K121459 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · LLZ · Jun 22, 2012 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K121459
Device Name
SYNGO.MR NEUROLOGY
Applicant
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Product Code
LLZ · Radiology
Decision Date
Jun 22, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device
Indications for Use
syngo.MR Neurology is a software solution to be used for viewing and evaluation of Neuroperfusion MR images for the routine use in MR image viewing. It is a syngo via based software option with dedicated MR specific workflows and basic MR specific evaluation tools and thus supports interpretation and evaluation of examinations within healthcare institutions, for example in Radiology, Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery environments.
Device Story
syngo.MR Neurology is a post-processing software application for neurological MR images; operates on the syngo.via platform. Inputs include brain perfusion datasets (DSC imaging) and BOLD fMRI data. The device processes these inputs to generate perfusion maps (relMTT, relCBV, relCBF) using Arterial Input Function (AIF) calculations and performs perfusion-diffusion mismatch evaluations. Used in clinical settings (radiology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery) by healthcare professionals. Output is visualized via color displays and structured evaluation tools, assisting clinicians in interpreting neurological examinations. Benefits include standardized workflow for complex neuro-imaging analysis.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Safety and effectiveness supported by risk management in compliance with ISO 14971:2007, software verification, and validation testing. Device conforms to applicable FDA-recognized IEC, ISO, and NEMA standards.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based post-processing application; syngo.via platform. Features include perfusion map calculation (relMTT, relCBV, relCBF) and perfusion-diffusion mismatch evaluation. Conforms to IEC, ISO, and NEMA standards for MR safety and performance. Risk management per ISO 14971:2007.
Indications for Use
Indicated for healthcare professionals in radiology, neuroradiology, and neurosurgery environments for the viewing and evaluation of neurological MR images, including perfusion and functional MRI data.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
Predicate Devices
syngo MR D11D for MAGNETOM Aera & MAGNETOM Skyra (K111242)
{0}------------------------------------------------
SIEMENS
Traditional 510(k) Submission: syngo.MR Neurolo
JUN 2 2 2012
### 510(k) Summary: syngo.MR Neuroloqy
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of Safe Medical Device Act 1990 and 21 CFR & 807.92.
Date of Summary Preparation: May 15, 2012
l. General Information
| Importer/Distributor | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------|
| | 51 Valley Stream Pkwy |
| | Mail Code D02 |
| | Malvern, PA 19355, USA |
| Registration Number: | 2240869 |
Manufacturer
Siemens AG Sector Healthcare Medical Solutions Henkestrasse 127 D-91052 Erlangen, Germany 8010024
Registration Number:
Contact Person
Michelle Byrne Regulatory Affairs Technical Specialist Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 51 Valley Stream Pkwv Mail Code D02 Malvern, PA 19355, USA Phone: (610) 448-4293 Fax: (610) 448-1787 Email: Michelle.L.Byrne@siemens.com
#### Device Name and Classification
| Data | Details |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade name /<br>Device<br>Proprietary<br>Name: | syngo.MR Neurology |
| | syngo.MR Neurology includes syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion<br>Engine and syngo.MR Neuro fMRI. syngo.MR Neuro<br>Perfusion Engine bundles the applications syngo.MR<br>Neuro Perfusion and syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion Mismatch. |
| | Each application is also sold separately. |
Traditional 510(k) for syngo.MR Neurology
{1}------------------------------------------------
Traditional 510(k) Submission: syngo.MR Neurology
| Data | Details |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification Name: | Regulation Description:<br>- Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| Device Classification: | Class II devices |
| Regulation number: | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Product Code: | LLZ, LNH |
#### II. Safety and Effectiveness Information Supporting Substantial Equivalence
#### Intended Use
SIEMENS
syngo.MR Neurology is a software solution to be used for viewing and evaluation of Neuroperfusion MR images for the routine use in MR image viewing.
It is a syngo via based software option with dedicated MR specific workflows and basic MR specific evaluation tools and thus supports interpretation and evaluation of examinations within healthcare institutions, for example in Radiology, Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery environments.
#### Device Description
syngo.MR Neurology is a post-processing software/application to be used for viewing and evaluating neurological MR images provided by a magnetic resonance diagnostic device. syngo.MR Neurology is a syngo.via-based software that enables structured evaluation of MR neurological images.
The medical device syngo.MR Neurology comprises syngo.MR Neuro fMRI (Neuro functional evaluation) and syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion Engine. syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion Engine comprises syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion (Perfusion
and Local as well as Global AIF (Arterial Input Function)) and syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion Mismatch (Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch Evaluation). This bundling is done for purchase purposes. Each application can also be purchased separately.
- syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion enables: processing of brain perfusion datasets acquired with DSC imaging. It provides color display and calculation of perfusion maps based on Arterial Input Function (AIF) (relative Mean Transit Time (relMTT), relative Cerebral Blood Volume (relCBV), and relative Cerebral Blood Flow (relCBF)).
- syngo.MR Neuro Perfusion Mismatch performs a calculation of the area differences between perfusion-diffusion datasets.
Traditional 510(k) for syngo.MR Neurology
{2}------------------------------------------------
SIEMENS
Traditional 510(k) Submission: syngo.MR Neurology
#### syngo.MR Neuro fMRI is a workflow-oriented visualization package for BOLD fMRI.
#### General Safety and Effectiveness Concerns
Instructions for use are included within the device labeling, and the information provided will enable the user to operate the device in a safe and effective manner.
Risk management is ensured via a risk analysis in compliance with ISO 14971:2007 to identify and provide mitigation to potential hazards beginning early in the design cycle and continuing throughout the development of the product. These potential hazards are controlled via software development, verification and validation testing. To minimize hazards, Siemens adheres to recognized and established industry practices and standards. Furthermore, the operators are healthcare professionals familiar with and responsible for the evaluating and post processing of magnetic resonance images.
syngo.MR Neurology conforms to the applicable FDA recognized and international IEC, ISO, and NEMA standards with regards to performance and safety as recommended by the respective MR FDA Guidance Document.
#### Substantial Equivalence
syngo.MR Neurology is substantially equivalent to the following predicate devices (see Table 1):
| Predicate Device Name | FDA Clearance Number | FDA Clearance Date |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------|
| syngo MR D11D for MAGNETOM<br>Aera & MAGNETOM Skyra | K111242 | November 23, 2011 |
| syngo.x®3 | K092519 | August 27, 2009 |
Predicate devices for syngo.MR Neurology Table 1:
#### Conclusion as to Substantial Equivalence
syngo.MR Neurology has a similar intended use and the same basic technical characteristics as the predecessor devices syngo MR D11D (on MAGNETOM Aera and MAGNETOM Skyra) and syngo.x, in regards to the specific neurological functionalities. syngo.MR Neurology will be used for post-processing neurological images (viewing, processing and reading). The predicate device, MAGNETOM Aera and MAGNETOM Skyra with software syngo MR D11D, is also capable of postprocessing neurological images (viewing, processing and reading), in addition to acquiring the MR images. syngo.x is used as the basic software platform and is intended for post-processing, for example, viewing, manipulating, communicating and
3 syngo.x is a registered trademark of Siemens AG. Traditional 510(k) for syngo.MR Neurology
{3}------------------------------------------------
# SIEMENS
Traditional 510(k) Submission: syngo.MR Neurology
storing medical images. The differences between the subject device and the predicate devices, which include the aforementioned new software applications, give the subject device greater capabilities than the predicate devices, but have the same technological characteristics as the predicate devices, are similar to the functionalities of the predicate devices, and do not introduce any new issues of safety or effectiveness.
#### Traditional 510(k) for syngo.MR Neurology
{4}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
JUN 2 2 2012
Ms. Michelle L. Byrne Regulatory Affairs Technical Specialist Siemens Medical Solutions USA. Inc. 51 Valley Stream Parkway, Mail Code D02 MALVERN PA 19355
Re: K121459
Trade/Device Name: syngo.MR Neurology Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LLZ Dated: May 15. 2012 Received: May 17, 2012
#### Dear Mr. Ms. Byrne:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into class II (Special Controls), it may be subject to such , additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean r that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must or any I vith all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of
{5}------------------------------------------------
medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); and good manufacturing pactice mourements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820). This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (301) 796-5450. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely Yours,
Janine M. Morris
Acting Director Division of Radiological Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
K121459
# SIEMENS
Traditional 510(k) Submission: syngo.MR Neurology
### Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known)
syngo.MR Neurology Device Name:
Indications for Use:
syngo.MR Neurology is a software solution to be used for viewing and evaluation of Neuroperfusion MR images for the routine use in MR image viewing.
It is a syngo via based software option with dedicated MR specific workflows and basic MR specific evaluation tools and thus supports interpretation and evaluation of examinations within healthcare institutions, for example in Radiology, Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery environments.
Prescription Use × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (OIVD)
Aalund D. O'R
Division Sign-Off Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety
510(k) Kla1459
Page 1 of 1
Traditional 510(k) for syngo.MR Neurology
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.