee Joint Replacement |
| Classification Name: | Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated<br>uncemented prosthesis. (888.3565)<br>Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-<br>constrained cemented prosthesis (888.3560) |
| Product Codes: | MBH, JWH |
### Legally Marketed Predicate Devices to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed:
- Zimmer Trabecular Metal Knee System Augments (K053340)
- DePuy Universal Gription™ TF Cones (Knee) DePuy Orthopaedics (K100391) .
### Legally Marketed Reference Devices Used to Support Substantial Equivalence:
- Triathlon® Tritanium® Tibial Baseplate (K123486) ●
- Triathlon® Tritanium® Metal Backed Patella (K132624) ●
### Device Description:
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augment is an extension of the Triathlon® Total Knee System product line intended to be used as an optional accessory component in primary or revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. It is a sterile, single-use device that is compatible for use with other Triathlon® Total Knee System components. The Tritanium® Cone Augment is composed of commercially pure titanium (raw material per ASTM F1580, processed material per ASTM F67).
The subject device is designed to be used with the Triathlon® TS femoral components and Triathlon® Universal baseplates and is compatible with other Triathlon® Total Knee System
{5}------------------------------------------------
components. The cones are intended to be cemented to the respective Triathlon femoral and/or tibial component, and are intended for fixation within the proximal tibia or distal femur with or without bone cement. Tritanium Femoral and Tibial Cones are intended to be used where there is a femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal defect secondary to trauma, failed previous prosthesis, or severe degeneration.
There are three designs of Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments:
- Femoral Cone Augments
- . Symmetric Tibial Cone Augments
- . Asymmetric Tibial Cone Augments
#### Intended Use:
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augment is intended for use in primary or revision total knee arthroplasty where there is a femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal defect secondary to trauma, failed previous prosthesis, or severe degeneration. The Triathlon Cone Augment is intended to be affixed to the mating femoral and/or tibial component using bone cement. The cones are intended for fixation as an assembled construct in the distal femur and/or proximal tibia, with or without bone cement.
#### Indications:
The Triathlon Tritanium Cone augments have the same Indications for Use as the Triathlon TS Total Knee System – additional indications for cone augments are noted below.
### General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
- Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function.
- Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability.
- Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure.
- Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be stabilized by standard fracture -management techniques.
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Total Knee System components are indicated for both uncemented and cemented use.
The Triathlon® Total Knee System beaded and beaded with Peri-Apatite components are intended for uncemented use only.
The Triathlon® All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Additional Indications for Posterior Stabilized (PS) and Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint.
- Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament.
- Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint.
### Additional Indications for Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- Severe instability of the knee secondary to compromised collateral ligament integrity or function.
# Indications for Bone Auqments:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee secondary to: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis, complicated by the presence of bone loss.
- Salvage of previous unsuccessful total knee replacement or other surgical procedure, accompanied by bone loss.
# Additional Indications for Cone Augments:
- Severe degeneration or trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement
- Femoral and Tibial bone voids
- . Metaphyseal reconstruction
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augment components are intended for cemented or cementless use.
Summary of Technological Characteristics: Device comparisons and performance testing show that the Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augment is substantially equivalent to its predicate in terms of intended use, indications, design, materials, performance characteristics and operational principles.
Non-Clinical Testing: The following non-clinical laboratory testing was performed to determine substantial equivalence:
- Cantilever Fatigue Testing in accordance with ASTM F1800- Cone augments survived . ten million cycles of clinically relevant loading without failure -
- . Torque Testing was performed to establish that the cone augments are able to withstand clinically relevant torque loads
- . Plastic Deformation of Cone Augments – cones were metallographically examined in the post-impacted condition – indicated porous surface can withstand impaction without loss of coating integrity
- . Micromotion of Triathlon Tibial Cone Augments – comparative testing was performed to evaluate the initial stability of the Triathlon Tibial Cone construct within the prepared
{7}------------------------------------------------
simulated tibial cavity during a simulated stair descent activity. Micromotion of the baseplate/cone construct with respect to the polyurethane foam constructs used to simulate the proximal tibia was recorded for Triathlon cone constructs and compared to the micromotion of the Zimmer Trabecular metal cone constructs (predicate device). This testing indicates that the Triathlon Tibial Cone Augments are at least equivalent to the Zimmer Trabecular Metal Cones in their ability to resist micromotion.
- Triathlon Tritanium Femoral Cone Augment Micromotion - comparative testing was performed to evaluate the initial stability of the Triathlon Femoral Cone construct within the prepared simulated femoral cavity during a normal walking profile. This testing indicates that the Triathlon Femoral Cone Augment is at least equivalent to the Zimmer Femoral Cone Augment in the ability to resist micromotion.
- . Characterization of the Physical Properties of the Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augment – this testing established that the porous coating meets the requirements outlined in the FDA guidance documents, "Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants With Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone Or Bone Cement", April 28, 1994, and FDA Guidance Document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses, Guidance for Industry and FDA", January 16, 2003.
- Characterization of the Material Chemistry of the Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augment the results of the chemical analysis illustrates that the material meets the requirements set forth in ASTM F67 for Grade 4 unalloyed titanium material, and is similar to a reference device
- Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments testing was performed to characterize the mechanical properties of cone augments. Surface treated test coupons processed identically to the final device were used. The subject devices met or exceeded the pre-established performance criteria, and are similar to the reference device in terms of performance criteria.
Clinical Testing: Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
Conclusion: Based upon a comparison of intended use, materials, summary of technological characteristics, and preclinical testing, the Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augment is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified in this premarket notification.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.