UD Implant System is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous maxilla, in support of single of multiple-unit restorations including; cemented retained, or overdenture restorations, and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed bridgework. UD Implant System is for single stage surgical procedures. This system is intended for delayed loading.
Device Story
The UD Implant System is a dental implant system designed for surgical placement into the maxilla to support dental restorations. The system consists of titanium fixtures and various prosthetic abutments (cover screws, healing, dual, combi, angled, milling, temporary, and ball abutments). The device is used by dental clinicians in a clinical setting to replace missing teeth. The fixture is surgically placed into the jawbone; after a conventional healing period, the abutment is attached to support single or multiple-unit restorations, including cemented or overdenture restorations and fixed bridgework. The system utilizes an internal hexagon connection and self-tapping cutting edge threads. The output is a stable foundation for prosthetic teeth, which restores oral function and aesthetics for the patient. The device is intended for delayed loading protocols.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Testing included physical tests (visual, packaging, seal, dimension, sterility), surface treatment analysis (roughness, SEM, EDX), mechanical property testing (adaptation accuracy, 35° compressive load, torsional breaking force, removal torque, fatigue), sterilization validation, and shelf-life testing. Biocompatibility testing was performed in accordance with ISO 10993 series.
Indicated for patients with partially or fully edentulous maxilla requiring single or multiple-unit restorations, including cemented retained or overdenture restorations, and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed bridgework. Intended for single-stage surgical procedures with delayed loading.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
Predicate Devices
Hero II and IS Dental Implant System by KJ Meditech Co., Ltd. (K121047)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(K) – safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92.
### Date: 12/04/2013
# 1. Applicant / Submitter
MEDIMECCA Co., Ltd. Daeryung Techno Twon 3-cha 104~105. 448, Gasan-dong, Guemcheon-gu, Scoul, 153-772 Rep. of Korea
Tel : +82-2-856-8282 Fax : +82-2-856-0238 Contact: Woo-young Ha
# 2. U.S Agent/Submission Correspondent
DEC 0 5 2013
LK Consulting Group USA, Inc. 1515 E Katella Ave. Unit 2115, Anaheim, CA 92805 Priscilla Chung Phone: 714.202.5789 Fax: 714-409-3357 Email: juhee.c@lkconsultinggroup.com
### 3. Device
| Proprietary/Trade Name | UD Implant System |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name | Dental Implant |
| Classification Name | Endosseous Dental Implant |
| Classification Product Code | DZE, NHA |
| Classification regulation | 21CFR872.3640 |
| Class | II |
### 4. Predicate Device:
Hero II and IS Dental Implant System by KJ Meditech Co., Ltd. (K121047)
#### 5. Description:
UD Implant System is a dental implant system made of titanium (Fixture: ASTM F136 / Prosthetic Abutment: ASTM F136, ASTM F67 Gr 4) intend to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches for loading after a conventional healing period. This device may be used to replace one or more missing teeth. Its material, structure and intended use are substantial equivalence with the predicate device.
{1}------------------------------------------------
### 6. Model List
### (1) Fixture
Diameter : 0 3.75mm, 0 4.0mm, 0 4.5mm, 0 5.0mm, 0 6.0mm Length : 7.3mm, 8.5mm, 10.0mm, 11.5mm, 13mm
*7.3mm length is not available for the 3.75 diameter implant fixtures.
## (2) Abutments
| No | Component | Description |
|----|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | Cover Screw | Type<br>Internal |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>2.8mm, 3.37mm |
| 2 | Healing Abutment | Type<br>Internal |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>4.0mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 6.5mm |
| 3 | Dual Abutment | Type<br>Internal Hex, Internal Non-Hex |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>4.0mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 6.5mm |
| 4 | Combi Abutment | Type<br>Internal |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>4.0mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 6.5mm |
| 5 | Angled Abutment | Type<br>Internal Hex, Internal Non-Hex<br>Angle: 15°, 25° |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>4.5mm, 5.5mm |
| 6 | Milling Abutment | Type<br>Internal Hex, Internal Non-Hex |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>4.0mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 6.5mm |
| 7 | Temporary Abutment | Type<br>Internal Hex, Internal Non-Hex |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>4.0mm, 4.5mm |
| 8 | Ball Abutment | Type<br>Internal Hex, Internal Non-Hex |
| | | Size(Diameter)<br>3.5mm |
#### 7. Indication for use:
UD Implant System is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxilla, in support of single of multiple-unit restorations including; cemented retained, or overdenture restorations, and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed bridgework. UD Implant System is for single stage and two stage surgical procedures. This system is intended for delayed loading.
#### 8. Basis for Substantial Equivalence
The UD Implant System is substantially equivalent to previously marketed devices. The design features and sizing of the components were compared and the UD Implant System found to be substantially the same as the predicate device. It is indicated for the same intended use. There are no significant differences between the UD Implant System and other systems currently being marketed which would adversely affect the use of the product. It is substantially equivalent to other devices in design, function, material and intended use.
{2}------------------------------------------------
| Device Name | UD Implant System | HERO II Dental Implant System<br>IS Dental Implant System |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) no | - | K121047 |
| Applicant | MEDIMECCA CO LTD | KJ Meditech Company, Limited. |
| Classification | Endosseous dental implant<br>(Class 11, 21CFR872.3640) | Endosseous dental implant<br>(Class 11, 21CFR872.3640) |
| Material | Titanium<br>(ASTM F136, ASTM F67 Gr 4) | Titanium 6Al 4V ELI Alloy |
| Surgery Type | One stage, Two stages | One stage, Two stages |
| Structure | Internal Hexagon connection<br>Self-taping cutting edge threads | Internal Hexagon connection<br>Self-taping cutting edge threads |
| Dimension | Fixture:<br>Diameter :<br>Ø 3.75mm, Ø 4.0mm, Ø 4.5mm,<br>Ø 5.0mm. Ø 6.0mm<br>Length :<br>7.3mm, 8.5mm, 10.0mm, 11.5mm,<br>13mm<br>Abutment<br>Diameter : Ø 4~6.5mm | Fixture:<br>Diameter :<br>Ø 3.75mm, Ø 4.0mm. Ø 4.5mm.<br>Ø 5.0mm. Ø 6.0mm<br>Length :<br>7.3mm, 8.5mm, 10.0mm, 11.5mm,<br>13mm<br>Abutment<br>Diameter : Ø 4~7mm |
| Surface(Fixture) | R.B.M. | R.B.M. |
| Intended use | intended for use in partially or fully<br>edentulous mandibles and maxilla,<br>in support of single of multiple-unit<br>restorations including; cemented<br>retained, screw retained, or<br>overdenture restorations, and<br>terminal or intermediate abutment<br>support for fixed bridgework. UD<br>Implant System is for single stage<br>and two stage surgical procedures.<br>This system is intended for delayed<br>loading. | intended for use in partially or fully<br>edentulous mandibles and maxilla,<br>in support of single of multiple-unit<br>restorations including; cemented<br>retained, screw retained, or<br>overdenture restorations, and<br>terminal or intermediate abutment<br>support for fixed bridgework.<br>HERO II Dental Implant System<br>and IS Dental Implant System is for<br>single stage and two stage surgical<br>procedures. This system is intended<br>for delayed loading. |
| Sterilization | Gamma radiation | Gamma radiation |
| Shelf-life | 5 years | 5 years |
## 9. Non-clinical Testing
The following non-clinical testing was conducted to validate its safety.
- Physical tests including visual test, packaging test, packaging seal efficacy test, dimension test, and sterility test (direct transfer method)
- Surface treatment tests including roughness average test, developed surface area ration test, surface characteristics test (SEM), and surface composition analysis test (EDX)
- Mechanical properties test including adaptation accuracy test (Implant to abutment comparibility). 35° compressive loads test, torsional breaking force test, removal torque force test. and fatigue test
- Sterilization validation and shelf life tests
- The biocompatibility tests have been performed in accordance with ISO10993 series.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 10. Conclusion
The subject device and the predicate device have the same intended use and have the same technological characteristics. The subject and predicate implants are all made of the titanium alloys and have the same surface treatments. The subject and the predicate devices encompass the similar range of physical dimensions, including diameter and length of the implants, and diameter of the abutments.
Overall, the UD Implant System has the following similarities to the predicate device: * has the same intended use.
- * uses the same operating principle.
- * incorporates the same basic design.
- * incorporates the same material and the surface treatment.
Based on the similarities, we conclude that the UD Implant System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 0903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G60 Silver Spring MD 20993-00002
December 5, 2013
MEDIMECCA Company, Limited C/O Ms. Priscilla Chung Regulatory Affairs Consulting LK Consulting Group USA, Incorporated 1515 East Katella Avenue, Unit 2115 Anaheim, CA 92805
Re: K131682
Trade/Device Name: UD Dental Implant System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DZE, NHA Dated: November 4, 2013 Received: November 7, 2013
# Dear Ms. Chung:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Kwame O. Ulmer -S for
Erin I. Keith, M.S. Division Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K131682
#### Device Name
UD Dental Implant System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
UD Implant System is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous maxilla, in support of single of multiple-unit restorations including; cemented retained, or overdenture restorations, and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed bridgework. UD Implant System is for single stage surgical procedures. This system is intended for delayed loading.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: December 31, 2013
See PRA Statement on last page.
# PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Image /page/6/Picture/13 description: The image shows the name "Susan Runner DDS, MA" in a stylized font. Next to the name is "Mary S. Runner -S". Below this is the date and time "2013.12.05 08:45:15 -05'00'".
FORM FDA 3881 (9/13)
in Services (301) 443-67-67-0
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.