K120362 · Corin USA · LZO · May 4, 2012 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K120362
Device Name
METAFIX FEMORAL STEM FOR HEMI-ARTHROPLASTY
Applicant
Corin USA
Product Code
LZO · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 4, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3353
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The indications for the Corin Metafix Hip Stem as a total hip arthroplasty and, when used in combination with Corin hemi-arthroplasty femoral heads, as a hemi-arthroplasty, include: - Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis - Rheumatoid arthritis - Correction of functional deformity - Treatment of non-union, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur - Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) or congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH) The Corin Metafix Hip Stem is intended for cementless use only.
Device Story
Titanium femoral hip stem; 12/14 tapered male trunnion; modular assembly with CoCr or ceramic femoral heads. Used in hip hemi-arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Implanted by orthopedic surgeons in clinical/OR settings. Provides structural support for hip joint; restores function; treats fractures/deformities. Cementless fixation. Plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating promotes osseointegration.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence determined via bench testing and comparison of design, materials, and indications to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Titanium alloy (TiAl6V4) per ASTM F136-11; plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating per ASTM F1185-03(2009). 12/14 tapered trunnion. Cementless design. Available in nine sizes with three offsets (135° standard, 135° lateralized, 125° standard).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total hip arthroplasty or hemi-arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis, functional deformity, non-union, femoral neck/trochanteric fractures, or hip dysplasia (DDH/CDH). Intended for cementless use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
# MAY - 4 2012
| 3. 510(K) SUMMARY | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| 1. Applicant/Sponsor: | Corin USA | |
| | 10500 University Center Drive | |
| | Suite 190 | |
| | Tampa, Florida 33612 | |
| | Establishment Registration No.: 1056629 | |
| 2. Contact Person: | Lucinda Gerber, BA (Hons) | |
| | Regulatory Affairs Associate | |
| | Corin USA | |
| | 813-977-4469 | |
| | lucinda.gerber@coringroup.com | |
| 3. Date: | February 3, 2012 | |
| 4. Proprietary Name: | Metafix Femoral Stem for Hemi-arthroplasty | |
| 5. Common Name: | Hip Prosthesis | |
| 6. Product Codes: | LZO, KWL, KWY | |
| 7. Classification Name: | Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or uncemented<br>prosthesis (21CFR 888.3390) | |
| | Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or uncemented<br>prosthesis (21CFR 888.3360) | |
| | Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or<br>nonporous uncemented prosthesis (21CFR 888.3353) | |
| 8. Legally Marketed Devices to which Substantial Equivalence is claimed: | | |
| | • | Corin Metafix Femoral Stem (K082525) |
| | • | Corin Optimom Modular Heads (K111911) |
| | • | Corin Bipolar Heads (K925897) |
| | • | Taper Fit Total Hip System (K003666) |
{1}------------------------------------------------
### 9. Device Description:
The Corin Metafix Hip Stem is a titanium femoral hip stem featuring a 12/14 tapered male trunnion for assembly with modular femoral head components. The stem is manufactured from Titanium (TiAL,V ) alloy for surgical implant applications, conforming to ASTM F136-11 and is coated with plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite conforming to ASTM F-1185-03(2009). The stem is indicated for use with Corin CoCr modular femoral heads and ceramic modular femoral heads with a 12/14 taper. (NOTE : the ceramic modular heads are not subject of this 510(k) submission.) The stem is available in nine sizes, each available in three offsets including standard (135°), lateralized 135°, and standard (125°).
The Corin Bipolar Head (K925897) is comprised of an outer CoCr shell, an inner liner of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), and an inner CoCr head. The Bipolar head is available in a range of outer diameter sizes and a variety of head offsets and is compatible with all Corin 12/14 taper femoral stems. The Corin Optimom Modular Head (K111911) is a polished, truncated CoCr alloy sphere with a high tolerance internal female taper and is available in a range of diameters with a variety of offsets. It is compatible with Corin 12/14 taper titanium and stainless steel femoral stems. The Bipolar and the Optimom Modular Heads are indicated for hip hemi-arthroplasty.
The purpose of this submission is to modify the labeling for the Metafix Femoral Hip Stem to include hip hemi-arthroplasty to the indications for use when the stem is mated with a Corin CoCr hemi-arthroplasty femoral head.
#### 10. Intended Use / Indications:
The indications for the Corin Metafix Hip Stem as a total hip arthroplasty and, when used in combination with Corin hemi-arthroplasty femoral heads, as a hemi-arthroplasty, include:
- 매 Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Correction of functional deformity
- Treatment of non-union, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur
트 Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) or congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH) The Corin Metafix Hip Stem is intended for cementless use only.
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### 11. Summary of Technologies/Substantial Equivalence:
The Corin Optimom Modular heads and the Corin Bipolar heads are identical to the predicate femoral heads in intended use/indications for use, design, materials and sizes. The Corin Metafix Femoral Stem for Hemi-arthroplasty is identical to the Metafix Femoral Stem cleared in K082525 in materials and sizes. The subject of this submission, Metafix Femoral Stem for Hemi-arthroplasty, is for a modification of the indications for use to include hip hemiarthroplasty with the addition of compatible components. The inner 26mm Eurocone CoCr femoral head of the Corin Bipolar Head (K925897, K003666), is manufactured of the same material, is similar in design and within the range of the 22mm and 28mm Eurocone CoCr modular heads that were previously indicated as compatible components for use with the Metafix Femoral Stem (K082525). The Optimom Modular head is indicated for use with the Metafix Hip Stem and the Bipolar Head is indicated with any Corin 12/14 taper hip stem.
### 12. Non-Clinical Testing:
A comparison of design, materials, size range, and indications for use demonstrate substantial equivalence with the predicate components. Testing was submitted in the predicate 510(k) submissions and as demonstrated in the substantial equivalence table, the Metafix Femoral Stem, when coupled with the Corin hip hemi-arthroplasty heads is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and expected to be safe and effective for the proposed indications.
#### 13. Clinical Testing:
Clinical testing was not necessary to determine substantial equivalence between the Metafix Femoral Stem for total hip arthroplasty and the Metafix Femoral Stem for Hemi-arthroplasty.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles an abstract human figure or a caduceus, with flowing lines representing movement or energy.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Corin U.S.A. % Ms. Lucinda Gerber 10500 University Center Drive Suite 190 Tampa, FL 33612
MAY - 4 2012
Re: K120362
Trade/Device Name: Metafix Femoral Stem for Hemi-Arthroplasty Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3390 Regulation Name: Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or uncemented prosthesis
Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LZO, KWL. KWY Dated: February 3, 2012 Received: February 6, 2012
Dear Ms. Gerber:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Lucinda Gerber
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
y yours,
Melkerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### 2. INDICATIONS FOR USE
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>4400 - 400 - 40 - 80 - 80 - 80 - 80 - 80 - 80 - 80 - 80<br>------------ | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>and and the program and the comments of the first of the first and the first and the first and the first and the first and the first and<br>ALEMAILA | <br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br>1<br>45 44<br>A BOOK | ---------------------------------- | 1<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |
Device Name: Corin Metafix Femoral Stem
Indications for Use:
The indications for the Corin Metafix Hip Stem as a total hip arthroplasty and, when used in combination with Corin hemi-atthroplasty femoral heads, as a hemi-arthroplasty, include:
- Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular 0 necrosis
- Rheumatoid arthritis o
- Correction of functional deformity ೦
- Treatment of non-union, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur 0
- Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH) O
The Corin Metafix Hip Stem is indicated for cementless use only.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF · NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
A
(Division Sign-Oft) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number K120362
Page 5 of 141
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.