The Neuroreader Medical Image Processing Software is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures from a set of MR images. This software is intended to automate the current manual process of identifying, labeling and quantifying the volume of segmentable brain structures identified on MR images.
Device Story
NeuroReader is medical image processing software for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of brain structures from T1-weighted MR images. Input requires T1-weighted MRI (including nose, ears, vertex, no wraparound). Operation involves uploading images to an analysis server; software performs filtering, gradient non-linearity/field inhomogeneity correction, and skull stripping. Segmentation utilizes multiple atlases (T1-weighted image, binary brain mask, label map) and discrete cosine nonlinear registration to a probabilistic atlas. Device compares patient regional brain volumes against a normative database, adjusting for sex, head size, and age. Output is a self-explicative volumetric report generated within 10 minutes. Used by clinicians as a support tool for assessing structural MRIs; automates manual identification/labeling/quantification processes. Benefits include standardized, efficient volumetric analysis to assist clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validation used 100 images from the manually segmented AEAD-ADNI Hippocampal segmentation protocol dataset as ground truth. Results showed a Dice similarity index of 0.87 for both right and left hippocampus, with a maximum index of 0.91.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based medical image processing. Uses atlas-based segmentation with T1-weighted MR images. Employs discrete cosine nonlinear registration to a probabilistic atlas. Implements standards from the Freesurfer project. Processing includes filtering, gradient non-linearity correction, field inhomogeneity correction, and skull stripping. Operates via server-based analysis of uploaded DICOM-compatible MR images.
Indications for Use
Indicated for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures from MR images in patients requiring assessment of structural brain volumes.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
Predicate Devices
NeuroQuantTM Medical Image Processing Software (K061855)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The seal features a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus. The seal is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
February 4, 2015
Brainreader ApS C/O Mette Munch QA Consultant Skagenvej 21 Egaa, 8250 DENMARK
Re: K140828 Trade/Device Name: NeuroReader Medical Image Processing Software Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LLZ, LNH Dated: January 15, 2015 Received: January 28, 2015
Dear Mette Munch:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Robert A Ochs
Robert Ochs, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page.
### 510(k) Number (if known) K140828
Device Name
NeuroReader Medical Image Processing Software
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The NeuroReader Medical Image Processing Software is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures from a set of MR images. This software is intended to automate the current manual process of identifying, labeling and quantifying the volume of segmentable brain structures identified on MR images.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## "DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) summary - Neuroreader Medical Image Processing Software
# Administrative information:
| Name: | Brainreader Aps |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | Emil Møllers Gade 41a<br>DK-8700 Horsens<br>Denmark |
| Contact person: | Mette Munch, QA Consultant |
| Cell phone: | +45 29872000 |
| E-mail: | mm@addaction.dk |
Date of summary: 15-Jan-2015
Name of device:
Trade name: Neuroreader medical Image Processing Software Common name: Neuroreader Classification name: Picture archiving and communication system (LLZ)
Predicate device:
| 510(k) reg. no | Manufacturer | Device | Product code |
|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------|
| K061855 | CorTechs Labs, Inc. | NeuroQuantTM | LLZ |
| | | Medical Image<br>Processing Software | |
## Device description:
Neuroreader is a medical image processing software intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of identifiable brain structures from magnetic resonance images. The segmentation system relies on a number of atlases which each consist of a T1-weighted MR image, a binary mask covering the brain and a label map dividing the MR image into different anatomical segments.
Neuroreader provides an estimation of the normal volume for a person with similar demographic data. This is done based on a statistical model and a database of healthy material. Neuroreader is intended to automate the current manual process of identifying, labeling and quantifying the volume of brain structures identified on MR images. Neuroreader is aimed to be a support tool for clinicians
{5}------------------------------------------------
in assessing structural MRIs. Neuroreader describes the analysis results in a self-explicative volumetric report within an analysis-time of 10 minutes.
# Intended use:
The Neuroreader Medical Image Processing Software is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures from a set of MR images. This software is intended to automate the current manual process of identifying, labeling and quantifying the volume of segmentable brain structures identified on MR images.
# Comparison to Predicate Device:
Table 1: Comparison between Neuroreader Medical Image Processing Software and K061855: NeuroQuant™ medical Image Processing Software.
| | Neuroreader Medical Image<br>Processing Software | NeuroQuant™ medical<br>Image Processing Software –<br>K061855 |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for use | The Neuroreader Medical<br>Image Processing Software is<br>intended for automatic<br>labeling, visualization and<br>volumetric quantification of<br>segmentable brain structures<br>from a set of MR images. This<br>software is intended to<br>automate the current manual<br>process of identifying, labeling<br>and quantifying the volume of<br>segmentable brain structures<br>identified on MR images. | NeuroQuant™ is intended for<br>automatic labeling,<br>visualization and volumetric<br>quantification of segmentable<br>brain structures from a set of<br>MR images. This software is<br>intended to automate the<br>current manual process of<br>identifying, labeling and<br>quantifying the volume of<br>segmentable brain structures<br>identified on MR images. |
Summary of technical characteristics of device compared to predicate device:
The device and predicate device (K061855) have identical:
- Regulation name: "Picture archiving and communication system", ●
- Regulation number: 21 CFR 892.2050
- Regulatory Class: II
- Product code: LLZ
{6}------------------------------------------------
Device and predicate device are software for measuring brain MRI volume, automatic labeling and visualization. The output volumes are then compared to a normative dataset computed based on MRI data from normal control subjects.
Neuroreader™ and Neuroquant achieve their intended use based on a similar principle, as the segmentation system relies on a number of atlases which each consist of a T1-weighted MR image, a binary mask covering the brain and a label map dividing the MR image into different anatomical segments. Analysis requires a T1 weighted MRI that includes nose, ears, and vertex without wraparound. All atlases must agree on which label values belong to which segments. For this purpose the standards implemented in the Freesurfer project are used. Image transformation use discrete cosine nonlinear registration to a probabilistic atlas.
Device and predicate device upload MR image to the analysis server, do automatic brain segmentation and determine the volume of brain structures. The MR image goes through filtering, a gradient non-linearities- and field inhomogeneities artifact correction as well as a skull stripping step.
Device and predicate device use the intra-cranial volume as a reference in the statistical calculations. The output compares an individual patient's regional brain volumes with those of a normative database, correcting for sex, head size, and age. Both devices generate a report with similar output parameters.
Summary of substantial equivalence based on clinical data: In order to validate the segmentation quality of Neuroreader 11 fully automated brain segmentation, 100 images of the manually segmented AEAD-ADNI Hippocampal segmentation protocol dataset was used as the ground truth. Neuroreader 11 can segment the hippocampus with a Dice similarity index of 0.87 for both the right and left hippocampus. The Dice similarity reaches a maximum of 0.91. The validation indicates that Neuroreader is safe to use.
# Conclusion on substantial equivalence based on technical comparison and clinical data:
By virtue of the physical characteristics and intended use, Neuroreader™ is substantially equivalent to a device legally cleared to be marketed in the United States.
The conclusion drawn from the non-clinical and clinical performance data, shows that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device and the state of the art manual segmentation process.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.