K141491 · Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular · NRY · Oct 22, 2014 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K141491
Device Name
SOLITAIRE 2 REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE
Applicant
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular
Product Code
NRY · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Oct 22, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device is intended to restore blood flow by removing thrombus from a large intracranial vessel in patients experiencing ischemic stroke within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVt-PA) or fail IVt-PA therapy are candidates for treatment.
Device Story
Solitaire 2 Revascularization Device is a catheter-based thrombus retriever; used in neurovascular procedures to restore blood flow in large intracranial vessels. Device consists of a distal nitinol stent retriever with Pt-Ir radiopaque markers; delivered via catheter to occlusion site. Operated by interventionalists in clinical settings. Device captures thrombus within stent structure; retrieved through guide catheter. Output is physical removal of clot; visualized via angiography. Benefits include rapid restoration of cerebral perfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients. New 4x40mm model adds length to existing product family; identical materials and design to predicate.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were performed. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing and animal studies. Animal study (n=12 swine) compared the 4x40mm model to the 4x20mm predicate across acute and 30-day endpoints, evaluating tissue damage, hemorrhage, and thrombi via angiography and histopathology. Results showed comparable vessel response and usability.
Indicated for patients experiencing ischemic stroke within 8 hours of symptom onset with large intracranial vessel occlusion who are ineligible for or failed IV t-PA therapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of a caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare, featuring a staff with a serpent entwined around it.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
October 22, 2014
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a Ev3 Neurovascular Mr. Larry Boucher Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 9775 Toledo Way Irvine, CA 92618
Re: K141491 Trade/Device Name: Solitaire 2 Revascularization Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Catheter, Thrombus Retriever Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NRY Dated: August 20, 2014 Received: August 21, 2014
Dear Mr. Larry Boucher,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carlos L. Pena -SFD/A
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K141491
#### Device Name Solitaire 2 Revascularization Device
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device is intended to restore blood flow by removing thrombus from a large intracranial vessel in patients experiencing ischemic stroke within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVt-PA) or fail IVt-PA therapy are candidates for treatment.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="font-size:100%;">☒</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size:100%;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Owner: | Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular<br>9775 Toledo Way<br>Irvine, CA 92618<br>Establishment Registration No. 2029214 |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Larry Boucher<br>Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Telephone: (949) 297-9781<br>E-mail: larry.boucher@covidien.com |
| Date Summary<br>Prepared: | 20 August 2014 |
| Trade Name of<br>Device: | Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device, 4x40mm |
| Common Name of<br>Device: | Catheter, Thrombus Retriever |
| Classification of<br>Device: | 21 CFR 870.1250 – Class II |
| Predicate Device: | Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device, 510(k)#: K123378<br>Solitaire™ FR Revascularization Device (Biocompatibility)<br>510(k)#: K113455 |
| Performance Data: | The following bench testing was performed in support of the<br>Solitaire™ 2 4x40 device and to establish substantial equivalence to the<br>Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device:<br>Dimensional Testing Delivery Force Testing Retrieval Force Testing Durability Testing Performance (Clot Retrieval) Testing Radial Force (in-process) The following test data was adopted from the predicate device:<br>Af Temperature Testing Kink Resistance Testing System Tensile Testing |
{4}------------------------------------------------
- . Distal Marker Testing
- Torque Response Testing
- Radiopacity Testing
Biocompatibility, sterilization, and aging data were also adopted from the predicate device as there is no change to the materials of construction, design, manufacturing process, or packaging for the addition of this additional model.
Animal studies were performed to assess the safety and usability of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40 device compared to the previously cleared Solitaire™ 2 4x20 device. No clinical studies were performed as there is no change to the indications for use or the fundamental scientific technology of the device.
- Conclusion: The Solitaire™ 2 4x40 device is substantially equivalent to the currently cleared Solitaire™ 2 device based on the successful completion of non-clinical bench and animal testing as well as similar principles of design, operation and indications for use.
#### Device Description:
The Solitaire™ 2 device is designed to restore blood flow in subjects experiencing ischemic stroke due to large intracranial vessel occlusion within 8 hours of symptom onset. It is indicated for subjects who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PA therapy. The distal nitinol portion of the device facilitates clot retrieval and has Pt-Ir radiopaque markers on the proximal and distal ends.
This purpose of this application is to add one (1) new model number (SFR2-4-40) to the Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device family. The additional model will be identical to the currently cleared Solitaire™ 2 4x20 (SFR2-4-20) model, with the exception of a longer retriever length.
#### Indications for Use:
The Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device is intended to restore blood flow by removing thrombus from a large intracranial vessel in patients experiencing ischemic stroke within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PA therapy are candidates for treatment.
#### Device Comparison
The table below provides a comparison of the technological characteristics of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40 model and the currently cleared Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | Solitaire™ 2<br>(K123378) | Solitaire™ FR<br>(K113455) | Solitaire™ 2 4x40 | Rationale for<br>Difference (if<br>applicable) |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indication for<br>Use | The Solitaire™ 2<br>Revascularization<br>Device is intended to<br>restore blood flow by<br>removing thrombus<br>from a large<br>intracranial vessel in<br>patients experiencing<br>ischemic stroke<br>within 8 hours of<br>symptom onset.<br>Patients who are<br>ineligible for<br>intravenous tissue<br>plasminogen<br>activator (IV t-PA) or<br>who fail IV t-PA<br>therapy are<br>candidates for<br>treatment. | Same | Same | N/A |
| Method of<br>Supply | Stored within<br>dispenser coil, Tyvek<br>pouch, & shipping<br>carton | Same | Same | N/A |
| Sterilization<br>Method | Ethylene Oxide | Same | Same | N/A |
| Device Sizes | 4x15mm<br>4x20mm<br>6x20mm<br>6x30mm | Same | 4x40mm | The difference in size<br>is due to the extra<br>working length of the<br>device. Bench and<br>animal testing have<br>demonstrated that the<br>extra working length<br>does not affect the<br>safety and<br>effectiveness of the<br>device. |
| Materials | | | | |
| Stent | Nitinol | Same | Same | N/A |
| Push-wire | Nitinol | Same | Same | N/A |
| Markers | 90% Platinum/ 10%<br>Iridium | Same | Same | N/A |
| Push-wire Shrink<br>Tubing | PTFE | Same | Same | N/A |
| Introducer Sheath | PTFE/Grilamid | Same | Same | N/A |
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Sterilization and Shelf Life
The currently cleared Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device into the EO sterilization cycle originally cleared under K1113455 for the Solitaire™ FR Revascularization Device. The materials of construction, design, manufacturing process, and packaging are identical to the predicate device. Therefore no additional validation testing is required.
Residual testing for the Solitaire™ 2 4x40mm device was adopted from the Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device as the materials of constructions and the manufacturing process are identical to the currently cleared Solitaire™ 2 device. In addition, the surface area of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40mm device is 5.2% less than the currently cleared Solitaire™ 2 6x30mm device.
Aging studies for the Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device have established the product and packaging remain functional and maintain sterility for 2 years. Aging studies for packaging integrity (per ASTM F2096-11), seal strength and device functionality were performed and met all acceptance criteria. The materials of construction, design, manufacturing process, and packaging of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40mm device are identical to the predicate device. Therefore the existing aging and packaging data has been adopted for the new model number.
#### Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility data for the Solitaire device family was tested for the Solitaire™ FR Revascularization device. The biocompatibility data for the Solitaire™ FR device has been adopted for the Solitaire™ 2 4x40mm device as no new materials have been introduced into the manufacturing process or the finished device.
#### Performance Data – Bench
A summary of the non-clinical bench testing performed for the Solitaire™ 2 4x40mm model is presented in the table below.
| Test | Method | Conclusion |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Total System Length | Samples were measured from<br>the proximal tip of the push-<br>wire to the distal-most tip of<br>the finger marker coils. | All devices met acceptance<br>criteria. |
| Distal Tip to Fluoro Safe<br>Marker Length | Samples were measured from<br>the distal tip of the device to<br>the distal side of the proximal<br>fluoro safe marker. | All devices met acceptance<br>criteria. |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Test | Method | Conclusion |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Delivery Force | Peak delivery force was<br>measured through a<br>representative tortuous<br>anatomical model. | All devices met acceptance<br>criteria. Delivery force same<br>as the predicate device. |
| Retrieval Force | Retrieval force was measured<br>through a representative<br>tortuous anatomical model. | All devices met acceptance<br>criteria. Retrieval force same<br>as the predicate device. |
| Radial Force | The radial force was measured<br>100% in-process. | Radial force was measured<br>100% in-process on DVT<br>builds. |
| Durability | Samples were evaluated on<br>their ability to withstand<br>delivery and withdrawal forces<br>in a representative tortuous<br>model beyond the<br>recommended number of<br>passes and re-sheathings<br>allowed per the IFU | All devices showed no<br>irregularities, breaks, kinks,<br>marker coil migration, glue<br>separations, or other observed<br>defects after all attempts.<br>Durability same as the<br>predicate device. |
| Performance | Test samples were evaluated<br>for their ability to restore<br>blood flow and retrieve soft<br>clot from a 4mm vessel and<br>hard clot in a 2mm vessel in a<br>representative tortuous model. | All devices successfully<br>retrieved the soft and firm<br>clots from the respective<br>vessels. Performance is the<br>same as the predicate device. |
## Performance Data - Animal
An acute and 30 day animal study was performed that assessed safety and usability of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40 device as compared to the Solitaire 2 4x20 predicate device. A total of twelve swine were evaluated with a total of 3 passes and 6 resheathings across selected sections of vessels, with six (6) swine used for the acute study and six (6) swine used for the chronic 30 day study. A total of 4 vessels per animal were treated with two (2) vessels receiving the control device and two (2) vessels treated with the test device. Safety was evaluated for tissue damage, hemorrhage, and thrombi using angiographic images and histopathological evaluation.
Histological findings of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40 and the predicate device for the acute and chronic study demonstrated that the vessel response to neurothrombectomy was comparable between the two devices with no histological remarkable difference in the vessel in regards to tissue injury, hemorrhagic evaluation and thrombogenic evaluation.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Usability for the acute and chronic study were assessed by an interventionalist on the following attributes after each pass: delivery through catheter, ability to position stent retriever at intended target zone, ability to deploy retriever, ability to re-sheath and reposition, ability to retrieve the device through a guide catheter and device condition. The safety and usability results from the acute and 30-day animal studies suggest that the Solitaire™ 2 4x40 device is safe, usable and is equivalent to the predicate device.
# Performance Testing - Clinical
No clinical study was performed as there is no change to the indications for use or the fundamental scientific technology for the new model number. Substantial equivalence of the Solitaire™ 2 4x40 device has been established to the predicate device through the results of bench and animal testing.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.