K130215 · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · DSY · Apr 9, 2013 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K130215
Device Name
GORE ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT
Applicant
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Product Code
DSY · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Apr 9, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.3450
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K130215 · Apr 9, 2013
GORE ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Historical control data
Historical control data were used as a comparator for the primary efficacy (cumulative patency) and safety (freedom from bleeding) endpoints in a prospective clinical trial.
Historical controls; Patency; Hemodialysis access
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft clinical study; Prospective, single-arm clinical trial with historical control comparison; Follow-up/Duration: 6 months
Patients requiring arteriovenous access grafts for hemodialysis; Sample Size: 138 subjects; Number of Sites: Multi-centered
Historical control group
Cumulative patency at 6 months; freedom from bleeding at 6 months
Indications for Use
The GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft is intended for use as a vascular prosthesis in patients requiring vascular access.
Device Story
Multilayer vascular graft comprised of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) and an elastomeric layer; optional covalently bound bioactive heparin (CBAS®) on luminal surface. Used as vascular prosthesis for hemodialysis access. Implanted by surgeons in clinical settings. Provides conduit for blood flow; allows for cannulation for hemodialysis. Benefits include potential for earlier cannulation and reduced reliance on central venous catheters. Performance evaluated via in vitro mechanical testing and in vivo canine model (suture line bleeding, patency, histology). Clinical trial (138 subjects) compared cumulative patency and freedom from bleeding against historical controls.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, single-arm, multi-center clinical trial (n=138) in patients requiring hemodialysis access. Primary endpoints: 6-month cumulative patency (84% vs 75% historical control) and 6-month freedom from bleeding (88% vs 78% historical control). Secondary endpoints: primary unassisted patency (46% vs 42% historical control) and time to first cannulation (median 5 days). No device-related adverse events or deaths reported.
Technological Characteristics
Multilayer ePTFE graft with elastomeric layer; optional CBAS® heparin coating. Tubular form factor. Sterilized. No recognized performance standards under Section 514. Mechanical properties include suture retention, kink resistance, and burst pressure.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring vascular access for hemodialysis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vascular graft prosthesis is an implanted device intended to repair, replace, or bypass sections of native or artificial vessels, excluding coronary or cerebral vasculature, and to provide vascular access. It is commonly constructed of materials such as polyethylene terephthalate and polytetrafluoroethylene, and it may be coated with a biological coating, such as albumin or collagen, or a synthetic coating, such as silicone. The graft structure itself is not made of materials of animal origin, including human umbilical cords.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for Vascular Prostheses 510(k) Submissions.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
K130215
510(k) Premarket Notification GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft 510(k) Summary of Substantial Equivalence
APR 0 9 2013
# 510(k) SUMMARY OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft Proprietary Name: Common Name: Vascular Graft Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, 6 mm and greater diameter Classification Name: Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, of less than 6 mm in diameter (per 21 CFR 870.3450) Device Classification: Class II Product Classification and Code: DSY Classification Panel: Cardiovascular Devices Establishment Registration Number: 2017233 Contact Person: Michael Ivey Regulatory Affairs Medical Products Division W.L. Gore and Associates 3250 W. Kiltie Lane Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Telephone: 928-864-3790 Facsimile: 928-779-4219 E-mail: mivey@wlgore.com
## Performance Standards
There are no applicable standards with recognized performance criteria that currently exist for these devices. None are established under Section 514.
## Device Description
The GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft is a multilayer graft design comprised of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) separated by an elastomeric layer and may be available both with and without covalently bound bioactive heparin on the luminal surface of the
{1}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Premarket Notification GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft 510(k) Summary of Substantial Equivalence
device (commonly known as the Carmeda® BioActive Surface, or CBAS® heparin). The GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft is intended for use as a vascular prosthesis in patients requiring vascular access.
## Indications for Use
The GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft is intended for use as a vascular prosthesis in patients requiring vascular access.
## Substantially Equivalent Devices
The following devices as substantially equivalent predicate devices listed below:
- GORE® PROPATEN® Vascular Graft (K062161) .
- GORE-TEX® Stretch Vascular Graft (K903931) .
- Vascutek® Ltd SEALPTFETM ePTFE Vascular Prosthesis (K030999) .
## Brief Comparison Summary
To demonstrate substantial equivalence of the applicant GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft to the predicate devices, technological characteristics and performance criterion were evaluated using in vitro and in vivo testing as indicated below:
#### In Vitro Testing
Using FDA guidance documents on non-clinical testing of medical devices the following in vitro tests were performed:
- Wall Thickness .
- Internal Diameter ●
- Suture Retention (transverse and longitudinal) ●
- Kink Radius (Pressurized and Non-Pressurized)
- Punctured Burst
- Punctured Leak ●
- . Burst Testing
- Fibril Length .
- Water Entry Pressure (WEP) ●
- Tensile Strength Fibril Length .
- Pressurized Internal Diameter
The in-vitro test results of GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft and the other predicate devices demonstrate that the technological characteristics and performance criteria of the devices are comparable and equivalent and that GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft can perform in a manner equivalent to devices currently available on the market.
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### In Vivo Animal Testing
To further assess the performance of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft, as well as evaluate the biocompatibility of the graft in a vascular application, an in vivo study was conducted in a canine model to evaluate 4 device attributes:
- . Intra-Operative Suture Line Bleeding: The implanted device demonstrates equivalent intra-operative suture line bleeding compared to currently marketed devices
- . Post-Cannulation Time-to-Hemostasis: the device achieves hemostasis successfully post cannulation and allows for closure of the incision site by the surgeon.
- Device Patency: The implanted device remains patient and in position . throughout the in-life period in the canine model.
- . Histological Response: device demonstrates tissue response similar to currently marketed grafts.
In vivo animal results demonstrate that the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft had no intra-operative suture line bleeding during implant. Devices achieved hemostasis successfully post cannulation in that the test devices had a time-to-hemostasis comparable to or significantly lower than that of the predicate devices. Angiographic imaging demonstrated that the devices remained widely patent throughout the in-life period in the canine model. CT scans showed no evidence of device kinking during the in-life period. The histological profile of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft was comparable to predicate vascular grafts.
#### In Vivo Clinical Data
A 138-subject, multi-centered, prospective, single arm clinical trial was conducted to compare the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft to historical controls in patients requiring arteriovenous access grafts for hemodialysis.
The primary efficacy endpoint was cumulative patency at 6 months, determined by hemodynamic evidence of blood flow. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from bleeding at 6 months defined as percent of subjects free from major or minor bleeding including hematoma, incision site bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, rectal bleeding, and hemoptysis. The study also documented the time to first hemodialysis access and first three consecutive hemodialysis sessions.
At the end of the 6-month follow-up, the primary endpoint of cumulative patency for the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft was 84% compared to the historical control of 75%. The secondary endpoint of primary unassisted patency for the GORE® Vascular Graft was 46% compared to the historical control of 42%. In addition, freedom from bleeding (defined as any occurrence of reported bleeding from any source including but not limited to gastrointestinal bleeds, hemoptysis, extravasations, incision site bleeds, etc) was 88% in the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft group
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Premarket Notification GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft 510(k) Summary of Substantial Equivalence
compared to 78% in the historical control group. There were no device related adverse events or device related deaths reported in the study.
As part of a secondary endpoint of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft clinical study, the time from initial graft implantation of the graft to the time of first cannulation was collected and analyzed. This data is summarized below:
| Time till Graft<br>Cannulation | Number of<br>ACUSEAL Grafts<br>Cannulated |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| 24 Hours | N=30/135 (22.2%) |
| 48 Hours | N=48/135 (35.6%) |
| 72 Hours | N=54/135 (40.0%) |
| 7 Days | N=70/135 (51.9%) |
Table 1: Time to First Cannulation post Graft Implantation
The median days to first cannulation through the study graft was 5 days with a range of 0-116 days. For patients cannulated within the first 24 hours, the median time to first cannulation of the study graft was 21 hours with a range of 2 hours to 24 hours.
An additional secondary endpoint of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft clinical study, for the subjects presenting with a central venous catheter (CVC), the time from initial graft implantation to the third consecutive use of the graft for hemodialysis was collected and analyzed. Within 28 days of graft implantation 75.6% of the implanted GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Grafts had been successfully cannulated 3 consecutive times and allowing for the potential for the CVC catheter to be removed.
The clinical data demonstrate that the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft has comparable clinical performance to that of the predicate grafts.
### Conclusion (Statement of Equivalence)
W. L. Gore and Associates believes that the data presented in this application, including in vitro testing, in vivo data, along with numerous device similarities support a determination of substantial equivalence, and therefore market clearance of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft through this 510(k) Premarket Notification.
{4}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles a person with outstretched arms, representing health and well-being.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 9, 2013
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Attn: Mr. Michael Ivey Regulatory Affairs Medical Products Division 3250 W. Kiltie Lane Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Re: K130215
Trade/Device Name: GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3450 Regulation Name: Vascular Graft Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DSY Dated: January 28, 2013 Received: January 29, 2013
Dear Mr. Ivey:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Michael Ivey
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Matthew GHillebrenner
for
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Premarket Notification
GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft Indication For Use
# INDICATION FOR USE
510(k) Number (if known):
#### K130215
Device Name:
GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft
Intended Use / Indication For Use:
The GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft is intended for use as a vascular prosthesis in patients requiring vascular access.
X
| Prescription Use | OR Over-The-Counter Use |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
| (Per 21 CFR 801.109) | |
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
## Matthew G. Hillebrenner
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.