A retrospective control group was used to compare the rate of tooth movement in subjects using the OrthoPulse device versus those undergoing standard orthodontic treatment.
Retrospective control; Orthodontic treatment; Tooth movement rate
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Controlled study of OrthoPulse with brackets and wires; Controlled study with retrospectively selected control group; Follow-up/Duration: 6 months
33 subjects with permanent dentition, moderate to severe crowding (LII ≥ 3 mm), no labiolingually displaced teeth, Class I or Class II by ½ cusp or less, non-extraction, good oral hygiene, non-smoking.; Sample Size: 33 subjects
Retrospectively selected matched controls
Rate of tooth movement (Little's Irregularity Index), root resorption (panoramic X-rays)
Indications for Use
The OrthoPulse™ device is intended for use during orthodontic treatment. It is used in conjunction with brackets and wires or aligners and helps facilitate minor anterior tooth movement.
Device Story
OrthoPulse is an intra-oral, mouth-guard-style appliance used by patients at home during orthodontic treatment. It delivers 850nm near-infrared light energy to the alveolar surface via LEDs embedded on a flexible circuit. The device treats one arch at a time and is reversible for the other arch. Operation is controlled by internal software, which manages the 5-minute daily treatment session duration and frequency. The device includes an integrated rechargeable battery and a wireless charging/storage case. It features an optional wireless connection to an iOS application for patient compliance monitoring. By delivering light energy, the device aims to accelerate the rate of tooth movement, potentially reducing overall orthodontic treatment time. Healthcare providers prescribe the device, and patients self-administer the treatment.
Clinical Evidence
Two primary clinical studies supported efficacy. A cross-over study (n=21) evaluating OrthoPulse with aligners showed statistically significant faster tooth movement compared to baseline (p=0.024). A controlled study (n=33) evaluating OrthoPulse with brackets and wires showed statistically significant faster tooth movement compared to matched controls (p<0.001). No serious adverse events, root resorption, or pathological tooth mobility were reported. Additional prototype studies confirmed performance.
Technological Characteristics
Intraoral appliance with flexible circuit and LEDs; 850nm wavelength; 50-80 mW/cm output. Powered by integrated rechargeable battery with wireless charging. Complies with IEC 62471 (lamp safety) and IEC 60601-1 (medical electrical equipment). Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1, -5, -10. Electromagnetic compatibility per IEC 60601-1-2 and CISPR 11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with brackets and wires or aligners to facilitate minor anterior tooth movement. Contraindicated for patients with periodontally involved teeth, those using bisphosphonates, or those with spaces between anterior teeth.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol featuring three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other, representing the department's focus on health and human well-being.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 24, 2015
Biolux Research Ltd. c/o Ms. Janice Hogan Hogan Lovells US LLP 1835 Market St., 29th Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Re: K143120 Trade/Device Name: OrthoPulse™ Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: II Product Code: PLH Dated: July 10, 2015 Received: July 10, 2015
# Dear Ms. Hogan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Tina
Kiang -S
for Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page
510(k) Number (if known) K143120
#### Device Name
# OrthoPulse™
Indications for Use (Describe)
The OrthoPulse™ device is intended for use during orthodontic treatment. It is used in conjunction with brackets and wires or aligners and helps facilitate minor anterior tooth movement.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
& Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Subpart C)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801
# PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Druq Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number.
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) SUMMARY
# Biolux Research Ltd.'s OrthoPulse™ Device
## Submitter's Name, Address, Telephone Number, Contact Person and Date Prepared
Biolux Research Ltd. 825 Powell Street, Suite 220 Vancouver, BC V6A 1H7 Canada
Contact Person: Kevin Strange, President and CEO
Phone: 604-669-0674 Fax: 604-608-5558
Date Prepared: July 21, 2015
#### Name of Device and Name/Address of Sponsor
OrthoPulse™ Biolux Research Ltd. 825 Powell Street, Suite 220 Vancouver, BC V6A 1H7 Canada
#### Common or Usual Name
Orthodontic LED Accessory (PLH)
### Classification Name/Classification
Orthodontic plastic bracket, 21 CFR 872.5470, Class II
#### Predicate Devices
OrthoAccel's Acceledent (K110661, K130643) This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Intended Use / Indications for Use
The OrthoPulse™ device is intended for use during orthodontic treatment. It is used in conjunction with brackets and wires or aligners and helps facilitate minor anterior tooth movement.
### Device Description
The OrthoPulse'''' device is an intra-oral appliance similar to a plastic sports mouth guard that is intended for use during orthodontic treatment in conjunction with traditional orthodontic treatment with brackets and wires or aligners.
The device achieves its effect by delivering light energy to the bone, accelerating the rate of tooth movement. Light-emitting diodes ("LEDs") are embedded into the mouth-guard on a flexible circuit. Light is directed toward the alveolar surface to facilitate light treatment of the anterior arch segment during orthodontic tooth movement. The intra-oral appliance is designed to treat one arch (upper or lower), and is reversible by the patient to treat the other arch.
OrthoPulse is considered a low level light treatment device and produces light at levels 50-80 mW/cm for the patient. The device is designed to comply with the lamp safety standard (IEC 62471: 2006) and with the general medical device standard IEC 60601-1 3rd Ed.
OrthoPulse includes light with wavelengths in the 850nm range (near infrared) and the treatment protocol is based on a daily treatment session of 5 minutes per arch (maxilla or mandible). The treatment time (session duration) is controlled by the software, along with the number of treatments per day.
OrthoPulse includes an integrated battery for power. The battery is rechargeable via a wireless charging platform / storage case. The device provides a wireless connection to an optional iOS application to enable monitoring of patient compliance with the treatment regimen. No other cable or connection to external devices is required.
#### Technological Characteristics
OrthoPulse™ has very similar technological characteristics as the predicate device. Both devices are intraoral appliances intended for home use under a prescription, and both devices are comprised of portable, battery powered devices that are placed in the user's mouth at regular intervals. Although OrthoPulse uses light energy to accelerate tooth movement while the predicate uses mechanical vibration, both devices are designed to achieve the same therapeutic effect of achieving faster tooth movement. The devices are both comprised of equivalent components, including the mouthpiece, battery component, and software. The differences in technological characteristics compared to the predicate do not adversely impact performance, as demonstrated in bench and clinical testing. Therefore, OrthoPulse presents similar technological characteristics as it predicate device, in support of substantial equivalence.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Performance Data
The following tests have been performed to support the substantial equivalence of OrthoPulse™:
- . Optical Output Testing
- . Lifetime Verification Testing
- Testing to ensure that the device can withstand bite forces in the mouth
- Testing to ensure the device can accurately detect when it is in contact with tissue
- . Biocompatibility testing in accordance with ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10
- . Electrical safety testing in accordance with IEC 60601-1
- . Electromagnetic compatibility testing per IEC 60601-1-2 (3rd ed., 2007 and CISPR 11:2010)
- . Testing to validate the cleaning instructions
- Software verification and validation .
Further, clinical testing of the device with orthodontic treatment demonstrated that the device may accelerate tooth movement and may decrease treatment time. Two primary clinical studies of the intra-oral OrthoPulse demonstrated device performance for its indicating that the device may accelerate orthodontic movement of teeth and may reduce the overall treatment time for the patient when used in conjunction with traditional orthodontic treatment with brackets and wires or aligners. In a cross-over study where subjects served as their own control, 21 subjects (mean age 34.9 years) who used OrthoPulse with aligners was evaluated. Eligibility criteria included requiring that the subjects have permanent dentition, mild to moderate crowding with no labiolingually displaced teeth, Class I or Class II by ½ cusp or less, good oral hygiene, and non-smoking. Subjects who were pregnant, enrolled in another study, had periodontally involved teeth, used bisphosphonates during the study, or had spaces between anterior teeth were excluded. Perimeter measurement analysis was used to evaluate each patient's rate of tooth movement during baseline and OrthoPulse™ periods in the mandibular arch. The degree of external apical root resorption was also investigated. Study subjects were followed from the start of aligner orthodontic treatment until 6 months. Results demonstrated statistically significantly faster tooth movement compared to baseline (p=0.024), achieving the primary effectiveness objective of the study. There were no serious adverse events, and no root resorption, gingival recession, or pathological tooth mobility was reported throughout the study.
OrthoPulse was also evaluated in conjunction with brackets and wires in a controlled study of 33 subjects (mean age 25.0 years). Matched controls (based on subjects' age, initial crowding, eligibility criteria) were retrospectively selected before any data analysis of the OrthoPulse subjects. Eligibility criteria included requiring that the subjects have permanent dentition, moderate to severe crowding (LII ≥ 3 mm) with no labiolingually displaced teeth, Class I or Class II by ½ cusp or less, non-extraction in both arches, good oral hygiene, and non-smoking. Subjects who were pregnant, enrolled in another study, had periodontally involved teeth, used bisphosphonates during the study, or had spaces between anterior teeth were excluded. There were no differences between groups in terms of gender, ethnicity, age, and initial crowding. The rate of tooth movement was measured using the change in Little's Irregularity Index measurements in both groups to evaluate OrthoPulse™ use with fixed orthodontic appliances. Root resorption was determined by use of panoramic dental X-rays collected before treatment and after 6 months of treatment. Results demonstrated that subjects treated with OrthoPulse
{6}------------------------------------------------
showed a statistically significantly faster rate of tooth movement (p<0.001) compared to the control group, achieving the primary effectiveness objective of the study. There were no serious adverse events, and no gingival recession or pathological tooth mobility was reported throughout the study. Data demonstrated the absence of external apical root resorption with OrthoPulse use, and that there is no device effect of accelerated tooth movement on tooth root integrity. Therefore, results from the primary clinical studies demonstrate that subjects treated with OrthoPulse achieve statistically significantly faster rates of tooth movement than control.
Several additional clinical studies were also conducted with prototype and final OrthoPulse devices to supplement the clinical findings observed in the primary studies, and results consistently confirmed device performance for its indicated use.
# Substantial Equivalence
OrthoPulse™ has the same intended use and indications for use as the predicate device. As described above, the technological characteristics are also very similar between the two devices; both devices are intended for home use under a prescription, and both devices are comprised of portable, battery powered devices that are placed in the user's mouth at regular intervals. Although OrthoPulse uses light energy to accelerate tooth movement while the predicate uses mechanical vibration, both devices are designed to achieve the same therapeutic effect of achieving faster tooth movement. Bench and clinical testing demonstrates that the difference in technological characteristics compared to the predicate does not adversely impact performance, and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness compared to the predicate device. Thus, OrthoPulse is substantially equivalent.
| | OrthoPulse | Acceledent (K110661, K130643) |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Intended for use during orthodontic<br>treatment in conjunction with orthodontic<br>appliances | Same |
| Indications for<br>Use | The OrthoPulse™ device is intended for use<br>during orthodontic treatment. It is used in<br>conjunction with brackets and wires or<br>aligners and helps facilitate minor anterior<br>tooth movement. | AcceleDent is an orthodontic<br>Accessory intended for use<br>during orthodontic treatment. It is<br>used in conjunction with<br>orthodontic appliances such as<br>braces and helps facilitate minor<br>anterior tooth movement. |
| Technological<br>Characteristics | Intraoral appliance, similar to plastic<br>mouth guard Integrated, rechargeable battery LED mechanism of action | Same Same Vibration mechanism of<br>action |
| Components | Mouthpiece with LED lights Battery Firmware | Mouthpiece Battery-powered activator Software |
| Accessories | Carrying/charging case | Charging port Travel shell |
| Power Source | Rechargeable battery | Same |
A detailed substantial equivalence table is provided below.
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | OrthoPulse | Acceledent (K110661, K130643) |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Sterilization | Not supplied sterile or sterilized by the user;<br>intended to be washed in water daily to<br>remove saliva and cleaned with FDA-<br>cleared denture cleaning products | Provided sterile (steam) |
# Conclusions
Based on the information provided in the 510(k) submission, including bench and human clinical data, OrthoPulse is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.