BrightMatter Navigation System is intended as a planning and intraoperative guidance system to enable open and percutaneous computer assisted surgery. The system is indicated for medical conditions requiring neurosurgical cranial procedures where the use of computer assisted planning and surgery may be appropriate. The system can be used for intra-operative guidance where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified. The system should be operated only by trained personnel such as surgeons and other clinic staff.
Device Story
BrightMatter Navigation System provides intraoperative guidance for neurosurgical cranial procedures. System inputs include pre-surgical clinical images and surgical plans (generated via BrightMatter Planning, K140337). Optical tracking sub-system tracks surgical tools equipped with passive reflective markers; system calculates tool position/orientation relative to patient anatomy and surgical plan. Output is visual display of tool location relative to clinical images and planned trajectories. Used in OR by surgeons/clinical staff. Provides visualization of surgical site, tool insertion, and target reach. Benefits include enhanced surgical precision and navigation during open/percutaneous procedures.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Safety and effectiveness established via bench testing, including tracking accuracy verification using measurement phantoms, software verification/validation, system integration testing, and biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993.
Technological Characteristics
Optical 3D tracking system; passive reflective markers; stereoscopic camera. Components: Auxiliary Cart (display/camera), Navigation Cart (computer). Patient-contacting parts (Pointer Tool, Port Reference Tool, Calibration Block) tested for biocompatibility (ISO 10993). Sterilization per AAMI TIR30/TIR12. Software-based workflow for image registration and tool visualization.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing neurosurgical cranial procedures requiring computer-assisted planning and intraoperative guidance.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
Predicate Devices
Stryker Navigation System – Cranial Module (K062640)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal features a stylized design of three human profiles facing right, arranged in a cascading manner. The profiles are connected by flowing lines, creating a sense of unity and movement. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the design.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 2, 2015
Synaptive Medical Inc. Mr. Cameron Piron President Mars Center, South Tower, 101 College Street, Suite 200 Toronto, ON M5G 1L7 Canada
Re: K142024
> Trade/Device Name: BrightMatter Navigation System v1.0 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HAW Dated: March 24, 2015 Received: March 30, 2015
Dear Mr. Piron,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Carlos L. Pena - S/^
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K142024
Device Name BrightMatter Navigation System v1.0
### Indications for Use (Describe)
BrightMatter Navigation System is intended as a planning and intraoperative guidance system to enable open and percutaneous computer assisted surgery. The system is indical conditions requiring neurosurgical cranial procedures where the use of computer assisted planning and surgery may be appropriate. The system can be used for intra-operative guidance where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.
The system should be operated only by trained personnel such as surgeons and other clinic staff.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="text-decoration: overline;"> </span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### l. SUBMITTER
Synaptive Medical Inc. MaRS Centre, South Tower 101 College Street, Suite 200 Toronto, ON M5G 1L7 Canada
Contact Person: Cameron Piron President Telephone: 416-673-6679 Email: cameron.piron@synaptivemedical.com
Date Prepared: March 27, 2015
#### II. DEVICE
Name of Device: BrightMatter Navigation System v1.0 Common or Usual Name: Stereotaxic instrument Classification Name: Stereotaxic instrument (21 CFR 882.4560) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HAW
#### III. PREDICATE DEVICE
Stryker Navigation System – Cranial Module by Stryker Corporation, K062640 Date cleared: December 14, 2006
#### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The subject device, BrightMatter Navigation system, is a planning and image guided surgical system that enables computer assisted surgery where use of stereotactic image guidance may be considered appropriate. In particular, the device is suitable for neurosurgical cranial procedures. The planning functionality of the device is provided by an already cleared device, BrightMatter Planning (K140337). The remaining system provides a sequence of discrete workflow activities (or phases) that guide a surgeon through the process of data preparation for the surgical procedure. Then the device aids the surgeon in visualizing the location of the surgical tools relative to clinical images and physical location of the patient.
Following is a summary of steps involved in data preparation and registration of the patient's head position relative to pre-surgical clinical images:
- Importing plan and imaging data
- Reviewing and selecting a previously generated surgical plan
- Optionally fusing (merging or co-registering) additional imaging data
- Preparing and executing point-based registration
Following steps are provided as visualization tools during the execution of the surgical procedure:
{4}------------------------------------------------
- Aid in visualizing location of the surgical site as planned by the surgeon (using BrightMatter Planning software, K140337)
- . For trajectory-centric procedures, help visualize insertion of tracked surgical tools by identifying location of surgical tool's position and orientation relative to clinical images and the surgical plan developed by the surgeon
- Visualize location of tracked surgical tools after the intended target location has been reached
Key functional components of the subject device are an optical tracking sub-system, navigated surgical tools, custom software application and an external display. The navigated surgical tools are tracked using single-use passive reflective markers (K033621) that are attached to the surgical tools prior to each surgical procedure.
The surgical display and tracking camera are mounted on an Auxiliary Cart. The computer is housed in a Navigation Cart.
As with many systems in the OR, not all components need to be sterile during use. The only subcomponents that come in contact with the patient are the Pointing Tool, Port Reference Tool and Calibration Block. These tools fit in the limited contact duration category.
#### V. INDICATION FOR USE
BrightMatter Navigation System is intended as a planning and intraoperative guidance system to enable open and percutaneous computer assisted surgery. The system is indicated for medical conditions requiring neurosurgical cranial procedures where the use of computer assisted planning and surgery may be appropriate. The system can be used for intra-operative guidance where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.
The system should be operated only by trained personnel such as surgeons and other clinic staff.
The Indications for Use statement for BrightMatter Navigation System is identical to the predicate device with the exception that the subject device's statement does not enumerate specific supported clinical procedures. This difference does not affect the intended use of the subject device as a guidance system when the device is used as labeled. The safety and effectiveness of the subject device were established through verification and validation summarized below.
#### VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
Design comparison summary: Both the subject device and the predicate device, Stryker Navigation System - Cranial Module, help develop a treatment plan is then used as input to image guided surgery. Both systems track the surgical tools using an optical 3D tracking system and the position and orientation of these tools are displayed relative to the clinical images of the patient. This information is used by the surgeon to guide the surgical instrument(s) to a target location designated by the surgeon. Both systems utilize a software sub-system that is workflow based. Hence, the overall design of the two systems are comparable. The only difference is that the subject device provides the additional capability of visualizing tractography information.
Biocompatibility summary: The subject device is comparable to the predicate device since the predicate device claims biocompatibility in its documentation and patient contacting parts of the subject device were tested per ISO 10993 and FDA Memo G95-1.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Pointer Tool, Pointer Tool Tip and Port Reference Tool | | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Test | Results | Conclusions |
| Cytotoxicity: MEM Elution<br>GLP | 0 score for based on degree of<br>cellular destruction | Non-cytotoxic |
| Sensitization: ISO Guinea<br>Pig Maximization<br>Sensitization Test (GLP-2<br>Extracts) | None of the animals showed<br>sensitization response greater than<br>zero. | Devices do not elicit<br>sensitization response |
| Irritation/Intracutaneous<br>Toxicity: ISO<br>Intracutaneous Irritation<br>Test (GLP-2Extracts) | No significant dermal reactions at<br>injected and control sites at 24, 48<br>and 72 hrs. | Do not cause tissue<br>irritation |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity:<br>ISO Materials Mediated<br>Rabbit Pyrogen (GLP) | None of the animals had a<br>temperature rise greater than or equal<br>to 0.5 degrees. | Devices are non-pyrogenic. |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity:<br>Acute Systemic Injection<br>Test | None of the tested animals showed<br>clinical signs of toxicity | Device contact is non-toxic |
| Rabbit pyrogen test | Detected endotoxin level is less than<br>0.005 EU/mL | Device is non-pyrogenic |
Following is a summary of biocompatibility tests conducted for patient contacting parts:
Sterility summary: The subject device is comparable to the predicate device since the predicate device's navigation tools are sterilizable and the subject device's end-user sterilizable components have been tested per AAMI TIR30 and TIR12 and validation demonstrated an SAL of ≤10°.
Technology comparison: The predicate device utilizes active light sources on the surgical tool that are tracked using a stereoscopic camera while the subject device utilizes passive reflective markers on the surgical tools and the markers are illuminated by light sources located on the stereoscopic camera system. The accuracy of the subject device was characterized using a measurement phantom, Pointer Tool, Port Reference Tool and using point registration. Mean positional error was measured to be less than 2 mm and mean angular error was measured to be less than 2 degrees for both the tools. This performance was observed at the center and at the boundaries of the field of view of the tracking camera.
The predicate device supports video input from external microscope as an optional feature; however, the subject device does not provide this feature. The subject device provides visualization of tractography information as an additional modality, whereas, this capability is not provided by the predicate device. Since the latter two technologies are provided as optional features in the respective systems they are not intended to mitigate specific risks. Hence, these disparities do not introduce any new risks.
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following testing was conducted on BrightMatter Navigation system:
- Tracking accuracy as positional error and angular error using a measurement phantom that mimicked the brain volume. Value of the measurement phantom was obtained using a Coordinate Measurement Machine (CMM) and used as truth data. CT image of the same phantom was used to simulate the clinical workflow during this measurement. The slice thickness of the CT image was 0.625 mm. Positional error was measured to be less than 2 mm and angular error was measured to be less than 2 degrees.
- Software verification and validation testing for each requirement specification.
- System integration testing using anatomical phantoms.
- Safety testing using external test laboratories.
The following quality assurance measures were applied during development of the software component of the system:
- . Software Development Life Cycle
- Software Risk Assessment. ●
- Risk Assessment of Off-the-Shelf (OTS) Software.
- Software Configuration Management and Version Control.
- . Software issue tracking and resolution.
Design Validation: Design validation was performed using the BrightMatter Navigation System in actual and simulated use settings. The results support substantial equivalence to the predicate device and demonstrate that the BrightMatter Navigation system is safe for its intended use.
Clinical Testing: This technology is not new, therefore a clinical study was not considered necessary prior to release.
#### VIII. CONCLUSIONS
The non-clinical data support the safety of the device and the hardware verification and validation demonstrate that the BrightMatter Navigation system should perform as intended in the specified use conditions. The non-clinical data demonstrate that the BrightMatter Navigation system device perform comparably to the predicate device that is currently marketed for the same intended use.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.