K132984 · Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. · ELM · Jan 14, 2014 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K132984
Device Name
SR VIVODENT S, SR ORTHOTYP S, SR ORTHOLINGUAL S
Applicant
Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc.
Product Code
ELM · Dental
Decision Date
Jan 14, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.3590
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Preformed denture teeth used for total and partial dentures and implant-supported removable prostheses.
Device Story
SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, and SR Ortholingual S are preformed denture teeth; used for total and partial dentures and implant-supported removable prostheses. These devices are fabricated from PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) and are intended for use by dental professionals in the construction of dental prosthetics. The devices function as artificial teeth to restore masticatory function and aesthetics. They are provided as preformed units for integration into removable dental appliances.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. The device was tested for compliance with ISO 22112:2005 (Artificial denture teeth), ISO 10477:2004 (Polymer based crown & bridge materials for flexural strength, water sorption, and solubility), and DIN EN ISO 2039-1 (Ball indentation test). Biocompatibility was evaluated per ISO 10993.
Technological Characteristics
PMMA-based preformed denture teeth. Tested per ISO 22112:2005, ISO 10477:2004, and DIN EN ISO 2039-1. Biocompatible per ISO 10993. No electronic or software components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total or partial dentures or implant-supported removable prostheses.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A preformed plastic denture tooth is a prefabricated device, composed of materials such as methyl methacrylate, that is intended for use as a tooth in a denture.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
k132984
JAN 1 4 2014
# 510(K) SUMMARY (revised 12.11.2013)
SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S
| Contact: | Donna Marie Hartnett, Director of QA/Regulatory Affairs | |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Company: | Ivoclar Vivadent. 175 Pineview Drive, Amherst, NY 14228<br>(716) 691-0010 | |
| Date Prepared: | December 11, 2013 | |
| Proprietary Name: | SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S | |
| Classification Name: | Denture, Plastic, Teeth (872.3590) | |
| Predicate Devices: | SR Vivodent PE, SR Orthotyp PE (K844349) and Phonares II (K120736) | |
Preformed denture teeth used for total and partial dentures and implant-Device Description: supported removable prostheses.
The predicate device to which SR Vivodent S, SR Ortholingual S have been compared is SR Vivodent PE, SR Orthotyp PE (K844349) and Phonares II (K120739) For this application, SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S, has been compreed to 1841349 predicate with regard to chemical composition, performance data and indications for use The subject device has also been compared to Phonares II (K120739) with regard to indications for use. The comparison shows that SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual a are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Intended Use: Preformed denture teeth used for total and partial dentures and implantsupported removable prostheses.
Technological Characteristics: The device design, i.e. delivery form, and intended use of SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S, and the predicate device are the same. The composition of the subject device has been modified from the predicate; however, there are no ingredients in the subject device which pose any new issues of safety and effectiveness i
Testing Summary: The Device has been tested in accordance with ISO 22112:2005 for Artificial denture teeth and it meets the requirements defined. The device was also tested in accordance with ISO 10477:2004 Polymer based crown & bridge materials for Flexural Strength, Water somion and Solubility. Finally, the materials were tested using a Ball Indentation test according to DIN EN ISO 2039-1. Biocompatibility testing and evaluation was also carried out according to ISO 10993. The subject device is a PMMA denture tooth, the composition of which is well known and accepted as biocompatible in dentistry.
Conclusion: SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{1}------------------------------------------------
### Concurrence & Template History Page [THIS PAGE IS INCLUDED IN IMAGE COPY ONLY]
Full Submission Number:
For Office of Compliance Contact Information:
http://insideportlets.fda.gov:9010/portal/page?_nageid=197,415881&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&org=318
For Office of Surveillance and Biometrics Contact Information:
http://insideportlets.fda.gov:9010/portal/page?_pageid=197,415881&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&org=423
| Digital Signature Concurrence Table | |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Reviewer Sign-Off | Myra Browne |
| Branch Chief Sign-Off | Susan Runner |
| Division Sign-Off | Kwame O=Ulmer S<br>2014.01.14 13:36:24 -05'00' |
Template Name: K1(A) – SE after 1996
Template History:
| Date of Update | By | Description of Update |
|----------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 7/27/09 | Brandi Stuart | Added Updates to Boiler Table |
| 8/7/09 | Brandi Stuart | Updated HFZ Table |
| 1/11/10 | Diane Garcia | Liability/Warranty sentence added at bottom of 1st page |
| 10/4/11 | M. McCabe Janicki | Removed IFU sheet and placed in Forms |
| 9/25/12 | Edwena Jones | Added digital signature format |
| 12/12/12 | M. McCabe Janicki | Added an extra line between letter signature block and the word<br>"Enclosure". Also, added a missing digit in 4-digit extension on<br>letterhead zip code: "002" should be "0002". |
| 4/2/2013 | M. McCabe Janicki | Edited sentence that starts "If you desire specific advice for your<br>device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801) " Replaced<br>broken Compliance link with general link to DSMICA. |
| 4/12/2013 | Margaret McCabe<br>Janicki | Fixed a typo: Paragraph 1, final sentence, "We remind you.<br>however; that device labeling must be truthful" Replaced<br>incorrect semicolon with a comma. |
{2}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three wing-like shapes, representing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle symbol. The logo is simple, yet recognizable, and is often used on official documents and websites related to the department.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
#### January 14, 2014
Ivoclar Vivadent, Incorporated Ms. Donna Marie Hartnett Director Quality Assurance/Regulatory Affairs 175 Pineview Drive Amherst, NY 14228
Re: K132984
Trade/Device Name: SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3590 Regulation Name: Preformed Plastic Denture Tooth Regulatory Class: II Product Code: ELM Dated: October 15, 2013 Received: October 16, 2013
Dear Ms. Hartnett:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
Sincerely yours,
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Kwame O.
Ulmer-S
for
Erin I. Keith, M.S. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
**510(k) Number (if known):** K132984
Device Name: SR Vivodent S, SR Orthotyp S, SR Ortholingual S
Indications For Use:
Preformed denture teeth used for total and partial dentures and implant-supported removable prostheses.
Prescription Use X AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
> Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) Page 1 of 1
Runner -S 80 14 44.44505'00'
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.