K143211 · Vital Art and Science Incorporated · HOQ · Mar 20, 2015 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K143211
Device Name
myVision Track Model 005
Applicant
Vital Art and Science Incorporated
Product Code
HOQ · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
Mar 20, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 886.1330
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device
Indications for Use
The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is intended for the detection of central 3 degrees metamorphopsia (visual distortion) in patients with maculopathy, including age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, and as an aid in monitoring progression of disease factors causing metamorphopsia. It is intended to be used by patients who have the capability to regularly perform a simple self-test at home. The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is not intended to diagnose; diagnosis is the responsibility of the prescribing eye-care professional.
Device Story
myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is a downloadable mobile application for patient-supplied Apple iOS devices (iPhone/iPad/iPod Touch). It implements a shape discrimination hyperacuity (SDH) vision test to detect central metamorphopsia. The device displays four circles, one of which is distorted via sinusoidal radius modulation; the patient identifies the distorted circle (4-alternative forced choice). Results are transmitted to a secure portal for physician review. Used at home by patients; monitored by eye-care professionals (MD, DO, or OD). If significant vision worsening is detected, the system alerts the physician, who decides if an earlier clinical visit is required. The device aids in monitoring disease progression; it does not provide a diagnosis. Benefits include improved accuracy over 3-choice tests by reducing chance-level guessing and enabling remote monitoring of maculopathy patients.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence includes a usability study (n=10, ages 19-68) demonstrating effective self-testing and user-friendliness. A cross-sectional study (n=86; 40 normal, 46 maculopathy) compared the 4AFC Model 0005 to the 3AFC Model 0003, finding no significant difference in performance (slight bias of 0.06 logRM attributed to reduced guessing). Platform validation (n=4) across iPod Touch, iPad Air, and iPhone 6+ showed test variability <0.10 logRM and no significant difference in mean results (p>0.95).
Technological Characteristics
Software-based vision test (SDH) delivered as an iOS application. Operates on validated Apple hardware (iPhone/iPad/iPod Touch). Uses a 4-alternative forced choice (4AFC) algorithm. Connectivity via user-supplied internet for data upload to a secure physician portal. Access controlled via 10-digit Rx code.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with maculopathy, including age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, to detect and monitor central 3-degree metamorphopsia. Intended for home self-testing by patients capable of performing the test.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An Amsler grid is a device that is a series of charts with grids of different sizes that are held at 30 centimeters distance from the patient and intended to rapidly detect central and paracentral irregularities in the visual field.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized graphic of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines representing hair or fabric.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 20, 2015
Vital Art and Science, LLC. c/o Ms. Maureen O'Connell President O'Connell Regulatory Consultants, Inc. 5 Timber Lane North Reading, MA 01864
Re: K143211
> Trade/Device Name: myVisionTrack® Model 0005 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.1330 Regulation Name: Amsler grid Regulatory Class: Class I Product Code: HOO Dated: February 13, 2015 Received: February 18, 2015
Dear Ms. O'Connell:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies.
{1}------------------------------------------------
You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Kesia Y. Alexander -S
for Malvina B. Eydelman, MD Director. Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name myVisionTrack® Model 0005
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The my VisionTrack® Model 0005 is intended for the detection of central 3 degrees metamorphopsia (visual distortion) in patients with maculopathy, including age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, and as an aid in monitoring progression of disease factors causing metamorphopsia. It is intended to be used by patients who have the capability to regularly perform a simple self-test at home. The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is not intended to diagnose; diagnosis is the responsibility of the prescribing eye-care professional.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable):
| <span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <span style="font-family: Symbol;"> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">x</span> </span> </span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <span style="font-family: Symbol;"> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">□</span> </span> </span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| Date prepared: | March 20, 2015 |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Owner: | Vital Art and Science, LLC |
| | 2725 N. Spring Drive |
| | Richardson, TX 75082-4233 |
| | Phone: 214-989-7130 |
| Contact Person: | Maureen O'Connell |
| | O'Connell Regulatory Consultants, Inc |
| | 5 Timber Lane |
| | North Reading, MA 01864 |
| | Phone: 978-207-1245 |
| | Fax: 978-824-2541 |
### Name of the Device and Classification
| Type of 510(k) Submission: | Traditional |
|----------------------------|------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | myVisionTrack® Model 0005 |
| Common Name: | Home vision function monitor |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 886.1330 |
| Regulation Name: | Amsler grid |
| Regulatory Class: | Class I |
| Product Code: | HOQ |
### Predicate Devices:
The Vital Art and Science, LLC myVisionTrack® Model 0005 (mVTTM) is substantially equivalent to the following predicate medical device:
- myVisionTrack® Model 0003 supplied by Vital Art and Science Incorporated; Perimeter, Automatic, AC-Powered, 21 CFR 886.1605; K121738; Product Code: HPT
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Device Description:
The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is a vision function test provided as a downloadable app on to the user's supplied cell phone or tablet. The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 implements a shape discrimination hyperacuity (SDH) vision test which allows patients to perform their own vision test at home. If a significant worsening of vision function is detected the physician will be notified and provided access to the vision self-test results so that they can decide whether the patient needs to be seen sooner than their next already scheduled appointment.
The test images used by myVisionTrack® Model 0005 are shown below. The distorted version is created by modulating the radius of the circle with a sinusoid. The user is shown four circles and asked to identify the distorted circle
Image /page/4/Picture/3 description: The image shows a black smartphone with a gray screen. On the screen, there are three circles and one star-shaped figure. The circles are arranged in a vertical line on the left side of the screen, while the star is on the right side.
#### Indications for Use:
The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is intended for the detection and characterization of central 3 degrees metamorphopsia (visual distortion) in patients with maculopathy. including age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, and as an aid in monitoring progression of disease factors causing metamorphopsia. It is intended to be used by patients who have the capability to regularly perform a simple self-test at home.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The my VisionTrack® is not intended to diagnose; diagnosis is the responsibility of the prescribing eye-care professional.
### Indications for Use as compared to the Predicate Device:
The Indications for Use is identical to the Indications for User for the Predicate Device.
## Substantial Equivalence Comparison
The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is a modification to the myVisionTrack® Model 0003 (K121738) which was cleared in February, 2013. The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 has the same intended use and indications for use, principles of operation, and similar technological characteristics as the previously cleared predicate. The major elements of the technology remain unchanged. The target population and the area of vision monitored is identical between the two devices. The vision test algorithm used and the test algorithm implementation is identical between the two devices.
The two devices are identical with the exception of the differences which are as follows:
Hardware Platform and Display Resolution: The my VisionTrack® Model 0003 was delivered as an app already installed on an Apple iPhone 4S device. The myVisionTrack® Model 0005 will be distributed as an app for a user supplied device including the following devices:
> iPhone 4s, 5, 5c, 5s, 6, 6+ iPod Touch 4, 5 iPad 2, 3, 4 iPad Air, Air 2 iPad mini, mini 2/3 (retina) iOS Support is iOS 6, 7, and 8
Some of the older devices have a lower pixels/degree than the previously cleared iPhone 4S, but previously conducted clinical studies on these devices have demonstrated there is no significant difference in the clinical results.
The my VisionTrack® Model 0005 only runs on hardware and operating systems that have been fully validated and approved by Vital Art and Science, LLC. This is controlled by doing a check on start-up of the app and comparing against a list of approved hardware and iOS.
Method Supplied: The myVisionTrack® Model 0003 was supplied with the necessary hardware while the myVisionTrack® Model 0005 will be provided as an app available on the Apple iTunes store. Instructions for how to download, install and unlock the app will be provided on the Rx provided by the Prescribing Doctor through a secure portal. These
{6}------------------------------------------------
printed instructions will also point the user towards Vital Art and Science, LLC's website, where there will be detailed instructions and videos on how to download, install and take the test. The Rx will also have information on how to access our 24/7 support center for any additional help they may need.
Data Upload Capability: The myVisionTrack® Model 0003 was being supplied with a device that was already set-up with a cellular data connection. In the myVisionTrack® Model 0005, the patient will be supplying the Apple device including the connection to the internet.
Number of test circles: The myVisionTrack® Model 0003 was limited to a maximum of 3 displayed test circles by the small display size of the iPhone Models 1 - 3. All of the original development work and initial studies were done on these smaller devices. Since the iPhone 4 the size of the display is such that we can fit in 4 test circles. It is desirable to transition to a 4 circle test because it reduces the "chance level" of the user guessing the correct circle from 33% to 25% and so improves the accuracy of the test. The underlying methodology and science of the test remains unchanged. The only change made here is to change from a "3 alternative forced choice" or 3AFC algorithm to a "4 alternative forced choice" or 4AFC algorithm.
Orientation of Display: In the my VisionTrack® Model 0003 users had been encouraged to test using 2 hands to hold the device in a "landscape" orientation. As Apple has come out with larger devices, such as the iPad and iPad mini, and added more features including the "front facing camera" it has become clear to us that most patients are more comfortable holding the device in a "portrait" orientation. This is the standard orientation for holding the iPhone when making phone calls, and using most other functions.
Method of managing "by Rx Only": The myVisionTrack® Model 0003 was controlled through physical management of the devices themselves. With the change to a downloadable app for the myVisionTrack® Model 0005 a different method is required to limit access to the app to those with a valid prescription, and to insure the test results and alerts are delivered to that prescribing doctor. The method implemented in the myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is to use a 10 digit Rx Code. This code is generated on Vital Art and Science, LLC's secure Portal by the prescribing doctor, or someone on their staff. This is a one-time-use code that is invalid for any additional user once it has been used. The code is printed automatically from the Portal at the time the device is prescribed, and once it is used to unlock the app it provides the connection required to insure that all test results are attributed to that patient, and results delivered to their prescribing doctor.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Who can prescribe: The myVisionTrack® Model 0003 was cleared for Prescription Use only by order of a physician (MD or DO). Since the bulk of eve care is provided by Optometrists (ODs) in the United States, Vital Art wants to allow ODs to prescribe the app as well.
In conclusion, the proposed myVisionTrack® Model 0005 as compared to the already cleared Model 0003 predicate device has:
- Identical indications for use;
- . Similar physical composition, in that both use visual testing software delivered on a validated hardware platform and operating system;
- . A more traditional prescription method where the doctor delivers a paper Rx with instructions on how to download and install the app instead of delivering a device with the app already installed;
- . An identical vision test algorithm, but with the change from 3 to 4 choices of displayed images:
- . An identical method of operation for the patient to perform self-testing at home; and
- . An identical central monitoring of patient self-test results, with a new method to insure test results and alerts are being delivered only to their prescribing doctor.
Therefore the myVisionTrack® Model 0005 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
## Performance Data
Verification and validation of the software confirmed that the software performs as intended. A Usability Study was independently performed with 10 subjects (5 normal and 5 with maculopathy) and concluded that subjects could effectively self-test their vision and that they found the device to be user-friendly. Participants ranged in age from 19 to 68. The usability study concluded that with a training session demo, users should not encounter any difficulties completing the self-test. Participants reported no complaints on device or myVisionTrack® Model 0005. All participants did meet the 90% criteria of taking the vision self-test without encountering any issues that prevented them from completing the test. 90% of participants understood how to access the "More" screen and additional functions. 80% were able to complete the vision self-test in less than 10 minutes.
A Cross-sectional Study was also performed with 86 subjects (40 with normal vision and 46 with various types of maculopathy) to do a direct comparison of the myVisionTrack® Model 0003 to the myVisionTrack® Model 0005. The study concluded that the performance of the myVisionTrack® Model 0005 employing a 4AFC testing paradigm is not significantly different from that of myVisionTrack® Model 0003 using a 3AFC testing paradigm. The test results obtained with these two models are comparable with each other. While there is a slight bias of approximately 0.06 logRM (log10 of Radial Modulation amplitude) worse results for the myVisionTrack® Model 0005 measurements compared to myVisionTrack® Model 0003. This bias is not surprising and
{8}------------------------------------------------
it agrees with the design hypothesis that 4AFC paradigm reduces the chance level (lucky guesses) when compared with 3AFC, so that it reduces the likelihood of overestimating patients' ability to detect distortion in a shape discrimination task, which will in fact allow myVisionTrack® Model 0005 to obtain more reliable self-testing results. Additionally 4 patients with maculopathy were tested using an iPod Touch (3AFC), an iPad air (4AFC, circular arrangement of stimulus patterns) and an iPhone 6+ (4AFC, rectangular arrangement of stimulus patterns) to confirm performance across device platforms. The test results demonstrated that the test variability across different devices is comparable or smaller than 0.10 logRM, which is the test variability over time for the mVT™ test. The mean results across all patients are -2.11 logRM, -2.07 logRM, and -2.07 logRM for iPod Touch, iPad air, and iPhone 6+, respectively, which is not significantly different from each other (F=0.047, p>0.95).
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.