K132799 · Clariso, Inc. · LLZ · Nov 7, 2013 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K132799
Device Name
CLARISO PACS
Applicant
Clariso, Inc.
Product Code
LLZ · Radiology
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device
Indications for Use
CLARISO PACS is a software Teleradiology system used to receive DICOM images, scheduling information and textual reports, organize and store them in an internal format, and to make that information available across a network via web and customized user interfaces. CLARISO PACS is used by hospitals, imaging centers, radiologist reading practices. CLARISO PACS is not intended for the acquisition of mammographic image data and is meant to be used by qualified medical personnel only who are qualified to create and diagnose radiological image data.
Device Story
CLARISO PACS is a software-based teleradiology system for managing medical images; receives DICOM images, scheduling data, and reports; organizes and stores data in internal format; provides network-based access via web and customized interfaces. Used in hospitals, imaging centers, and reading practices by radiologists and qualified medical personnel. Functions as a standalone service or embedded application; replaces film archives; enables remote tele-diagnosis and teleradiology; integrates with HIS, EMR, and RIS. Users interact via web browser (Google Chrome) using mouse/keyboard to view, manipulate, and annotate images. Features include window/level, zoom, pan, flip, rotate, and various measurements (distance, area, angle, Cobb angle). Provides real-time audit logs and thumbnail previews. Facilitates clinical decision-making by providing convenient, simultaneous access to diagnostic images and reports across different physical locations.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Verification and validation testing performed on all input/output functions and operational modes. Results confirmed that predetermined acceptance criteria were met.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based PACS; utilizes DICOM 3.x standard for image storage/transfer. Database: MySQL. Connectivity: Networked (10/100/100 Ethernet). User interface: Web-based (Google Chrome). Supports standard image rendering (greyscale/RGB) and manipulation tools (window/level, zoom, pan, flip, rotate, annotations). No patient contact; does not control life-sustaining devices.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by hospitals, imaging centers, and radiologist reading practices for receiving, organizing, storing, and viewing DICOM images, scheduling information, and textual reports. Not intended for mammographic image data acquisition. For use by qualified medical personnel only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
K132799
Page 1 of 5
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990.
#### Date Prepared:
October 27, 2013
### Submitter's Information: 21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)
Mr. Cody D. Ebberson, CEO Clariso, Inc. 55 Page Street #824 San Francisco, CA 94102 Email: cody@clariso.com
**NOV 07 2013**
# Trade Name, Common Name and Classification: 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2)
| Trade Name: | CLARISO PACSTM |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Picture, archive and communications system |
| Classification Name: | System, Image Processing, Radiological |
| Product Code: | LLZ |
#### Predicate Device: 21 CFR 807. 92(a)(3)
| Device Classification Name | system, image processing, radiological |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number | K061421 |
| Device Name | ERAD PACS |
| Original Applicant | ERAD, INC.<br>16303 Panoramic Way<br>San Leandro, CA 94578 |
| Regulation Number | 892.2050 |
| Classification Product Code | LLZ |
| Decision Date | 07/25/2006 |
| Decision | substantially equivalent (SE) |
| Classification Advisory Committee | Radiology |
| Review Advisory Committee | Radiology |
| summary | summary |
| Type | Traditional |
| Reviewed by Third Party | No |
| Expedited Review | No |
| Combination Product | No |
#### Device Description: 21 CFR 807 92(a)(4)
CLARISO PACS™ is a software system to be used to view DICOM compliant studies, which are stored within the CLARISO PACS™ . CLARISO PACS™ is intended for professional use only as a viewing tool for studies within a medical facility. CLARISO PACS™ is a 'Continuous Use' device. This device is also compliant with HIPAA regulations regarding patient privacy (such as restricting access to particular studies, logging access to data.). Since there is no direct patient interaction with the device, there is no possibility that CLARISO PACS™ might lead to a fatal fault or injury to the patient. The only two most likely causes of a fault would be the change of the computing environment of the Client system, or a mislabeling of the DICOM studies used by the Viewer. In the best-case scenario, CLARISO PACS™ would be able to operate safely in spite of such faults. The strategy of CLARISO PACS™ in fault handling is to keep its normal operation as much as it can. The CLARISO PACS™ is
{1}------------------------------------------------
intended to work as a standalone service that provides common PACS functionality. The main objective of CLARISO PACS™ is to be a service that can be embedded in other applications that require PACS functionality.
CLARISO PACS™ has four main uses:
- Hard copy replacement: PACS replaces hard-copy based means of managing . medical images, such as film archives.
- Remote access: It expands on the possibilities of conventional systems by providing . capabilities of off-site viewing and reporting (distance education, tele-diagnosis). It enables practitioners in different physical locations to access the same information simultaneously for teleradiology.
- . Electronic image integration platform: PACS provides the electronic platform for radiology images interfacing with other medical automation systems such as Hospital Information System (HIS), Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Practice Management Software, and Radiology Information System (RIS).
- . Radiology Workflow Management: PACS is used by radiology personnel to manage the workflow of patient exams.
#### Indications for Use: 21 CFR 807 92(a)(5)
CLARISO PACS™ is a software Teleradiology system used to receive DICOM images, scheduling information and textual reports, organize and store them in an internal format, and to make that information available across a network via web and customized user interfaces. CLARISO PACS™ is used by hospitals, imaging centers, radiologist reading practices. CLARISO PACS™ is not intended for the acquisition of mammographic image data and is meant to be used by qualified medical personnel only who are qualified to create and diagnose radiological image data.
#### Technological Characteristics: 21 CFR 807 92(a){6)
CLARISO PACS™ is a software application that handles and manipulates digital medical images. The device does not contact the patient, nor does it control any life sustaining devices. A physician, providing ample opportunity for competent human intervention interprets images and information being displayed and printed. In general, a PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) is a medical imaging technology which provides storage of, and convenient access to, images from multiple modalities. Electronic images and reports are transmitted digitally via PACS; this eliminates the need to manually file, retrieve, or transport film jackets. The universal format for PACS image storage and transfer is DICOM 3.x (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine). Non-image data, such as scanned documents, may be incorporated using consumer industry standard formats like PDF (Portable Document Format), once encapsulated in DICOM. The new device and predicate devices are substantially equivalent in the areas of technical characteristics, general function, application, and intended use. The new device does not raise any new potential safety risks and is equivalent in performance to the existing legally marketed devices. Both systems have been developed to replace traditional film handling in radiology. The 2 devices are substantially equivalent in the areas of design, architecture, general function, and intended use. The predicate device and the new device are compared below:
| ltem | Functionality | Predicate device<br>(ERAD PACS) | CLARISO PACS™ | If different, Impact on Safety<br>and or Efficacy |
|------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Web Browser Software | Custom Microsoft<br>Windows application | Google Chrome for all<br>features. Microsoft<br>Internet Explorer &<br>Mozilla Firefox for features<br>except the DICOM Viewer | Provides access in the Google<br>Chrome web browser instead of<br>using a custom Windows<br>application. See reference #1<br>below. |
| 2 | Intended use | Acquiring, viewing,<br>editing and storing<br>radiographs and<br>related patients images | Same | No difference |
| 3 | Intended user | Radiologist | Radiologist | No difference |
| 4 | Network | 10/100/100 Ethernet | Same | No difference |
| 5 | Monitor | Above 19inch monitor<br>(Above 1280x900) | Same, Using 1280x1024 | No difference |
| 6 | User interaction/input | Mouse and keyboard | Same | No difference |
| 7 | Import / export images | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 8 | Acquisition devices | CT, MR, US, PET | Same | No difference |
| 9 | Image organization | Yes. Patient ID, Name.<br>study instance UID | Same | No difference |
| 10 | Image search available | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 11 | Image storage | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 12 | Database software | MySQL | MySQL | No difference |
| 13 | Greyscale Image<br>Rendering | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 14 | RGB Image Rendering | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 15 | Localizer Lines | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 16 | Localizer Point | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 17 | Orientation Markers | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 18 | Distance Markers | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 19 | Study Data Overlays | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 20 | Stack Navigation | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 21 | Window Level | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 22 | Zoom in on images | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 23 | Panning | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 24 | Horizontal/Vertical Flip | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 25 | Clockwise/Counterclockwis<br>e rotate | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 26 | Invert image | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 27 | Text Annotation | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 28 | Area measurement<br>annotation | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 29 | Angle measurement<br>annotation | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 30 | Cobb Angle Measurement<br>Annotation | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 31 | Image annotation | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 32 | Image operations | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 33 | Security | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 34 | DICOM 3.0 conformance | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 35 | Worklist | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 36 | Thumbnail viewing | Yes | Different sizes of<br>thumbnails available | Provides 3 sizes of thumbnails<br>instead of just one size. See<br>Reference #2 below. |
| 37 | Login | Yes | Yes | No difference |
| 38 | Audit | Yes | Yes | Provides the ability to see the<br>audit trail at any time in real<br>time. See Reference #3 below. |
{2}------------------------------------------------
.
.
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Ref #<br>related to<br>differences | Functionality or Item | Impact on Safety and or Efficacy |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | Software/Hardware<br>Requirements | The new device CLARISO PACS™ requires Google Chrome Browser to view<br>image data. The predicate device, eRAD PACS installs a custom Windows<br>application to view image data. The new device uses the Google Chrome web<br>browser. Increasingly, practitioners prefer to use Google Chrome instead of<br>installing a Windows Application because web browsers are more convenient and<br>users already know how to use them. The function of the hardware and software<br>are the same and the use of a Google Chrome web browser in the subject device<br>does not raise any new potential safety risks. The subject device is equivalent in<br>performance to existing legally marketed devices and was based upon the<br>software developed for the predicate eRAD PACS. Therefore, it is our<br>determination that there is "No impact on safety or efficacy" |
| 36 | Thumbnail viewing | There are slight differences in Thumbnail Viewing, The new device CLARISO<br>PACS™ supports three sizes of thumbnails on preview, small, medium and large.<br>The old device only supports medium sized thumbnails. This difference<br>differences does not raise any new potential safety risks and gives the user<br>additional flexibility. The subject device is equivalent in performance to existing<br>legally marketed devices and was based upon the software developed for the<br>predicate eRAD PACS. Therefore, it is our determination that there is "No impact<br>on safety or efficacy" |
| 38 | Audit | The new device adds a tool to view access logs in real time. The predicate device<br>eRAD PACS doesn't have this kind of tool. In ERAD PACS audit trails need to be<br>generated offline with a lag. Since the subject device has real time log access it<br>gives the user added flexibility and does not raise any new potential safety risks.<br>The subject device is equivalent in performance to existing legally marketed<br>devices and was based upon the software developed for the predicate eRAD<br>PACS. Therefore, it is our determination that there is "No impact on safety or<br>efficacy" |
#### Nonclinical Testing:
The complete CLARISO PACS™ system configuration has been assessed and tested at the factory and has passed all in-house testing criteria. The Verification & Validation Test Plan was designed to evaluate all input functions, output functions, and actions performed by the CLARISO PACS™ software in each operational mode and followed the process documented in the Validation Test Plan.
{4}------------------------------------------------
KB2799
Page 5 of 5
Nonclinical testing results are provided in the 510(k). Validation testing indicated that as required by the risk analysis, designated individuals performed all verification and validation activities and that the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met. If the device is installed by CLARISO Inc., integration and installations verification tests are conducted against acceptance criteria prior to release to the client.
#### Conclusion: 21 CFR 807 92(b)(1)
The 510(k) Pre-Market Notification for CLARISO PACS™ contains adequate information, data, and nonclinical test results to enable FDA - CDRH to determine substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
The subject device will be manufactured in accordance with the voluntary standards listed in the enclosed voluntary standard survey. The subject and predicate devices are substantially equivalent in the areas of technical characteristics, general function, application, and intended use. The modification to the subject device does not raise any new potential safety risks and is equivalent in performance to existing legally marketed devices.
Nonclinical tests demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device.
Therefore, CLARISO PACS™ is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
{5}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, USA
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO06-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 7, 2013
Clariso, Inc. % Mr. Carl Alletto Consultant OTech, Inc. 111 Melanic Drive AUBREY TX 76227
Re: K132799
Trade/Device Name: CLARISO PACS" Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: 1.LZ Dated: October 28, 2013 Received: November 1, 2013
Dear Mr. Alletto:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. or 10 devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmativ Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Ilisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA). it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition. FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA 's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803): good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2-Mr. Alletto
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resources/orYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/dcfault.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
for
Janine M. Morris Director, Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K132799
Device Name: CLARISO PACS
Indications for Use:
CLARISO PACS is a software Teleradiology system used to receive DICOM images, scheduling information and textual reports, organize and store them in an internal format, and to make that information available across a network via web and customized user interfaces. CLARISO PACS is used by hospitals, imaging centers, radiologist reading practices.
CLARISO PACS is not intended for the acquisition of mammographic image data and is meant to be used by qualified medical personnel only who are qualified to create and diagnose radiological image data.
Prescription Use × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (OIR)
| ming ma | |
|---------|--|
|---------|--|
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
> 510(k) K132799
Page 1 of 1
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.