ARDIS INTERBODY SYSTEM

K131242 · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · MAX · Sep 3, 2013 · Orthopedic

Device Facts

Record IDK131242
Device NameARDIS INTERBODY SYSTEM
ApplicantZimmer Spine, Inc.
Product CodeMAX · Orthopedic
Decision DateSep 3, 2013
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 888.3080
Device ClassClass 2
AttributesTherapeutic

Intended Use

The Ardis Interbody System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft as an intervertebral body fusion device at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-S1) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device. Patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The Ardis Interbody System is implanted using a posterior or transforaminal approach and is intended to be used singly or in pairs with supplemental fixation.

Device Story

Ardis Interbody System is a spinal fusion device for lumbosacral region; replaces disc to facilitate fusion. Implants are hollow PEEK-OPTIMA cages with tantalum radiographic markers; textured surfaces for bone ingrowth. System includes specialized inserter instruments for posterior or transforaminal placement. Inserter threads into implant; features secondary locking mechanism for secure delivery. Used by surgeons in clinical settings; requires supplemental fixation. Benefits include stabilization of spinal segments and promotion of interbody fusion in DDD patients.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Design verification and validation studies confirmed performance, material, and biocompatibility equivalence to the predicate device.

Technological Characteristics

Materials: PEEK-OPTIMA (ASTM F2026) for implants; tantalum (ASTM F560) for markers; aluminum, stainless steel, and polymers for instruments. Principle: Intervertebral body fusion via hollow cage. Form factor: Various lengths, widths, and heights. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Standard methods.

Indications for Use

Indicated for skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels (L2-S1) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis, who have failed six months of non-operative treatment. Includes patients with prior non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.

Special Controls

*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval. (c) *Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.

Predicate Devices

Related Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0}------------------------------------------------ SEP 0 3 2013 ## 510(K) Summary Of Safety And Effectiveness Submitter: Zimmer Spine, Inc. 7375 Bush Lake Rd. Minneapolis. MN 55439 Establishment Registration Number: 1649384 # Contact Personnel: Jon Gilbert Director Regulatory Affairs Telephone: (952) 830-6385 Fax: (952) 837-6985 # Date: 2 August 2013 Trade Name: Ardis® Interbody System Common Name: Spinal Intervertebral Body Fusion Device # Classification Name and Reference: Ardis® Interbody System is classified as Class II (MAX). Spinal Intervertebral Body Fusion Device, 21 CFR § 21 CFR 888.3080. # Predicate Device: Zimmer Spine Ardis@ Spacer System (a.k.a. Ardis Interbody System), K073202 (1/30/08 & Add to file 11/17/11) # Device Description:: The Ardis® Interbody System is a device for interbody fusion of the anterior column of the spine. The Ardis implant may be used to replace the disc. These cages are hollow so that bone can grow through the device. fusing the adjacent bony surfaces. Ardis Inserter, 510(k) K131242 Al response 287 of 361 {1}------------------------------------------------ The Ardis implant is a hollow device with texture on two opposing convex sides, and is offered in various lengths, widths and heights. Zimmer Spine designed Ardis to be placed through a posterior or transforaminal approach and to address vertebrae in the lumbosacral region of the spine. The system contains implants of various sizes to accommodate different patient anatomy. and instruments for site preparation. trialing and insertion. The device is crafted from (polvetheretherketone) PEEK-OPTIMA (ASTM F2026). As PEEK-OPTIMA is radiolucent, radiographic markers are included in the distal and proximal ends of the PEEK implants. The markers consist of tantalum wires and beads (ASTM F560) that are press fit into small holes in the implant. Additionally. the Zimmer Spine Ardis® Interbody System includes the instrumentation to facilitate the implantation of the system is comprised of instruments and perforated instrument cases that are generally comprised of aluminum, stainless steel. and/or polvmeric materials. The Ardis Inserter that is the subject of this premarket notification is an instrument intended for use with the Ardis® Interbody System. The instrument is designed specifically to implant the PEEK interbody device into a prepared disc space. The inserter threads into the posterior hole of the PEEK implant securing the implant in place with a secondary locking (anti-rotation) mechanism. The inserter design is specific to the width measurement of the PEEK implant. A 9mm width implant will be used in conjunction with the PEEK Ardis Inserter, 9mm, and an 1 Imm implant will be inserted using the PEEK Ardis Inserter, 1 I mm. # Indications for Use: The Ardis Interbody System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft as an intervertebral body fusion device at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-S () in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device. Patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The Ardis Interbody System is implanted using a posterior or transforaminal approach and is intended to be used singly or in pairs with supplemental fixation. # Device Technological Characteristics and Comparison to Predicate Device(s): Zimmer Spine has submitted documentation demonstrating the substantial equivalence between subject and predicate devices. The unmodified versions of the instrument and the proposed version have the same intended use. operate on the same technological principles, are biocompatible for the expected patient contact profile and are cleaned and sterilized in the same way with the same parameters. The unmodified versions of the Ardis® Interbody System differ only in design and materials. {2}------------------------------------------------ # Performance Date: Design Verification Testing and Design Validation studies conducted on the Ardis Interbody System implants and instruments demonstrated the performance of the subject device was substantially equivalent in design, function, material, biocompatibility and sterilization when compared to the predicate device. # Substantial Equivalence: Zimmer Spine Inc. has submitted documentation demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the modified and unmodified versions of the Ardis® Interbody System. The proposed Inserter instrument is similar to the unmodified version of the instrument in general form, sterilization and cleaning. and intended use. As demonstrated by supporting tests and descriptions, this design modification does not present new issues of safety or effectiveness. #### Ardis Inserter, 510(k) K131242 Al response {3}------------------------------------------------ Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of two main elements: the department's name arranged in a circular fashion around the perimeter, and a stylized symbol in the center. The symbol is composed of three curved lines that resemble a person embracing the world. The text is in all caps and reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA". # DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring MD 20993-0002 September 3, 2013 Zimmer Spine. Incorporated % Mr. Jonathan Gilbert Director, Regulatory Affairs 7375 Bush Lake Road Minneapolis. Minnesota 55439 Re: K131242 Trade/Device Name: Ardis " Interbody System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Spinal intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: August 2. 2013 Received: August 5, 2013 Dear Mr. Gilbert: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into cither class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA`s issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set {4}------------------------------------------------ ## Page 2 – Mr. Jonathan Gilbert forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801). please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, plcase note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Sincerely yours. # Mark N. Melkerson -S Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure {5}------------------------------------------------ #### Indications for Use 510(k) Number (if known): _ K131242 # Device Name: Ardis® Interbody System ### Indications for Use: The Ardis Interbody System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft as an intervertebral body fusion device at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-SI) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device. Patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The Ardis Interbody System is implanted using a posterior or transforaminal approach and is intended to be used singly or in pairs with supplemental fixation. Prescription Use _X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) (Please do not write below this line - Continue on another page if needed) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) Anton E. Dmitriev, PhD Division of Orthopedic Devices
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Sort by
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...