EVEREST SPINAL SYSTEM

K132361 · K2m, Inc. · MNI · Oct 3, 2013 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK132361
Device NameEVEREST SPINAL SYSTEM
ApplicantK2m, Inc.
Product CodeMNI · Orthopedic
Decision DateOct 3, 2013
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3070
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

The EVEREST Spinal System may be used in conjunction with the RANGE® (MESA® and DENALI®) Spinal Systems, all of which are cleared for the following indications; Non-cervical, pedicle screw fixation devices for posterior stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: Trauma ( i.e. fracture or dislocation ): spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e. scoliosis; and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. It is also indicated for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis ( grades 3 and 4 ) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine ( L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion. Non-cervical, non-pedicle spinal fixation devices intended for posterior or anterolateral thoracolumbar screw stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (DDD) (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies ); spondylolisthesis; trauma ( i.e. fracture or dislocation ); spinal stenosis; curvatures ( i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis; and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion.

Device Story

Everest Spinal System is a top-loading, posterior thoracolumbar spinal fixation system; components include pedicle screws, rods, locking set screws, and hooks. Used as an adjunct to spinal fusion to provide immobilization and stabilization. Operated by surgeons in clinical settings. Minimally invasive implants added to existing system. Mechanical stabilization achieved through rigid fixation of spinal segments.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Mechanical testing performed in accordance with ASTM F1717 (static compression, static torsion, dynamic compression) to compare subject device components against predicate systems.

Technological Characteristics

Materials: Titanium Alloy and Cobalt Chrome per ASTM and ISO standards. Form factor: Top-loading, multiple component posterior spinal fixation system (pedicle screws, rods, locking set screws, hooks). Energy source: None (mechanical). Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Not specified.

Indications for Use

Indicated for non-cervical posterior stabilization as an adjunct to fusion in patients with trauma, spinal stenosis, scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis, tumor, pseudoarthrosis, or failed previous fusion. Also indicated for severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3-4) at L5-S1 in skeletally mature patients. Non-pedicle components indicated for degenerative disc disease.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

(1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.

Special Controls

*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards; (ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards; (iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and (iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information: “Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.” “Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.” (2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls: (i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use. (ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant. (iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. (iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments. (v) Labeling must include the following: (A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation; (B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation; (C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status; (D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and (E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal. (3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls: (i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate. (ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ ## 510(k) Summary for the Everest Spinal System This 510(k) summary for the Everest Spinal System is provided as required per Section 513(i)(3) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. #### 1. Submitter : K2M, Inc. 751 Miller Drive SE. Suite FI Leesburg, VA 20175 #### Contact Person : Nancy Giezen K2M, Inc. Telephone: 703-777-3155 Date Prepared: 09/26/13 **OCT 0 3 2013** | 2. Tradename: | Everest Spinal System | |----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Common Name: | Spinal Fixation System | | Classification Name: | Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis (21CFR 888.3050)<br>Pedicle Screw Spinal System (888.3070) | | Device Product Code: | KWP, MNI | | Regulatory Class: | Class II | 3. Predicate or legally marketed devices which are substantially equivalent : - K2M Everest Spinal System (K103440, K120656) 0 - K2M Range Spinal System (K052398, K070229, K080792, K081381, K112037, . K130330) - NuVasive SpherX (K092287) o - Globus Resolve (K083416) . #### 4. Description of the device: The Everest Spinal System is a top-loading, multiple component, posterior (thoraciclumbar) spinal fixation system which consists of pedicle screws, rods, locking set screws, and hooks. Materials: The devices are manufactured from Titanium Alloy and Cobalt Chrome per ASTM and ISO standards. Function: The system functions as an adjunct to fusion to provide immobilization and stabilization of the posterior thoracic and lumbar spine. The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to add minimally invasive implants. {1}------------------------------------------------ #### 5. Intended Use: The EVEREST Spinal System may be used in conjunction with the RANGE® (MESA® and DENALI®) Spinal Systems, all of which are cleared for the following indications; Non-cervical, pedicle screw fixation devices for posterior stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: Trauma ( i.e. fracture or dislocation ): spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e. scoliosis; and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. It is also indicated for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis ( grades 3 and 4 ) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine ( L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion. Non-cervical, non-pedicle spinal fixation devices intended for posterior or anterolateral thoracolumbar screw stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (DDD) (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies ); spondylolisthesis; trauma ( i.e. fracture or dislocation ); spinal stenosis; curvatures ( i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis; and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. ## 6. Comparison of the technological characteristics of the device to predicate and legally marketed devices : The minimally invasive components of the Everest Spinal System were mechanically tested and compared to predicate devices. The subject device performed equally to or better than these systems in static compression, static torsion and dynamic compression in accordance with ASTM F1717. The design features and sizing of the components were also compared and found to be substantially the same as these systems. There are no significant differences between the Everest Spinal System and other systems currently being marketed which would adversely affect the use of the product. It is substantially equivalent to these other devices in design, function, material and intended use. {2}------------------------------------------------ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle or bird-like symbol with three curved lines forming its body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol. The text is in all capital letters and is evenly spaced around the circle. Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 October 3, 2013 K2M, Incorporated Ms. Nancy Giezen 751 Miller Drive Southeast Leesburg, Virginia 20175 Re: K132361 Trade/Device Name: Everest Spinal System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3070 Regulation Name: Pedicle screw spinal system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MNI, KWP Dated: August 6, 2013 Received: August 7, 2013 Dear Ms. Giezen: . We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set {3}------------------------------------------------ #### Page 2 - Ms. Nancy Giezen forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/McdicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Sincerely yours. # Erin Keith for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthonedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {4}------------------------------------------------ # Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known): K132361 Device Name: Everest Spinal System Indications for Use: The EVEREST Spinal System may be used in conjunction with the RANGE® (MESA® and DENAL 90 Spinal Systems, all of which are cleared for the following indications: Non-cervical, pedicle screw fixation devices for posterior stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: Trauma ( i.e. fracture or dislocation ); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e. scollosis. kyphosis; and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. It is also indicated for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis ( grades 3 and 4 ) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine ( L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion. Non-cervical, non-pedicle spinal fixation devices intended for posterior or anterolateral thoracolumbar screw stabilization as an adjunct to following indications: degenerative disc disease (DDD) (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies ); spondylolisthesis; trauma ( i.e. fracture or dislocation ); spinal stenosis; curvatures ( i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis; and/or lordosis); turnor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR Over-the-counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS-LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) **Colin Neill** for RPJ (Division Sign-off) Division of Orthopedic Devices 510(k) Number: K132361
Innolitics
510(k) Summary
Decision Summary
Classification Order
Enter a record ID and click Load to view the document.
100%