K120917 · MicroVention, Inc. · DQO · Aug 2, 2012 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K120917
Device Name
HEADWAY DUO MICROCATHETER
Applicant
MicroVention, Inc.
Product Code
DQO · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Aug 2, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1200
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Headway Duo Microcatheter is intended for general intravascular use, including the peripheral and coronary vasculature for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents, such as embolization materials. The Headway Duo Microcatheter is intended for neurovascular use, for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents that have been cleared or approved for use the in neurovasculature and are compatible with the inner diameter of the Head way Dvo Microcatheter.
Device Story
Single lumen microcatheter; semi-rigid proximal section; flexible distal tip; hydrophilic coating; dual radiopaque markers. Used to access small, tortuous vasculature via steerable guidewire. Operated by physicians in clinical settings. Infuses diagnostic contrast media or therapeutic embolization materials (e.g., coils, liquid embolic systems, PVA particles). Facilitates targeted delivery of agents to specific vascular sites; aids in visualization via fluoroscopy. Benefits include improved navigation through complex anatomy and precise delivery of therapeutic agents.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included surface/physical attributes, tensile strength, hub testing (ISO 594-2), leakage, burst pressure, simulated use, flow rate, kink resistance, radio-detectability, flexural fatigue, torque, particulate, and DMSO compatibility. Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993 standards (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, hemocompatibility, systemic toxicity).
Technological Characteristics
Single lumen catheter; hydrophilic polymer coating; dual radiopaque markers. Materials verified via ISO 10993 biocompatibility standards. Hub design compliant with ISO 594-2. No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring intravascular infusion of diagnostic agents (contrast media) or therapeutic agents (embolization materials) in peripheral, coronary, or neurovascular systems. Compatible with cleared/approved neurovascular therapeutic agents.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravascular diagnostic catheter is a device used to record intracardiac pressures, to sample blood, and to introduce substances into the heart and vessels. Included in this generic device are right-heart catheters, left-heart catheters, and angiographic catheters, among others.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K120917
P. 1 of 2
| | 510(k) Summary |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | Headway Duo Microcatheter |
| Generic Name: | Diagnostic Intravascular Catheter |
| Classification: | Class II, 21 CFR 870.1200, DQO |
| | AUG 2 2012 |
| Submitted By: | MicroVention, Inc<br>1311 Valencia Avenue<br>Tustin, California U.S.A. |
| Contact: | Naomi Gong |
| Date: | 2012Mar23 |
| Predicate Device: | Headway 17 Microcatheter (K083343) |
#### Device Description:
The Headway Duo Microcatheter is a single lumen catheter designed to be introduced over a steerable guidewire to access small, tortuous vasculature. The semi-rigid proximalsection transitions to a flexible distal tip to facilitate advancement through vessels. Dual racionali markers at the distal end facilitate fluoroscopic visualization. The outer surface f the microcatheter is coated with a hydrophilic polymer to increase lubricity. A luer fitting on the microcatheter hub is used for the attachment of accessories.
#### Indication For Use:
The Headway Duo Microcatheter is intended for general intravascular use, including the peripheral and coronary vasculature for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents, such as embolization materials.
The Headway Duo Microcatheter is intended for neurovascular use, for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents that have been cleared or approved for use the in neurovasculature and are compatible with the inner diameter of the Head way Dvo Microcatheter.
#### Verification and Test Summary :
| Bench Testing | Result |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Surface and physical attributes | Pass |
| Distal tensile strength | Pass |
| Hub tensile strength | Pass |
| Hub test (ISO 594-2) | Pass |
| Leakage (liquid and air) | Pass |
| Static and dynamic burst pressure | Pass |
| Simulated use | Pass |
| Compatibility with devices | Pass |
{1}------------------------------------------------
| Flow rate | Pass |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Kink resistance | Pass |
| Radio-detectability | Pass |
| Catheter flexural fatigue | Pass |
| Torque test | Pass |
| Particulate test | Pass |
| DMSO compatibility | Pass |
| Biocompatibility | Result |
| Cytotoxcitiy (ISO 10993-5) | |
| - MEM elution assay | Pass |
| - Agarose overlay | |
| Sensitization/Irritation (ISO 10993-10) | |
| - Guinea pig maximization sensitization | Pass |
| - Intracutaneous reactivity | |
| Hemocompatibility (ISO 10993-4) | |
| - Hemolysis | |
| - Prothrombin time assay | Pass |
| - Complement activation C3a and SC5b-9 | |
| - 4 hour thromboresistance in dogs | |
| Systemic Toxicity (ISO 10993-11) | |
| - Systemic toxicity | Pass |
| - Rabbit pyrogen test | |
The Headway Duo has been verified to be compatible for use with embolization materials, such as occlusion coils, liquid embolic devices (such as Onyx® and Trufill® liquid embolic systems), and PVA particles.
### Technological Comparison:
The Headway Duo utilizes the same fundamental technology, operating principle and intended use as the predicate device. The microcatheter length has been extended up to 157 and 168 cm.
### Summarv of Substantial Equivalence:
The data presented in this submission demonstrates the technological similarity and equivalency of the Headway Duo Microcatheter when compared with the predicate device, Headway 17 Microcatheter (K083343).
The devices.
- 트 Have the same intended use,
- Use the same operating principle,
- Incorporate the same basic design,
- Are packaged and sterilized using same material and processes.
In summary, the Headway Duo Microcatheter described in this submission is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo consists of a circle with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the circumference. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle with its wings spread, facing to the right.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
> 2 2012 AUG
MicroVention, Inc c/o Ms. Naomi Gong Regulatory Affairs Project Manager 1311 Valencia Avenue Tustin, CA 92780
Re: K120917
Trade/Device Name: Headway Duo Microcatheter . Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1200 · Regulation Name: Diagnostic Intravascular Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DQO Dated: July 3, 2012 Received: July 5, 2012
#### Dear Ms. Gong:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three bars representing the department's mission. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle. The logo is printed in black and white.
## Page 2 - Ms. Naomi Gong
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609
or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies!!!!#o&rimaND 2099-0002 comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
K120917 510(k) Number (if known):
Headway Duo Microcatheter Device Name:
Indications For Use:
The Headway Duo Microcatheter is intended for general intravascular use, including the periphera and coronary vasculature for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents, such as embolization materials.
The Headway Duo Microcatheter is intended for neurovascular use for the infusion of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents that have been cleared or approved for use in the neurovasculature and are compatible with the inner diameter of the Headway Duo Microcatheter.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
## (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Jhe
(Division Sign Off
Page 1 of 1
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.